Results 1 - 4 of 4
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Present tense | Col 2:17 | djconklin | 28272 | ||
Note that whatever Paul is referring to as a shadow he says that they "are" and not "were" which is what would be required if these things ended at the Cross. | ||||||
2 | Present tense | Col 2:17 | stjones | 28389 | ||
Hi, drconklin; Mightn't it be true that Paul used the present tense because dietary laws, holy days and Sabbaths were a present reality and still observed by the Jews and promoted by the Judaizers? Those promoting adherence to the Law would not know or acknowledge that such requirements had been crucified with Christ. For them, not understanding that the Law was a mere shadow (i.e. Hebrews 5, 8-9), the rules would still be in effect and they would criticize Jesus' followers for not obeying them. Just my 2 percent of a dollar. Peace and grace, Steve aka Indiana Jones |
||||||
3 | Present tense | Col 2:17 | Makarios | 28407 | ||
Excellent post Steve, And I agree! :-) Blessings to you, Nolan |
||||||
4 | Present tense | Col 2:17 | stjones | 28417 | ||
Thanks, Nolan; Nice to know I'm back on track. ;-) Peace and grace, Steve aka Indiana Jones |
||||||