Results 1 - 5 of 5
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Woman in pants | Deut 22:5 | KcabmI4 | 213658 | ||
When we are looking at the scripture. Deut.22:5 5- (The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man,) (neither shall a man put on a woman's garment:) for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God. When it is saying thes things that the (men and the woman) are not supposed to be doing because doing those things are an abomination to the Lord. We as Christians always are using this for a sign of homosexual behaviour. But a thing Iam just thinking about. Why do WE in our Christian society accept woman wearing pants? Even to be wearing when they will be going to Church? So my question is for the people of the forum. The men of the forum. Do your wives wear dresses all the time? The women of the forum. Do you wear dresses all the time? Iam courious because of the example we say we are always to show the world. Are we setting a standard for the world to emulate? Or a double standard for the world to ridicule? Blessings to all KcabmI4 |
||||||
2 | Woman in pants | Deut 22:5 | Beja | 213659 | ||
Do you really think that in our current culture pants is a "man only attire" in the same way a dress is "women only?" The reason it is alright for women to wear pants is that its no more a "man only" article of clothing than shoes are, at least in our current culture. Women in pants is not cross dressing. Perhaps where you live its different. In Love, Beja |
||||||
3 | Woman in pants | Deut 22:5 | KcabmI4 | 213686 | ||
... | ||||||
4 | Woman in pants | Deut 22:5 | Beja | 213689 | ||
Kcabm14, I hardly know where to begin, though I'm certain where to end. First let me point out the root of your error in this specific instance. You first are reading into the scripture. Deuteronomy 22:5 says specifically this, "A woman shall not wear man's clothing, nor shall a man put on a woman's clothing; for whoever does these things is an abomination to the LORD your God." Now, that is exactly what it says. Where in that do you see pants mentioned? Nowhere. Nor does it go on to clarify what those clothing articles might be. It leaves it completely blank. All we know with certainty is that a woman's clothing is off limits for a man, and a man's clothing is off limits for a woman. Nowhere does it identify any single article as specific to either a man or woman such as pants. So where shall we determine that from? It is specific to the culture to where the gospel travels. In this case the norm for society (within reason) determines what clothing is gender specific. You are bringing the presuposition that pants are male only. This presuposition is wrong even though it may have been true a century ago. Why does a Christian not have an obligation to cling to the standards of a century ago? Because it is purely incidental to morality. Nudity and lust are not incidental, but things such as pants, the color pink, are incidental. To go from this to the accusation that the church should let society establish its morality is absolutely rediculous and to suggest that I am making that suggestion from this arguement shows a shameful lack in reluctance to judge another man's servant. I'm not angry in the least at your suggesting this, my sterness in writing this is that I see in you this passage: "remain on at Ephesus so that you may instruct certain men not to teach strange doctrines, nor to pay attention to myths and endless genealogies, which give rise to mere speculation rather than furthering the administration of God which is by faith. But the goal of our instruction is love from a pure heart and a good conscience and a sincere faith. For some men, straying from these things, have turned aside to fruitless discussion, wanting to be teachers of the Law, even though they do not understand either what they are saying or the matters about which they make confident assertions." 1 Tim 1:3-7 I hold no animosity towards you, I have no anger or frustration towards you, but you really need to turn from such speculative, unedifying issues. In Love, Beja |
||||||
5 | Woman in pants | Deut 22:5 | DocTrinsograce | 213691 | ||
Dear Beja, Well said. As with much of the Word, the import is not mysterious. Even in our mixed-up society, we understand when a man is wearing clothing intended for a woman, or a woman is wearing clothing intended for a man. It is pretty clear that when this arises out of a "cross-dressing" intent, we have deviant behavior forbidden by Scripture. My wife wears pants frequently, but they are pants designed for women. Thank you for helping kcabm14 -- whichever kcabm14 that's interacting with us today -- derive a more sound exegesis of the passage. In Him, Doc |
||||||