Results 1 - 3 of 3
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Please help me to find this out for this | Luke 1:27 | Morant61 | 23506 | ||
Greetings Emmaus! You said in your post: "Matthew 13:55 is undone by Matt 28:1 and 27:55 and John 19:25 and Jude 1:1 which points out that James and Joseph and Jude, the "brothers of Jesus " are in fact cousins and the sons of another Mary." Yet, none of the verses you listed say that the brothers of Jesus were cousins, or that they were the sons of another Mary! This seems to be pure assumption of your part! Also, as Searcher56 pointed out, Mt. 1:25 clearly indicates that Joseph and Mary did have sexual relations after the birth of Jesus. The exact wording is, "He did not know her until she gave birth to a son!" The believe in the perpetual virginity of Mary simply isn't found in Scripture! Your Brother in Christ, Tim Moran |
||||||
2 | Please help me to find this out for this | Luke 1:27 | kalos | 23518 | ||
"Matthew 13:55 is undone by Matt 28:1 and 27:55 and John 19:25 and Jude 1:1?" Excuse me, but not one verse of Scripture is EVER undone by another verse. The Bible never ever contradcits itself. Hypothetically, it may be that the *interpretation* of Matt 13:55 is undone by other verses of Scripture. The interpretation of the verse -- but not the text of the verse itself. Since, not if, since all Scripture is inspired of God, then it is not possible that one Scripture contradicts or is undone by another Scripture. Is God inconsistent? Does He contradict Himself? Is he confused? I think not. |
||||||
3 | Please help me to find this out for this | Luke 1:27 | Morant61 | 23522 | ||
Greetings Kalos! I agree with you! I was simply quoting from Emmaus's post. The statement you refer to was his, not mine! :-) Your Brother in Christ, Tim Moran |
||||||