Results 81 - 100 of 161
|
||||||
Results from: Answers On or After: Thu 12/31/70 Author: Tamara Brewington Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
81 | REV 11 The Temple stands yet destroyed | Rev 1:11 | Tamara Brewington | 204558 | ||
See Daniel 9 and look closely at verse 24-27, it says that Jerusalem will be rebuilt. Most commentators believe that the temple will be rebuitl at this time and the time is during the the times of distress in Revelation. See Daniel 11:31 where it says that forces from him will arise and desecrate the temple and set up the abomination of desolation. You can't have descration in a temple that does not exist, it has to be rebuit first. It has not rebuit yet and probably won't be rebuilt until the times of distress comes in Revelation times. John doesn't have to mention the temple being destroyed in 70 AD to write about it being rebuilt. As John pointed out to you he was to write down what he saw, not what we want to know. Another thing to factor in is that John would naturally assume that his readers knew that the temple had been destroyed and would not need to mention it. God Bless, Tamara |
||||||
82 | Destiny of Hinnom? | Jer 31:40 | Tamara Brewington | 204557 | ||
Dear Thomas, This appears to be saying that the Valley of Hinnom after being likened to hell will end up being changed. See Jeremiah 30:18 where it talks about the resotoration of Jacob. In that passage Jeremihah talks about restoring the place where Jacob dwells as rebuidling on the ruins. Your passage in Jeremiah 31:40 is directly saying that this place the Valley of Hinnom will be restored to a holy state. This relates I believe very well to what you have been studying, Revelation, because in chapter 20 you have Jesus coming back and setting up rule for the 1,000 years and this is when Jerusalem will get fully restored as a holy city functioning in a holy state and not before. God bless Tamara |
||||||
83 | Driven by eternity or love? | Ps 150:1 | Tamara Brewington | 204503 | ||
First and foremost if you are having trouble being driven by your love for Jesus try praising Him a lot. The love relationship will grow in proportion to how much time you spend praising Him for His mighty goodness to save a sinner like you. Start with gratefulness as your theme. What I mean about praising Him is take the time out to sing your heart out to Him (as well as get on your kness and pray praising Him). Sing an old song, sing a new song, sing with a good voice, a bad voice, while crying, or while happy, just keep on singing until the drops of sweat have you drenched and you are ready to drop. I guaruntee you you will find yourself in love with Jesus. Works every time. Here is one for you; Psalm 150 Praise the Lord! Praise God in His sanctuary; Praise Him in His mighty expanse. Praise Him for His mighty deeds; Praise Him according to His excellent greatness. Praise Him with trumpet sound; Praise Him with harp and lyre. Praise Him with timbrel and dancing; Praise Him with stringed instruments and pipe. Praise Him with loud cymbals; Praise Him with resounding cymbals. Let everything that has breath Praise the Lord! Go get some praise music, go get some hymn music, go get some old music, some new music. Make a project out of it, He is worth th eeffort. You can down load it you can go buy it, you may already have it make the effort to learn the songs and sing your heart out. Praise is an important part of your relationship with Jesus. You will find yourself feeling more love towards Him and you will start to really experience the love back in a myriad of ways. Don't wait for anyone to join you, this is personal. Worrying about your eternal security can be a real healthy thing, keeps you on track. Mathew 22:37 And He said to them, You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and all your soul and all your mind. This is the great and foremost commandment. The second is just like it, You shall love your neighbor as yourself. God Bless, hope this helps. Tamara |
||||||
84 | Confess to the person you have wronged? | 1 John 2:2 | Tamara Brewington | 204501 | ||
I found something close; James 5:16 Therefore, confess your sins to one another, and pray to one another so that you may be healed. I don't find anyting like the verse you are trying to find. I looked up every place the word confess appears and it is not in there. I don't believe the Bible teaches what you are asking though. The Bible teaches us to love one another, and to love our enemies. It teaches us to ask Jesus for forgiveness of sins, not other people we have wronged. Although that might be the right thing to do out of love it is not required. Here consider this; I John 2:1c if anyone sins we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous. There is a verse in the Gospels that says; Mathew 5:23,24 therefore if you are presenting your offering at the altar and there remember that your brother has something against you, leave your offering there before the altar and go; first be reconciled to your brother, and then come and present your offering. This verse says to go be reconciled to your brother. But it doesn't say specifically to go confess your sins to your brother, maybe to acknowledge them. Hope this helped. God Bless, Tamara |
||||||
85 | Embrace the truth and rejoice! | 2 Tim 2:15 | Tamara Brewington | 204470 | ||
I am not finding this verse you are looking for. I am sure you are paraphrasing it and some of the words might not be the same as in the Bible. I want you to try something new. I want you to try using the same tool I was just tyring to find your verse in. You have to be willing to do some foot work here yourself. None of us mind answering your questions, just keep asking them. Go to www.blueletterbible.com on the web and type in a phrase, or just one word and search diligently through all the verses in the Bible until you find what you are looking for. This takes time, but you will find it I can tell you you will. It is the same thing as trying to find it in the Concordance, it is the same amount of foot work, only quicker. God Bless, Tamara |
||||||
86 | Interpretative Schools? | Rev 1:1 | Tamara Brewington | 204468 | ||
The Two Preterist Views 1)The final judgments in Revelation are about Rome and Jerusalem and Jerusalem is Babylon the Great. This Preterist View does not explain why Jesus did not come, or why the two witnesses did not come, or why Abomination of Desolation did not come, or why the world wide destructions of the earth did not come, or why no one received a mark of the beast. The list can keep right on going. 2)The final judgments in Revelation are about the fall of the Roman Empire with Rome as the Great Babylon. The same problems exist with this view as the first one. The Two Historic Views 1)Revelation is a charted history of events, the past Revelation 1:19 – John speaks of the past the announcement of the vision in 1, John speaks of the present the message to the seven churches in 2and 3, John speaks of the future in 4-22. The only thing that remains is to see the events unfold because the Bible is the inerrant word of God. Those that have a problem with this view are concerned with where we now are in time because they are not sure when the future part begins in history. There is a simple answer to this, we now have wars and rumors of wars and that is all we can say for sure. 2)Revelation is history, but the message to the churches is figurative and applies to both John’s day and to continuing history as a message to church types. This view often identifies the Catholic Church as Babylon the Great with the first beast as a pope and the second beast as his false prophet. The problem with this view is that it will be impossible to know for certain what all the symbols mean until they happen. Some have already interpreted the symbols as having occurred. The Futurist View 1)Revelation from 4 on is about the future and is largely seen as dispensationalist as the final two divisions of God’s history with man. Some futurists believe the church will be raptured before the 7 year Great Tribulation, some do not. The judgments happen in sequence during the 7 years or are varying descriptions of the same events. Those who have a problem with any futurist view are concerned with whether or not the book has a practical application right now. They ignore what John says in Revelation 1:3 that whoever reads the book of Revelation will receive a blessing and that they should pay attention to what is written in it, which surely is giving instructions for an application as to continued perseverance in the faith and good conduct. The Two Idealist Views 1)Revelation is purely symbolic of the ongoing struggle between God and Satan and is about everything that has occurred and that will occur between them and the symbols don’t represent real historical events. The problem with this view is that it removes the possibility that Jesus will actually come back and conquer and rule the earth and reduces God’s sovereign involvement in history to the symbolic fight between good and evil. 2)Revelation is purely symbolic literature because Revelation defies a literal interpretation of what the author’s intent was to his audience, but can still as symbolic literature, adhere to the history of redemption. This allows for an application for today of the symbols found in Revelation as a heavenly perspective on earthly events. The problem with this view is that it minimizes the prophetic nature of the message by making it a be a reapplication of the message to uncertain events in the present or future without allowing for a literal interpretation of a past, a present or a future, as John declares it to be, and relegates the prophetic nature of the Revelation to mere symbolism. The Historical View With The Futurist View 1)The first historical view with the futurist view combined present a very good case for a reliable view that incorporates the apocalyptic language and the prophetic nature of Revelation and is a fifth rarely presented view. Revelation is an apocalypse containing material combining symbolic descriptuve language with prophecy. These two elements have to be considered in determing what John's intent in writing it was. We can't just say it is purely symbolic based on Revelation 1:19 because John says it is about the past, present, and future, which makes it historical. We can't say it is purely historical because John is prohecying so it has to also be about the future which had not happened yet, or has not happened yet. We can't say it is purely symbolic because it contains a message to a church in his day and because it is about the past, present, and future. But we can say that it is about history, the future and that it uses symbolic language to describe future acts of judgment and that it is prophetic. That is why I believe the fifth veiw is the correct one to hold. The Preterist view has too many errors to be true. God Bless, Tamara |
||||||
87 | What is the Gospel? | Mark | Tamara Brewington | 204459 | ||
Dear Brother Tim, I found something within the concept of what I was referrig Lookinforacity to about what the Gospel consists of. Mathew 4:23 Jesus was going throughout Galilee, teaching in their synagogues and proclaiming the gospel of the kingdom, and healing every kind of disease and every kind of sickness among the people. This concept of what the Gospel is comes from Isaiah 61:1, 2 where Isaiah says the good news is bringing the good news to the afflicted, sending to bind up the broken hearted, proclaim liberty to the captives and freedom to prisoners, proclaiming the favorable year of the Lord and this description of what the good news is gets repeated by Jesus as a fulfillment of prophechy in Luke 4:18-19. Jesus says again that the time has come as a fulfillment of prophecy that the kingdom has come and to repent and in believe in the good news, referring to the fulfillment of prophecy that the kingdom has come. Mark 1:15 and saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand; repent and believe in the gospel. I found something interesting in the OT; Isaiah 52:7 How lovely on the mountains are the feet of him who brings good news of happiness, who announces salvation, and says to Zion, your God reigns! According to this verse Isaiah is saying that the good news of happiness is the announcement of salvation and saying that God reigns. What is the most interesting part of what Isaiah says though is that the good news is the news of happiness because of the announcement of salvation. This is clearly the Bible saying that salvation is the Gospel message. Now, let's turn to the matter of what the disciples were preaching as the content of the gospel message and how that contrasts with the content of what Jesus preached. We will be able to conclude that both messages were preaching salvation through Jesus Christ, just in different ways. Acts 13:32 Now, Paul says a couple of things here; 1) Jesus was raised up by God to be His Son, meaning Jesus is God (the kingdom is at hand)as a fulfillment of prophecy, 2)God raised Jesus from the dead, part of the new message the apostles began preaching after Jesus rose, 3)unlike David who died Jesus inherited His eternal throne,4)the forgiveness of sins through Jesus continued to be a part of the Gospel message. Acts 2:22-36 Peter's first preaching echoes the elements of Paul's preaching in Acts 13. In verse 23 Peter mentions the predetermined plan and foreknowledgd of God which indicates that God raised Jesus up according to a plan to be curcified. Verse 24 speaks about God raising Jesus from the dead death being impossible to hold Him in its power. Verse 29-35 speaks of David dying and Jesus having conquered death being the heir to the throne next to God in heaven and implies co-rulership of God's kingdom. The elements are the same 4 elements Paul used. Acts 10:34-48 Peter takes elements from Jesus ministry that the sick were healed and the captives freed which was an old element, the crucifixion of Jesus and His raising from the dead which was a new element, and the forgiveness of sins through Jesus which was an old element. Acts 4:2 Peter and John preached the resurrection of Jesus. I Corinthians 1:23 Paul preached Christ crucufied as the salvation message a new element. II Corinthians 4:5 Paul preached Jesus as Lord an old element. Romans 1:26 Paul says that the Gospel is the power of God for salvation an old element. Ephesians 1:16 Paul says that the Gosel is the message of truth of salvation. Ephesians 6:15 Paul says the Gospel is peace meaning peace between God and man. The over all understanding we can take away from all this is that the Bible says specifically that the Gospel is the message of salvation. It was first preached in the OT at various times by various men in several ways (too long to get into here and now). Then it was preached a second way by Jesus as the kingdom of God is at hand meaning Jesus is God with all the attendant signs, the repentance of sins through Jesus, and believing that Jesus is God. Then it was preached a third way through the apostles as mainly although with varying elements; Jesus is the Son of God, Jesus was raised from the dead by God, Jesus did not undergo decay like David but was raised from the dead and rules on His throne eternally, men must repent of their sins through Jesus. I hope I answered the question right, please correct me if I didn't. God bless Tamara |
||||||
88 | Salvation message of Jesus | Mark | Tamara Brewington | 204443 | ||
Dear Lookinforacity, The Content of the Gospel as a title over the verse and verses that go with it below, inadvertantly got left out when I posted you last where it says; Romans 1:3 etc. as a second set of verses ending with Acts 17:3, as a paragraph under the mandate to preach the gosel. Tamara |
||||||
89 | Jesus meant what in Matt 10:23 16:28 | Bible general Archive 4 | Tamara Brewington | 204442 | ||
Hello RC, I am going to answer this since no one else did (now don't anybody go getting ruffled out there the scriptures were never addressed). Your question; What did Jesus mean in Mathew 10:23 16:28, 26:64. please no Theology just plain and simple literal interpretation. There is no such thing as answer to this that will not require a bit of theology, it just is not possible to get a literal interpretation without examinig the grammar and the contexts. But I will try to minimize it all for you if I can (no insult intended). Mathew 10:23 is Jesus talking about the disciples undergoing persecution and that they won't be able to finish preahing the gospel until His return. Without getting too theological it becomes clear that this cannot be referring to Jesus coming back after the resurrection because they had not gone out to all the regions yet. It can't be referring to the fall of Jerusalem in 70 AD becuase Jesus didn't show up again. It is most likely referring to when Jesus will make His second appearance or even third appearance because the disciples never finished preaching to all the cities in Israel and we haven't finished now either. I say even third coming becuase you have to figure in the 144,000 who will do the last work of preaching to every nation and region and they will be bringing in Jews who will have fled to Israel before the Abomination of Desolation occurs in the new temple at Jerusalem. Do you see, now, Doc's apparent frustration at your request for no theology, but just a literal interpretation? The theology is impossible to avoid here because a literal interpretation can't be garnered without a bit of work on what the grammar is saying in context with future history from then and now. Mathew 16:28 This is Jesus talking about the disciples seeing Jesus in his royal majesty (talk about theology, you have to check the Greek grammar on this to see it) with power and that they would see this phenomena before they died natural deaths. This is referring to when the disciples saw Jesus at the transfiguration exhibiting His majesty and power while He was talking to two of His royal subjects, Moses and Elijah (see the Markan version for this and check the Greek grammar in 9:1, no pun intended, do you see how you can't avoid some theology with this thing?). Mathew 26:64 Jesus is talking to the Sanhedrin and they ask whether He is the Son of God and He is telling them that after they are done with their doings concerning Him the next time they will see Him is when He returns and makes His third appearing when every eye will see the one whom they have pierced. God Bless, hope that answers it, Tamara |
||||||
90 | Similar verses? | Rev 10:1 | Tamara Brewington | 204438 | ||
Dear Thomas 8, Not all of them are not connected, some of them are. Revelation 10:1 I saw a mighty angel coming down out of the sky, clothed with a cloud. A rainbow as the appearance of the bow that is in the cloud was on his head. His face was like the sun and his feet like pillars of fire. This is talking about a mighty angel. Ezekiel 1:28a KJVR - This is a picture of Jesus as God on the throne in heaven not an angel. Rev 1:16 Jesus face like the sun - Jesus is God not an angel. Dan 10:6 His body also was like the beryl, and his face as the appearance of lightning, and his eyes as lamps of fire, and his arms and his feet like in color to polished brass, and the voice of his words like the voice of a multitude. This is seen by most commentators as being Christ and not the angel Michael. Revelation2:18 And unto the angel of the church in Thyatira write; These things saith the Son of God, who hath his eyes like unto a flame of fire, and his feet are like fine brass. This is describing Jesus. There are several times where Revelation will say and they another angel, this always means a next separate angel. There are several times where Revelaiton will say a mighty angel who are given descriptions similar to those given to Jesus in some way or other, but it means an angel and not Jesus. There are several times in the OT where Jesus is described as having a raingbow around Him and this has no connection to where angels have something similar described of them in Revelation. These kinds of descriptions of both Jesus and angels is talking about some sort of glory they possess as angels also have states of glory that they are in which can be seen with the naked eye according the account of John in Revelation and Daniel and Ezekiel in the OT. |
||||||
91 | False Prophet? | Rev 20:10 | Tamara Brewington | 204436 | ||
Ok Here goes Thomas 8, 1)We have in Daniel the another description that can be found in the Bible of the Abomination of Desolation in Daniel 9:26-27, 11:30,31, 12:11. 2)The False Prophet in Revelation 13:11-15 is described as speaking like Satan, excersing the same authority as the Anti-Christ to make people worship the Anti-Christ. The False Prophet performs great signs making fire come out of heaven to decieve men and then down in verses 14 and 15 he makes an image of the Anti-Christ and makes it speak for real. This said to be the Abmoniation of Desolation found in Daniel according to some commentators. 3)Jesus speaks of the Abomination of Desolation in Mathew 24:15. 4)The False Prophet is specifcially mentioned in Revelation 13:11-14, 16:13, 19:20. Daniel is talking about the same things as Revelation in Daniel chapter 8. See Daniel 8:9-11 some commentators see this as the Ant-Christ and some see this as the False Prophet. 5)There are no direct references to the False Prophet in the OT. Only allussions that could be attributable to him. His deeds that can be tied into what Revelation directly tells us about him. We can't know for sure whether Daniel meant the Ant-Christ or the False Prophet. 6)Verses from the OT about false prophets; Deuteronomy 18:20-22,13:1-5, Isaiah 8:20, Jeremiah 14:14-16. 7)Verses from the NT about false prophets; Mathew 7:15-23, Mathew 24:11,24,II Peter 2:1-3, Mark 13:22, II Corinthians 11:3,4,13-15, I John 4:1-3. Consider these passages which allude to those who are false prophets; II Timothy 3:1-9, I Timothy 1:3-4, II Thessalonians 2:2-12, II John 1:7-11, I John 2:18-19, I Timothy 1:19,20, II Timothy 2:17,18. 8)Make a mental note of Mathew 7:21-23. All over the place in the NT where there are scriptures alluding to people who ostensibly did the works of Christ in one way or another, but failed to live the life that Christ proscribes have made a false confesion of Christ. The Bible has two different names for such people, Apostates who first adhered to the faith but have left the faith and False Prophets who either made a false profession of faith or who made true (see Deuteronomy 13:1-5) or false prophesies in order to get people to follow another god. I couldn't find anything else but there is probably more in there. God Bless, Tamara |
||||||
92 | Disobedience to God - Why? | Num 20:11 | Tamara Brewington | 204357 | ||
The exact answer is becuase God told Moses in verse 8 to speak to the rock, not strike the rock. In verses 9-12 Moses is angry calling Israel rebels and in anger strikes the rock twice instead of speaking to the rock to get the water for a complaining Israel. God tells Moses because you did not believe Me to treat Me holy (speak to the rock, not strike) you will not bring the assembly into the land I am giving them. God Bless, Tamara |
||||||
93 | Carpenter or rabbi? | Matthew | Tamara Brewington | 204356 | ||
Go to www.blueletterbible.com and use the search engine by typing in the word carpenter and then the word Rabbi. It will take you to every place that those words appears in the Bible. At the bottom of the search page will be blocks of verses that the word also occurs in. God Bless, Tamara |
||||||
94 | Carpenter or rabbi? | Matthew | Tamara Brewington | 204354 | ||
Go to www.bible.com and use the search engine by typing in the word carpenter and then the word Rabbi. It will take you to every place that those words appears in the Bible. At the bottom of the search page will be blocks of verses that the word also occurs in. God Bless, Tamara |
||||||
95 | Four reasons Jesus was baptized? | Bible general Archive 4 | Tamara Brewington | 204337 | ||
I love this sort of thing keep doing it. How about 5 reasons instead... 1)To fulfill righteousness - Mathew 3:15 2)To please the Father - Mark 1:11 3)To recieve the Holy Spirit - Luke 3:22 4)To be revealed to be the Son of God - John 1:34 5)To have the power to baptize with the Holy Spirit - John 1:33 God Bless the hat lady |
||||||
96 | Why can't I speak in tongues yet ? | Acts | Tamara Brewington | 204272 | ||
I just saw that you are completely new, welcome to the forum! Trick, once your question had been answered go back to the primary page, click on your answered question and scroll to the very bottom of the page. There you will see all the people who picked up what is called the thread who did not chose to answer you, but answered each other about their notes to your posted questions. You may be surprised once in a while what you find out in this manner. It can be enlightening in more ways than one. Once you are there, click on each user name and it will take you to their personal profile which has been left there in order for you to know a little bit about them. You may need to go in and click on your own name in a question you have posted and and fill in your personal profile so people will know a little bit about you too. Be sure when you click on someones name to click on to their stats up to the right and go into where it says questions asked, or notes answered, etc. This will give you an excellent idea what they are doing in here, what they believe, a little about what they are about. When you want to comment on anything you see any where, in a thread, in a note, in a posted question be sure to select note, the person whose name you see will get your note. Hardly anyone was willing to school me I had to learn the hard way. God Bless, Tamara |
||||||
97 | Why can't I speak in tongues yet ? | Acts | Tamara Brewington | 204270 | ||
The first group of people the Holy Spirit fell on at Pentecost in Acts 2 on the Jews gathered at Jerusalem who were disciples of Jesus and they were speaking in other languages to other Jews the great deeds of God. In the end of the chapter a great many of these Jew from other countries believed after Peter the apostle preached to them and they were baptized and they also recieved the Holy Spirit. That is the fist group to be included in the church. Then the second group of people the Holy Spirit fell on was in Acts 10:34-48 Peter goes to Cornelius a Gentile and he and all of his household heard the gospel and even before they got baptized in the Holy Spirit fell on them, they spoke in tongues and then they got baptized. The third group of people who got brought in were the Samaritans in Acts 8:4-18 who received the Holy Spirit after believing in the gospel and being baptized. The fourth group of people that got brought in whom the Holy Spirit fell on where those who had the baptism of John and once Paul had them baptized the Holy Spirit fell on them and they spoke in tonuges. So there was a reason people were having the Holy Spirit fall on them in this way and in some instances speaking in tongues. God was brining the four major groups into the church. After these groups; the Jews to whom the promises belonged, the Samaritans who worshipped the right God the wrong way, all the pagans the Gentiles, and those who had received the repentance and baptism of John were brought into the church, you don't find the Holy Spirit falling on people in the Bible making them speak in tongues quite like you do in Acts. In Acts people had tongues of fire fall on them and they spoke in real languages as evidence that the Holy Spirit had included a group. In I Corinthians it says in 12:4-7 Now there are varieties of gifts, but the same Spirit. And there are varieties of ministries, and the same Lord. There are varieties of effects, but the same God who works all things in all persons. But to each one is given the manifestation of the Spirit for the common good. Speaking in tongues is not the only evidence, nor does it have to be the first evidence that the Holy Spirit is working. What if God did not give you the gift of tongues? What if He gave you a different gift? You can tary till the cows come home, but you can't decide for God which gift He will give to you. Your words may be limited for a reason, you may have been a different gift! Read Romans 12:1-8 and you will see that once you present your body as a living sacrifice it becomes possible through the renewing of your mind to prove what the will of God is... You can know with certainty what your gift realy is over time by doing this. Read on through verses 3-8 about the gifts being exersised. It takes time to discover what your gift is don't rush God and decide what it should be. God Bless, Tamara |
||||||
98 | Why are they future. | Rev 17:10 | Tamara Brewington | 204207 | ||
Is this in response to something? Or is this an original question? The verse is there for us to see what you are looking at to base your question on, but what do you mean by, "they are out of the future, when none of the others are', is not clear. Did you mean that now in the present the five kings have fallen, as if somehow any part of Revelation has happened yet? Or did you mean that it is not possible for the five kings to have fallen in the future when Revelation will come to pass as the text says before the one that is there functioning and the one that will come because of something else you see in another passage of Revelation? If it is the first case, then the answer would be none of Revelation has happened yet except chapters 2,3, only wars and rumors... If it is the second case then could you please be mnore specific about where else in Revelation you are seeing that, none of the the others are out of the future? This is why we are supposed to not use brevity, so others can see the total context of the question in order to try to answer it. But of course this may have been a note to someone, in which case remember to choose note so that it doesn't appear as a post. God, Bless, Tamara |
||||||
99 | Define wine, please? | Rev 17:2 | Tamara Brewington | 204175 | ||
Dear Thomas, 1)The word wine as in intoxicated is used consistently as #3631 in the NT as the only word listed. 2)Contrary to modern belief the wine at the Lord's supper was not watered down, see how in I Corinthians 11 they were getting drunk at the Lord' supper? 3)When Jesus changed the water to wine it wasn't watered down and we can assume He was drinking it along with the guests. 4)At the Last supper Jesus and the disciples were drinking real wine, not watered down wine. 5)At that time in history the water was largely no good and while it is true that sometimes wine was watered down to ensure that the water was cleansed and drinkable real wine was common at the supper table unwatered down for everyone. 6)There may be a term in Koine Greek for watered down wine, but you won't find it anywhere in the NT. God Bless, Tamara |
||||||
100 | I am horrible at locating verses, HELP | 1 John | Tamara Brewington | 204132 | ||
Welcome to the forum Andrew if you are new! 1)verses that show the formula for the trinity as being coequal and how they work together; John 1:33,34, 14:16,24,26, 15:26, 16:7,13-15, 20:21,22, I John 4:2,13,14, 5:7. 2)verses that show the deity of three; I Corinthians 8:4, I Timothy 2:5,6, Mathew 6:26, Mathew 19:23-26,27:46, Mark 12:17,24-27, Philippians 2:5-11, Hebrews 1, Psalm 45:6, Psalm 110:1, Luke 12:8,9, Mathew 13:41,12:28, 19:14, 21:31,43, Mark 13:20,2:8-10, 14:26, Mathew 25:31. 24:30, Acts 5:3,4, John 16:8-11, 3:8, I Corinthians 12:4-11, 3:16,17, 6:19, 20, Mathew 28:19, II Corinthians 13:14, I Peter 1:2. 3)Don't lose contact with Doc, he is a gold mine, there are some others in here who can teach too, humbly, your Sister in Christ, Tamara 4)Post note, you seem like a serious Bible study, hopefully you left an email address in your profile, I got some serious Bible (about 5 or so)web tools for you, here is mine in case you didn't leave your email in there; whatdoyoubelieve@hotmail.com |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ] Next > Last [9] >> |