Results 61 - 80 of 130
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: lightedsteps Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
61 | Money changers in Temple | Matthew | lightedsteps | 223631 | ||
What was the purpose for the money changers to set up their business in the Temple? | ||||||
62 | SEARCHING FOR THE TRUTH | Matt 5:17 | lightedsteps | 223200 | ||
Hi Doc 1) The law is described as, a yoke - Acts 15:10 - Gal. 5:1 2) The law is called, the traditions of the elders - Mk.15:2 3) The law is, a schoolmaster - Gal. 3:24 4) The law is, the handwriting of ordinances Col.2:14 5) The law was, Middle Wall of Partition - Eph. 2:14 I believe you might be in error about the word, "instructor" being a metaphor for the law in Rom. 2:20 I have posted the verses before, and after, in order to see the context. Paul is speaking to the Jews, about how "they" see themselves as instructors, but not about the law being an instructor. Rom 2:19 And art confident that thou thyself art a guide of the blind, a light of them which are in darkness, Rom 2:20 An instructor of the foolish, a teacher of babes, which hast the form of knowledge and of the truth in the law. Rom 2:21 Thou therefore which tea chest another, teachest thou not thyself? thou that preachest a man should not steal, dost thou steal? As far as the James verses. Many might say that the ("GLASS" - "MIRROR") is a metaphor for the law, but when we look at the passage where this metaphor is used, we see it is not speaking about the law, "but the engrafted word", therefore the mirror should not used as a metaphor for the law. Jas 1:21 Wherefore lay apart all filthiness and superfluity of naughtiness, and receive with meekness the engrafted word, which is able to save your souls. Jas 1:22 But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves. Jas 1:23 For if any be a hearer of the word, and not a doer, he is like unto a man beholding his natural face in a glass: Jas 1:24 For he beholdeth himself, and goeth his way, and straightway forgetteth what manner of man he was. Jas 1:25 But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed. Grace be unto you lightedsteps |
||||||
63 | SEARCHING FOR THE TRUTH | Matt 5:17 | lightedsteps | 223207 | ||
Brother Beja Hoping this will suffice, as I am not sure of the point of your question. Said - Hebrew - Amar - The literal spoken Word of God Gen 1:3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. Word - Greek - Lego - A relating of Gods' words in discourse (Prophesy) Heb 1:1 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners Spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets Word - Greek - Logos - The word of God incarnate, Jesus Joh 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. Rev 19:13 And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God. Scripture - Greek Graphe, The written word of God, Holy Scripture 2Ti 3:16 All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: Grace be unto you lightedsteps |
||||||
64 | SEARCHING FOR THE TRUTH | Matt 5:17 | lightedsteps | 223215 | ||
Beja The Gospel, Word of Truth, The Law of liberty. Grace be unto you lightedsteps |
||||||
65 | SEARCHING FOR THE TRUTH | Matt 5:17 | lightedsteps | 223220 | ||
Beja Yes, that is exactly what I have said. Jesus is the only one to ever keep the law, why then would James teach that we should be doers of the law? If that is what is being taught, then we should be able to keep the law also, according to James. Jas 1:22,23 22) But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves. 23) For if any be a hearer of the word, and not a doer, he is like unto a man beholding his natural face in a glass: Would we not be deceiving ourselves if we thought we could keep the law? The following scripture tells us metaphorically what the law is, and it's purpose. Gal 3:24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. Gal 6:13 For neither they themselves who are circumcised keep the law; but desire to have you circumcised, that they may glory in your flesh. After our being justified, why then try to keep the law that Christ has already kept for us.This was the reason we needed a savior, because He did keep the law, we are justified in Him. It is by Grace through faith, and that not of ourselves. Rom 7:6 But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter. Rom 2:26 Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision? Rom 8:4 That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit. Gal 3:23-27 23) But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed. 24) Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. 25) (BUT AFTER THAT FAITH IS COME, WE ARE NO LONGER UNDER A SCHOOL MASTER). 26) For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. 27) For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. Verse 25 tells us we are no longer under a school master, its purpose has been fulfilled in Christ. Therefore it is not the law, but the engrafted word, the perfect law of liberty, and our abiding in it, that we will be blessed. Grace be unto you lightedsteps |
||||||
66 | SEARCHING FOR THE TRUTH | Matt 5:17 | lightedsteps | 223224 | ||
Hello ariel levin Welcome to the forum If I may. Is there anywhere in the Old or New Testaments, where the word "LAW" has been substituted with, for, or by the word "WORD", or visa versa? Or have you ever found in your studies, these two words being used as synonyms? Grace be unto you lightedsteps |
||||||
67 | SEARCHING FOR THE TRUTH | Matt 5:17 | lightedsteps | 223231 | ||
Good day Ariel Thank you for your thoughts, but these choice terms, are from James, as far as Deut, 6:6 it is nothing more than God telling them to obey, it's not really being used as a synonym for the Law. What I am looking for, is where the words are used as synonyms, in order to say, when James teaches. Jas 1:22-24 22) But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves. 23) For if any be a hearer of the word, and not a doer, he is like unto a man beholding his natural face in a glass: 24) For he beholdeth himself, and goeth his way, and straightway forgetteth what manner of man he was. That we can then fully understand, he is speaking about the LAW, the Law of Moses. Otherwise we cannot, and should not change the words that he did use. ie, (hearer of the word, doers of the word), If we do, then we change the meaning of just what James was teaching. If James meant to say Law, why didn't he just say LAW instead of WORD, why use a metaphor? This is the metaphor of James Jas 1:23 For if any be a hearer of the word, and not a doer, he is like unto a man beholding his natural face in a glass: Here is the same metaphor used by Paul 1Co 13:12 For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known. 2Co 3:18 But we all, with open face beholding as in a glass the glory of the Lord, (ARE CHANGED INTO THE SAME IMAGE) from glory to glory, even as by the Spirit of the Lord. Are both James, and Paul speaking of the LAW? IMO James is not speaking of the LAW when he uses the term Law of Liberty. James does teach on the LAW in chapter 2, but he never uses the term Law of liberty, or engrafted word, as descriptive of the LAW in that teaching. Jas 2:8-11 James' teaching on the LAW 8) If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well: 9) But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors. 10) For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all. 11) For he that said, Do not commit adultery, said also, Do not kill. Now if thou commit no adultery, yet if thou kill, thou art become a transgressor of the law. Then he goes on to say. Jas 2:12 So speak ye, and so do, as they that shall be judged by the law of liberty. Is he in verse 12, still speaking about the LAW? Is he teaching the LAW, is the Law of Liberty? Is the LAW ever called the Law of Liberty? Listen what Paul says about the law. Rom 3:19 Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God. Rom 3:20 Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin. Whenever you, have used the term (THE WORD) were you speaking of (THE LAW)? You say "exactly what commands were being spoken of for believers to obey if not the commands found in the books of Moses?" I think these should suffice. Mat 7:24 Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock: Joh 14:15 If ye love me, keep my commandments. Joh 14:21 He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him. Joh 15:10 If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father's commandments, and abide in his love. These sayings of Jesus, were being spread throughout the country, this was being done before any of the Apostolic writings, or the New Testament. Luk 1:65 And fear came on all that dwelt round about them: and all these sayings were noised abroad throughout all the hill country of Judaea. Grace be unto you lightedsteps |
||||||
68 | SEARCHING FOR THE TRUTH | Matt 5:17 | lightedsteps | 223250 | ||
Hello Beja Coming across this last night, I felt this commentary on the subject better puts into words what I was trying to convey, and far beyond my feeble attempt has been. My only regret is, I did not think of him sooner. Sorry but this will have to be a two part post, it's a couple hundred characters to long. Commentary by John Gill James 1:25 But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty… By which is meant, not the moral law, but the Gospel; for only of that is the apostle speaking in the context: this is no other than the word of truth, with which God begets men of his own will; and is the ingrafted word which is able to save, and of which men should be doers, as well as hearers, (James 1:18,21,22) , and this is compared to a glass by the Apostle Paul, (2 Corinthians 3:18) , and the word here used for looking into it is the same word the Apostle Peter uses of the angels, who desired to look into the mysteries of the Gospel, (1 Peter 1:12) all which serve to strengthen this sense; now the Gospel is called a law; not that it is a law, strictly speaking, consisting of precepts, and established and enforced by sanctions penalties; for it is a declaration of righteousness and salvation by Christ; a publication of peace and pardon by him; and a free promise of eternal life, through him; but as it is an instruction, or doctrine: the law with the Jews is called (hrwt) , because it is teaching and instructive; and everything that is so is by them called by this name: hence we find the doctrine of the Messiah, which is no other than the Gospel, is in the Old Testament called the law of the Lord, and his law, (Isaiah 2:2) (42:4) and in the New Testament it is called the law, or doctrine of faith, (Romans 3:27) and this doctrine is perfect, as in (Psalms 19:7) , it being a perfect plan of truths, containing in it all truth, as it is in Jesus, even all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge; and because it is a revelation of things perfect; of the perfect righteousness of Christ, and of perfect justification by it, and of free and full pardon of sins through him, and of complete salvation by him; and because it directs to Christ, in whom perfection is: and it is a law or doctrine of liberty; (ton thv eleuyhriav) , "that which is of liberty"; which has liberty for its subject, which treats of it, even of the liberty wherewith Christ makes his people free: the Gospel proclaims this liberty to captive souls; and is the word of truth, which makes them free, or is the means of freeing them from the slavery of sin, from the captivity of Satan, and from the bondage of the law; and is what gives souls freedom and boldness at the throne of grace; and is that which leads them into the liberty of grace here, and gives them a view and hope of the glorious liberty of the children of God hereafter. This doctrine is as a glass to look into; in which is beheld in the glory of Christ's person and office, and grace; and though (by) the law is the knowledge of sin, yet a man never so fully and clearly discovers the sin that dwells in him, and the swarms of corruption which are in his heart, as when the light of the glorious Gospel shines into him, and when in it he beholds the beauty and glory of Jesus Christ; see (Isaiah 6:5) and looking into this glass, or into this doctrine, is by faith, and with the eyes of the understanding, opened and enlightened by the Spirit of God; End Part (1) |
||||||
69 | SEARCHING FOR THE TRUTH | Matt 5:17 | lightedsteps | 223251 | ||
Part (2) and the word here used signifies a looking wisely and intently, with great care and thought, and not in a slight and superficial manner; and such a looking is designed, as is attended with effect; such an one as transforms into the same image that is beheld, from glory to glory; and happy is the man that so looks into it. And continueth therein; is not moved away from the hope of the Gospel, nor carried about with divers and strange doctrines; but is established in the faith, stands fast in it, and abides by it; or continues looking into this glass, and to Christ, the author and finisher of faith, who is beheld in it; and keeps his eye upon it, and the object held forth in it; and constantly attends the ministration of it: he being not a forgetful hearer; but takes heed to the things he hears and sees, lest he should let them slip; and being conscious of the weakness of his memory, implores the divine Spirit to be his remembrancer, and bring to his mind, with fresh power and light, what he has heard: but a doer of the work; of the work of faith, and labour of love, and patience of hope, and of every work and ordinance the Gospel ministry points unto; doing and being subject to all in faith, from a principle of love, and with a view to the glory of God and Christ. This man shall be blessed in his deed; or "doing", and while he is doing; not that he is blessed for what he does, but "in" what he does; see (Psalms 19:11) he having, in hearing the word, and looking into it, and in submitting to every ordinance of the Gospel, the presence of God, the discoveries of his love, communion with Christ, and communication of grace from him by the Spirit; so that Wisdom's ways become ways of pleasantness, and all her paths are peace; see (Psalms 65:4) (84:4,5) , moreover, in all such a man does, he is prosperous and successful; and so he is blessed in his deed, by God, whose blessing makes rich, both in spirituals and temporals: there seems to be an allusion to the blessed man in (Psalms 1:1,3). Grace be unto you Lightedsteps |
||||||
70 | what does the word rica mean | Matt 5:22 | lightedsteps | 220631 | ||
Hi wejlly These are the Strongs Concordance numbers and definitions RACA G4469: Of Chaldee origin (compare [H7386]); O empty one, that is, thou worthless (as a term of utter vilification): - Raca. H7386: empty; figuratively worthless: - emptied (-ty), vain (fellow, man). Grace be unto you lightedsteps |
||||||
71 | what does the word rica mean | Matt 5:22 | lightedsteps | 220633 | ||
Hi wejlly These are the Strongs Concordance numbers and definitions RACA G4469: Of Chaldee origin (compare [H7386]); O empty one, that is, thou worthless (as a term of utter vilification): - Raca. H7386: empty; figuratively worthless: - emptied (-ty), vain (fellow, man). Grace be unto you lightedsteps |
||||||
72 | Luke 31:24-27 | Matt 12:44 | lightedsteps | 220580 | ||
Hi Aileen This is the entire teaching of Jesus, in it's context. Take note that the Pharisee, asked Jesus a question, and then He answered. Mat 12:38-45 38. Then certain of the scribes and of the Pharisees answered, saying, Master, we would see a sign from thee. 39. But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas: 40. For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. 41. The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: because they repented at the preaching of Jonas; and, behold, a greater than Jonas is here. 42. The queen of the south shall rise up in the judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: for she came from the uttermost parts of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon; and, behold, a greater than Solomon is here. 43. When the unclean spirit is gone out of a man, he walketh through dry places, seeking rest, and findeth none. 44. Then he saith, I will return into my house from whence I came out; and when he is come, he findeth it empty, swept, and garnished. 45. Then goeth he, and taketh with himself seven other spirits more wicked than himself, and they enter in and dwell there: and the last state of that man is worse than the first. (EVEN SO SHALL IT BE ALSO UNTO THIS WICKED GANERATION). This teaching is not about unclean spirits being cast out or leaving a person of there own volition. You can see from this whole teaching by Jesus, that He was talking about the Jewish People / Nation. He used the story of the unclean spirit as an allegory for the Jews. Grace be unto you lightedsteps |
||||||
73 | Avoiding Bible Abuse | Mark 12:24 | lightedsteps | 223399 | ||
Hi Doc Is there someplace I can get a transcript of this teaching by Mr. Belkeley? I have dial up, and my computer will not play videos:-( Grace be unto you lightedsteps |
||||||
74 | believeth and is baptized | Mark 16:16 | lightedsteps | 222906 | ||
In relation to the thread that is going on now, (Becoming a Christian) I ask for some clarification on this verse spoken by Jesus. Mar 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. Does not this verse clearly equate believing with baptism, as part of the same package? Grace lightedsteps |
||||||
75 | believeth and is baptized | Mark 16:16 | lightedsteps | 222913 | ||
Hi srbaegon Thanks for the reply, I read the article, interesting. Although I have not read the book you have mentioned, I can see where someone as yourself that was leaning in that direction to begin with, would easily accept the explanation which you say was put forward by these two men. So is it your contention, that when the disciples went about baptizing, according to what Jesus had said to them, in Mk.16:16 they were performing these baptisms, as nothing more than what could be called ones Christian Confession of Faith, such as today's (Sinners Prayer), with no more meaning than a ritual? Isn't that trivializing the Mk.16:16 passage, based on the grounds that this understanding does not explain the passage, it merely negates it, putting it into the realm of not meaning what it actually said. By keeping the passage in sight, I cannot see where it would apply, although I can understand that human nature being what it is, through the course of time, things do tend to lose their meaning. I had no idea when asking the question, it was such a hotly contested verse. I guess the only way of understanding the Mark passage, would be summed up in another verse. Rom 14:5 One man esteemeth one day above another: another esteemeth every day alike. Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind. When it comes down to it, there are differences of opinion as to the meaning of what was meant in Mk. 16:16, these opinions come from ones own believed doctrine, some would say one thing, while others would counter with an opposite opinion. Maybe that is the way God wanted things to be, Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind. Thanks again for the input. Grace be unto you lightedsteps |
||||||
76 | believeth and is baptized | Mark 16:16 | lightedsteps | 222922 | ||
Hi Doc Always good to hear from you You cite 3 reasons for believing this verse does not belong. 1. It is absent from most of the earliest manuscripts. 2. Early church writers tell us that it is absent from many other manuscripts. 3. There are stylistic aspects of this passage that are not in keeping with the rest of the book. As far as I am concerned, I believe the Bible to be the inerrant word of God to the Church, mind you I said Church, as the mystical body of Christ, not any religion, I also believe that this inerrancy extends as far as the canon itself, as well as the writers of the books, I do not in any way believe that anything having to do with the Bible is not what it appears to be. Therefore I take with a grain of spiritual salt, what New Testament scholars might have to say on the matter. Others have said the book of Mark was actually written by Peter. If we took what they all say now, or have said in the past, all we would have left of our Bibles, would be a very nice piece of leather, (with our name embossed on it in gold). I may sound old fashioned, but I have to believe the canon we have received, is the one that GOD wanted us to have. I'm sorry but when it comes to belief, just because someone has a Phd, or Ma. after their name, I still question their findings, (teachings). We have been warned in the Bible about False teachers, when I hear of such things, I question the motive for such statements. What I mean is, do these teachings edify the reader, or do they make the reader, question the Bible text as true or not? (example) Gen 3:1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? Once the doubt has been raised, then any belief is possible. We can become to sophisticated in our beliefs, when God meant His word to be understood by the simplest of men. When you said "After all, doing something in the natural and expecting supernatural results has a name: magic -- and we are told to eschew such things." I know you didn't mean these such things did you? Rom 6:4 Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. Col 2:12 Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead. Grace be unto you lightedsteps |
||||||
77 | believeth and is baptized | Mark 16:16 | lightedsteps | 222926 | ||
Hi Doc I hope you aren't of the mind, that I would be remiss in the doing my utmost in the fulfilling of Eph.4:29 also. I think your assessment of my meaning to be found within Rom., and Col. would be fair, I do feel as though they are representative of the doing something in the natural, which then in turn is capable of causing a supernatural result. This is not saying, our doing causes the result, it is all Gods doing. Our place is to follow those things He has said to do, the result then will follow the actions He has said they would follow. I too can say, I thoughtfully, carefully, studiously, assuredly, and completely agree: with The Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy. I am curious as to what you might think, on just what my particular theological slant might be? I take great care about what I say, here on the forum. I make every effort to say authoritatively what God has, using scripture whenever, and wherever possible. My efforts on the forum are a service to Him. Our modes of operation my differ, but our goals are still the same. We both come from diametrically opposed backgrounds, yours being Jewish, mine being Catholic. We both have a unique perspective that not all Christians have, with their having been raised with a more, or less Protestant background. All I can say is, were both on the same path, God is lighting the way, because of our differing backgrounds, there are things you will accept that I won't, and there are things that I will accept that you won't, neither one is wrong in our beliefs, we just have differing perspectives. In closing, I apologies for my affront, your right, I should have known:-( Are we still friends:-) If your e-mail address on your profile is still valid, I will drop you a line. Grace be unto you lightedsteps |
||||||
78 | believeth and is baptized | Mark 16:16 | lightedsteps | 222927 | ||
Hi Inquisitor Sorry but I don't think Matt.28:19 can be connected to Mk.16:16. You say "There's over 80 verses in the Bible that refer to this subject. I agree some of them are a little vague but most are pretty clear." my advice Copy, and paste them all onto one place, where you can read, and compare them all at the asme time, and against each other. Having doen that, then start the process of elimination, being very critical as to just what is being said, if it doesn't stand muster then deleat it. Don't worry about convincing anybody else, Convince yourself, or Unconvince yourself. Let the Holy Spirit teach you. At this point you have a belief, find out if that belief is true or not. You need to be able to see the forest, not the indevidual trees. These 80 some verses need to agree or there is no truth. Grace be unto you lightedsteps |
||||||
79 | believeth and is baptized | Mark 16:16 | lightedsteps | 222928 | ||
To: the thread The place where these verses are missing, is in the Codex Vaticanus from (350AD) and also the Codex Sinaiticus from (375AD) plus some other early manuscripts. But within the vast majority of the ancient manuscripts, the verses in question do appear (Mk.16:9-20) There is an entire blank column the Codex Vaticanus From Mk.16:9-20 to Lk.1:1 which gives the appearance that something should indeed be there. This long ending of Mark as some may call it, was known to both Justin Martyr, and to Tatian in the second century which was from 130 - 150 AD). The question that comes to my mind then is, with so much controversy regarding these verses from Mk.16 over the centuries, as all of you have said, why then have they been repeatedly published within the Bible as though the do indeed belong? I have taken the time to go to 23 different translations, and this verse is in every one, including the KJV, NASB, NIV, AMPLIFIED, and even the MESSAGE, but most surprising of all is that Calvin even put it in the Geneva Bible. Therefore if the publishers of these Bibles do continually reprint , and publish these verses, then they must feel they do belong. I for one, would say "if the consensus is that these verses do not belong, and should not be there, then they should not be there. Otherwise these types of arguments against them should cease. I no not what course others may take, but as for me, this will be my last post on this thread. Thank you all, for your interest participation, and input. Grace be unto you all lightedsteps |
||||||
80 | believeth and is baptized | Mark 16:16 | lightedsteps | 222932 | ||
Hi BradK Thanks for the input, but to quell any misconception that may have arisen, I am not of the school that espouses, that our salvation comes any other way other than through the blood of Jesus for the remission of sins. For by Grace are we saved. I can assure you, I do not base my doctrine of salvation upon such verses as Mk.16:16 All I was asking, was for some reasonable explanation, as to how it is to be understood, how can it be explained, and all I was getting was. It doesn't belong, or what was said isn't what was meant, or it's an addendum to a book that isn't accredited to the person who did write it, by a person or persons unknown, and therefore not to be accepted as any part of the canon of scripture. So I felt before any further misconceptions, I would withdraw from the discussion. But I owed you some sort of explanation, hope it will suffice. Grace be unto you lightedsteps |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ] Next > Last [7] >> |