Results 201 - 220 of 499
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: Scribe Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
201 | Did the high priest have a rope on ankle | Not Specified | Scribe | 64337 | ||
I have heard that the high priest had a rope tied around his ankle when he went into the holy of holies. Is this just a fable or is there any substance to it? | ||||||
202 | Did the high priest have a rope on ankle | Ex 28:35 | Scribe | 64339 | ||
I have heard that the high priest had a rope tied around his ankle when he went into the holy of holies. Is this just a fable or is there any substance to it? | ||||||
203 | next step..? | Eph 5:31 | Scribe | 63837 | ||
This question is often considered among those that are having a struggle with lust for the one they are planning on marrying. The devil whispers.. "go ahead and do it now, you are getting married, and in God's eyes you can do this act now and be married , then get the license later." This is not from God this carnal reasoning and a sin. The first step is to repent of entertaining the thought or if you have fallen already, do not justify it but repent then you can will be able to start thinking clearly again and see it the way God really sees it which is fornication. 1 Corinthians 7:2 Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband. The fact that God ordained and blessed The CEREMONY of marraige is very clear in the Bible. To begin with just consider all the times Jesus Christ used the Jewish Wedding Ceremony to teach about the wonderful mysteries of the Kingdom of Heaven. See the parable of the ten virgins, marriage supper invitation, and others, also do a keyword search on Bridegroom, wedding, etc. You will see that not only did God ordain such a ceremony to be part of the reality of the covenant and not just the comsumation of the sex act only, but you will see that all the parts of the wedding ceremony were indeed orchestrated by God to prophecy of things eternal. So I guess the question would really be should we have a Jewish Wedding or one that has been handed down from the catholic/protestant history. I don't think it is critical which but wouldn't it be beautiful to have one like the parable Jesus spoke about. God bless you as you study His Word with an honest heart to please God. |
||||||
204 | gold refined | Rev 3:18 | Scribe | 63666 | ||
might be found unto praise and honour and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ: Peter was talking to saints 2000 years before Christ has returned, and saying that the trials they were going through then are going to be REWARDED at the appearing of Jesus Christ. When Jesus Comes again we enter into an inheritance that is worth all that we might endure in the way of suffering for his name now. |
||||||
205 | Did Jesus go to hell after crucifixion? | Acts 2:27 | Scribe | 63523 | ||
Acts 2:27-31 Because thou wilt not leave my soul in hell, neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption. Thou hast made known to me the ways of life; thou shalt make me full of joy with thy countenance. Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulchre is with us unto this day. Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne; He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption. I think you will get different answers on this, but it seems to me that this passage makes it clear that Jesus did descend into hell. But not as in torment for sin, but as the One that had the authority becuase he was without sin to take the keys (authority) of death hell and the grave. Ephesians 4:9 (Now that he ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the earth? |
||||||
206 | Christian Ecology | Gen 1:28 | Scribe | 63520 | ||
Fennis Dake made much about the word "replenish" insisting that the earth had been populated between Gen 1:1 and 1:2. I do not agree but why is the word Replenish used here if the world is new? | ||||||
207 | gold refined | Rev 3:18 | Scribe | 63519 | ||
Gold tried in the fire is faith having gone through testing. May God bless you as you continue in faith.1 Peter 1:7 That the trial of your faith, being much more precious than of gold that perisheth, though it be tried with fire, might be found unto praise and honour and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ: | ||||||
208 | freely recieved.. do thou likewise | Matt 10:8 | Scribe | 63518 | ||
God will bless you for your faith. | ||||||
209 | freely YOU recieved... go do likewise | Matt 10:8 | Scribe | 63517 | ||
Check out David Wilkerson and Times Square Church in New York. They have prooven that you can be on the level of a book of Acts Church and have standing room only in the largest theater in Broadway and not beg for money. |
||||||
210 | run, that ye may obtain. | 1 Cor 9:24 | Scribe | 63516 | ||
I am thankful for the holiness of God. He predestinated all of mankind to be before him in holiness and Love, all they have to do is allow Him to sanctify them through faith. | ||||||
211 | being clean escaped | 2 Pet 2:20 | Scribe | 63515 | ||
These scriptures you have given are very encouraging. Thank You. I am in need of keeping these before me everyday. The battle rages and the stakes are eternal. I know I have a promise He will perfect that which concerns me, and complete the work He started, but I fear the Lord too much to allow that to make me light and flippant about the strategies of satan against me, my family, and my fellow saints. | ||||||
212 | made partakers | Heb 6:4 | Scribe | 63514 | ||
It is a good warning, and Peter was careful to remind the saints to be sober and vigilant. I am much encouraged by the clear instructions Peter gives on how we can be 100 perecent sure we will not fall. 2 Peter 1:5-11 And beside this, giving all diligence, add to your faith virtue; and to virtue knowledge; And to knowledge temperance; and to temperance patience; and to patience godliness; And to godliness brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness charity. For if these things be in you, and abound, they make you that ye shall neither be barren nor unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ. But he that lacketh these things is blind, and cannot see afar off, and hath forgotten that he was purged from his old sins. Wherefore the rather, brethren, give diligence to make your calling and election sure: for if ye do these things, ye shall never fall: For so an entrance shall be ministered unto you abundantly into the everlasting kingdom of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. |
||||||
213 | Imputed sin vs. sin nature-the same? | Rom 5:12 | Scribe | 63513 | ||
Romans 5:12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned: The idea of all being sinners is not hard for us to understand. Because we are well aware of the fact tha all have sinned. Now consider this last part of the verse and read it again. Romans 5:12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned: for that all have sinned, in other words death passed upon all becuase all have sinned. We all know that babies go to heaven. So it is obvious to us that though they have inherited a sin cursed form of the perfected body soul and mind originally created; that imperfection that is part of them (getting sick, etc); they are still considered innocent of sin as in that definition of sin called "sin is the transgression of the law" they are going to heaven and their salvation is bought by the redemptive work of the Cross even thought they do not have the conscience to act upon it. Romans 8:19 For the earnest expectation of the creature waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God. It is possible that the ideas of "sin nature" have become a little more mystical than they need be. The idea of man being born imperfect into an imperfect world that was ruined and ravaged by death on degradation and that all nature is cursed with this downward trend toward death from the moment we are born is the idea. When it says all have sinned it means that every person that lived long enough to choose between the good and evil has choosen evil. Some did repent and learned how to choose good even in the OT but they all choose evil at some point. A baby that has not yet reached the age of knowing to choose good or evil; (and there is such an age) Isaiah 7:16 For before the child shall know to refuse the evil, and choose the good, the land that thou abhorrest shall be forsaken of both her kings. if the baby dies before this time, they are not judged as sinners who resisted the Spirit of God on their conscience.. Genesis 6:3 And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years. They are coverd by the Grace of God and the Work of Christ to "redeem man from the curse" so that they also inherit that perfect body and perfect redemption, that those that are old enough to put faith in Christ can choose by faith. |
||||||
214 | spirit led | Rom 8:14 | Scribe | 63510 | ||
Romans 8:13-14 For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live. For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God. From this passage we can conclude that whatever else being led by the Spirit might include it certainly has to do with resisting sin or resisting the lusts of the flesh. The Spirit leads men to resist sin, the enemy leads him to "go ahead and jump." Luke 4:1 And Jesus being full of the Holy Ghost returned from Jordan, and was led by the Spirit into the wilderness, Luke 4:9 And he brought him to Jerusalem, and set him on a pinnacle of the temple, and said unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down from hence: The Spirit leads all men to follow after righteousnes.. the flesh man will resist the Spirit and follow after flesh.. the spiritual man, he who has been born again and learned to identify his flesh as crucified with Christ will submit to the Spirit. Genesis 6:3 And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man,... Yes even these unregenerate men before the Flood were said to have had the Spirit of God striving to get them to turn from their fleshly ways. Being led by the Spirit is therefore listenting to that voice in the conscience, for the sinner but for the saint it is a regenerated conscience which has a heart to not only hear but to obey... Isaiah 30:21 And thine ears shall hear a word behind thee, saying, This is the way, walk ye in it, when ye turn to the right hand, and when ye turn to the left. |
||||||
215 | Why is "laying on of hands" so important | Heb 6:2 | Scribe | 63415 | ||
Some excellent posts have been given to you so far and I am ecouraged by such thorough posts. This is what will make this forum a treasure for many people world wide. One thing I would like to add is that though it seems obvious that Paul is wanting to take them on unto perfection, the list he gives has been treated by the church for centuries as the main meat of theological teachings. So if these be the first principles then I am wondering when someone is going to start teaching like they are moving on to perfection. Instead it seems that many spend their entire ministries on this list. Than being said I think the real key here is in the NASB amplified way of stating it...[These are all matters of which you should have been fully aware long, long ago.] See it is not that these are ideas of less significance, how can foundational priniciple of oracle of Christ be considered a non important issue. The idea is that "YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO KNOW THIS BY NOW... do we really have to go back and lay this foundation again.. What do you really need to go back and get born again AGAIN? Are you needing to learn all the things you learned when you first came into this Life?" As you read the passage you see him say as much when he speaks about a person that has known these things and goes back to living the old life anyway.. The main idea seems to be that it is a sad thing to have to keep dealing with the basics of "you should stop sinning and live in holiness..." Or.. when you get baptized you are buried with Him that you might walk in newness of life... There is a time when you should be focusing on the newness of life not the identifying with Christ on the cross as a constant repenting of sins... So putting it in this light (you should have already moved on..) then the laying on of hands would fit that which we see in Acts when the apostles laid hands on new believers and they recieved the baptism of the Holy Spirit. This was a beginning thing, now they are to walk in that baptism of the Holy Spirit and all that the Spirit brings. Why look for another laying on of hands.. or think you need a new initializing all the time.. the initializing experience is good and to be sought, but then you need to quit focusing on that laying on of hands experience that helped you get into the baptism of the Holy Ghost to begin with, and move on to the many gifts that the Spirit brings and understand what it means to edify in Love others. This is the way I see this passage and I hope it helps to add to the pool of knowledge. |
||||||
216 | What is baptism | Heb 6:2 | Scribe | 63410 | ||
From this verse alone we see that baptisms as subject of doctrine is plural. Now in comparing this to Ephesians 4:5 One Lord, one faith, one baptism,.. we see that there is One baptism as it relates to the baptism into Christ that each believe must be able to testify he has in order to be a believer.. Galatians 3:27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ... But we know that Paul did not mean there was no other baptism mentioned in the bible because we see this passage in Acts...Acts 19:3 And he said unto them, Unto what then were ye baptized? And they said, Unto John's baptism.Acts 19:4 Then said Paul, John verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people, that they should believe on him which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus.... And not only do we see that there was the baptism of water in the Name of Jesus (or Father Son and Holy Ghost) but also that there was this Baptism of the Holy GHost which in all points was an entirely seperate event than that of water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ. Now there is also a worthy study to be done on the very meaning of the word baptism and that this was not a new concept to the Jews at the time that John came baptizing. I mean they had many baptisms or washings as purification ceremonies and they understood the idea of baptism as a religious observance. However they usually had methods of washing hands, or parts of the body. To do it as a whole body washing like John was doing was a statement of agressive intensity of conversion which of course was just like how John Preached. A going all the way.. a bringin forth fruit meet for repentance.. no more of this playing around with religion.. A radical making the rough places smooth, and crooked places straight... type of commitment. A taking hold on the kingdom of God by violent faith and not letting go until God blesses you with a change of heart. This is the whole body baptism. But It of course takes faith in Jesus Christ having paid the price for us in order for us to enter into to that rest of ceasing from our own works to trust in Him and therefore we identify with His death and resurrection in the water baptism in the name of Jesus. So on the one hand we have John the Baptists baptism which speaks of that human desire that we do have the ability to express which is a whole hearted going all the way with God.. and then you have the Baptism in the name of Jesus in water which is different than the baptism of John and that is that you are saying ... though Johns baptism was a good start.. the whole hearted human effort to get right with God... the baptism of Jesus is that faith that you accept His death burial and resurrection to make you righteous and already earned by Christ. Then you rise up clean and holy before you have even done one good work (baptism in water is not a work) and you go forth rejoicing and doing the will of God that has made you righteous by faith. I hope this blessed you. It blessed me to write it. :) |
||||||
217 | Should women be allowed to preach? | Galatians | Scribe | 63368 | ||
One comment I have on this response. Can you help me understand where people get the idea that Preaching the Word of God is ONLY done by "PASTORS,DEACONS,ELDERS"? I agree that a woman should not usurp authority over a man. I think the confusion comes when we think that one must hold the office of "PASTORS,DEACONS,ELDERS" to preach the Word. My post was not that a woman should be a "PASTORS,DEACONS,ELDERS" but that a woman can preach the Word. Also we know from Acts 15 a woman can prophesy. I appreciate your desire to not add to the word, therefore we must not add to the word to say that these women did anything wrong. Therefore if a woman can prophesy then we must decide what the definition of prophesy is. And if it is the gift of prophetic utterance as a spiritual gift in the church it is speaking in the church, if it is pulpit preaching as so many believe that do not hold to charismatic views, then we must conclude that women can preach in the pulpit. Either way whether it is pulpit preaching or if it is prophesy as a spiritual gift during the service neither one requires that the woman be a Pastor. God Bless you as you study the word with all honesty and humility before the God. |
||||||
218 | biblical reason for todays mondern toung | 1 Cor 1:7 | Scribe | 63320 | ||
PART TWO 2) another possibility would be that these mockers these “others” than the ones that did hear their own languages, did not understand the language, because they were not from the country of the language being spoken, and so instead of understanding that Peter was speaking in Egyptian they though Peter was just babbling meaningless words. This would of course give them reason to say “they are drunk.” And on this note, some have said that Peter and the apostles were addressing the crowd as in a preaching mode, and they were speaking to them in their own language. The text says they were speaking of the wonderful works of God. Comparing this passage to the others in Acts it would seem they were praising God and in a state of addressing God not the people but that we can take up another time, suffice it to say for now that if they addressing the people in a preaching style of body language (looking at the people and declaring the wonderful works of God to them) and speaking in their own language and a group came up and heard them speaking in this manner, calling them drunk would not fit and would rather make the mockers appear drunk it is so out of context with the scene. Just because the mockers could not understand the language, it would not have been a sight that would make them think the speaker was drunk. Certainly they had heard others in this international time of holiday speaking to groups in languages other than the mockers understood. Did they go about calling anyone they heard speaking in a language they did not understand “drunk?” and if they did would not the mockers be the ones people would say were drunk. No it would fit much better if we understood that the mockers not only did not understand the language being spoken but that they saw that the disciples were speaking this tongue to the heaven lies in praise to God. Then it would fit as they would think this display of emotionalism to be that of those filled with too much new wine. 3) And we have not yet exhausted this idea of why the mockers did not understand the language if that be the case. a) either the mockers did not understand the language and they saw the emotionalism of praising God with unknown tongues and called the men drunk, or b) he mockers heard the language understood it and yet called them drunk because they were saying things that they did not agree with on a religious basis. This does not seem to fit either. We know that Paul and Jesus were accused of being mad by those that did not agree with their theology, but they did not associate it with being drunk. To be drunk one looses their coherent senses so that they do not do well in constructing sentences and one thing that normally gives away a drunk man is the fact that you notice that he is not making sense. It seems far more logical that the reason they were mocking was because the disciples were showing emotionalism of Praising God maybe with hands uplifted which was a common method of the Jew and that they were loudly praising God .. and these mockers not understanding the language said they were beside themselves with emotionalism because they were drunk even to the point of pretending they could speak in a language they did not know. c) If the mockers could not understand the language. Then the question must be asked Why not? 16 or 17 nations were mentioned, were these mockers of a nation that was excluded from the Grace of God? That could not be since the message was to go out to all the world. Were these individuals of a nation that was mentioned but the miracle did not occur on their ears? Was this due to some predestined plan of God that these particular men should not get the chance to understand the message? NOW READ CAREFULLY… If these mockers were of a nation that was listed, but they did not understand the language so that they accused the disciples of babbling and being drunk.. Could it be that the speaking in tongues by the disciples might sound as a known language to one hearer and as vain babbling to the next? Looking at this passage only for biblical evidence that the speaking in tongues was not always a known language to those that heard is clear by this text. |
||||||
219 | biblical reason for todays mondern toung | 1 Cor 1:7 | Scribe | 63319 | ||
I am answering this question over a year after it has been posted. It is very unlikely that the original poster will read it but I am going to address it carefully with biblical evidence as the poster requested in an effort to help build this wonderful database of biblical interpretations from fellow believers from all over the world. Looking at the text tecnotrog is referencing we see a peculiar scene... Acts 2:4-13 And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance. And there were dwelling at Jerusalem Jews, devout men, out of every nation under heaven. Now when this was noised abroad, the multitude came together, and were confounded, because that every man heard them speak in his own language. And they were all amazed and marvelled, saying one to another, Behold, are not all these which speak Galilaeans? And how hear we every man in our own tongue, wherein we were born? Parthians, and Medes, and Elamites, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia, and in Judaea, and Cappadocia, in Pontus, and Asia, Phrygia, and Pamphylia, in Egypt, and in the parts of Libya about Cyrene, and strangers of Rome, Jews and proselytes, Cretes and Arabians, we do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works of God. And they were all amazed, and were in doubt, saying one to another, What meaneth this? Others mocking said, These men are full of new wine. Several things are obvious here at first glance.. one is that more than the 12 were speaking, since more than 12 languages are mentioned. Most commentaries I look at agree that outpouring of the Spirit was upon the entire 120 and not just the 12 apostles (Acts 1:15...number of names together were about an hundred and twenty,) most also agree that all of them were doing the speaking in tongues. However some commentators and many modern christians say that they think that only the 12 did the public speaking in tongues when the crowds gathered. In reading the passage we see that there are more than 12 nations that heard them speak in their own language. Therefore if it were only the 12 speaking then they must have had such a gift of speaking in tongues that one or more of them could move from one known language to another as the Spirit willed. Or another possibility would be that the hearers were having the miracle upon their ears so that it would not matter how many nations were gathered 17 or 200 they would have all heard their own language. Some have suggested this and let us take it up for a moment. If it did not matter how many nations had gathered, that they would still have heard their own language, then the question would have to be asked which language was coming out of the speaker? One particular language or whatever the Lord wanted at the time? If the miracle happened upon the ear of the hearer than it does not seem fair to conclude that one could know which language the speaker was speaking. One could say he was speaking Arabic, but another that just walked up says nay he is speaking my tongue which is of Egypt. Who is right? And if this be the case then how can you know when you hear a tongue whether it is a known language or not. Here are two from another country both hearing their own language from the same speaker. Now if that is not the case then you must say that one of the 12 was able to speak one language and then instantly start speaking another. If we limit it to only the 12 then one of these two scenarios must be correct, 1) that the miracle occurred on the ear of the more than 12 nations that gathered, or 2) that the speaker could switch tongues, because more than more 12 nations heard their tongue. The other possibility of course is that all 120 were speaking and not just the 12 in which case one could then make an argument for their stand that authentic speaking in tongues is always in a known language, while siting this passage as their biblical evidence. Now we consider the verse.. Acts 2:13 Others mocking said, These men are full of new wine. What are the possibilities here? 1) these men heard them speak in languages that were known, the disciples having never learned them in language school.. and said “they are drunk” Instantly we see how illogical that view would be. The last thing I am going to think if I see you speak in a language you have never taken the time to learn, (and especially if I hear them speak in more than one language they had never learned), is that you are drunk. I might think you are a genious, nay more than a genious, a superman, one with intellect beyond any man that had ever been before.. but I am not going to think your inebriated with alcohol. SEE PART 2 |
||||||
220 | Is 1 Cor 1:4-7 same gifts... Part 2 | 1 Cor 1:7 | Scribe | 63312 | ||
PART 2 PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS QUESITION If that be the case then the next verse would say that the spiritual gifts did have their place in confirming that God was indeed among them. 1 Corinthians 1:6 Even as the testimony of Christ was confirmed in you: It seems that one thing both side of the tongue controversy in the church agree on is the tongues were for a sign for the unbeliever. Used in public utterance they were a confirmation that God was speaking through the believer. This is often the argument given against the use of tongues today. I am not sure why using this fact, (that tongues is a sign for the unbeliever), would preclude using the gift today since we still have plenty of unbelievers. 1 Corinthians 14:22 Wherefore tongues are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe not: but prophesying serveth not for them that believe not, but for them which believe. Now whether you have agreed with me so far or not one thing is certain; this next verse does tell us that the gifts are to remain in the church until Jesus come again. 1 Corinthians 1:7 So that ye come behind in no gift; waiting for the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ: Later when looking at I Cor 13 we will see that the gifts are to end at some time in the future called the time when “that which is perfect” is come. Some claim, (but not many of a scholarly reputation) that “that which is perfect” is the Bible by taking a few verses from the Bible such as “the law of the Lord is perfect” etc and trying to establish that when the books of the bible were collected or the last book Revelation was written that then “that which is perfect” as it relates to God’s Revelation to man had occurred. But as we carefully examine the passage in 1 Cor 13 we will see why you will not find that interpretation in hardly any commentaries but only in some denominational literature of a few groups that others have labeled “ceasationists”. But for now we must stay focused on the verse at hand. The purpose of the Holy Spirit Gifts in the Church were for the edification of the saints which both sides of the tongues controversy agree on. This verse not only tells us that the gifts will remain in the church until Jesus Comes again but also that these gifts are beneficial in keeping us ready for that day.. or that they help us to be “waiting” in the proper way for that day. And if you were not convinced that verse 6 Even as the testimony of Christ was confirmed in you means that the gifts do confirm that Christ is in you, then I think verse 8 puts all doubts to rest; 1 Corinthians 1:8 Who shall also confirm you unto the end, that ye may be blameless in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ. I have so much more to say on this and I imagine before we are finished I will have written a small book on it, but suffice it say that for now I will end with this introduction to the subject of the gift of tongues and mention that while we procede further in the days weeks and months to come I will attempt to explain what I see the Bible is telling us is the PURPOSE for the Holy Spirit Gift of Tongues. In summary for this post I see that some of the PURPOSES, of the gift of tongues and other spiritual gifts such as the Corinthians received from the Lord and did operate in (in spite of the need for correcting abuse) are as follows: 1 Corinthians 1:5 That in every thing ye are enriched by him, in all utterance, and in all knowledge; Purpose of spiritual gifts: is a confirmation to the world that Christ was in them. 1Co 1:6 Even as the testimony of Christ was confirmed in you: 1Co 1:8 Who shall also confirm you unto the end, that ye may be blameless in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ. Purpose of spiritual gifts: that it did help them be in the proper state of Waiting for the Lord Jesus Christ to Come Again 1Co 1:7 So that ye come behind in no gift; waiting for the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ: Purpose of spiritual gifts; That to be without the spiritual gifts would be in a state of “coming behind” or to not have spiritual gifts is not as good as being having them, and even to have all of them in the church is better. 1Co 1:5That in every thing ye are enriched by him, in all utterance, and in all knowledge; 1 Corinthians 1:7 So that ye come behind in no gift; waiting for the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ: Please understand that this is only a fraction of what I will post on this subject. I am well aware of all the areas I have not touched upon yet. I am only laying a foundation to help clarify other things we will read in 1 Corinthians. Please visit me anytime at http://groups.msn.com/BibleStudyChatGroup/homepage |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ] Next > Last [25] >> |