Subject: Salvation Poll |
Bible Note: Azure Oh come on! You are correct in what you are saying about Wikipedia but be mindful most answers that are incorrect are challenged immediately and corrected. Also it would be my guess most definitions are mere lifts from a dictionary or something similar. Also if a response in Wikipedia is biased it is usually challenged and corrected. I’m not here to defend Wikipedia and since Fmp6954 didn’t give the Wikipedia definition other that saying theology is written by man I don’t see the point in beating the horse to death. I still fail to see what FMP6954 said that was so offensive. He quoted a man Richard Hooker who defined "theology" in English as "the science of things divine It is a scientific study by Men not inspired by God, theology is what humans say about the Bible so no more credibility then a commentary .” Fmp6954 opinion was then related to the philosophy of the Abecedarians which distain all human knowledge. He didn’t distain any thing he simply said theology like a commentary is man’s interpretation/opinion. It was added this would be contrary to Campbellites which I take to imply that FMP6954 was a Campbellite or why else would it have been mentioned? Next you come along and ask him is he is a Christian. I don’t believe many of us would have reacted differently. Fmp6954 has been associated with Abecedarians then labeled as being a Campbellite and now he is asked if he is a Christian. Stop think for a minute do you think that might be a tad inflammatory? Azure how would you react if I asked, “are you a Christian”. Not in a curiosity type environment but one better equated to an accusatory environment? |