Bible Question:
IS YOUR MODERN TRANSLATION CORRUPT? Answering the Allegations of KJV Only Advocates by James R. White 'Summary 'King James Version Only advocates argue that all modern translations of the New Testament are based on Greek manuscripts that contain intentional doctrinal corruptions. However, an examination of the most important manuscripts underlying these translations demonstrates that such charges are based more upon prejudice than fact. The papyri finds of the last century, together with the great uncial texts from the fourth and fifth centuries A.D., do not deprecate the deity of Christ, the Trinity, or salvation by grace through faith. Modern translations, such as the NIV and NASB, are not "corrupt" but instead trustworthy and useful translations of the Word of God. (...) 'The importance of the topic should not be underestimated. While the vast majority of conservative Christian scholars completely reject the KJV Only position, the emotionally charged rhetoric of KJV Only advocates causes unnecessary concerns among many believers. It is a sad truth that most Christians have only a vague knowledge of the history of the Bible and almost no knowledge of the mechanisms by which the Bible has come to us today. Issues regarding the transmission of the text over time (the process of copying), the comparison of one written text to another (textual criticism), and translation are not popular topics of discussion or study in the church today. Therefore, the claims of KJV Only advocates are liable to deeply trouble many Christians, even to the point of causing them to question the reliability and usefulness of their NIV or NASB Bibles. When believers are wrongly led to doubt the integrity of the translation they have used for years, Christian scholars have a responsibility to set the record straight. 'Moreover, there is a real desire on the part of many to hold to the "old ways" — the "traditions" of the "good ol’ days" when things were so much better than they are today. Since many believers distrust anything connected with the term "modern," for them the KJV becomes an icon of what was "good" about the past, and modern translations end up representing everything that is wrong with today’s church. 'Is there any weight to the charges being made against the manuscripts used by modern translations? Should one distrust modern translations? Those are the questions we must answer.' ------------- To read this entire article, go to (www.equip.org/free/DK115.htm) IS YOUR MODERN TRANSLATION CORRUPT? Answering the Allegations of KJV Only Advocates Also recommended, James White's book: "The King James Only Controversy: Can You Trust The Modern Translations?" James R. White/Bethany House Publishers/1995 (Type: Trade Paperback) |
Bible Answer: 2 Tim.3:7 describes perfectly what I've been reading on this site since I loged on to it. So far I've seen a "Water Dog" trying to convince everyone that they need to go to Hell wet like he is going to.A Brother who has been brain washed wetter than the Water Dog on Jimmy Whites UNSCHOLLARLY book of lies.Guys that take 10 paragraphs full of phylosophy,hot air,and "the original greek" to explain something that should only take 1 paragraph and an old fashioned black backed 66 cal.AUTHORIZED King James Bible.But it's certainly true what the Bible says about Christians in the last days.And we are in sad shape as the body of Christ.I'll bet not more than one of you guys has ever got down on your face before God and told him you were stupid(which I've done)and NEEDED Him to give you understanding of the scriptures so you wouldnt be decieved.It worked for Solomon.I can testify that doing that helped me more than I can say.But most of you would rather trust your seminary teacher or your favorite author.P.S.-Stop tapping on your computer and go pass some tracts out on the street.Don't respond to me on this.Tell God what you think about what I said.I dare you. |