Results 1 - 20 of 277
|
||||||
Results from: Answers On or After: Thu 12/31/70 Author: charis Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Where did the word Christian come from? | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 525 | ||
ACT 11:26(NASB) "and when he had found him, he brought him to Antioch. And it came about that for an entire year they met with the church, and taught considerable numbers; and the disciples were first called Christians in Antioch." | ||||||
2 | Where are guardian angels mentioned? | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 527 | ||
Dear Gomar, Angels are God's servants, and are shown as helping, guiding and protecting His people throughout the Bible. As far as 'personal, dedicated, full-time, assigned' guardian angels are concerned, I can find no hard evidence of their existence. | ||||||
3 | So when did "evil" start? | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 838 | ||
Was Lucifer 'tempted' to be vain? No, I don't think that God is responsible for that. As far as we are told, Lucifer was the first 'sinner,'and it had to start somewhere. Frankly, I am not sure I like the phrase 'good vs. evil.' Though I don't think you meant it in this manner, many people think of it as a battle between almost equal opponents. For the sake of those who watch too many movies, God Almighty is the Creator, and Satan is just a miniscule 'wannabe,' soon to be vanquished with a breath. Though we are now temporarily living in a place heavily influenced by this petty pretender, we are citizens of the kingdom of God, and will soon live there forever. Hallelujah! Amen. |
||||||
4 | Is any type of contraception allowed? | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 1047 | ||
Dear JMR, Good question! I don't think that the Bible expressly prohibits the use of contraceptives, BUT, it is the attitude of the user that is in question. If used for the purpose of 'safe sex' because you are not sure of your partner, God cannot be pleased with the attitude. This includes promiscuous sex, adultery, harlotry, homosexuality, pre-marital (trial) sex, etc. Another abuse would be selfish, such as, "kids would detract from my plans, my career, or even my ministry." The key word is 'MY.' If, however, you have a normal, healthy, natural Christian life, and decide that your family is complete, and that (to a certain degree, and led by the Holy Spirit) age, finances, marital unity, logic, etc. lead you to want to stop proliferation, I cannot see God saying either, "Take a chance on another child," or "Stop having sex with your mate." Another factor,of course,is your gender. A man seems to be able to be more legalistic about this than a woman. He doesn't have to bear the child, nor does he have (usually) as much responsibility in rearing them. The only 'pro-choice' (in this matter) that is Biblical is that a woman should have a say in how many. I belong to the former gender, but can see the latter's point of view. Finally the method of contraception is also important. Abortion is absolutely out! Some drugs are potentially dangerous, and operations are permanent. Great caution is necessary, as well as spiritual and medical counsel. As to Biblical support for my thinking, I don't think that it was an issue, as there were not many forms available. As abortion and some very dangerous concoctions were the only real options, it is no wonder that God did not speak in favor of these methods. I would be interested to hear, in the light of these comments, views from the 'other side.' I am sure there are some who would say the Bible forbids contraception, but I suspect that the view is a bit legalistic or assumptive. I pray that this portrays, if nothing else, a good argument based on my understanding of the intent of God toward us. Blessings in Jesus' name. | ||||||
5 | Is Bible for or against birth control? | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 1074 | ||
Dear Friend, Please look at my answer to JMR, at the bottom of this topic line, "The Entire Bible" Mon 03/12/01, 7:56pm and let me know what you think. In Jesus, R | ||||||
6 | Sin vs. sins vs. iniquity? | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 1325 | ||
Dear me, Apparently, no one could, would, or did answer this question. In case anyone was wondering (but I guess not) I was not talking about singular and plural sin. Sin seems to be in the being, in the heart of man. Sins are the many actions and inactions of man that are not pleasing to God, thus against Him. Iniquity seems to be a judgement of the person, not his actions. Thus, it seems to refer to in-born sin inherited from Adam. Dead works are those things that we do that are not in accord with God's will. Even though they may seem to have some benefit in the perpetrator's eyes, they are selfish in nature, thus sin. Jesus died for our sins and our sin. Though sin is dealt with immediately upon our confession of Christ as Savior, sins are still a part of man until final judgment. Sins will be brought before the Lord, and dealt with at the judgment seat of Christ. | ||||||
7 | Sin vs. sins vs. iniquity? | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 1326 | ||
I'll get this one off, too. | ||||||
8 | May I Ask Again... Bible Software? | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 1389 | ||
Dear EveryHome, I have the NAS Electronic Bible Library and BibleMaster, both by Foundation. Both are very good. The price of the BibleMaster is hard to beat, and it loads into Japanese WinMe O.S. with no problems. I have a few others (sorry, forgot the names) but they were overly complicated, so they got 'put away,' maybe forever. (i.e. I forgot where they are) I use the computer for reference a lot, but still like the printed Bible to read. | ||||||
9 | Is there an age of accountability? | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 1182 | ||
Dear Joseph, the answer is No. The question is, "Were you looking for a particular answer?" You got the answers you got because of your ambiguous question. If you want to discuss this with those of your own thinking, use personal email. We have been invited by our hosts to a Christian Bible Forum, for the edification of the saints, with views and commentary by ALL for ALL. I can imagine that some Christians new to their faith would be thrilled to see lively discussion, but disappointed to see petty bickering among mature men of the Word. The best way you can show forth your bent, is to use the Bible clearly, use common sense, and show a little honor and dignity. (and maybe a wee bit of humor :-) With love in Christ Jesus. | ||||||
10 | Personal Introduction Service? | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 1527 | ||
I might as well get this off the list. Thanks, StudyBibleForum for providing a means to have personal contact. In Christ Jesus, charis | ||||||
11 | To: charis, JVH0212 and HeirofGod | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 1615 | ||
Thank YOU, EveryHome. We all look forward to your safe return. Godspeed to you, friend in Christ. | ||||||
12 | This is why...? | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 1810 | ||
Dear SSprln, When you say that non-denominational churches have no standard theological teaching, it may or may not be true. They may have a very standard theology, but just prefer not to be bound by a denominational title. Or, they really might have a non-standard, sub-standard, or para-standard theology :-) But when you say they have no set theological teaching, this also may or may not be true. They might have a set theology, but not standard, or, they may have a truly un-set theology, that changes all the time. Is that clear? ;-) Seriously, my friend, non-denominational can mean many things. Sometimes 'independent' is used (or abused). I personally do not believe that Jesus wants denominations, and I am certain that He has no 'favorite.' My church is 'non-denominational' and-or 'independent.' We have no hierachal affiliation to another church, mother church, or denomination. Yet, we have a set (subject to 'adjustment' by the Holy Spirit) theological teaching, which is surprisingly standard. You could say we are a 'hybrid,' but I prefer the word 'distillation.' We want to please our Master, not His minions. Blessings in Christ Jesus. charis |
||||||
13 | Jesus says about children being sacred? | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 1963 | ||
Dear rapunzel202020, I don't believe there is anywhere in the Word that exhorts us to idolize our children. Nor does the Bible say that they are pure and innocent and without sin. The Bible does say to be 'like' children. By this we are not being told to regurgitate on Daddy (or worse!) like a newborn, throw a tantrum at Daddy like a toddler, or rebel against Daddy like a teenager. We are being told to respect and honor and have simple faith in Father, like kids of the generation of Jesus. Frankly, I cannot see much in the attitude that mass-media and society-at-large gives our kids today to portray a relationship with Jesus. God often calls US His little children, and talks about us when referring to children on several occasions. As to the care and protection of children, these go hand-in-hand with the responsibility of disciplining them and nurturing them into Christ. In Jesus' name, charis |
||||||
14 | Anything wrong with dating? | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 1964 | ||
Dear JVH0212, I have read the book, and I think it goes a bit overboard...however, unchaperoned, umlimited dating for teenagers is just like playing Russian Roulette, except you have 5 of the 6 chambers loaded with magnum :-) The people who tell me they trust their teens completely must have already played and lost! Chaperoned dates or 'multiple dates' with some ground-rules, might work. Certainly parents must nurture their kids even into their teens, and through them. I say these from experience and the wisdom the Bible gives us. In Christ Jesus, charis |
||||||
15 | Not understanding | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 1971 | ||
Dear KBurgee, Ric was talking about Jeremiah 8:2, where is says of the 'princes of Judah,' "...the sun, the moon, and to all the host of heaven, which they have loved, and which they have served, and which they have gone after, and which they have sought, and which they have worshiped." In Christ Jesus, charis |
||||||
16 | invitation to salvation/accepting Christ | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 4047 | ||
Dear jrm, In our church we have extended an invitation to accept Christ a few times. However, usually we do not. Mainly, this is because our church is small by American standards. In any case, we are taught to give forth the Good News on our own, and not to rely on 'church' or 'the pastor' to save those whom the Lord has brought to us. I don't know if there is anything wrong with depending on an 'altar call' to present salvation to the person you brought to church, especially if it is a mega-church with thousands of shy saints ;-) As to a scripture that propounds the 'invitation to Christ,' I cannot find any. Also, in my experience, I have seen many abuses of this kind of salvation. The pride of counting 'decisions for Christ' seems popular these days. Especially when they 'broaden' the altar call to include 're-commitments' to Christ. (Opinion: What a charade!) We are all called to preach the Gospel to all mankind. Blessings in Christ Jesus, charis |
||||||
17 | invitation to salvation/accepting Christ | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 4048 | ||
Dear jrm, In our church we have extended an invitation to accept Christ a few times. However, usually we do not. Mainly, this is because our church is small by American standards. In any case, we are taught to give forth the Good News on our own, and not to rely on 'church' or 'the pastor' to save those whom the Lord has brought to us. I don't know if there is anything wrong with depending on an 'altar call' to present salvation to the person you brought to church, especially if it is a mega-church with thousands of shy saints ;-) As to a scripture that propounds the 'invitation to Christ,' I cannot find any. Also, in my experience, I have seen many abuses of this kind of salvation. The pride of counting 'decisions for Christ' seems popular these days. Especially when they 'broaden' the altar call to include 're-commitments' to Christ. (Opinion: What a charade!) We are all called to preach the Gospel to all mankind. Blessings in Christ Jesus, charis |
||||||
18 | i need a bio on paul the apostle | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 4057 | ||
Dear amhobson123, A very readable book about Paul is "The Apostle' by John Pollock. Blessings in Christ Jesus, charis |
||||||
19 | Should the Bible be taken literally? | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 4175 | ||
Dear EdB, I agree that we should take the word of God literally, but,as you said earlier, any life-directing doctrine should be confirmed by '2 or 3 witnesses.' (Frankly, I prefer 3, if it is a command that places a gender-related burden upon someone) There are several areas of scripture that only give one specific command. Many could be called guilty of 'making the word support their bent,' by mixing command with allegory. Indeed, in the books to the Corinthians, there seem to be some specific commands, with out clearly supporting witness. I believe the Bible speaks to us of 'patterns' of doctrine, supported by more than one scripture. "Brethren, join in following my example, and observe those who walk according to the pattern you have in us." Philippians 3:17 NASB. I find it interesting to note that many would focus on certain 'single-command' subjects, but most ignore 'baptism for the dead.' Though I agree heartily with the Bible applying to us today, men do not wear 'tunics' or 'outer garments' such as used 20 centuries ago, do we? I never heard of anyone in the early church wearing a necktie. (but we do) As with anything, we can become extreme in our interpretation of right and wrong. Though our Lord is pleased with obedience to His commands, they were intended for the heart, for our attitude toward Him, unless I am greatly mistaken. God wants us to serve Him from the heart, not just through physical obedience to a New Law. Please don't misunderstand me, I am not suggesting that we abandon all propriety and dignity. I am only suggetsting that 'literal' can easily mean 'legalistic.' The Lord was not happy the first time around (OT), why would He desire it afresh in this New Covenant? EdB, Please note that this answer is not directed to you only, but to all the saints of the Forum. I am not assuming that you hold one bent or another, only answering the question you posed. Blessings upon you in Christ Jesus, charis |
||||||
20 | Would you please provide source(s)? | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 4728 | ||
Dear Phillip, Though I cannot answer for amor65, I can say that he has not posted in over two months and this was his only posting. There is a good chance that our friend has either departed or is content with auditing our forum fellowship. I think that the (numerous) postings on this and related lines will answer your question to (over)abundance :-) Keep up the good postings. Blessings to you in Christ Jesus, charis |
||||||
Result pages: [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ] Next > Last [14] >> |