Results 61 - 70 of 70
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: YenIsaRap Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
61 | Can we live life without sinning? | Rom 6:12 | YenIsaRap | 218097 | ||
Dear Doc (A Biblical definition of sanctification is essential for evaluating any teaching on sanctification.) YenIsaRap |
||||||
62 | Can we live life without sinning? | Rom 6:12 | YenIsaRap | 218096 | ||
Dear David Your use of Rom.12:2 is a proof text. It does not say sanctification is an ongoing process. These scriptures on the other hand say sanctification is a completed work. Acts 26:18 those who ARE SANCTIFIED by faith in me Rom.15:16 that the offering up of the Gentiles might be acceptable, BEING SANCTIFIED by the Holy Ghost. 1 Corinthians 1:2 to THOSE SANCTIFIED in Christ Jesus and called to be holy 1 Corinthians 6:11 But you WERE WASHED , you WERE SANCTIFIED Heb.2:11 For both HE THAT SANTIFIETH and they who ARE SANCTIFIED are all of one Hebrews 10:10 By this will we HAVE BEEN SANCTIFIED through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all. Hebrews 10:14 For by one offering He HAS PERFECTED for all time those who ARE SANCTIFIED Hebrews 10:29 who has treated as an unholy thing the blood of the covenant THAT SANCTIFIED HIM, and who has insulted the Spirit of grace? Jud 1:1 to them that ARE SANCTIFIED BY GOD the Father, AND PRESERVED in Jesus Christ, and called Be Blessed YenIsaRap |
||||||
63 | That we may grow thereby | Matt 18:15 | YenIsaRap | 218073 | ||
I have been here but a short time therefore everyone may feel as though I have no voice in the matter. But I find fault with the last few posts in this thread. "Why did Paul do it? For conscience sake?" There have been comments made that have been neither edifying to, for, or about a brother nor uplifting for the forum in general. There is a proper way for this matter to have been handled. I have not said these things in defense of this brother. He was in the wrong. But rather for the possible betterment of the forum as a whole in the future. There are those that come here seeking knowledge do we want to show them petty bickering and strife? 2Ti 3:16,17 16) All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 17) That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works. (Scripture follows) Matt.18:15,21,22 15) Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him ALONE: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother. 21) Then came Peter to him, and said, Lord, HOW OFT SHALL MY BROTHER SIN AGAINST ME, and I forgive him? TILL SEVEN TIMES? 22) Jesus saith unto him, I say not unto thee, Until seven times: but, UNTIL SEVENTY TIMES SEVEN. 1 Cor. 6:7 7) Now therefore there is utterly a fault among you, because ye go to law one with another. WHY DO YOU RATHER NOT TAKE WRONG? why do ye not rather suffer yourselves to be defrauded? Matt.6:38,39 38) Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: 39) But I say unto you, THAT YOU RESIST NOT EVIL: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, TURN TO HIM THE OTHER ALSO. In Love for the Brethren YenIsaRap |
||||||
64 | Can we live life without sinning? | Rom 6:12 | YenIsaRap | 218054 | ||
Dear David In this statement of yours. "Isn't this really the process of sanctification which is a work of God?" 1) Are you saying that sanctification is an act of Gods' grace a completed work? 2) Or are you saying that we become sanctified through an ongoing process? Blessings YenIsaRap |
||||||
65 | the last Adam | 1 Cor 15:45 | YenIsaRap | 218018 | ||
Dear stjohn Thank you once again. The correct word is Omniscience.:-) Blessings Yen |
||||||
66 | the last Adam | 1 Cor 15:45 | YenIsaRap | 218016 | ||
Dear Brother stjohn Rom. 5:12 (NASB) Therefore, just as through (X)one man sin entered into the world, and (Y)death through sin, and (Z)so death spread to all men, because all sinned-- Rom. 5:12 (KJV) Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned: According to (Rom. 5:12) Death entered the world through sin. Therefore Adam was created immortal. Nowhere in scripture are we told Adam succumbed to temptation. Eve was tempted then gave to Adam. (Gen.3:12) (K)The man said, "The woman whom You gave to be with me, she gave me from the tree, and I ate." Adams' sin was eating the forbidden fruit. Gen.2:16,17 16) The LORD God (Q)commanded the man, saying, "From any tree of the garden you may eat freely; 17) but from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat from it (R)you will surely die." Be Blessed YenIsaRap |
||||||
67 | the last Adam | 1 Cor 15:45 | YenIsaRap | 218004 | ||
Dear Makarios 1) Your question about "WHY" would God include the Tree of Life. Let's look at creation for the answer. Didn't God create opposites in nature? Hot - Cold Night - Day Male - Female. Therefore is not the Tree of Life the opposite of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil which bears the fruit of "DEATH". On the other hand we could ask the question "WHY" would God include "EITHER" Tree in the garden? The inclusion or exclusion of the Tree of Life in the garden does not give us sufficient evidence as to the question of the immortality of Adam upon his creation by God. 2) There were two trees that were in the midst of the Garden the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil and the Tree of Life. God gave command to Adam not to eat of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil But there was not any such command in regard to the Tree of Life. We could therefor assume Adam could and did eat of the Tree of Life upon occasion. Could have been even part of his daily routine. Not that he was commanded to eat or that he needed to eat to maintain his immortality. Like I said though that is assumption but that is the only way I could answer your hypothetical question about his need for eating from the Tree of Life. 3) If man was already immortal then God including death as a consequence (Gen. 2:17) would be the most logical consequence for the disobedience. After all what would be a better punishment for an immortal but loosing that immortality. God being Sovereign already knew what Adam would do. Then on the other hand It seems illogical that the consequence of disobedience as recorded in (Gen. 2:17) would be death if Adam was not immortal. What I am saying is that if Adam was going to die anyway what consequence is there? To sum it up I think scripture gives us the answer as it should. Gen.16,17 16) And the LORD God commanded the man, "You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; 17) but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat of it you will surely die." Again what would be the point of telling Adam that he would surely die if he was going to die anyway? If Adam was created in the image and likeness of God just what does that entail? God does not have a physical appearance as we do does He? It then seems as though Adam would therefore have the attributes of God ie, He is immortal. Blessings YenIsaRap |
||||||
68 | Who is speaking in Luke 19:27? | Luke 19:27 | YenIsaRap | 217959 | ||
Dear stjohn "OOPS SO SORRY";-( Blessings YenIsaRap |
||||||
69 | Luke 21:32 "geneav" translated in AMP? | Prov 30:6 | YenIsaRap | 217925 | ||
Dear Searcher The word that Vintage says is (Generation) You say is (Fruit). - ghennaymah I have been checking the Greek for definitions and spellings. The word used in your references to the verses in Mt.are (YEVVNUARA) (Offspring) Generation or Fruit. Your post from (Mt. 26:29) that word is (YEVNUAROS) which is Fruit - (Like the Grape). The definition says "(OFFSPRING); by analogy produce (literally or figuratively): - fruit, generation.)" your both right. But to tell you the truth I don't think where the context of these verses lends itself to (FRUIT) as a grape. From your question on the difference between the passage in Luke and the ones in Matthew this is what I have found. What Heidibelle posted was correct "(those living at that definite period of time)" can be defined as (generation) (age, period or persons). Within that definition there is also (born, country (-man), diversity, (GENERATION), kind (-red), nation, (OFFSPRING), stock) all of these are speaking of people and as the connector the word (OFFSPRING) taking us back to your list of Mt. verses. With that being the case (Generation) can be considered as correct. Meaning the people alive at the time of Jesus as the Generation being spoken to - of. Hope you don't mind my answering your question too. Blessings of Jesus YenIsaRap |
||||||
70 | Luke 21:32 "geneav" translated in AMP? | Prov 30:6 | YenIsaRap | 217915 | ||
Dear Vintage I was unaware of how many places in the new testament it said something about the Generation of Jesus time. With all that scripture identifying them as "The Generation" to witness those things Jesus prophesied. Those scriptures remind me of what Paul said in 1 Cor. 10:11 Where does that put us today? In Christ YenIsaRap |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 4 ] |