Results 1 - 4 of 4
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | MARK 16:16: Was it perverted? | Bible general Archive 2 | Aspiring Overseer | 101835 | ||
Tim, 1 Peter 3:21 21And corresponding to that, baptism now saves you NAS According to your "lowest common denominator" theory you must certainly believe that water baptism saves you, the original subject of this thread. If not, it seems we must rethink the validity of your theory. AO |
||||||
2 | MARK 16:16: Was it perverted? | Bible general Archive 2 | Radioman2 | 101912 | ||
It always amazes me, and sometimes amuses me, when people strongly disagree with an interpretation, yet offer no alternate interpretation. Likewise, when you reject the Lowest Common Denominator principle of interpretation, I wonder what you have to offer as an alternative. What, if any, principles of translation do you apply? --Radioman2 |
||||||
3 | MARK 16:16: Was it perverted? | Bible general Archive 2 | Aspiring Overseer | 101915 | ||
Radioman, Reason, not emotion, is always the best principle. Isa 1:18 18"Come now, and let us reason together," Says the LORD, "Though your sins are as scarlet, They will be as white as snow; Though they are red like crimson, They will be like wool NAS P.S. Is this thread amazing or amusing you? AO |
||||||
4 | MARK 16:16: Was it perverted? | Bible general Archive 2 | Radioman2 | 101921 | ||
You write: "Reason, not emotion, is always the best principle." I ask: Could you be a little more specific? --Radioman2 |
||||||