Bible Question (short): i dont get your point please write far m |
Question (full): my point for point questioning resumes below: he was speaking... rationally true, in many areas but then it was to them (thee), even then if it was so clear why was Chri.st rejected when he was born and grew up as he was and did not us (you, ye, kjv) the world has changed drastically over 2000 years agriculture, fishing etc are not dominant in the first world there were points and even whole chapters where God, it appears, speaks irrationally, in figures of speech to us. eg Job, out of the thunder, Ezekiel 1,-secular critics of Ezekiel 1 say he may have been an extremely deranged schizo to experience all that, to St. Peter with the living creatures vision and SIGN to go mix with the Gentiles and eventually be rebuked by St.Paul for his stumbling sin in this. 2 true, there is only one PRIMARY interpretation, but there is INFINITUDE of overtones as to what the unbelievers and less faithful are misled to think. From here we can VERY LOGICALLY speculate accurately or at least as a discipline, in incrementally-progressively greater achievements of accuracy of prediction of unfolding world history and future details and other phenomena over time. eg Isaac Newton, Galileo, widely and deeply Bible conscious antiCs are eg da Vinci, Einstein Revd. Dake, in Gods Plan for Man, a book, quoted sb. eminent in declaring the Bible to be the best library for philosophy i have found Ecclesiastes alone to be the best Philosophy-Prophecy manual luke 24:27 can be interpreted in my allegoric way too. consider Isaiah, Psalms 1-10 im not clear what exegesis is. one pastor i know says it means dissecting and dissecting to derive meaning that not everybody can apprehend (Assembly of God, Asia). my Bible-Presbyterian pastor says the key reason for my imaginative errant interpretations is my absence of knowledge in this area thanks for your prompt help, sorry for not responding sooner, this hopefully is an interim answer embodying my reservations as to the efficaciousness of literalism whatever it really does. i feel it robs analytical-minded seekers of parallel truth reservoirs of the chance to find Christ out satisfyingly i will look at #15-- and #17-- in your last answer later when i have more time and less tired, thanks i have 2 serious medical conditions, asthma, incurable being one of them and i need to build stamina over at least 7 hours to concentrate without disruption. i am glad you understand |