Results 1 - 20 of 32
|
||||||
Results from: Answers On or After: Thu 12/31/70 Author: gmsmith101 Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | chcking scripture context | Bible general Archive 1 | gmsmith101 | 4172 | ||
Reading the "before" and "after" are important. Often a phrase is pulled out of nowhere and used to support a wacky doctrine, when the phrase doesn't mean that at all. One of the best ways I have found is to use a concordance to see how the word or phrase was used in other passages. Does it always mean the same thing? Is the word used the same way? Also, a topical index can be very handy. You can find other verses on the same subject and compare. | ||||||
2 | Who is going into the millenium? | Bible general Archive 1 | gmsmith101 | 4354 | ||
I think that those who reign during the 1,000 years (Rev. 20:4) here on earth are the saints that returned with Christ in Rev. 19:14, which were called the "armies of heaven" in this passage. | ||||||
3 | When were angels created? | Bible general Archive 1 | gmsmith101 | 4357 | ||
There may be an indication that angels were created prior to the creation of the world in Job 38:6-7, but I am unsure about this. It seems to fit. I believe they were created when God created all the heavens. Also, there is Isaiah's portrayal of the fall of Lucifer (Is.14:12-20), which must have happened before the Garden of Eden. Also, Ezek. 28:16-19, which most believe refers to Satan, must have happened before Eden, because Satan was already cast out of heaven. Therefore, the angels must have been created before earth. | ||||||
4 | HOW COULD JESUS BE A DESCENDANT OF DAVID | Bible general Archive 1 | gmsmith101 | 4407 | ||
My understanding of the differences in the geneologies is the following: 1. The Gospel of Matthew records Jesus' "legal" geneology, i.e., the line of Joseph, His earthly and legal father. The reason for this is that Matthew's Gospel account is directed to the Jews, his purpose being to prove Jesus' Kingship. In order to do this, he would have to prove that Jesus was a legal descendent of David, therefore a legal heir to the throne. Mary is mentioned in Matthew's Gospel as the wife of Joseph. 2. Luke's Gospel is directed to Theophilus, most likely a Gentile, and is focused on Jesus as the Son of Man. Therefore, it is logical to record the geneology of His mother, even though the Gospel of Luke says that Joseph is the supposed son of Eli. Also, I have heard it said that it is possible that Eli had no sons, therefore no heir except his son-in-law, making Joseph his "son." |
||||||
5 | Will saints come through the tribulation | Bible general Archive 1 | gmsmith101 | 4776 | ||
Because of the sequence of events and they way they are described in Jesus' account in Matt. 24: 4-28, I believe that the church will be here on earth during the tribulation. | ||||||
6 | Any other thoughts? | Bible general Archive 1 | gmsmith101 | 4791 | ||
I understand your view. But in light of the words of Jesus Himself, and the sequence He describes, I continue to believe the church will be here until after the tribulation. Jesus says in v. 22, "Unless those days had been cut short, no life would have been saved; but for the sake of the elect those days will be cut short." If the elect weren't still here, there would be no need to cut the days short. As far as v.31 goes, it follows 29 and 30 which describe events AFTER the tribulation (v. 29 begins with "But immediately..." and v. 30 begins with "And then..."). Jesus is saying the elect will be gathered AFTER the tribulation. | ||||||
7 | How much should we give? | Bible general Archive 1 | gmsmith101 | 4968 | ||
We are still required to give a tithe under the new covenant. The law of tithing was not introduced as a law of Moses. This law has been in effect since Genesis. Of course, we know that Cain and Abel gave an offering. More specifically, Abraham gave Melchizedek a tenth (Heb. 7:2). This happened way before the Law was written. Since the Law that we have been released from is the ceremonial law, we are still require to tithe. | ||||||
8 | Babies in heaven when they die? | Bible general Archive 1 | gmsmith101 | 5933 | ||
Dear Nolan, I believe that babies and small children go to heaven when they die. My reasons are the following: 1. Although all are born with a sinful nature, these children have not sinned. God is just. 2. When David's adulterous affair with Bathsheba resulted in pregnancy, the Lord struck the child ill. David fasted and prayed. When the child died, David washed his face, ate food and annointed himself. When asked why he would do such a thing, David answered, "While the child was still alive, I fasted and wept; for I said, "Who knows, the Lord may be gracious to me, that the child may live. But now he has died; why should I fast? Can I bring him back again? I shall go to him, but he will not return to me." 2 Sam. 12:15-23. David believed his child to be in heaven, where he would follow when he himself died. I am comforted by this passage. I base my hope to see my children in heaven on this principle. |
||||||
9 | Why did God change His mind? | OT general | gmsmith101 | 4704 | ||
I don't think God changed His mind, since God doesn't change at all. Gen. 9:3 doesn't say all things are clean, it says "Every moving thing that is alive shall be food for you; I give all to you, as I gave the green plant." The human diet was expanded here to includ meat, though the consumption of carrion (Lev. 11:40) is forbidden. (for completely understandable reasons). |
||||||
10 | answer and question | OT general | gmsmith101 | 24856 | ||
Actually, The tabernacle was probably very similar if not identical to the tabernacle that was in use since the time of Moses and the wilderness wandering. The tabernacle was constructed according to the exacting instructions provided by God in Exodus. You should be able to find a faithful representation of what the tabernacle looked like in any good study Bible, e.g. Inductive Study Bible, Reformation Study Bible, etc. Remember the tabernacle was basically a tent. | ||||||
11 | answer and question | OT general | gmsmith101 | 24857 | ||
Actually, The tabernacle was probably very similar if not identical to the tabernacle that was in use since the time of Moses and the wilderness wandering. The tabernacle was constructed according to the exacting instructions provided by God in Exodus. You should be able to find a faithful representation of what the tabernacle looked like in any good study Bible, e.g. Inductive Study Bible, Reformation Study Bible, etc. Remember the tabernacle was basically a tent. | ||||||
12 | who did cain marry | Genesis | gmsmith101 | 4155 | ||
Clearly, Cain married one of his sisters. Marriage between close relations was necessary and acceptable that early on. Abraham's wife, Sarah, was his half-sister. Intermarriage between close relations was not forbidden until the time of Moses. Laws against marriage and sexual contact between relatives are spelled out in Leviticus 18, etc. | ||||||
13 | Who created all things? | Gen 1:1 | gmsmith101 | 4294 | ||
I don't understand your question. Why would Col. 1:16 and Gen. 1:1 be in contradiction to each other? If Jesus is God, and clearly He is, He was present at the creation. John 1:1-3 says Jesus WAS in the beginning and all things came into being through Him. | ||||||
14 | Holy Spirit | Gen 1:2 | gmsmith101 | 73138 | ||
I agree with jlpang. The Holy Spirit has been here since before creation, and has moved in the life of believers at many times, although He has not not INDWELT believers until after Pentacost. For example, David asked God not to take His Holy Spirit from him when he sinned (PS 51:11). How would this be possible if the Holy Spirit had not been present in David's life to begin with? Not that He indwelt David, but that David knew of the Holy Spirit's presence, if you know what I mean. This is just one example, there are others (which of course I can't think of at the moment!). He was always there, even though He did not indwell the believer. | ||||||
15 | infant death | Is 7:16 | gmsmith101 | 25420 | ||
When David's infant child died, he believed he would see him again. That's good enough for me. | ||||||
16 | where is satan? | Matt 12:45 | gmsmith101 | 4707 | ||
Satan roams the earth (Job 1:7) and must present himself before the Lord, so it is possible that he may appear in Heaven at times. Apparently, though, the permanent home of Satan is hell (2 Pet. 2:4). | ||||||
17 | Urgent and swift help needed!! | Matt 18:15 | gmsmith101 | 5935 | ||
Just a comment--I think this man's teaching is very dangerous, especially if he is indoctrinating young believers, teenagers and children. Act quickly. | ||||||
18 | Mrk16:17/Act2:11 what's the difference | Mark 16:17 | gmsmith101 | 3927 | ||
When the tongues phenomenon occurred in the Bible, it happened with a purpose. These early occurrances of tongues-speaking happened when people of different languages were gathered. The purpose, clearly, was so that people of other nations could hear the Gospel in their own language. (See Acts 2:6) Paul discouraged tongues without an interpreter. What is the purpose of the gift, if no one understands? 1 Cor. 12:10 calls the gift of tongues and interpretation of tongues two different gifts. Therefore, the one speaking in tongues cannot be the one interpreting the tongues. 1 Cor. 14:2 says that one who speaks in a tongue speaks not to man, but to God, and that he does not edify the church but himself. Keep in mind that tongues was low on the totem pole of gifts, as far as Paul was concerned. The most important purpose of the gifts was to edify the CHURCH ("for the common good"). The wording in v. 5 also makes it clear that although tongues was a valued gift, the interpretation of tongues was better, so that the church may be edified. There is no instance of the type of tongues you are talking about (where everyone in the church is praying and then people just start speaking tongues all over the place) anywhere in the Scripture. I know this is happening in many churches today, but there is no Scriptural support for this activity whatsoever. |
||||||
19 | Who wet Jesus feet with her tears? | Luke 7:44 | gmsmith101 | 4151 | ||
This woman is unnamed in the Gospel accounts. Although many would have you believe that what took place in Luke 7:38-50 is the same as the annointing that took place in Matt 26:6-13, Mark 14:3-9, and John 12:1-8, these were accounts of a completely different event. These three accounts are of the same event and took place in Bethany. THIS woman was Mary, the sister of Martha and Lazarus. There is no reason to think it is the same woman, because Mary and Martha were godly, respected women, and the woman in the Luke story was a sinner, or sinful woman--most likely a prostitute or an adulterous. Hope this helps in some way. | ||||||
20 | Can I remarry and be forgiven by god | Luke 7:47 | gmsmith101 | 72611 | ||
Adultery is as forgivable as any other sin, sweetie. The only unforgivable sin is blasphemy of the Holy Spirit. Seek counseling with a Christian counselor who uses Scripture. Try to heal your family. If your husband will not reconcile, work on healing you and your children through God's grace and counseling. Also, you are not obligated to confess your sins to your husband, only to God. I think that confessing to your husband would only add fuel to the fire. And don't think about remarriage right now. But remember--God forgives ALL sins if you've accepted Christ as your Savior. | ||||||
Result pages: [ 1 2 ] Next > Last [2] >> |