Results 1 - 3 of 3
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Dear Forum, can you verify my research? | John 1:1 | survivor | 134118 | ||
Read this carefully as it supports my understanding: James Moffatt: "'The Word was God...And the Word became flesh,' simply means "The word was divine...And the Word became human.' The Nicene faith, in the Chalcedon definition, was intended to conserve both of these truths against theories that failed to present Jesus as truly God and truly man..." Jesus Christ the Same (Abingdon-Cokesbury, 1945), p.61. The word was divine, not God. The Nicene creed tried to "preserve this truth against theories that failed to present Jesus as truly God and truly man." Follow the evolution of creeds and you'll see how this truth was later ignored. |
||||||
2 | Dear Forum, can you verify my research? | John 1:1 | Morant61 | 134126 | ||
Greetings Survivor! You clearly misunderstand Moffatt's point my friend. There is only one God. Anyone who has the same nature as God, by definition is God. And, Is. 43:10 is quite clear that there is no other god but Jehovah! Therefore, Jesus cannot be 'a god'. He must be Jehovah! Your Brother in Christ, Tim Moran |
||||||
3 | Dear Forum, can you verify my research? | John 1:1 | survivor | 134188 | ||
Tim: How can you say that "I" clearly misunderstand Moffat's point! I would like to see others weigh in on his statements. "Simply divine and became flesh." "The Nicene faith intended to conserve both of these truths against theories that failed to present Jesus as truly God." I believe you will need to remove this quote from your list in the future. |
||||||