Results 121 - 140 of 567
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: disciplerami Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
121 | Not incest, but adultery? | Mark 6:18 | disciplerami | 77531 | ||
Hi Justme, I think that may be the case with Herodias' daughter. Maybe he was having incestuous thoughts with her who was also called Herodias, and whom Josephus called Salome. But I'm referring to the relationship between Herod and Herodias [the mother of the one who was dancing before Herod], also the wife of Philip. Some people believe the 'unlawful' sin was adultery [because he had his sister-in-law for a wife] and others believe it was 'unlawful' because he was married to a blood relative. Since Herodias had the same BLOOD relationship with Herod and Philip [the two brothers], if incest was the sin, then wouldn't the Holy Spirit bypass the discussion over Herod having his brother's wife and directly address the problem of incest? Thoughts please. Disciplerami |
||||||
122 | Why couldn't Herod have Herodias? | Mark 6:18 | disciplerami | 77565 | ||
Emmaus, We know that Herod 'had his brother's wife', which means he had married her. My question has to do with John's rebuke that "it was not lawful for him [Herod] to have his brother's [Philip's] wife." What was Herod's 'unlawful' act: marrying a blood relationship [incest] or committing adultery? Which? Thanks, Disciplerami |
||||||
123 | Not incest, but adultery? | Mark 6:18 | disciplerami | 77568 | ||
Justme, I appreciate your thoughts and John did pay a heavy price because he stood up for the truth. Here is another question that might help you understand what I'm looking for (the truth): Was Herodias' the lawful wife of Philip, Herod's brother? I looking for some help. Thanks. Disciplerami |
||||||
124 | Was Herodias Philips Lawful Wife? | Mark 6:18 | disciplerami | 77570 | ||
Greetings We know that Herod 'had his brother's wife', which means he had married her. My question has to do with John's rebuke that "it was not lawful for him [Herod] to have his brother's [Philip's] wife." What was Herod's 'unlawful' act: marrying a blood relationship [incest] or committing adultery? Which? Here is another question that might help you understand what I'm looking for (the truth): Was Herodias' the lawful wife of Philip, Herod's brother? Looking for help. Disciplerami |
||||||
125 | Why couldn't Herod have Herodias? | Mark 6:18 | disciplerami | 77596 | ||
Thanks for giving me food for thought. | ||||||
126 | Incesat of affinity or consaguinity? | Mark 6:18 | disciplerami | 77650 | ||
Greetings, I read somewhere that Herodias' was half-neice to both Philip and Herod. Maybe John, like Jesus in Matthew 5:28-32, was pointing people back to the original plan. What do you think? Thanks, Disciplerami |
||||||
127 | Was Herodias Philips Lawful Wife? | Mark 6:18 | disciplerami | 77653 | ||
Euphemism for marriage | ||||||
128 | Was Herodias Philips Lawful Wife? | Mark 6:18 | disciplerami | 77655 | ||
Mark 6:17 | ||||||
129 | Why couldn't Herod have Herodias? | Mark 6:18 | disciplerami | 77656 | ||
Unlawful marriage? Herod married Herodias, - Mark 6:17 "For Herod himself had sent and had John arrested and bound in prison on account of Herodias, the wife of his brother Philip, because he had married her" Herod also wouldn't repent of it and put her away. - Lk 3:19 "But when Herod the tetrarch was reprimanded by him because of Herodias, his brother's wife, and because of all the wicked things which Herod had done," Herod was living in an unlawful marriage. |
||||||
130 | Incesat of affinity or consaguinity? | Mark 6:18 | disciplerami | 77658 | ||
Thanks for helping me study this out. I've been reading some notes from J.W.McGarvey's "Fourfold Gospel." He says that Herodias was the daughter of Herod Philip's and Herod Antipas' half-brother Aristobulus. That would make her a half-neice of them both. Disciplerami |
||||||
131 | Incesat of affinity or consaguinity? | Mark 6:18 | disciplerami | 77666 | ||
[Herodias was the daughter of Aristobulus, who was the half-brother of Herod Philip I. and Herod Antipas, and these two last were in turn half-brothers to each other. Herodias, therefore, had married her uncle Herod Philip I, who was disinherited by Herod the Great, and who lived as a private citizen in Rome. When Herod Antipas went to Rome about the affairs of his tetrarchy, he became the guest of his brother Herod Philip I., and repaid the hospitality which he received by carrying off the wife of his host.] (JWMcGarvey, Fourfold Gospel) |
||||||
132 | Incesat of affinity or consaguinity? | Mark 6:18 | disciplerami | 77670 | ||
Emmaus, I think you are right on. I'm not having trouble with this. I certainly don't think the fact that she was a half-neice is the issue. It says, "he had his brother's wife" and he "married her." The Leviticus 18 and 20 passages certainly do apply. Leviticus talks about all kinds of sexual sins: everything from lying with your neighbors wife to sex with animals. The penalty for sexual sins is strong. John was telling Herod that his union with Herodias was not acceptable to God. Likewise, many marriages today are unlawful. Adultery, and homsexuality, and incest are unlawful and need to be preached against. We live in a society that allows anything and Christians must have the courage to do as John did and tell when a marriage is wrong. If John had approached Scripture in the "enlightened" manner that many do today, he could have saved his neck. Good day to you. Disciplerami Do you think Herod could have said, 'I'm sorry, I won't do it again', and it would have been suddenly acceptable? It's not lawful and preachers need to point out sin when they see it. Thanks for continuing this post. Disciplerami |
||||||
133 | Does Mark 7:4 mention tables? | Mark 7:4 | disciplerami | 77203 | ||
Searcher56, where does Mark 7;4 say anything about 'tables?' I've looked at the Greek and see nothing about 'tables?' The only thing mentioned in the Greek is the 'cups', 'utensils', and 'bronze vessels.' Is your question based upon a variant reading? Please respond and tell me from where the question about 'tables' comes. Thanks. |
||||||
134 | "Tables" or "Beds" in original text? | Mark 7:4 | disciplerami | 77458 | ||
Does the original text includes 'tables' or 'bed'? The reference to 'tables' is a variant reading that gets no better than a "C" rating by the committee that compiled the Nestle-Aland 3rd edition. Variant readings are given the following ratings: "A" - signifies that the text is virtually certain; "B" - indicates that there is some degree of doubt. "C" - means that there is a considerable degree of doubt concerning the text Here is the reason that the NASB does not include any reference to 'tables' or 'beds' in the Mark 7:4 |
||||||
135 | "Tables" or "Beds" in original text? | Mark 7:4 | disciplerami | 77486 | ||
Searching for a better answer. Does anyone else have some evidence for or against "table" being included in Mark 7:4. Searcher56 says it is there and wants to know if tables were baptized. | ||||||
136 | "Tables" or "Beds" in original text? | Mark 7:4 | disciplerami | 77503 | ||
Most up-to-date Greek text: 'table' not there. | ||||||
137 | "Tables" or "Beds" in original text? | Mark 7:4 | disciplerami | 77533 | ||
OK, Thanks very much. Good answer. Then if the Holy Spirit intended for 'beds' to be mentioned in Mark 7:4, I believe it. I also believe therefore that tables had to be immersed :) The primary idea of Christian baptism is a burial, and only a burial should be received. The Eunuch and Philip went down into the water and Paul said the Romans were 'buried with Christ in baptism.' History teaches us that sprinkling and pouring were added as accomodations when men put off their baptism (i.e. the adoption of 'clinical baptisms') Disciplerami. |
||||||
138 | "Tables" or "Beds" in original text? | Mark 7:4 | disciplerami | 77538 | ||
Hold up! I have the 3rd Edition of the UBS, 1983. I see that the word KAI KLEENON is bracketed in the text and gets the C rating. That means the translation committee believes it more likely was added from the original, right? |
||||||
139 | "Tables" or "Beds" in original text? | Mark 7:4 | disciplerami | 77539 | ||
Thank you for helping. | ||||||
140 | Does Mark 7:4 mention tables? | Mark 7:4 | disciplerami | 78876 | ||
Repost Whomever asked about Mark 7:3 and why the NASB did not have "beds and couches" Lockman editorial board responded to this, in this way. "The phrase in question does not occur in the best and oldest Greek manuscripts. Also, late manuscripts that have phrase do not have "beds and couchs" but only the word "and" followed by one word which can be translated as "beds" or "couchs" (Greek "klinon"). I hope this helps in answering the question brought up in the forum. With peace to all. justme |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ] Next > Last [29] >> |