Results 1 - 2 of 2
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Genesis 3:14 | Gen 3:14 | DUDUTJ | 210728 | ||
But it is not necessary to suppose that the snake stood upright like a man, justa because we use the term "legs", but rather that it was like a reptile. And although some critics speak agaisnt the Bible in this issue, like myth, science shows that it is quite possible: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7339508.stm This, actually, would prova Bible account. Dont you think so? |
||||||
2 | Genesis 3:14 | Gen 3:14 | srbaegon | 210730 | ||
No, it is not necessary to suppose standing upright. I was simply giving the full quote in its context. I do not think the article proves the Bible account. There is nothing in Genesis 3 that would cause us to think there could not have been a member of the snake family with leg appendages--working or not. Steve |
||||||
Up | | |||
Questions and/or Subjects for Gen 3:14 | Author | ||
|
godsown_76 | ||
|
DUDUTJ | ||
|
srbaegon | ||
|
DUDUTJ | ||
|
srbaegon |