Prior Book | Prior Chapter | Prior Verse | Next Verse | Next Chapter | Next Book | Viewing NASB and Amplified 2015 | |
NASB | 1 Corinthians 14:5 Now I wish that you all spoke in tongues, but even more that you would prophesy; and greater is one who prophesies than one who speaks in tongues, unless he interprets, so that the church may receive edifying. |
AMPLIFIED 2015 | 1 Corinthians 14:5 Now I wish that all of you spoke in unknown tongues, but even more [I wish] that you would prophesy. The one who prophesies is greater [and more useful] than the one who speaks in tongues, unless he translates or explains [what he says], so that the church may be edified [instructed, improved, strengthened]. |
Subject: Why no prophets anymore? |
Bible Note: Hello Edb, Allow me to share my perspective on 2 points: 1. In all fairness, I can find 3 positions regarding the question as to whether God still speaks today: Continuationism- This view holds that miraculous sign gifts are still being given and, therefore, God still speaks directly in various ways today. Hard Cessationism- This view holds that miraculous gifts ceased with the death of the last apostle and the completion of the New Testament. Therefore God does not speak directly to people today. Soft Cessationism- This view holds that miraculous sign gifts could still be given today, but believers need to be careful about outright acceptance of people's claims of possession. I personally would be in the Soft-Cessationist camp. In saying so, I have modified my view from that of a Hard Cessationist over the years from study:-) While this is certainly an important issue and one that carries much emotional baggage, I don't feel it a test of fellowship. It's not a core doctrine of Historic Orthodoxy; 2. Regarding Doc's statement. I realize you find it objectionable, but I don't see any "violation of forum guidelines". While I also don't want to presume to speak for him, he is free to share his view regarding this matter. He did so. You are as well. You did so. I fail to see this as any violation, my friend. Sorry! Doc is not pressing this matter or carrying on with any bias, so beyond your objection to his view, what's the problem? I don't see one:-) May we simply agree to disagree agreeably on this point? Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |