Results 21 - 40 of 45
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Unanswered Bible Questions Author: Emmaus Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
21 | Confusing Nazarene with Nazirite? | Rev 1:12 | Emmaus | 79112 | ||
RC. "ALL WE HAVE SCRIPTURALLY IS THAT HE WAS A FROM NAZARETH, WHICH WOULD MEAN THAT HE TOOK AN OATH OF A NAZARENE, AND WOULD HAVE HAD LONG HAIR AND BEARD, UN SHAVEN" Are you confusing Jesus being a Nazarene from Nazareth with Jesus being a Nazirite, which is a wholly different thing? Emmaus |
||||||
22 | Confusing Nazarene with Nazirite? | Rev 1:12 | Emmaus | 79111 | ||
RC. "ALL WE HAVE SCRIPTURALLY IS THAT HE WAS A FROM NAZARETH, WHICH WOULD MEAN THAT HE TOOK AN OATH OF A NAZARENE, AND WOULD HAVE HAD LONG HAIR AND BEARD, UN SHAVEN" Are you confusing Jesus being a Nazarene from Nazareth with Jesus being a Nazarite, which is a wholly different thing? Emmaus |
||||||
23 | Incesat of affinity or consaguinity? | Mark 6:18 | Emmaus | 77595 | ||
Herodias was not the sister of half sister of Herod Philip, her first husband, nor of Herod Antipas, her second husband and Herod philip's brother, which seems to be the marriage restriction of the law for consaguinity in Lev 18:9; 20:17. What other law do you see that would apply? The incest with Herod Antipas is an incest of affinity (a brother's wife), as is marrying your stepmother, rather than incest of consaguninity (a sister or half sister). Emmaus |
||||||
24 | Herodias and Philip Herod? | Mark 6:18 | Emmaus | 77592 | ||
Disciplerami, Herodias was not the sister of half sister of Herod Philip, her first husband, which seems to be the marriage restriction of the law for consaguninity in Lev 18:9; 20:17. What other law do you see that would apply? Emmaus |
||||||
25 | David, Bathsheba's child died on 7th day | Gal 2:21 | Emmaus | 75832 | ||
2 Samuel 12:18 The first child of David and Bathseba, conceived in adultery died on the seventh day before he could be circumcised into the Covenant. This is an interesting detail, but it seems to me that often the little details are significant and are there because they are important. Doe anyone else see this as significant? |
||||||
26 | Interpretation of is 1:18? | Matt 27:28 | Emmaus | 75848 | ||
Is 1:18 "Come now let us reason together, says the Lord: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall become white as snow; though they are red like crimson, they shall become like wool." The usual interpretaion of this verse is that the red and crimson refer to the sins of Israel but the white refers to Israel's purification. Has anyone heard a different interpretaion of this passage? Emmaus |
||||||
27 | How did baptism heal naaman of leprosy? | 1 Pet 3:21 | Emmaus | 75766 | ||
Another good question relating to baptism is: How did baptism heal Naaman of leprosy when he dippedin the Jordan. The story is an interesting read in its full context as a type foreshadowing the baptism and its scaramental aspects. Emmaus |
||||||
28 | Jesus cleanses the leper. What do we see | Mark | Emmaus | 75691 | ||
How about doing a little Bible Study on the StudyBibleForum? I would like to discuss the passaage in Mark 1:40-45, when Jesus cleanses the leper. "And a leper *came to Jesus, beseeching Him and falling on his knees before Him, and saying, "If You are willing, You can make me clean." Moved with compassion, Jesus stretched out His hand and touched him, and *said to him, "I am willing; be cleansed." Immediately the leprosy left him and he was cleansed. And He sternly warned him and immediately sent him away, and He *said to him, "See that you say nothing to anyone; but go, show yourself to the priest and offer for your cleansing what Moses commanded, as a testimony to them." But he went out and began to proclaim it freely and to spread the news around, to such an extent that Jesus could no longer publicly enter a city, but stayed out in unpopulated areas; and they were coming to Him from everywhere." What do we see in this passage? Emmaus |
||||||
29 | Jesus cleanes the leper. What do we see? | Mark 1:41 | Emmaus | 75671 | ||
How about doing a little Bible Study on the StudyBibleForum? I would like to discuss the passaage in Mark 1:40-45, when Jesus cleanses the leper. "And a leper *came to Jesus, beseeching Him and falling on his knees before Him, and saying, "If You are willing, You can make me clean." Moved with compassion, Jesus stretched out His hand and touched him, and *said to him, "I am willing; be cleansed." Immediately the leprosy left him and he was cleansed. And He sternly warned him and immediately sent him away, and He *said to him, "See that you say nothing to anyone; but go, show yourself to the priest and offer for your cleansing what Moses commanded, as a testimony to them." But he went out and began to proclaim it freely and to spread the news around, to such an extent that Jesus could no longer publicly enter a city, but stayed out in unpopulated areas; and they were coming to Him from everywhere." What do we see in this passage? Emmaus |
||||||
30 | You can ride double with me anytime. | Matt 7:23 | Emmaus | 73981 | ||
Hank, If you guys are the whore now, what does that make us papists, since we have been bumped off our seat on the horse so to speak? Or are we riding the beast in tandem now? Emmaus |
||||||
31 | What program are you referring to? | NT general Archive 1 | Emmaus | 71241 | ||
CDBJ, What is the program to which you referred? Emmaus |
||||||
32 | Adam and Eve's nature not corruptible? | Rom 1:20 | Emmaus | 70306 | ||
Joe, "Adam an Eve didn;t start out with a corruptible sin nature, but obviously is was a nature that was susceptible to corruption." Was this a typographical error that Adam and Eve didn't start out with a corruptible nature, but obviously it was a nature suspecptible to corruption? That sounds like an oxymoron. How can a thing be not corruptible and at the same time be susceptible to corruption? Did you mean to say they did not start out with a "corrupted" nature? Emmaus |
||||||
33 | The olive tree graft in Romans | Acts 2:17 | Emmaus | 60974 | ||
What about the olive tree analogy that paul uses in Romans? Emmaus |
||||||
34 | Church grafted into Israel? | Acts 2:17 | Emmaus | 60970 | ||
Searcher, What about the Church being grafted into Israel as Paul discusses in Romans? Emmaus |
||||||
35 | Are you asking about a mystical body | Eph 5:25 | Emmaus | 54138 | ||
Andes, Thank you for your self restraint. Are you perhaps asking if God has a body as in "body of Christ" or the "mystical" body of Christ, rather than a "spiritual body"? That mystical "body of Christ" being the Church and her members who are the instuments of God's presence in the world ministering to one another and the rest of the world. Emmaus |
||||||
36 | Primary purpose of the written Gospels | Luke 1:4 | Emmaus | 48817 | ||
Hank and Reformer Joe: What are your opinions on this question? Were the Gospels and the rest of the New Testament written primarily for the building up and catechising of those who had already converted to Christ or for the purpose of evangelizing non christians? I am not saying that the Gospel is not to be preached to the unblievers for purposes of conversion or that the substance of the preaching should not be from the Gospels, Epistles, Acts and Revelation. But there is a school of thought which holds that the written Gospels as well as the rest of the NT were written primarily by believers for believers to strengthen believer and that there is a preumption of faith in Christ in them. This of course is more apparent and explicit in the Epistles and Revelation, but what doe you think about the Gospels in this regard? Emmaus |
||||||
37 | Did anyone else hear Jack Hayfert today? | Ex 15:22 | Emmaus | 36674 | ||
Did anyone else hear Jack Hayfert on the radio today preaching on Ex 15:22-27? It was one excellent peice of expository preaching. Emmaus |
||||||
38 | God of the living | Rev 6:10 | Emmaus | 36183 | ||
heavens ring, How would you interpret Matt 17:1-8? Is our God the God of the living or the dead? Do the saints who have gone before worship and pray before the throne of God? See the Revelation references in conjunction with the Hebrew reference. Emmaus |
||||||
39 | Adam and Eve, no fall from grace? | Gen 2:16 | Emmaus | 31513 | ||
Lionstong, No fall from grace? You said: "So the Protestant understanding of Scripture is that our first parents were not in a state of grace before the fall. And they did not lose grace in the Fall, because they never had it or needed it before the Fall! " Are there others on this forum that believe this? Did the reformers believe this? Please quote them if they did. Adam and Eve did not fall from grace!? What then did they fall from and what did did Jesus's sacrifice restore? If the creation of Adam and Eve from nothing in immortal bodies and daily face to face fellowship with God as his children is not unmerited favor what is? What did they do before their creation to earn this favor? Did not Jesus restore what was lost? Are we not "new creations" with the promise even of immortal bodies at the resurection? And if fellowship with God as his children was not an unmerited favor and that which was lost and restored, what was lost and what was restored? Were not Adam and Eve and all us us disgraced as a result of what they did? No pun intended. All of which takes us away from the original questions you did not answer. Do you believe Adam and Eve thought they could not loose Eden and once we are restored to justification bt Christ do we still have free will as Adam and Eve did? Emmaus |
||||||
40 | Freefall from grace, then and now? | Gen 2:16 | Emmaus | 31345 | ||
Lionstrong, If the state of grace and fellowship with God which Adam and Eve lost through sin has been restored to us by Christ's sacrifice, have we also thereby lost the free will that Adam and Eve had in Eden before the fall while they were still in that original state of grace? Emmaus |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 ] Next > Last [3] >> |