Results 1 - 6 of 6
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Why did Paul do it? For conscience sake? | Acts 21:23 | stjohn | 218070 | ||
Sigh... Thats the sound I make, when someone falls under the -sour wine- spell of legalism. John 19:30; Matthew 27:51 So, are you saying it's posable that Christ's sacrifice, was not sufficient to put an end to the sacrificial system? Are you saying that would make sense? Why is it called a 'new' covenant, if the old is still in binding? It seems we can make our own sense of things, out of just about anything, if we want to. But why on earth, would we want to? John With all due respect. |
||||||
2 | Why did Paul do it? For conscience sake? | Acts 21:23 | MJH | 218077 | ||
Chist's sacrifice puts an end to the need for sin sacrifice in the world to come as Hebrews teachs. Again, my applogise to Doc and other offended by my psst, which was received in a manner not intended, but disrescpectful none the less as I ought to be more careful. MJH |
||||||
3 | Why did Paul do it? For conscience sake? | Acts 21:23 | stjohn | 218080 | ||
"Christ's sacrifice puts an end to the need for sin sacrifice in the world to come as Hebrews teaches." (sic) So are we to be sacrificing lambs? Since the "world to come" is obviously in future. Thence, if we are to be obeying the law -and not a jot or title is to be left out- how are the lambs doing in your neighborhood? :-) Sorry, MJH, I couldn't resist, you don't have to answer, and we really don't need to revisit this same old tired debate. Shalom John |
||||||
4 | Why did Paul do it? For conscience sake? | Acts 21:23 | MJH | 218081 | ||
Sorry about the miss spelled words. Forgot spell check :-( Lambs in the neighborhood are doing great. No Temple, not priesthood, not in the Land. We obey as much as we are able. I also couldn't resist. You don't have an answer either ;-) So, you did get my apologize right? That's important for me. I'd hate to start the 40 days without getting this error cleared up as much as I am able. MJH |
||||||
5 | Why did Paul do it? For conscience sake? | Acts 21:23 | stjohn | 218085 | ||
:-) No problem... friend. :-) No need to apologize in the first place, MJH, that's why I didn't acknowledge it, sorry for that. You say you do the best you can? But the word of God says that isn't good enough when it comes to the law. Gal 3:10-13 John p.s. If it weren't for spell check, I wouldn't have known. :-) |
||||||
6 | Why did Paul do it? For conscience sake? | Acts 21:23 | stjohn | 218088 | ||
note: So that there is no misunderstanding to all involved in this thread. When I said no need to apologize, I've meant from where I sit alone, and not at all speaking for others. I was not offended, seeing the levity intended, though not well thought through and sorely misplaced. But if there is some twinge of conscience, which is, indeed apparent, then I'd hope that the one offended would be the one confessed and apologized to, i.e. God. Psalm 51:4 Shalom John |
||||||