Results 1161 - 1180 of 1239
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: jlhetrick Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1161 | Are we to pray to the holy spirit? | Matt 6:9 | jlhetrick | 155239 | ||
Hi Ray, Well, my (m)man thing was just showing that I disagree with you on your capitalization argument here. Where the title "man" is used to refer to Jesus there are two different functions involved. That of showing that Jesus was a man, and that of showing that Jesus was God. When we refer to His being a (m)man we are talking about that state of humility that He experienced in setting aside for a time His glorified Self in Heaven to become like you and me. When Jesus used the title man to refer to Himself as God, He used Son of Man which pointed toward His being God (capitalization is appropriate). We recognize and believe that Jesus the (m)man was also God. So, I just believe that to attempt to assign God status to the (m)man that Jesus became in order that He might experience temptation and physical death invalidates His whole purpose and need for becoming like us. Perhaps you have heard it taught that Jesus was "fully man" and "fully God". It was required of Him to be fully man, otherwise He could not have truly experienced temptation; though He sinned not. It would not have been so great a feat for Him if He had not become fully man; first, He could not have experienced temptation of sin (and therefore could not have been sufficient as a sacrifice being found blameless), so no biggy and no suffering, and second, He could not have died a physical death, again no suffering. If He could not have died a physical death, He could not have been raised again to life, physically, and death still would not be conquered. So we must honor Him for having humbled Himself in that He became a (m)man and died for you and me, by recognizing that He did so. We do this while recognizing that Jesus was and is fully God. Of course this at once becomes a mystery at this point and one that my (and your) human minds can not comprehend. I have followed your arguments regarding capitalization and respect your opinion though I disagree here. But, I hope that you do not teach or believe that Jesus was not in fact born an actual, physical human. On the other issue; Ray, I simply can't follow your argument here. You support your position with a verse that absolutely contradicts yourself and your position. You write: "I believe that Jesus was always Spirit, was always God, and is now "Spirit" Then you give as support: Luke 24:39 says, "See My hands and My feet, that it is I Myself; touch Me and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have." Jesus, right there in your quoted verse says; "a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see THAT I HAVE. Jesus was saying, Hey, wake up guys, your not looking at a "SPIRIT" here, it's me, Jesus, in the flesh. Look at it again Ray, closely. You then contradict yourself again. You write: "A spirit or a ghost does not have flesh and bones like Jesus had, so He was not a ghost." Finish the thought. A SPIRIT OR A GHOST does not have flesh and bones LIKE JESUS HAD, so He was not a ghost (though finished- and He was not a spirit). Not to put words in your fingers Ray, this is only a logical conclusion. Finally Ray, you write: "So He had a resurrected body, one that could still eat food, yet one that went through doors, and could change appearances. Who knows or understands? But I know that He is a Spirit and we shall see Him as He is." Your right that Jesus' body after the resurrection was different. The bible teaches that it was a glorified body but a body none-the-less. Ours too will be changed, and made incorruptible at His glorious coming. We will SEE Him, actually and absolutely. In Luke 24:39 it was a physical body as you point out; He ate and the deciples were able to touch and feel Him. But you emphasis that He "went through doors." Well I go through doors several times a day. I assume that you are teaching what I have heard others teach; that being that he went through a closed door without opening it or similarly through a wall. Let me redirect this and argue that no where in scripture does it teach or say that Jesus walked through unopened doors or through walls, but instead "he stood among them." A more acurate interpretation would be that He "appeared" before them and how, again, this is a mystery that speaks to His glorified body, but a body it was and is. But the bible does not say that "He walked through doors." I don't fault you here though as it is an easy mistake to make when you consider that the verse does render that the doors were locked, bringing the readers attention to the doors. But lets not re-write it. Anyway, I hope I make myself understandable whether or not you agree; I at least hope my presentation is rational and able to be understood. 2 Tim 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. KJV God bless, Jeff |
||||||
1162 | Are we to pray to the holy spirit? | Matt 6:9 | jlhetrick | 155201 | ||
Hi Ray, got a question for you related to your above post. You wrote: The heavenly Father is Spirit. The Holy Spirit is Spirit. The Son, being God, is Spirit Jesus was born, lived, and died on the cross a (m)man (in the flesh) who was also God. When He rose again He was "flesh and bone". This same physical body was seen by the deciples ascending into Heaven. Question: Is Jesus now "spirit"? |
||||||
1163 | I'm doing the best I can. | John 13:34 | jlhetrick | 155185 | ||
Hello In2Jesus, I am at work now and checking my emails and saw you had responded. I don't have the time to respond in depth but I will get back to you with some bible references that apply to your situation and may help guide and comfort you. Let me say this though. Take this in love, it is meant to help you not offend you. The forum is not intended to be a source of counseling one another and for good reason. Consequently, I will not advise you in any way regarding "my opinion" about how you should proceed with your son. I will give this advise though. Obviously pray for your son, and this woman and her children. Also go to another Christian you can trust (preferrably a pastor or other that will counsel you from the bible). Make sure this person is someone who will keep your and your son's (and the woman's) confidentiality. In love and best wishes, Jeff |
||||||
1164 | REVELATION ! | Matt 16:15 | jlhetrick | 155155 | ||
Obi, How interesting that you persist with hyperverbal manic babble and can't find time to resond to those who have redirected you, and given you the truth. When someone is confused, as you are, and longing for the answer to a question, as you are, eternally hopeless to find it on their own, as you are, the next best thing is to listen to those who are far more experienced and knowledgeable in the area of that which you seek. knowing this. As long as you continue to poor sand into your gas tank, your boat motor will never start and thus, you will continue to drift farther and farther away. Soon there will be no one near to listen to your desperate cries for answers and therefore able to give them to you. It has been said that the definition of insanity is repeating the same disfuntional behavior over and over again and expecting different results. It has been said of a babbler Prov 10:10 a chattering fool comes to ruin. NIV One is not totally lost until he dies not knowing and having accepted Jesus Christ as Lord. But Obi, Jesus said: John 10:27 My sheep hear my voice , and I know them, and they follow me: KJV Please, listen for His voice and if you are able to here it, follow Him. Praying for you, Jeff |
||||||
1165 | Are names of God important? | Bible general Archive 2 | jlhetrick | 155117 | ||
Short answer, everything in the bible is important. The names are there for a reason, to express His great majesty, as descriptives of who He is. Names in bible times were much more important or significant than most of the world considers them today. A name had a meaning and was given for a purpose. Names were so important in identifying who a person was and what he/she represented, that even as an adult one's name might be changed in order to reflect one's standing in society and before God. In establishing the covenant with Abram Gen. 17:5, God changed Abram's name to Abraham to reflect who he (Abraham) had become through the promise, "a father of many nations". Though these "many nations" would never be seen or realized by Abraham, none-the-less, it was and is who he was, Abraham. One more example: John 1:42 And he brought him to Jesus. Jesus looked at him and said, "You are Simon son of John. You will be called Cephas" (which, when translated, is Peter). NIV Peter Peter a rock or stone (from Hitchcock's Bible Names Dictionary) Later in Matt 16:15-18 Matt 16:15-18 But what about you?" he asked. "Who do you say I am?" 16 Simon Peter answered, "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God." 17 Jesus replied, "Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by man, but by my Father in heaven. 18 And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it. NIV Jesus renamed Simon, Peter. He did this apparently in anticipation of Simon, now called Peter, one day "in the future" believing in Jesus as the Christ as it was revealed to him by God the Father. So, Peter is not "the rock" but rather, believing (which can only be given through God the Father) in Jesus as the Christ is the "rock' on which Jesus continues to build His church. Hope this helps, Jeff |
||||||
1166 | When Was Godhead Divided? | Bible general Archive 2 | jlhetrick | 155114 | ||
Still not following but thanks for the reply anyway, No need to respond back, as I have these matters seetled for myself. I will say that Jesus is the Son of Man because Jesus the man was and is God. And He who was God and is God could not have humbled Himself any further than having taken on not only the form, but the essence of a (m)man. The man did not become God, God became the man, in all of man's aspects save for a sin nature. Jesus the man, was and is Jesus the Son of Man. As for the answer to hoaryhead's question, you can get it from Doc's response. Sincerely, Jeff |
||||||
1167 | When Was Godhead Divided? | Bible general Archive 2 | jlhetrick | 155113 | ||
Exactly, thanks Doc (no pun intended) Jeff |
||||||
1168 | I'm doing the best I can. | John 13:34 | jlhetrick | 155097 | ||
Hello IN2JESUS, I am too. In to Jesus that is: like your screen name. Hey, looks like you have a struggle here, sorry 'bout that. But don't be so hard on yourself. I want to try and help you. Let me start with a question, just for you to think about before anything else. Is there any jealously involved on your part here? If so repent of it and ask forgiveness and then see what happens in these relationships. OK, first of all, it is not wrong or sinful to disagree with someone else. You might not even like them but I think I read in your words that it is not really them, but their behavior that you do not like. Good, if their behavior is wrong, you shouldn't like it and you shouldn't go along with it, and you shouldn't partake in it. After that though, you have a responsibiity to love them in spite of their shortcomings: John 13:34 A new command I give you: Love one another . As I have loved you, so you must love one another NIV But what if they are not a christian? Jesus also said: Matt 5:44 4 But I tell you: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you..." NIV Notice Jesus did not say "agree with" or "go along with". No, Love them He said. Finally Jesus' command to love others implies that there will be action on your part that is observable by others. So love is something we demonstrate not just say to ourselves that we are doing, it will be obvious to others. John 13:35 By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another. NIV Hope this helps, Jeff |
||||||
1169 | where should i start reading bible | Rom 1:16 | jlhetrick | 155090 | ||
I recommend Mark because Mark was recommended to me by bro. Billy Graham. His rational if I remember right was: that the book of Mark is a fast moving account of much of the work of Christ that demonstrates His diety, power and glory. It is also the shortest of the gospels and once completed it might give you a sense of accomplishment and encourage you to continue. I would include a daily reading from the books of Proverbs and Psalms as well. These books, among other things, impart both inspiration and wisdom. After this you might continue reading daily from both the Old and the New Testaments. Start at the beginning, read the story of creation and watch the plan of salvation unfold on the pages of both testaments. You will likely get very different advise from others. I'm not sure there is necessarily a wrong way and a particularly right way. I would make the argument though that starting with one of the Gospels should be a priority in that it is in them that the fullness of the Glory of Christ is revealed. Hope this helps, God bless your journey. PS, are you saved? |
||||||
1170 | can we pray for more of God's power | Rom 1:16 | jlhetrick | 155087 | ||
Hello Iesbillys, I can hopefully shed some light on this but look forward to the feedback from others. To begin with I do not believe the scriptures teach that the power of God is something given to or lent to men. In other words. I don't think we are to ask "for" God's power that might be used at "our" discretion. How much would "more" of God's power be? Imagine if you will the awesomeness of His power. Might not the smallest measure be far beyond the capacity for any man to contain within his humanity? The "presence" on the other hand is something more comprehendable. If you are a Christian, saved by His grace by the justification through Christ, then you have His presence. I do not find scripture that teaches we might gain more of His presence (though some denominations do teach that you can). What we might have at times is an "empowering" which may be where you are coming from. The bible teaches that the Spirit of God (who is with all believers from the day of Pentacost on (see Acts 2:1) will at times "empower us for service (See Mark 13:11) Mark 13:11 Whenever you are arrested and brought to trial, do not worry beforehand about what to say. Just say whatever is given you at the time, for it is not you speaking, but the Holy Spirit. NIV To get a good understanding of the "power of God" and how it is at no man's discretion, read Acts 8:14-20 Notice that this "power" that Simon observes and attempts to purchase, is in fact the Holy Spirit. Notice also that Peter and John had not the "power" to give but "prayed" that those believers in Samaria would receive, not power, but the Holy Spirit. There is a great deal in scripture involving the power of God but the most tangible experience of this power, I believe, is the hearing, believing, and receiving the truth of the gospel which saves you. Again, if you are a christian, you have all of the Holy Spirit there is to have. The power of God is present in the Holy Spirit who will demonstrate it through your service to Him, most noteably in the preaching and teaching of the Good News of Jesus Christ. Rom 1:16 I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the POWER OF GOD for the salvation of everyone who believes: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile. NIV (emphasis mine). Hope this helps, Jeff |
||||||
1171 | When Was Godhead Divided? | Bible general Archive 2 | jlhetrick | 155084 | ||
Hello Ray, may I jump in? I read your post several times and I'm having trouble following so I thought I would ask questions of both you and hoaryhead if I may. First, for hoaryhead if you read this. When you ask "when was the Godhead divided?" will you please be more specific. Are you of the belief that the "godhead" was at one time a single person which at another time divided into separate persons? For you Ray: I know and understand the emphasis on capitalization but I don't follow your rational for using it in Phil. 2:8. Again, I don't follow so I'm not being critical, only trying to understand. Why would "you" "interpret" it differently than "others"? By what appears to be your rational, wouldn't you have to apply the same to "bondservant" in verse 7, interpreting it "Bondservant"? Finally, I see no form of answer to hoaryhead's question. Help please, Jeff |
||||||
1172 | what is wisdom- what is knowledge | 1 Cor 12:8 | jlhetrick | 155077 | ||
Hello Annet, Knowlege is information; wisdom is knowing what to do with the information. |
||||||
1173 | I am confussed on what to believe. | Bible general Archive 2 | jlhetrick | 155073 | ||
Hi Confussled, Your screen name demonstrates a sense of humor, that's great. Anyway, I started not to respond because I think Kalos (and through the help of CRI) summed it up for the most part; but I did want to offer some words that I hope will be encouraging. Dogma, in it's most extreme form, refers to something that is settled, or at least is a settled opinion (webster's 1829) Doctrine is what follows in the way of teaching. I bore you with definitions to make a point (I hope). Don't be sidetracked into placing your Hope in another man's "settled opinion" except that man be Jesus Christ. Humbeledbygrace gave a good explanation in post #155011. Humbled's focus was on "denominations" which is relevant. After all, denominations are started and maintained by their doctrine. The challenge is not to decide on a particular label to which you place your loyalty. Too many christians today prioritize their loyalty to their denomination first. If one becomes unbendenly loyal to his/her denomination (as many are in my humble opinion) they may in-turn learn to look to it rather than to the word of God and the Spirit who is able to reveal all truth. John 15:26 But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me: KJV The task at hand is to trust in Him. Go to His word and let Him produce in you your own settled opion on each matter. This is not easily done. It is sufficiently hard work. But one's eternity may rest on it. Through this, if in fact it is a lie that you believe, the Spirit of God will correct you with the truth at which time you shall be truly comforted (though as Doc pointed out there may be significant discomfort through the process). And if it is the truth that you believe, when the lie is spoken you will recognize it for what it is and no discomfort will come to you save for your sorrow for the liar. I was reminded by one who is much newer to christianity than I am of the importance of putting all else aside from time to time in order to focus soley on the word of God. There is the one and only sure place that truth can be found. If you watch the posts on this forum closely, you will see that there are more than a few who regularly (if not habitually) quote the words of men far more often than they do the bible. One last thing. know that you are right in questioning even your church pastor when he teaches what disturbs your spirit. Do it with love and responsibility and only directly after having searched the scriptures. As Doc suggested; that discomfort may be the truth trying to push the old lie out of the way. But it may also be the truth resisting the temptation of the lie. Hope this is helpful, Jeff |
||||||
1174 | AUTHORITY, ORGINISATION | Matt 16:15 | jlhetrick | 155047 | ||
Obi, humbledbygrace has sufficiently revealed your ploys and tactics so I don't feel the need to further expose you. I would like, however, to take one comment you made in your post that humbled didn't touch on and try and reveal the most important truth of all regarding your position and condition. You wrote: "I believe in JESUS CHRIST and I AM NOT SAVED" You say you believe, great; and then you boldly confess that you are not saved. Let us let the scriptures, the Truth, reveal who you are then and what you stand for. James 2:19 You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that — and shudder. (NIV) Now I am not saying that you are a demon, not at all. But your eternal condition is the same, yet you do not shudder. This is arrogance. So before you can know the truth you must discard the arrogance and humble yourself. As you mature, you will find just how beneficial humility can be, especially as you leave the world of the class room and enter into adult life and all of the responsibilities that will follow. So I want to give you some truth, not from me but, from the scriptures; from God Himself. Rom 10:9-10 "...if you confess with your mouth, "Jesus is Lord," and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. 10 For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you confess and are saved. (NIV) You see, one can believe "in" Jesus as you claim, but only when you make Him your Lord will you be saved. Don't take my word for it. Read the verses from the bible, meditate on it, and receive it from God. After all, it is only God himself who can reveal this truth to you. He himself has said so very plainly. If you don't believe me refer to Matt. 16:15-20 This portion of scripture talks plainly about this truth. "on this rock" our Lord says. On believing in who I am, Jesus said, which can only be revealed to you in truth by my Father in Heaven He teaches so wonderfully and eloquently. Obi, read this, understand it, believe it, and confess it and you too will be given the keys of the kingdom of Heaven which are in Jesus Christ the man, Jesus Christ our Lord, and never ever, the denomination of the Church of Jesus Christ. God Bless you Obi, and may you find the truth though you stray far from it. Sincerely, Jeff |
||||||
1175 | Flesh or Spirit | Psalm | jlhetrick | 155015 | ||
Dear Doc, Thanks for another learning experience. And thanks for the point to the website. Sincerely, Jeff |
||||||
1176 | Flesh or Spirit | Psalm | jlhetrick | 155010 | ||
OK Doc, perhaps I am oversensitive and/or reading into your statements. If so, or in any case, I sincerely apologize for my own argumentativeness. I am not so eager to see negative in you, only seemed to be seeing it. I did note in my post (I believe I did anyway) that you agreed that salvation is a permanent state once received. I am an educated man. I too have an appreciation for language that is best representative of one's point and argument. I, on the other hand find myself very often using a good deal of common and even slang language when I teach or preach. Perhaps this is to my failing and the detriment of my students and listeners. Perhaps I am sometimes guilty of assuming that they might not know or be familiar with some of the language. Anyway, I will consider this more. Regarding "assurance" this post is more understandable to me (if I have it right). It appears to me that you are referring to the assurance (or encouragement) that we as believers might give to another "professing" Christian. If I have you right on this then I agree. We also agree regarding sanctification. Thanks. Regarding A.W. Pink, I have only recently become familiar with his writings. I am currently reading from "Why Four Gospels" for personal entertaiment and learning. I am doing some digging in "The Doctrine of Justification" in preparation for my Sunday lessons at church. Thanks for your reply, Jeff |
||||||
1177 | Flesh or Spirit | Psalm | jlhetrick | 155003 | ||
Hello Doc, I must say that I usually follow your posts well and 99 percent of the time have agreed with what you have had to say. You have redirected my thinking and taught me some truths and generally been very helpful. I hope I am wrong but I am now getting the feeling that you are interested in calling other's thoughts and beliefs into question; which would be fine and appropriate if you are able to support your arguments with scripture and therefore be a teacher. Again, I have to take issue with your comments that both directly and indirectly make reference to one of my posts. While I too am usually uncomfortable with almost any kind of "lingo", some of it used by Christians is sometimes the most insincere and abused. In my earlier post I refered to "once saved always saved" as a commonly quoted belief and argument. Though I did not use the phrase as my own language, and therefore feel no need to defend it, I question what you mean when you say it is misleading. You make the statement but give no evidence or support for making it. If you believe that a person can not lose his/her salvation (as you say you do) then what is misleading about the statement? I too prefer language such as "Perseverance of the Saints" and "Infallible Grace." but, that does not make these sayings "superior" except perhaps in our own minds. You write: "I truly do not believe that anyone deserves assurance nor can be guaranteed assurance!" Let me help you with this because this is important. It is not a question of one's deserving, we deserve nothing from God except eternal wrath; it is a question of God's will for us. God wants you to be sure and to be guaranteed of that assurance. Phil 1:5-6 "because of your partnership in the gospel from the first day until now,being CONFIDENT of this, that he who began a good work in you will carry it on to completion until the day of Christ Jesus." NIV (emphasis mine) I agree we are to work out our salvation with "fear and trembling" but please, don't confuse this "working out" with "obtaining through receiving". If a person has trusted in the Lord He/she is saved and encouraged again and again in scripture to have confidence and assurance in that. That is why Paul is so tedious in articulating the gift and miracle of salvation. The "working out" involves one's "becoming" more like Christ, which can only occur after salvation. I have read A. W. Pink as well, an eloquent writer, but his feelings and thoughts on a subject have to take a back seat to the scriptures. I appreciate your remarks regarding "progressive sanctification" and believe that it is here that your misunderstanding is linked. Sanctification is indeed a ongoing process in which the Holy Spirit continues in us the process of becoming more like Christ. But this process begins after salvation is received Rom 6:22 But now being made free from sin and become servants to God, ye have your fruit unto sanctification , and the end eternal life. ASV Thank you for your continuing remarks under and including "progressive sanctification". They were enlightening and encouraging. Sincerely, Jeff PS, I truly look forward to continuing to follow your posts and feel confident that I will continue to learn from you. Thank you for that. |
||||||
1178 | Flesh or Spirit | Psalm | jlhetrick | 155001 | ||
Your welcome WOS, Glad I could help with this one Jeff |
||||||
1179 | Flesh or Spirit | Psalm | jlhetrick | 155000 | ||
Thanks Hank, It always helps to have your understanding of a topic confirmed by another. I wich I could have thought of the words you used in your post to better articulate my points. They go well together. Jeff |
||||||
1180 | Flesh or Spirit | Psalm | jlhetrick | 154972 | ||
Hi WOS, Interesting topic with debateable points and probably answered through the search funtion. Rom 2:7-11 7 To those who by persistence in doing good seek glory, honor and immortality, he will give eternal life. 8 But for those who are self-seeking and who reject the truth and follow evil, there will be wrath and anger. 9 There will be trouble and distress for every human being who does evil: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile; 10 but glory, honor and peace for everyone who does good: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile. 11 For God does not show favoritism. NIV These verses do not refer to backsliding Christians but rather to the saved (who receive eternal life), and the unsaved (who reject the truth of God and receive wrath and anger). The debate you seem to be having with yourself here is the old one of "once saved always saved?" See Heb 6:4 This verse is used by both camps to argue both the possibility of losing one's salvation as well as the impossibility of losing one's salvation. The "can lose" camp argue that this verse clearly teaches the possibiity of losing salvation. If one has "been enlightened" and "shared in the Holy Spirit", and "tasted the goodness of the Word of God and the powers of the coming age", this person must have absolutely been saved. The "can not lose" camp argues from a different perspective. The one "falling away" here is likened to Judas Iscariot. Having seen the works of God in Jesus himself and even having "shared in those works" and "tasted the goodness of the word of God" in the hearing of Jesus' word, and "witnessing the powers of the coming age" by being witness to the miracles of Christ. It would appear from Scripture that Judas in fact performed miracles as one of the deciples sent out in Matt. 10:1 the argument continues against Judas that he "was a traitor" (Luke 6:16) was entered into by Satan (further supported by theological argument that a true christian can not be possessed literally though he might be harrassed or oppressed) and possibly the most important reference Judas lef his ministry to "go where he belongs" (Acts 1:25) Though this last reference doesn't specifically say that Judas died eternally lost, taken in context with the rest of scripture, it certainly appears to be the case. Finally, the "can't loose your salvation" argument logically argues that scripture teaches that once you are justified by Christ it is impossible to be unjustified. The logical argument might go like this. If there is anything one can do to undo his salvation, this thing would be a greater work than the greatest mirical of all that which only Christ could accomplish in reconciling the sinful man to the Father. If we can not be "saved" by our works, how can we be "unsaved" by our works once we have been justified? As a Christian I have gone back and forth on what I believe regarding this as I moved from church to church and teaching to teaching in my travels. The debate is much more involved than what I have articulated above but let me say that based on what I have discovered for myself in the bible, I am convinced that nothing can undo my salvation and that once a person is justified by Christ, he/she is saved once and for all time. Paul said it best: Rom 8:38-39 38 For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, 39 neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord. NIV |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 ] Next > Last [62] >> |