Results 1 - 5 of 5
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | 3 brothers descendants changed | Col 1:16 | lookinforacity | 205945 | ||
John: Scripture to back up a Theory would be greatly appreciated, isn't that what is supposed to be the point of the Forum? If a theory cannot be backed up with scripture, then it doesn't carry any more weight than, Darwin' s Theory. Just because someone might be a "Scholar" doesn't mean (THEY), can agree to put forth Theory's, Beliefs as though they were Truth, without something concrete to back them up (Scripture). That is called Dogma. How can we agree, that it was in Noah, and in his sons, if the Theory hasn't (BEEN) proven? All we can agree on, is that (IT IS A Theory). The language was confused, but it wasn't the language that spread across the world, it was the people that had, had their language confused, they did the spreading, thereby populating in areas that were theretofore unpopulated, banding together because of similar qualities, Language. (skin color, and racial features) My Theory. The important thing is that God did it. We don't know HOW, we don't know WHEN, but I tend Not to believe the Scholars. Jim |
||||||
2 | 3 brothers descendants changed | Col 1:16 | skccab | 205946 | ||
Shalom Jim, I see you don't follow what you're requiring of John? Where is your scripture that backs your "theory"? Cheri |
||||||
3 | 3 brothers descendants changed | Col 1:16 | lookinforacity | 205947 | ||
Hi skccab: Well that was a given, for those that have read the whole thread, between John and me. My statements have all been around, the confusing of the language of the Earth time period. But for those that don't know when that happened. Gen 11:1-9. GOD BLESS Jim |
||||||
4 | 3 brothers descendants changed | Col 1:16 | skccab | 205949 | ||
Jim, I'm aware of the scripture about the confusing of the languages but are you not talking about a genetic line outside of Adam's? It sure sounds like you are and I have not seen that backed up with scripture references. If you did so, please pardon me and would you give it again as I missed it? Cheri |
||||||
5 | 3 brothers descendants changed | Col 1:16 | lookinforacity | 205950 | ||
Hi skccab: The thread goes back to Val at 5:46 pm She wrote, QUOTE "I however, agree with their research that we all come from one man Adam who had the DNA for all the features we see in humankind". Everything I have said has been against that theory. All I did was to put up a more plausible Theory, on the grounds of everything I have stated. The whole point was to say, there isn't anything to back up your theory, as mine has at least the confusing of the languages , that might go along with that event, which makes more sense to me, rather than following some so called scholars, merely because they have a doctorate. I have not said, or intimated there is another line outside of Adam. I was saying (that) theory doesnt hold water, where mine might hold alot more, on the grounds of the posts. That was the reason for asking John for Scripture to back up the one in Vals post. Reread them carefully Jim |
||||||