Results 1 - 2 of 2
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | should red sea be reed sea instead ? | Bible general Archive 1 | 4 hope | 42262 | ||
in exodus 13:17 the bible speaks of the red sea I heard it said that was a miss translation, it should have been the reed sea which was alot less deep, in terms of depth of water. is this true ?. 4hope. | ||||||
2 | should red sea be reed sea instead ? | Bible general Archive 1 | DoggieGrace | 43562 | ||
Would it matter? If it wasn't as deep, then the miracle is that God still drowned all those Egyptians in it! There is always someone wanting to discount the Word of God. I know it is the Red Sea, but regardless, God delivered the Israelites by parting the sea and drowning their enemies. 4hope - email me sometime - I read your member profile and think we could enjoy chatting about the Lord. I manage a few Christian communities on the website. I know you are a busy lady, but you could come in and visit with us in the communities anytime! Email me if you would like to know more! DoggieGrace@msn.com |
||||||