Results 1681 - 1700 of 1773
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: John Reformed Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1681 | From whom does faith originate? | Eph 2:8 | John Reformed | 37727 | ||
Dear Makarios, My arguement is from scripture not from man. Would tou be so kind as to enlighten me regarding your understanding of Romans 9. After all, if I am indeed misguided it would be only a simple matter of showing me where I err. Brother John |
||||||
1682 | Did the disciples have a choice? | John 15:16 | John Reformed | 37719 | ||
Dear Searcher, I fail to see the connection between the scriptures you cited and your arguement in favor of "Free Willism". They plainly contradict your assertion. If God Almighty chooses to call a person that person will come! Rom 9:19 "You will say to me then, "Why does He still find fault? For who resists His will?" Matt 22:14 "For many are called, but few are chosen." Are you saying that this verse indicates that it is man that does the choosing? If so you must believe that man also does the calling. Please explain. Luke 18:27 "But He said, "The things that are impossible with people are possible with God." Where do see agreement in this verse? It clearly states othewise. John 15:16 "You did not choose Me but I chose you". Hello? John |
||||||
1683 | From whom does faith originate? | Eph 2:8 | John Reformed | 37715 | ||
Good Morning Makarios, Prior to conversion all men are DEAD in trespasses and sin. We were not capable of even understanding spiritual things. Paul is emphatic when he said "none seek God". John says we are not born again because of the will of man but by the will of God. I strongly disagee with the man glorifying doctrine of (so called) free will respecting salvation. It flys in the teeth of sound interpretation. It diminishes the Glory due to God by placing the ultimate sayso upon man. Meditate and pray when you contempate God's attributes. Read the scriptures that declare His soverignty. Reread Romans chapters 1 thru 3 and 9. They speak of His almighty power and our powerlessness. I realize that Ro 9 is particularly disturbing. At one time I could not believe it's clear meaning either. I thought it must mean something other than what it said! If you could tell me your interpretation, perhaps it would help. God Bless Makarios, John |
||||||
1684 | From whom does faith originate? | Eph 2:8 | John Reformed | 37604 | ||
Dear Makarios, I asked you, based on your understanding of Ro 10:17, Does everyone who hears the Gospel obtain faith? A yes or no answer supported by a brief expanation would be appreciated. John |
||||||
1685 | Is God ONE or is God THREE? | James 2:19 | John Reformed | 37528 | ||
Dear TWT,, If a person held that Jesus was merely a man, would you consider his belief heretical? If so on what basis could you maintain your charge? I presume you would appeal to Holy Writ. You would bring forth scriptures that clearly claim the fact of Christ's diety to witness against the Heretic. You would deduce from Scripture the whole truth and restae it in the form of an arguement supporting your truth claim. In short I have no idea what you are talking about when you critisize "some" early church fathers. I guess by some you mean the ones who disagree with you. Please respond, John Reformed |
||||||
1686 | Is God ONE or is God THREE? | James 2:19 | John Reformed | 37527 | ||
Dear Tim, I am grateful that we have begun our conversation with an agreement. Many times folks don't take the trouble to listen to the opposing side, but rush headlong into attacking a strawman of their own construction. I'm no stranger to this type of attack myself. As you can easily presume from my screen name, I too hold, what has become, a minority position in the church in 21st century America. The majority have their own presupposed ideas concerning calvinist doctrine which in reality are mere caricatures. For instance: When a calvinist begins a dicussion on the "Soverignty of God", it is oftimes misconstrued to mean that this doctrine reduces man to the level of a wooden puppet. Such erroneous ideas are next to impossible to overcome if they are not addressed early on in the debate. If you have read any of my posts, you will see that I am a stickler over the necessity of defining our terms. In responding to Zacht's question, "Is Limited Atonement Biblical", I put forth the definition of atonement from Easton's Bible Dictionary. As the debate raged, I began to wonder if any one had taken the trouble to read that definition? Now that we have established your position on "The Nature of God", I will state mine. Again, I will se Easton,s Dictionary (The historical position of The Church). Easton's Bible Dictionary Trinity [N] a word not found in Scripture, but used to express the doctrine of the unity of God as subsisting in three distinct Persons. This word is derived from the Gr.trias, first used by Theophilus (A.D. 168-183), or from the Lat. trinitas, first used by Tertullian (A.D. 220), to express this doctrine. The propositions involved in the doctrine are these: 1. That God is one, and that there is but one God (Deuteronomy 6:4; 1 Kings 8:60; Isaiah 44:6; Mark 12:29,32; John 10:30). 2. That the Father is a distinct divine Person (hypostasis, subsistentia, persona, suppositum intellectuale), distinct from the Son and the Holy Spirit. 3. That Jesus Christ was truly God, and yet was a Person distinct from the Father and the Holy Spirit. 4. That the Holy Spirit is also a distinct divine Person. I f you are agreeable or if you disagree with the definition(as to it's conformity to the classical position of the Church) please restate what you believe is the trinitarian position. I pray the Holy Spirit will enlighten us.That we may conduct ourselves in love and glorify God through our work. Your Friend John Reformed |
||||||
1687 | From whom does faith originate? | Eph 2:8 | John Reformed | 37486 | ||
Dear Makarios, Please forgive mt tardiness in replying to your post. It was an excellent post. I just lost track of it. What are we to make of Rom 10:17 "faith comes from hearing, and hearing by the word of Christ." If it were the only verse in the Bible it would be simple. all we would need do is analyze what each word meant, consider how each word related to one another and, through common sense and reason draw our conclusion. What is "faith"? 1)Definition (Stongs): conviction of the truth of anything, belief; in the NT of a conviction or belief respecting man's relationship to God and divine things, generally with the included idea of trust and holy fervour born of faith and joined with it 1a) relating to God 1a1) the conviction that God exists and is the creator and ruler of all things, the provider and bestower of eternal salvation through Christ 1b) relating to Christ 1b1) a strong and welcome conviction or belief that Jesus is the Messiah, through whom we obtain eternal salvation in the kingdom of God 1c) the religious beliefs of Christians 1d) belief with the predominate idea of trust (or confidence) whether in God or in Christ, springing from faith in the same 2) fidelity, faithfulness 2a) the character of one who can be relied on "comes by": a primary preposition denoting origin (the point whence action or motion proceeds), from, out (of place, time, or cause; literal or figurative;prep Hearing: 1)the sense of hearing 2) the organ of hearing, the ear 3) the thing heard 3a) instruction, namely oral 3a1) of preaching the gospel 3b) hearsay, report or rumour Based on what we have thus far defined, we must exclude touching, smelling, tasting and seeing (which would exclude reading). The Word of Christ: The Gospel Conclusion: Every person who hears the Gospel recieves faith. Agree? Disagree? Brother John |
||||||
1688 | memories and forgiveness | Is 38:17 | John Reformed | 37466 | ||
Dear Rmhall, I doubt if there is one christian whose face does not blush with shame, when they think on past sins. Our response to such feelings of regret should cause us to look to Christ, the object of our faith. If we look inside ourselves we will never find the righteosnness we seek. Look to Jesus. He is all the righteouness we need. We are in Christ, which means when the Father looks upon His child he sees Jesus. He has provided us with a robe of righteousness. Remembrance of our sins should serve to bring forth praise to our blessed Saviour for the things He has done. God Bless, Brother John |
||||||
1689 | Is God ONE or is God THREE? | James 2:19 | John Reformed | 37450 | ||
Dear Preacher, You made reference to the multiple roles you fulfill regarding work and your family. " When I visit my parents' house with my family I act in all three capacities at once; I speak to my children as their father, to my parents as their son, and to my wife as her husband.) I am also comprised of a body, soul, and spirit--still just one person. I am a computer programmer, a preacher, and a writer; but I am only one person". Father, son, husband etc. are titles that define your relationship to your family. But none of them is your name. I am sure that you are known to the world by your name alone! No matter what you are doing you are always Tim D. Cormier.It is what identifies your personhood. The essence of who you are. It is a mistake in logic to use a name and title interchangeably. (my name is Tim, My name is father). You see the difficulties your example causes. Could your arguement be stated better, by describing your doctrine of the Godhead as: God is one in essence and relates to man in the roles of Father, Son and Holy Ghost? What say ye? John Reformed |
||||||
1690 | time? | Ecclesiastes | John Reformed | 37362 | ||
Dear Bruce, You wrote: "To the Jews, the events that were prophecied by the Prophets sent by God were viewed as Past actions". Would you please expand upon your statement? I am not familiar with this viewpoint and would be interested to discover just how you arrived at it. Bother John PS I also await your response to my answer of your question to me: "Ok. Paul makes it clear that God does as he chooses. That still doesn't answer the next question. If it is God's spoken desire that all of mankind are to be saved, and that he has the very power and ability to do so, then Why doesn't he do it? What is stopping him from saving all of mankind? |
||||||
1691 | time? | Ecclesiastes | John Reformed | 37358 | ||
Dear Angel1, It would be interesting to determine, whether or not Einstien (independently and by by means of scientific inquiry), came to the same conclusion as Soloman. But, the more important question (at least itseems to me)is: What does this passage teach concerning the nature of God Himself? What is your understanding of the soverign rule of God over His creation? God Bless Angel1, Brother John |
||||||
1692 | New Covenant alone? | Heb 8:6 | John Reformed | 37325 | ||
Dear Emmaus, The continuity of the Old and New Covenants is a doctrine on which both Covenant (Reformed) and Dispensational theologians (by and large) agree. I subscribe to the former. However, as of late I have been considering the claims of New Covenant Theology which is at odds with them both! One may wonder: what is a good calvinist is doing by entertaining dogma that disagrees with his own tradition? I'm glad you asked. I believe the creeds, confessions, catechisms etc. are of great importance in instructing the faithful. To the degree they conform to Scripture, they are a treasure. Nevertheless, they are written by fallible men, so the duty of every reader is to search the Word, relying on the infallible teacher; The Holy Spirit. When I was a Catholic I believed the Catholic Church; As a Nazarene I believed the Nazarenes; as a Pentacostal I adopted their brand of Christianity and as a Presbyterian I embraced Reformed Theology. From the preceeding history one is liable to label me as a "flighty" sort of person. Not so! First of all, I've been going to one chuch and then another for 50 years. For another, every time I left one for another it was a painful and gut wrenching decision. Each time my reason for moving involved Doctrine. I had come to believe that the doctrinal differences were irreconcilable and as the spiritual head of my family I was compelled to go elsewhere. At the present time, I feel no such compulsion to leave the (PCA). It is a great denomination and God has used it in my life to grow to know Him better. However, I must have the whole truth concerning God's Word! Having been in bondage to works in other churches, I may have a keener appreciation for the liberty we have in Christ than some others who grew up under scriptural teaching. And now having touched and handled and tasted of it, I am loath to surrender one sweet morsel! Emmaus, my message is growing longer and the hour is growing later. If youcan bear with me thru a 2nd post, I will continue, God willing, in the morning. God Bless Emmaus, John |
||||||
1693 | New Covenant alone? | Heb 8:6 | John Reformed | 37198 | ||
Dear Saints, Are we under the New Covenant alone? Or, are we we, in some way, still subject to portions of the law contained in the Old Covenant? Your Brother in Christ, John |
||||||
1694 | bible bulluy | 1 Cor 12:1 | John Reformed | 37051 | ||
Dear Tom, I forgot to give you the location for Calvin. www.ccel.org Click on Classics Scroll down to Calvin Click on 2nd check mark. Commentaries John |
||||||
1695 | bible bulluy | 1 Cor 12:1 | John Reformed | 37030 | ||
Hello Tom, I praise God for giving us this means of meeting brothers and sisters. I am amazed by the depth of affection I have toward people I've never met personaly. He is a gracious God and gives good gifts (even to old warhorses like us). I have read the article you suggested, but not being the brightest penny in the pouch, I need to go over it again (I hate to admit it but my O.T is awful rusty). So I owe you one for sending me back to it. The time I have spent reading Isa 55, the article you suggested and (being a good calvinist) John Calvin's commentary, has been time well spent. I hope you can find the time to read Calvin's commentary as well. My wife Carole is calling me away. We're going to the relatives for dinner. If it was'nt for her I'd never get off the computer. Thank God for our wives! John Reformed, Over and Out |
||||||
1696 | bible bulluy | 1 Cor 12:1 | John Reformed | 36989 | ||
Dear Eagle One, Thanks for putting me on too the Net Bible. I have been spending the past 2 hours familiarizing myself with it. I particularly like the footnotes and the outlines. As for the translation itself, in the brief time I've had to examine it, I see no glaring differences between it and my NKJV. However, the language itself is not as pleasing to me as the New King James. Maybe I'm just old-fashioned, but the majesty and beauty of God's Word is very important to me. For instance: (NET) Psalm 23 The Lord is my shepherd, I lack nothing. He takes me to lush pastures, He leads me to refreshing water. He restores my strength. He leads me down the right paths for the sake of his reputation. Even when I must walk through a dark ravine, I fear no danger, for you are with me; your rod and your staff keep me calm. You prepare a feast before me in plain sight of my enemies. You refresh my head with oil; my cup is full of wine. Surely your goodness and faithfulness will pursue me all the days of my life, and I will live in the Lord's palace for the rest of my life. (KJV) Psa 23 The LORD is my shepherd; I shall not want. He maketh me to lie down in green pastures: He leads me beside the still waters. He restoreth my soul: He leadeth me in the paths of righteousness for his name's sake. Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou [art] with me; thy rod and thy staff they comfort me. Thou preparest a table before me in the presence of mine enemies: thou anointest my head with oil; my cup runneth over. Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life: and I will dwell in the house of the LORD forever. I said my personal Bible is the NKJV, but I have used the KJV for Psa. 23. I consider the NKJV to be closer to the Original text, and thats the one I use for study. But, for sheer magnificence of Language give me the KJV. What say ye? Brother John PS you would have had no problem at all on my boat. It was the USS Monmouth County LST 1032, an old WWII amphib. We also had a great deal of respect for those "squids" in the Brown Water Navy. Our job was to keep them supplied. I read a book written by a christian brother, Dave Rievers (I'm not certain of the spelling of his name), that left me praising God for His mercy and providance towards me. One other thing: If you don't mind, I know your handle,but whats your first name? |
||||||
1697 | bible bulluy | 1 Cor 12:1 | John Reformed | 36923 | ||
Dear Eagleone, No need to apologize. At one time I thought all Presbyterians were the same (the frozen chosin). I think you'd like are pastor. He's a retired Army Colonel. A Vietnam vet who served with 101st airborne in Nam. I was a squid down in the Delta for the most part. Your Comrade in Arms in The King's Sevice, John |
||||||
1698 | scriptural basis for church government | 1 Tim 3:1 | John Reformed | 36916 | ||
Dear Mimaburt, It sounds like you have a serious problem in your church. I pray God will restore unity and peace and justice to your fellowship. As I understood your post, it seems like the pastor is accountable to the elders but not to the flock. The elders are appointed by the pastor himself and the flock has no vote or veto on the pastor's choice of elders.(To me that seems like a shakey proposition). I hope someone who is well versed in Biblical Chuch government will respond to your question. If thats the way your church is organized, the flock better get together and come up with a new form of government. I must confess I'm a babe in the woods when it comes to this kind of problem. And all I can offer is my personal opinion for what it's worth. I would call upon the men of the church to meet with the leadership, express their concerns and demand accountability from those leaders. And I do mean the MEN! Pray for your men that God will open their eyes and awaken them to their resposibilities. We have been given a Spirit of freedom in Christ and not a spirit of bondage. We fear God, we do not fear man! God Bless you Sister, Your Brother in Christ John Adams PS: Rom 8:28 "And we know that God causes all things to work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to His purpose." |
||||||
1699 | What does men in Eph. 4:8 mean? | Eph 4:8 | John Reformed | 36877 | ||
Dear Hank, Ditto's Brother John |
||||||
1700 | bible bulluy | 1 Cor 12:1 | John Reformed | 36775 | ||
Dear Eagleone, I hope you don't mind my intrusion, but I would like to offer my definition for what it's worth. Bible Bully: one who uses the Bible to cower his opponents and intimidate them to surrender to his interpretation of any particular passage. A Bible Bully can be found in any church or on any forum in the world. He may be recognized by his somewhat pufffed up cranium; superior attitude; unloving and unlovely demeanor and his inability to hear what anyone else has said. The most amazing aspect of this hideous creature (I know this from personal experience) is that he can also be found in the mirror. God Bless Eagleone, John Adams |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 ] Next > Last [89] >> |