Results 1 - 5 of 5
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | satan in the Passion movie | Bible general Archive 2 | CDBJ | 117336 | ||
All I can say is that the epitome of evil was reflected in that scene and Satan likely has his own counter fit system of the trinity; we are left to draw our own conclusions. Did you notice the tear drop from heaven in the section close to the end? CDBJ |
||||||
2 | satan in the Passion movie | Bible general Archive 2 | inzax | 117340 | ||
I think the child satan was holding was an intended taunt of Mary and Jesus, at least that is what I understand. | ||||||
3 | satan in the Passion movie | Bible general Archive 2 | CDBJ | 117349 | ||
It's like I suggested, the scene was open to personal interpretation seeing that it wasn’t scriptural in it's essence, but it conveyed a thought; the presence of evil. Have you come to the place yet where you have place your confidence in the work that Christ did on the cross, that was so explicitly portrayed in the movie? I don’t see any evidence suggesting such in your personal profile? The whole movie was very moving, to say the least, CDBJ |
||||||
4 | satan in the Passion movie | Bible general Archive 2 | inzax | 117392 | ||
I really believe most peolple would not spend 30 million on your ininterpretation of their movie(emphasis on their)it was Gibson's view of satan plain and simple. | ||||||
5 | satan in the Passion movie | Bible general Archive 2 | CDBJ | 117428 | ||
Hello enzax, Since you didn’t like my version, “ the scene was open to personal interpretation seeing that it wasn’t scriptural in it's essence, but it conveyed a thought; the presence of evil.” You suggested the following, which is the same thing I said, or am I missing something??? “it was Gibson's view of satan plain and simple.” I said that it wasn’t scriptural, are you saying otherwise, chapter and verse please. What gives, CDBJ |
||||||