Results 1 - 20 of 61
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: alanh Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | What is effeminate | Bible general Archive 3 | alanh | 172042 | ||
The KJV uses effeminante most modern translations such as the NASV have homosexual. | ||||||
2 | What is effeminate | Bible general Archive 3 | alanh | 172073 | ||
your right | ||||||
3 | Adultery by both parties. Divorce? | NT general Archive 1 | alanh | 124507 | ||
The term divorce comes from the Greek word apoluo and means "to loose, set free." If one is loosed or set free do they not have the right to marry or are they still "bound." Both partys are set free not just one. You are misreading the Scriptures or reading them the way they have been intrepreted without regard to the meaning of the Greek word. A divorce involves both partys not just half. | ||||||
4 | Adultery by both parties. Divorce? | NT general Archive 1 | alanh | 124609 | ||
The Scripture says two things: 1) Divorce, except for adultry eguals adultry 2) Divorce, in the case of adultry eguals divorce not adultry. Divorce means the parties involved are no longer married! |
||||||
5 | Adultery by both parties. Divorce? | NT general Archive 1 | alanh | 124717 | ||
The remarriage in the case you are referring to would refer to any divorce then this is not so, but only to divorce where it was done for other reason than fornication (adultry, sexual immoralatry). Follow the meaning of divorce (apoluo) logically---i.e. what does it mean.] Please notice as I have shown you two cases are stated: 1) no divorce in the eyes of God 2) divorce in the eyes of God If you are saying REMARRIAGE means adultry then it only follows that both parties are still married and neither can remarry, but if one can remarry BECAUSE THEY ARE DIVORCED DUE TO UNFAITHFULNESS then both can remarry BECAUSE THEY ARE DIVORCED---NO LONGER MARRIED!!! The fact is God hates divorce (Malachi 2:16). Couples should always try to work things out, even when marital unfaithfulness is involved. But when it cannot and divorce for fornication is the cause then the divorce applies to both parties one cannot still be married and commit adultry while the other cannot it is not logical nor is it what the Scriptures say. |
||||||
6 | Age of earth according to bible? | Gen 1:5 | alanh | 171781 | ||
The earth according to the bilical record is appox. 6000 years more or less based on genealogical records. | ||||||
7 | Age of earth according to bible? | Gen 1:5 | alanh | 171900 | ||
The truth of the matter is that the Bible, being grounded in history, is filled with chronological data that may be used to establish a relative age for the earth. The Bible, for example, provides impressive chronological data from Adam to Solomon. The death of Ahab has been determined to be 853-852 B.C., and terefore the reign of Solomon (forty years, 1 Kings 11:42) can be dated at 971-931 B.C. According to 1 Kings 6:1, 480 years before Solomon's fourth year of reign (967-966 B.C.), Moses brought the Israelites out of Egypt. The date of the Exodus is 1446/1445 B.C. To this date is added the years of sojourn in Egypt (215 years), thereby producing the date of 1661 BC as the year Jacob went into Egypt. Interestingly, the Bible records Pharaoh's query of Jacob's age in Genesis 47:9. That age was 130 and that makes the year of Jacob's birth 1791 BC (Gen 25:26). Isaac was 60 when Jacob was born, which would place the birth of Isaac at 1851 BC. Abraham was 100 when Isaac was born, therefore his birh was in 1951 BC. (Gen 21:5). The chronology from Abraham to Adam is recorded in two separate genealogical tables-Genesis 5 and 11. According to Genesis 12:4, Abraham was 75 when he left Haran, presumably after Terah died at 205 years; thus Abraham was born when Terah was 130, albeit he is mentioned 1st by importance when Terah started having sons at the age of 70 (Gen 11:27; 12:4; Acts 7:4) Having est. the birth date of Abraham at 1951 BC, it is possible to work from the time of Adam's creation to Abraham in order to dicern the chronology "of the beginning." The time from the creation of Adam to Seth is 130 years (Gen 5:3), the time from Adam to Noah was 1,056 years, and the time from Noah's birth to the flood was 600 years (Gen 7:6), or 1656 AA (After Adam). Shem was 100 and begat Arphaxad 2 years after the Flood (the earth was not dry for more than a year; cf. Gen 7:11 and Gen 8:14; see also Gen 11:10) in approx. 1659 AA. The Bible indicates that "Arphaxad lived thirty-five years, and begot Salah"; however, Luke 3:36 may complement the chronological table of Genesis 11 with the insertion of Cainan between Arphaxad and Salah, which indicates Arphaxad possibly was the father of Cainan. When the ages of the remaining patriarchs in Genesis 11 are considered at the time they begat sons, one observes that Terah was likely born around 2000 AA, and bore Abraham 130 years later (in approx. 2130 AA). Simple arithmatic-1951 BC added to 2130 AA-places the creation date at approx. 4081 BC (give or take a few hundred years) the Flood would have occurred around 2425 BC. References: Thompson, Bert (1999) "The Bible and the Age of the Earth" |
||||||
8 | genesis 4:14 | Gen 4:14 | alanh | 171782 | ||
Eve was the mother of all living. Altho we are not told the names of other children of Adam and Eve it is very likely that they did have other children and that they intermarried. where else would Cain get his wife if not a daughter of Eve? | ||||||
9 | The Flood Chronology | Gen 7:4 | alanh | 124396 | ||
The flooding only lasted forty days and forty nights. The results of the flooding lasted one year and ten days. | ||||||
10 | The Ten Commandments in the Bible | Ex 20:1 | alanh | 126012 | ||
The Ten Commandments were a part of the old covenant and were nailed to the cross (Col. 2:14). Although many of the commandments are repeated under the New Covenant one is not: "Remember the Sabbath day by keeping it holy." (Exodus 20:8-11; Deut. 5:12-15). We are no longer to worship on the Sabbath. The covenant of the Ten Commandments were given only to the Jews Moses said,"Jehovah our God made a covenant with us in Horeb. Jehovah made not this covenant with our fathers, but with us, even us, who are all of us here alive this day" (Deut. 5:2-3). The Ten Commandments were indeed that covenant of which he spoke, notice the following, "And he was there with Jehovah forty days and forty nights; he did neither eat bread, nor drink water. And he wrote upon the tables the words of the covenant, the ten commandments" (Exodus 34:28). In summary the Ten Commandments were nailed to the cross. The maral laws can all be found in the New Testament writings after the church has begun. The fourth law is no where to be found in the New Testament after Acts 2. |
||||||
11 | Clean and unclean problem may be complex | Lev 11:3 | alanh | 126015 | ||
I agree with you completely. the only animal I know for sure tthat fits the situation is the pig because of trichinosis. It is possible that other animals fit into a similar catigory. I do know that you can get very sick with seafood such as muscle, oysters, scallops and these were considered unclean. | ||||||
12 | The rise of Antichrist, we are close. | Dan 9:27 | alanh | 124412 | ||
The antichrist has come, "Little children, it is the last hour: and as ye heard that antichrist cometh, even now have there arisen many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last hour"(1 John 2:18); "Who is the liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist, even he that denieth the Father and the Son." (1 John 2:22); "and every spirit that confesseth not Jesus is not of God: and this is the spirit of the antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it cometh; and now it is in the world already" (1 John 4:3). As you can see the antichrist, "every spirit that confesseth not Jesus is not of God," is already among us he (they) are not yet to come. Daniel 9 is a prophetic chronology enabling the studious Hebrew to know when the promised Messiah would die for the sins of humanity. The chronology of this prophetic context involves three things: (a) a commencement point; (b) a duration period; and (c) a concluding event. The beginning point was to coincide with a command to “restore and rebuild Jerusalem.” The time span between the starting point and the concluding event was specified as “seventy weeks.” This would be seventy weeks of seven days each — a total of 490 days. Each day was to represent a year in prophetic history. Most conservative scholars hold that the symbolism denotes a period of approximately 490 years Finally, the terminal event would be the “cutting off,” (i.e., the death) of the Anointed One (9:26). [NOTE: Actually, the chronology is divided into three segments, the total of which represents 486½ years. This would be the span between the command to restore Jerusalem, and the Messiah’s death.] If one is able to determine the date of the commencement point of this prophecy, it then becomes a relatively simple matter to add to that the time-duration specified in the text, thus concluding the precise time when the Lord was to be slain. Let us therefore narrow our focus regarding this matter. There are but three possible dates for the commencement of the seventy-week calendar. First, Zerubbabel led a group of Hebrews out of captivity in 536 B.C. This seems to be an unlikely beginning point, however, because 486 years from 536 B.C. would end at 50 B.C., which was eighty years prior to Jesus’ death. Second, Nehemiah led a band back to Canaan in 444 B.C. Is this the commencement point for computing the prophecy? Probably not, for 486 years after 444 B.C. ends at A.D. 42 — a dozen years after the death of Christ. However, in 457 B.C., Ezra took a company from Babylon back to Jerusalem. Does this date work mathematically? Indeed. If one starts at 457 B.C., and goes forward for 486 ½ years, the resulting date is A.D. 30 — the very year of Christ’s crucifixion! In “the midst” of the seventieth week, i.e., after the fulfillment of the 486½ years, the Anointed One was to be “cut off.” This is a reference to the death of Jesus. Isaiah similarly foretold that Christ would be “cut off out of the land of the living” (Isaiah 53:8). But why are the “seventy weeks” of Daniel’s prophecy divided into three segments — seven weeks, 62 weeks, and the “midst” of one week? There was purpose in this breakdown. The first division of “seven weeks” (literally, forty-nine years) covers that period of time during which the actual rebuilding of Jerusalem would be underway, following the Hebrews’ return to Palestine (9:25b). This was the answer to Daniel’s prayer (9:16). That reconstruction era was to be one of “troublous times.” The Jews’ enemies had harassed them in earlier days (see Ezra 4:1-6), and they continued to do so in the time of Ezra and Nehemiah. The second segment of sixty-two weeks (434 years), when added to the previous forty-nine, yields a total of 483 years. When this figure is computed from 457 B.C., it terminates at A.D. 26. This was the year of Jesus’ baptism and the beginning of His public ministry. Finally, the “midst of the week” (3½ years) reflects the time of the Lord’s preaching ministry. This segment of the prophecy concludes in A.D. 30 — the year of the Savior’s death. |
||||||
13 | Pact with Death Isreal an the Antichrist | Dan 9:27 | alanh | 136508 | ||
Ezekiel 38.11 says nothing about Maygog. Taken in context it is clearly speaking of the invasion of Egypt and Judea by Antiochus. Cf. Daniel 11.31 to 32, 36. This Calmet interprets of Cambyses, his cruelties in Egypt and his evil design to destroy the Israelites. According to John the antichrist existed in the 1st century, and were no more than those whom ..deny the Father and the Son.. In Matthew 24 Jesus is answering two questions posed by His disciples. First, ..When will these things happen.. referring to the statement made by our Lord in verse 2, and ..What will be the sign of Your coming and the end of the age.. ,referring to the Christian age or the end of the world. He answers the first question in verses 4 to 35 and the second question in verses 36 to 41. Marks account of these events makes two interesting statements. First, in verse 10 he says, .. the gospel must first be preached unto all the nations.. Paul in his letter to the Colossians states, .. the gospel which ye heard, which was preached in all creation under heaven.. Colossians 1.23. The second statement is in Mark 13.30 and says, .. This generation shall not pass away, until all these things be accomplished.. A generation is 65 to 80 years. As for ..the abomination of desolation standing where he ought not.. this is none other than the raising of the Roman standards in the temple by Titus in 70CE. There is no evidence in Scripture that a third temple will be built. As for Daniels prophecies in chapter 9 verses 24 to 27 he is merely stating three things. First, when Messiah will come, secondly when He will be cut off, i.e. crucified, and thirdly, what punishment will be imposed on the Jews for their participation in the second event. The book of Revelation which is where I am sure you get the term Magog from is als a book of figurative speech. There are four important things to remember about Revelation. 1. It is a revelation. 1.1 2. to seven churches in Asia. 1.11 3. in signs. He sent and sign.i.fied it. 1.1 4. of things that must shortly come to pass. 1.1 This book like Matthew 24 is about the destruction of Jerusalem in 70CE. |
||||||
14 | Mark 16:15-16 mean? | Matt 28:19 | alanh | 150539 | ||
Then we must believe and be baptized in order to be saved? I assume since Acts 2:38 adds repentance to the mix that is a requirement too. | ||||||
15 | Mark 16:15-16 mean? | Matt 28:19 | alanh | 150612 | ||
Cornelius was not saved before baptism. He was baptized by the Holy Spirit so that Peter would know that "God is no respecter of persons" Acts 10:34. He received the Holy Spirit before he had any faith or belief in Jesus because Peter had not taught them yet (cf. Acts 11:15). If you read through the book of Acts every conversion is ended in baptism. According to Peter it is baptism that now saves us 1 Peter 3:21. Why would Jesus say, "he that believes AND is baptized shall be saved" (Mark 16:16) if baptism is optional or nonessential? | ||||||
16 | Post-Endtime Martyrs | Mark 9:1 | alanh | 124511 | ||
Mark 9:1 "And Jesus was saying to them, "Truly I say to you, there are some of those who are standing here who will not taste death until they see the kingdom of God after it has come with power." Jesus here is specifically speaking to His 12 apostles, of which Judas was present. As we know Judas hung himself in remorse for betraying Christ (Matthew 27:5). In the book of Acts chapter one we find the following "and, being assembled together with them, he charged them not to depart from Jerusalem, but to wait for the promise of the Father, which, said he, ye heard from me: For John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized in the Holy Spirit not many days hence. They therefore, when they were come together, asked him, saying, Lord, dost thou at this time restore the kingdom to Israel? And he said unto them, It is not for you to know times or seasons, which the Father hath set within His own authority. But ye shall receive power, when the Holy Spirit is come upon you: and ye shall be my witnesses both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea and Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth" (Acts 1:4-8)[note they are asking about an earthly kingdom, the kingdom is spiritual, and Jesus tells them about the power of the H.S. they are to receive]. Acts 2 tells of the kingdom coming with power and some that were standing with Jesus in Mark 9:1 are here. Colossians 1:8 tells us the kigdom is already here. When did it come? Acts chapter 2 on Pentecost with power. |
||||||
17 | Only ONE God | Mark 12:32 | alanh | 124515 | ||
Genesis 1:1 "In the beginning GOD (Elohim, a plural singular word)created" (John 1:1) In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. (John 1:14) And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us (and we beheld his glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father), full of grace and truth. (Acts 5:3) But Peter said, Ananias, why hath Satan filled thy heart to lie to the Holy Spirit, and to keep back part of the price of the land? (Acts 5:4) While it remained, did it not remain thine own? and after it was sold, was it not in thy power? How is it that thou hast conceived this thing in thy heart? thou has not lied unto men, but unto God. Note the following from the proceeding verses: 1) Elohim is a plural singular 2) The Word was with God...the Word was God...the Word became flesh (the Word, God, is two different entities) 3) Ananias lied to the Holy Spirit at the same time as to God...they are one and the same yet different. |
||||||
18 | child of light 777, did He die on Thurs? | Mark 15:42 | alanh | 172072 | ||
... | ||||||
19 | Kalos (Word Study) | Luke 8:15 | alanh | 136357 | ||
The term "kalos" is only used 37 times in the NT. Strong's defines the word as well (usually moral), (in a )good (place), honestly, recover, (full) well. It is translated as follows in the ASV 31 times as "well" 4 times as "good" 1 time as "recover" 1 time as "honorably" |
||||||
20 | Kalos (Word Study) | Luke 8:15 | alanh | 136397 | ||
see biblicalgreek.com | ||||||
Result pages: [ 1 2 3 4 ] Next > Last [4] >> |