Results 1 - 20 of 55
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: RJJ Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Who was the witness? | John 1:32 | RJJ | 113646 | ||
Greetings Emmause, Many thanks for your reply, was this a vision or a manifestation? For who's benefit was it for John or Jesus, if John, why was doubt shown later and, why would Jesus need encouragement? The gospel writers seem vague as too whom it was for. SHALOM,RJJ |
||||||
2 | Thief on Cross discrepancy Mt vs Lk | Matt 27:44 | RJJ | 105896 | ||
SORRY, SENT TWICE | ||||||
3 | Double Dutch? | Bible general Archive 2 | RJJ | 100617 | ||
Greetings mommpbs, thanks for your response, confusing is it not?. The "quote" and its author ect are irrelevant to the question, what is relevant to the question is the manner of its presentation. Is "fancy" words hiding the truth of the gospel or is satan using the modern language to "cloud" the minds of modern man? Also the deeper and harder question was, is there any Scriptural resources to counter this deception of the author of all lies? Clarification pleaseeee, OK, what does Scripture teach? I hope that these posts will demonstrate that we need to show the plain gospel truth in an understandable way. So, lets get simple, for the fools shall confuse the wise!!! SHALOM RJJ. |
||||||
4 | IS there any answers out there? | NT general Archive 1 | RJJ | 100220 | ||
Greetings Heathclif89 many thanks for your post, and refer you to my conclusion to the question, where do children go when they die #post 99421. I especially want to thank you as your answer must have reawakened hurtful memories, while I cannot apologise for some of the reactions, I can assure you that my intention was not to upset anyone. As I am sure was not your intention, I am sorry to say that debaters on this Forum are easy to arouse and do have a tendency to wander off the issue/topic under debate, as this thread shows and the reason behind the warning at the top of the page. Although I cannot attribute all blame to my fellow debaters, as some of the question/notes are "open ended", stray from the point or contain a word or a statement that are pounced upon with a vigour that would credit a starving wolf! So please do not be discouraged keep on sharing with us all. SHALOM RJJ. P/s if my comments upset ANYONE may I say this, "if the cap fits" meaning that, if the truth hurts then do something to stop the truth hurting!! |
||||||
5 | IS there any answers out there? | NT general Archive 1 | RJJ | 100217 | ||
Greetings candy lee, thank you for your post you may be interested in my conclusion to this question, post #99421. Although the Catholic doctrine is commonly known as "limbo" (and come from the Latin "limbus"), it is only a "name", the substance of the doctrine, where do children go when they die is not, "in the bible" either! While not saying that the Catholic theologians got it right or wrong, my question was what was the Protestant answer? I am no theologian but what does one say to the distraught parents of a dieing child when asked that question and asked to "prove it" SHALOM RJJ P/s Thanks for the doctrine, commonly called"soul sleep"a doctrine that I DO NOT subscribs to. SHALOM RJJ. |
||||||
6 | IS there any answers out there? | NT general Archive 1 | RJJ | 99960 | ||
Greetings Jephthae, thank you for your post. If you go to post #99421 you will be able to read my conclusion to this question, I am sorry that your post was not part of that conclusion but I hope that you agree with ny conclusion. May I point out that the question was regarding where children went when they died, so purgatory was not the issue. Nor was the issue, the election/predestination or the foreknowledge of God or even the issue of free will of God/man. All good debatable topics which I am sure has been debated already many times. This of course does not stop you raising them again as questions, I am sure that someone will debate with you, possibly I will. I note that this is one of your first notes, so welcome to the Forum and keep them coming!! SHALOM. RJJ |
||||||
7 | SOMEPEOPLE SAY IT IS NECESSARY | NT general Archive 1 | RJJ | 99461 | ||
Greeting HIRAM and welcome to the Forum. I hope that you have been able to follow the good advice given by Emmaus. You may have the answer already to my question! Are you a swimmer or a paddler or do you dunk or do you sprinkle? To be a little more serious have you given the means of baptism? Some churches teach that a sprinkle of Holy Water is all that is needed in adult baptism while others say that total immersion is the Scriptural way. I support total immersion, I pray that you do also, if not, and want Scriptural support for total immersion I will supply if asked. The most important thing of course is the reason for baptism. May obedience to God be your answer and may God bless you on that day. SHALOM RJJ. |
||||||
8 | IS there any answers out there? | NT general Archive 1 | RJJ | 99452 | ||
See Post #99241. Thank you. SHALOM.RJJ | ||||||
9 | IS there any answers out there? | NT general Archive 1 | RJJ | 99451 | ||
See Post #99241. Thank you. SHALOM.RJJ | ||||||
10 | IS there any answers out there? | NT general Archive 1 | RJJ | 99450 | ||
See Post #99241. Thank you. SHALOM.RJJ | ||||||
11 | IS there any answers out there? | NT general Archive 1 | RJJ | 99449 | ||
See Post #99241. Thank you. SHALOM.RJJ | ||||||
12 | IS there any answers out there? | NT general Archive 1 | RJJ | 99448 | ||
See Post #99241. Thank you. SHALOM.RJJ | ||||||
13 | IS there any answers out there? | NT general Archive 1 | RJJ | 99447 | ||
BAD/GOOD NEWS :- I have returned and I have reached a conclusion regarding the question I had posted. See Post #99241. Thank you. SHALOM.RJJ |
||||||
14 | EUREKA!! I have found it! | 2 Sam 12:23 | RJJ | 99433 | ||
Greetings Searcher56. Thank you for you post. A post that I found very exasperating, the post I posted was a conclusion not a begging, I would suggest that you read all the posts mentioned, all the posts on the thread, the Westminster Confession of Faith (10.1 where it relates to the question), the Holy Scriptures and if you want to, the Catholic answer to the question (it can be found on the web) and if after all that research and study you still cannot answer the question that I posed, then I pray that God will show you the answer in a way that you will understand. May I point out that it was our Lord Jesus who called the "place of the dead" Abraham's Bosom, who also gave a description of Hell and as our Lord died HE descended into hell to take the just (who had been waiting for the resurrection) to take them up to Paradise. As both David and his son died (fact!), then they MUST have meet. ALL die because of the sin of Adam/original sin (fact!). The age of accountability is a separate issue, if you are interested there are already 972 posts in the archives on this topic. So, God bless you in your search. SHALOM. RJJ. |
||||||
15 | IS there any answers out there? | NT general Archive 1 | RJJ | 98884 | ||
Greetings Emmaus. Please laugh with me, God LOVES us both, despite our differences. Should Reverend Jim Wright decide to write Right rite, then Wright would write right rite, to which Wright has the right of copyright. Duplicating his rite would be to copy Wright's Right rite, and violate copyright, to which Wright would have the right to right. Right? AMohSL? SHALOM RJJ |
||||||
16 | IS there any answers out there? | NT general Archive 1 | RJJ | 98622 | ||
Greetings Joe! thank you for your response. A very good answer BUT it raises a question what about the child/baby who is not one of the elect and how do you know which child is one of the elect. I await your reply. SHALOM. RJJ |
||||||
17 | IS there any answers out there? | NT general Archive 1 | RJJ | 98617 | ||
Greetings DL5 thank you for your response, a goor answer BUT what would you say in reply to the question, what about "original sin/the sin of Adam" is not the offspring of man born with and in sin? I await your reply. SHALOM. RJJ |
||||||
18 | IS there any answers out there? | NT general Archive 1 | RJJ | 98614 | ||
Greetings mkm9, I personly agree with you and SHOUT AMEN. I think that a study of the doctrines of the Catholic Church would open your eyes to the truth of the gospel. BUT I WOULD CAUTION YOU to be sure that you are strong, well grounded in understanding Gods word. SHALOM RJJ. P/s if you do not feel ready then by all means ask the FORUM. |
||||||
19 | IS there any answers out there? | NT general Archive 1 | RJJ | 98611 | ||
Greetings Emmaus, Whether you have it in print or in stone, if you do not read it, then what good will it do? If you can not, or will not, understand English word structure and its usage then we will never understand why the Catholic Church has stopped/dropped using the word limbo. I am not going to nit pick/argue over a word that has changed its nearing over 800 years but I will say look at the root word and that is LIMBUS (Latin meaning BORDER, Date 14 century). I would humbly ask that the reader look beyond the single word and READ the doctrine, which is the Catholic Churches answer to my question BUT I would like to know/discover the Protestant answer to my question. SHALOM RJJ. |
||||||
20 | IS there any answers out there? | NT general Archive 1 | RJJ | 98521 | ||
Greetings mkm9 and many thanks for your response. I appreciate that this ? has been raised many times and if the Catholic Church can confirmm, as they did in 1992, a doctrine that most Protestants disagree with, what do they state as the answer? To answer with "have faith" is good but in what? the doctrine of Mother Church or Gods word? Remember that authority is given to the Church for interpretation, their doctrine not mine. SHALOM RJJ |
||||||
Result pages: [ 1 2 3 ] Next > Last [3] >> |