Results 61 - 80 of 314
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: prayon Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
61 | claiming things in your life | Is 53:5 | prayon | 136565 | ||
I never said you were either. What I said was that you were burying your head in the sand if you think that there are no starving Christians in third world countries. | ||||||
62 | claiming things in your life | Is 53:5 | prayon | 136479 | ||
While God wants His children to prosper and drive nice cars and live in nice houses it's your attitude that really concerns me. Jesus said "I'm telling the solemn truth: Whenever you failed to do one of these things to someone who was being overlooked or ignored, that was me--you failed to do it to me." When ever we fail to provide for those in need - for those who are hungry, we fail to do for Him. The strongest believer lives not so much by apprehending Christ as by being apprehended of him (Phi 3:12),not so much by knowing God as by being known of him (Gal 4:9); and this the least child is capable of. If they cannot stretch out their hands to Christ, yet he can lay his hands on them, and so make them his own, and own them for his own. These starving childrenyou are saying that do not matter do belong to Him. Another thing - you do not know if they do know of Christ or not. There are still thousands of God's children in third world countries that are starving. One way God provides for them is by having those who are blessed such as you and me send finances for food. In your words it clearly relays that you are burying your head in the sand. Be sure of your actions because there will be many who will say "Master, we preached the Message, we bashed the demons, our God-sponsored projects had everyone talking." But Jesus will tell them, "I've never known you. Get away from me, you evil people." Mat 7:22-23. prayon |
||||||
63 | Who does "the dead" include? | Rev 20:12 | prayon | 133468 | ||
Greetiongs, It depends. Many profess to be Christians and they are that in name only. I believe that they will be in front of the Great White Throne. True followers of Christ - who walk the walk and talk the talk will not be. prayon | ||||||
64 | What is the correct way to pray | Matt 6:9 | prayon | 132410 | ||
It's sister and you are very welcome! prayon | ||||||
65 | What should be a woman's boundaries? | Ruth 2:22 | prayon | 131284 | ||
Greetings, I think that you your extention can be valid. Unfortunetly there are pastors and leaders who will do say and do unappropriate things. #1 shouldn't have to be extended to the church but unfortunetly it is. #2 is biblically based. Pro 2:12-14: "Wisdom will save you from the way of evil, from the person who speaks devious things, from those who abandon the paths of righteousness to walk the ways of darkness, from those who enjoy doing evil, from those who find joy in the deviousness of evil". prayon |
||||||
66 | What should be a woman's boundaries? | Ruth 2:22 | prayon | 131187 | ||
Reighnskye, In what way? prayon | ||||||
67 | A SIN TO FILE BANKRUPTCY | 1 Pet 4:10 | prayon | 129666 | ||
Greetings glory, I take it to mean that you think that it is against the bible But suppose one has been a good steward of their finances but something happens such as an accident or illness and they can no longer pay their debts - then what? prayon | ||||||
68 | WAS I THE ONE THAT GOT IT | Bible general Archive 2 | prayon | 126583 | ||
You are very welcome! Keep your faith high! prayon |
||||||
69 | what did he do to be replaced ? | Acts 1:23 | prayon | 125482 | ||
Greetings - Both passages are talking about the day that Christ rose. And when Jesus had risen early the first day of the Sabbath, He appeared first to Mary Magdalene, out of whom He had cast seven demons (Mar 16:9). After that He appeared in another form to two of them, walking and going into the country (Mar 16:12) and Afterward He appeared to the Eleven as they recline (Mar 16:14) In the John passage it tals about Mary finding the empty tomb and then it says Then the same day at evening, being the first of the sabbaths(Joh 20:19). So both passages talk about the first visit of Jesus to the upper room. If they both didn't refer to the "first of the sabbaths" then it might be quite possible that Mark was talking about a later event. prayon |
||||||
70 | what did he do to be replaced ? | Acts 1:23 | prayon | 125481 | ||
Greetings - Both passages are talking about the day that Christ rose. And when Jesus had risen early the first day of the Sabbath, He appeared first to Mary Magdalene, out of whom He had cast seven demons (Mar 16:9). After that He appeared in another form to two of them, walking and going into the country (Mar 16:12) and Afterward He appeared to the Eleven as they recline (Mar 16:14) In the John passage it tals about Mary finding the empty tomb and then it says Then the same day at evening, being the first of the sabbaths(Joh 20:19). So both passages talk about the first visit of Jesus to the upper room. If they both didn't refer to the "first of the sabbaths" then it might be quite possible that Mark was talking about a later event. prayon |
||||||
71 | what did he do to be replaced ? | Acts 1:23 | prayon | 125416 | ||
John 20:19-24 talks about the first visit Jesus made to the apostles in the upper room. Mark 16:14 also talks about the first visit Jesus made to the apostles in the upper room. John says that Thomas was not there. Mark says that he appeared to the 11. Therefore at that one visit the only one missing of the 12 was Thomas therefore Judas was there. Granted it does not say that he jumped off a cliff but he had to of fallen a good distance for his belly to burst open and his insides come out. When one falls a short distance that does not happen ---- Thank God! prayon |
||||||
72 | speaking in tongue | 1 Cor 12:13 | prayon | 125392 | ||
Greetings again, Just an addendum to my previous note concerning apostles. Additional apostles beside the 12: Andronicus Rom 16:7 Barnabas Acts 14:14 Epaphroditus - Phil 2:25 (messenger and apostle are the same original word in the Greek) James (the Lords brother) Gal 1:19 Junias or Junia Acts 16:7 Matthias Acts 1:26 Paul of course Silas 1 Thes 1:1; 2:6 Timothy 1 Thes 1:1; 2:6 prayon |
||||||
73 | what did he do to be replaced ? | Acts 1:23 | prayon | 125389 | ||
Greetings Emmaus, Actually Judas did not hang himself. Strongs tells us that hang also means to choke. So I believe a better way to read this would be Judas was all choked up. Let me explain - First in Acts 1:18 it says "Now Judas purchased a field of blood with the wages of iniquity and falling headlong he burst open and all his insides burst out" (Field of Blood) Field is personal possession Field of blood is a plot of land v. 18 – with reward he got for his wickedness (stealing throughout ministry) v. 19 People called it the field of blood Matt 27:7 calls the piece of land bought with the silver a potter’s field - 2 entirely different places Field of blood is a plot of land Mark 16:14 says that Jesus appeared to the 11 in the upper room butJohn 20 19-*24 – Thomas wasn’t there when Jesus came so Judas had to of been there since they had not chosen a replacement apostle yet. Again in Acts 1:13 it says all 12 went back to the upper room and Judas name is listed as one of them. If he would of indeed ran off and hung himself after he threw the pieces of silver back he could not of been with the 12 in the upper room. I can't remember where I read it but if I remember right hanging wasn't a form of suicide at that time. Judas died by throwing himself off a cliff on his own land which is why it was named Field of Blood. prayon |
||||||
74 | speaking in tongue | 1 Cor 12:13 | prayon | 125355 | ||
Greetings Country Girl, May I bring your attention to 1Co 13:8-10: "Love never comes to an end. There is the gift of speaking what God has revealed, but it will no longer be used. There is the gift of speaking in other languages, but it will stop by itself. There is the gift of knowledge, but it will no longer be used. 1Co Our knowledge is incomplete and our ability to speak what God has revealed is incomplete. But when what is complete comes, then what is incomplete will no longer be used." "What is complete" is Jesus. The bible says that tongues will cease when Jesus comes therefore tongues are still in existance today. Therefore their must be away to receive the gift of the Holy Spirit (tongues) without the apostles layihg hands on you. You have 3 examples of people receiveing the gift of tongues without the apostles laying hands on them. That shows without a doubt that you don't need the apostles to lay hands on you to speak in tongues. (The 3rd was Paul and Ananias - Ananias was not an apostle). As for no more apostles today. You said in a previous post "Since we have no more living Apostles amongst us, it's difficult to believe in the modern manifestation of miracles from common men and women, even christians in today's world" Why can't there be apostles today? Paul called himself an apostle and I have not reason not to believe it but he was not appointed by Jesus. He was appointed by God. (1Ti 1:1 From Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus by the command of God our Savior and Christ Jesus our confidence.) So why can't God still appoint apostles? I call your attention to Eph 4:11-13 "He also gave apostles, prophets, missionaries, as well as pastors and teachers as gifts to his church. Their purpose is to prepare God's people, to serve, and to build up the body of Christ. This is to continue until all of us are united in our faith and in our knowledge about God's Son, until we become mature, until we measure up to Christ, who is the standard." Therefore the bible specifically states that we will have apostles until we become perfect. There are many form of miracles and I have seen some of them. They do exist today. If you really want to see miracle after miracle happen go to somewhere like India. As for tongues - I have a test for you. Pray out loud for about 5 minutes while you are praying write someone else an email. It will be impossible to do without stopping eiter part. A persons mind cannot do two things simultanesously without hesitating on one or the other. Do you know that when someone prays in tongues they can do both at the same time without problem? It is because it is not the person praying but the Holy Ghost who lives in them doing the praying. Tongues is very much alive today as well. prayon |
||||||
75 | speaking in tongues 1cor.12:1coming | 1 Cor 12:13 | prayon | 125325 | ||
Oh well I knew somebody was going to catch me sooner or later......prayon | ||||||
76 | speaking in tongues 1cor.12:1coming | 1 Cor 12:13 | prayon | 125316 | ||
Greetings Songbird, YOu are right we do have different opinions. I go by the 5 instances of the baptism of the Spirit given in Acts. In each instance the evidence of speaking in tongues was given as a sign of baptism in the Holy Spirit. There is not record of any kind that one person did failed to receive the Spirit. Jesus said in Mark 16:17 "These are the miraculous signs that will accompany believers: They will use the power and authority of my name to force demons out of people. They will speak new languages. Jesus didn't say that some of the believers would speak in new tongues. He said that speaking in tongues would accompany those that believed. YOu said that we cannot ask for a gift. I disagree. I believe that if we can ask for any gift but whether we get it or not is up to God. For example if there was one thing that I am not it is discerning. I prayed repeatedly for the gift of discernment and God gave it to me. I sincerely believe that this gift was of no part of me before I received it. In your last sentence are you saying that you don't have to be reborn or saved to speak in tongues? prayon |
||||||
77 | speaking in tongues 1cor.12:1coming | 1 Cor 12:13 | prayon | 125312 | ||
Greetings Hank, I do not see how what I said can be a false notion. Receiving the HOly Spirit is seperate from being born again. Acts 8:15-16 tells us that the Samaritans were baptized in the name of Jesus but that Peter and John had to go to them and lay hands on them for them to receive the baptism of the Holy Spirit. Again in Acts 10:45-48 it tells us the two are seperate. The Gentiles heard the word and were baptized in the HOly Ghost and began to speak in tongues. Peter then concluded "Can anyone forbid water that these, who have received the Holy Ghost as well as we, should not be baptized? And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord." I have never read anywhere in the bible that there had or has to be a transitional period between being born again and being included in a church. You said that confirmation was necessary to verify the inclusion of a new group of people into the church. What would of happened if the apostales decided that they didn't want to let them into the church? Is there somewhere in scripture that says that the apostles had the authority to do that? Does that mean that when Jesus brings someone to salvation that if the apostles didn't believe that they should be included in the church that they overrule Jesus and say no? Does that meant that today when someone is born again that there has to be a transitional period so the pastors of a church can verify that the new converts will fall under the authority of the pastors? Where does it say in scripture that leader must be present for someone to receive the Spirit? I am not quite sure how you got the impression that I think Acts 8 contradicts 1Cor 12.... By the way Hank I has a slight bit of trouble looking up your Acts ll reference as Acts 11 only has 30 verses.... ;o) prayon |
||||||
78 | speaking in tongues 1cor.12:1coming | 1 Cor 12:13 | prayon | 125283 | ||
Greetings Songbird, I agree with some of what you say but there are a couple things that were not accurate. The first is when you said "If every believer has been baptized in the Spirit, then it happens at the moment you accept Christ and become a Christian." Actually it does not. Acts 8:14-17 contradicts this. Notice verse 16 in particular "Before this the Holy Spirit had not come to any of the Samaritans. They had only been baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus." Therefore the baptism of the Holy Ghost does not come automatically when being born again. You also said that tongues is not for every believer. It is a gift to all. Acts tells of 5 instances that tongues were the evidence of the Holy Spirit's indwelling (see Acts 2,8,9,10, and 19), all who were baptized had the evidence of speaking in tongues except for one instance and it was alluded to. Tongues is for all Christians who meet the 5 conditions - Salvation, obedience, faith, asking, and yielding (please see my answer to MrOteng for scriptures and explanations). Mark 16:17 clearly states that those who are believers will speak in new languages "These are the miraculous signs that will accompany believers: They will use the power and authority of my name to force demons out of people. They will speak new languages." He does not say some of the believers he says ALL of the believers. Again in Acts 2:4 it says all believers "All the believers were filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other languages as the Spirit gave them the ability to speak". Acts 2:38-39 again says all believers " Peter answered them, "All of you must turn to God and change the way you think and act, and each of you must be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ so that your sins will be forgiven. Then you will receive the Holy Spirit as a gift. There are 2 sides to tongues the public side and the private side. This is where the confusion lies. The private side of tongues is what was given in Acts 2,8,9,10 and 19. The private side of tongues is a devotional gift where you speak to God and edify yourself. Public tongues is a ministry gift of the Holy Spirit where you speak for God and edify the church. This gift is not given to everyone. Hope this clears up some stuff. prayon |
||||||
79 | What's really going on? | 1 Thess 5:18 | prayon | 125074 | ||
Greetings Mommapbs, Our deliverence is from much more than death. Isaiah 53:4-5 Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted. But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed. Surely He hath born our griefs has to do with sickness. All sickness taken on cross - meets us where we are at - Heals us so that we will hear Him And carried our sorrows - has to do with emotional pain); suffering (Mental suffering - deals with our mind) Wounded for our transgressions - breach of relationship Man / Sin relationship breached spiritually (Make Him Lord and breach is restored) Bruised for our iniquities - deals with Past, present, and future - sin separated from God; Chastised for our peace - Shalom means peace or prosperity has to do with our wellness; safety wholeness; completeness His stripes we are healed - (Rapha:healed) - speaking in the causative sense refers to the body Healed - causes us to walk in health so we will serve Him Jehovah Rapha - One who heals you. prayon |
||||||
80 | Explain Romans chapter 7 | Rom 7:1 | prayon | 124843 | ||
You are very welcome! | ||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ] Next > Last [16] >> |