Results 1 - 2 of 2
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Uriah the Hittite in Christ's lineage? | Matt 1:6 | EdB | 243022 | ||
I have always assumed Uriah was a proselyte, a man that had met David and became a close friend and fellow warrior. As such he would have no claim to the promised land and there would not be considered in the requirement to have an inheritance redeemer to provide an heir to possess his part of the promised land. However if that is right or wrong, the fact remains the Matt 1 was written to show the succession of Kings from David to Jesus. Uriah's bloodline plays no part and is of no effect. Because of this I don't understand Brent insistance that Solomon was the product of the inheritance redeemer law. We know David named Solomon The son he fathered by Bathsheba, king thus the kingly succession is complete just as God had promised |
||||||
2 | Uriah the Hittite in Christ's lineage? | Matt 1:6 | DocTrinsograce | 243026 | ||
Sounds right to me, Ed. Sorry for jumping in. | ||||||