Results 1 - 2 of 2
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | having sex if engaged biblical stance? | 1 Cor 6:16 | biblicalman | 228110 | ||
hi doc my point was the translation of a phrase in an old testament passage. The general consensus of the Rabbis may not lead to acceptable doctrine but it is very useful in deciding what Hebrew words mean to people who spoke Hebrew. i could have said in my view and according to my knowledge of Hebrew. but people might then have dismissed it. Jesus did not argue that the Scribes were wrong in their translation of the Hebrew. He said that Moses had spoken of divorce becos of the hardness of men's hearts. In fact both the Scribes and Beja misunderstood the real meaning of Deuteronomy 24. But that did not mean that the Scribes were incorrect in their translation. I agree completely that American dispensationalists who teach what you state are misinterpeting Scripture. I lay no emphasis on what the Rabbis teach, except as showing Jewish opinion. But I do respect their knowledge of Hebrew, even though they may sometimes fail to distinguish between their Hebrew and ancient Hebrew. May i suggest that you read what i actually wrote again |
||||||
2 | having sex if engaged biblical stance? | 1 Cor 6:16 | DocTrinsograce | 228112 | ||
Dear biblicalman, I promise to read it again, sir. Notwithstanding, my caution still stands. In seven years on the forum, one gets a sense of what will be "read into" the most casual of assertions. That sense comes from many responses. Which has persuaded me that those responses are quite probably representative of the many non-responders. (Drop me an email sometime if you would like to discuss it further -- besides which, I would like to buttonhole you about Baptists in the UK.) In Him, Doc |
||||||