Results 1 - 3 of 3
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Mark of the Beast | Bible general Archive 3 | DocTrinsograce | 167304 | ||
Dear Brother Mark, No, the questions are really the same. I apologize for the confusion. Since it was penned, Revelation has been called apocalyptic from the first word of the book -- from which it gets its title -- apokalupsis. Nevertheless, if it helps to "unload" my question, let me rephrase: "On what hermeneutical principle of Biblical exegesis does one switch back and forth from literal interpretation to figurative interpretation?" This avoids the question of genre entirely. If need be, reintroduce a genre categorization as you see fit. If the "text gives no foundation to believe anything other," then it should be possible to articulate the corresponding principle. I don't mean to put you on the spot. We need sound foundational reasons to ground our every emphatic exegetical statement. Furthermore, if I'm missing a principle of this kind of power, I'd like to be able to apply it to the rest of Revelation. (Indeed, after stating it, it would be helpful to me to demonstrate the principle on the other elements of the chapter.) Thank you for taking the time to respond. In Him, Doc |
||||||
2 | Mark of the Beast | Bible general Archive 3 | mark d seyler | 167344 | ||
Hi Doc, Thank you for the clarification. Indeed, the Revelation is the true apocalypse. The problem is, "apocalyptic" has been hijacked to define literature which is not Biblical, through no fault of yours! :-) The simple answer to your question is this: The hermenuetical principle of Biblical exegesis one uses to distinguish between literal interpretation and figurative interpretation is to only treat as figurative that which is specifically presented as figurative, and that which is presented as literal, treat as literal. To this I would addd that we must define symbols and terminology only by those definitions that are given in Scripture. Also, we should only take time related cues strictly from the text, and not rearrange events just because that seems to make more sense to us. Also, we need to combine the study of the Revelation with a thorough study of the Bible itself, as many details are explained and elaborated upon by other passages. In a nutshell, Scripture interprets Scripture, just like with any other book of the Bible. I don't have the time right now to add an example, but I will post something later this week that will show you how I understand this chapter. Thank you for your patience. Love in Christ, Mark |
||||||
3 | Mark of the Beast | Bible general Archive 3 | DocTrinsograce | 167351 | ||
Dear Brother Mark, Thank you for taking the time here for me. While you're preparing that analysis, I'll see if I can apply these principles directly in my own study. At first blush, they sound reasonable. Yours is the patience that is appreciated! In Him, Doc |
||||||