Results 1 - 2 of 2
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Serious study on this passage | 1 Tim 3:2 | teragram123 | 55916 | ||
Since Paul was the writer of both the passage in question as well as this on... 1 Tim. 5:9 Let not a widow be taken into the number under threescore years old, having been the wife of one man, 10 Well reported of for good works; if she have brought up children, if she have lodged strangers, if she have washed the saints' feet, if she have relieved the afflicted, if she have diligently followed every good work. Why did Paul say so clearly what was meant for the widow? having been the wife of one man. Yet when it came to naming the qualifications for the leadership of the church he all of sudden is short on words. I find it hard to believe that he would not have said, “being the husband of one women at a time”, if indeed that was what he really meant. Adultery was the warning here... not polygamy. Where in Scripture does Paul spend energy writing to the Church concerning “multiple wives”... polygamy? But many times he touched on the problem of unfaithfulness and immorality. The word of God is clear to the pure in heart. But when we do not like what we are reading, or are not comfortable with it for our lives, it is tempting to wrestle the Scriptures to fit our situation rather that change our situation to fit the scriptures. It still remains true that at a village smith shop, many hammers have been worn out but the anvil still stands. 2 Peter 3:16 As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction. |
||||||
2 | Serious study on this passage | 1 Tim 3:2 | Raul Goulden | 57357 | ||
You said- "I find it hard to believe that he would not have said, 'being the husband of one women at a time,' if indeed that was what he really meant." I reply- The phrase is a peculiar one, but the Greek language had readily available words to express "married only once," for which Paul clearly chose NOT to use. His decision not to use the readily available terms to express "married only once" is strong evidence that that is NOT what he meant. You said- "Adultery was the warning here... not polygamy. Where in Scripture does Paul spend energy writing to the Church concerning 'multiple wives'... polygamy? But many times he touched on the problem of unfaithfulness and immorality." I reply- Yes, I believe the peculiar phrasing is best understood in light of all the Scriptures teaching, and that it is a call to faithfulness in marriage and chastity in singleness. Raul Goulden "We reject ...subjective morality as articulated through WWJD T-Shirts, and embrace the objective and clear revelation of God's will for man." -Andy G 3-29-02 |
||||||