Results 1 - 4 of 4
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | WHO WROTE THE GOSPLES? THE APOSLES? | NT general Archive 1 | Emmaus | 28290 | ||
I couldn't agree more about the sound historical basis of Tradition in this case and mnay others. | ||||||
2 | WHO WROTE THE GOSPLES? THE APOSLES? | NT general Archive 1 | djconklin | 28292 | ||
One of the things that I found particularly interesting in doing that study was the wealth of detailed information that we have available that shows that our traditions on this are quite reliable. The second thing that was tantalizing for me was the information that points to a very early date for Matthew. |
||||||
3 | WHO WROTE THE GOSPLES? THE APOSLES? | NT general Archive 1 | Emmaus | 28300 | ||
djconklin We are in agreement. The argument for the early dating of Matthew, pre 70 A.D. and the destruction of the Temple, also supports the tradition of the ordering of the Gospels with Matthew before Mark, which goes against the popular opinion of many biblical scholars of the past 100 years who have been influenced by the thought of historical criticism method which has obvious weaknesses in some areas that are now being made very clear. Emmaus |
||||||
4 | WHO WROTE THE GOSPLES? THE APOSLES? | NT general Archive 1 | djconklin | 28303 | ||
You are quite right. Isn't it amazing how professional scholars can be lead to believe a theory instead of looking at all of the available facts? And then people on the side-lines, so to speak, accuse you of being a "lone ranger" if you dare question what the pro's have said! | ||||||