Results 61 - 80 of 165
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: Radioman Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
61 | How do we respond to war as Christians? | Deut 7:2 | Radioman | 23719 | ||
Martha's exact words were "War is evil." Tell us the book, tell us the chapter, and tell us the verse where the Bible says "War is evil." I know from first-hand experience that war is evil, having been right in the middle of one in 1967. But where does the Bible SAY that? |
||||||
62 | How do we respond to war as Christians? | Deut 7:2 | Radioman | 23717 | ||
I agree with you. And I know that. That's why I labeled my post as my opinion. Many on this forum post their opinion as absolute fact. I did not do that. I posted my opinion as opinion. When you find the "Truth" about this question, please share it with us, will you? I await your Truth with bated breath. |
||||||
63 | Did Christ not fulfill the law? | Matt 5:17 | Radioman | 22107 | ||
casiv: I realize that this is a public forum and anyone has the right to attempt to answer any posted question. But, I suggest that before you attempt to answer questions that were NOT addressed to you, that you first answer questions which WERE addressed to you. Since you are known for answering questions with riddles, for evading questions for weeks at a time, and doing everything but giving a straight answer, perhaps you are not quite ready to take on any new questions. Answer the old ones first. Also, it would be helpful if your answers had some remote relevance to the questions being asked. And how can you accuse or imply that someone else is putting you down when you yourself have spent half your time on the forum hurling curses and judgments at other people? |
||||||
64 | Did Christ not fulfill the law? | Matt 5:17 | Radioman | 22106 | ||
casiv: You are correct. I agree with you regarding freewill, putting somebody down and Matthew 5:17-19 -- the three subjects all go together like a horse and carriage. To answer your previous post, I can only say: I give up. Why did the chicken cross the road? (If you don't know the answer, it's OK to ask Puppetmaster.) Radioman |
||||||
65 | response | Rom 1:18 | Radioman | 22033 | ||
Joe: I have been reading your writings on the forum from the beginning. Your points are always well thought out, well researched and well written. I notice that you do not just write off the top of your head. You are thorough and accurate in every factual matter with which you deal. Any dabbler or babbler who thinks he can just waltz in here and with a few "witty" postings refute your points is very much mistaken. On the forum I've said all along that before one attempts to disprove or refute a position, he had better be very familiar with that position in order to write intelligently about it. Bravado and sophistry are themselves marks of immaturity and are no match for a knowledgeable, articulate believer such as yourself. Keep up the excellent, excellent work. Radioman P.S. To attack the razor sharp mind of R.C. Sproul with a dull butter knife is laughable at best. |
||||||
66 | created with a conscience or taught | NT general Archive 1 | Radioman | 21750 | ||
Hank: You write: " . . . (animals hardly have a conscience -- though I wouldn't be surprised to see this issue debated on the forum :-)." What saith the Panthera leo strang? How readest thou? All conscience is not the same conscience: but there is one kind of conscience of men, another conscience of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds. Radioman |
||||||
67 | "Herodians" who were they? | Matt 22:16 | Radioman | 21505 | ||
casiv: Indeed, what ARE you talking about? It is you who are rude and condescending. I agree with Charis, who said, "Please stop the rambling and the curses! Finally, stop acting like you are enlightened, and all of us are ignorant fools." You yourself are guilty of the very same things of which you accuse us. And why do you ramble on an on and on without using one single Scripture reference? This is the StudyBIBLEForum. This is not a forum for rambling riddles. Nor is it intended as a haven for any and every man-made religion that opposes Christ and His Word. If you have any sensitivity and perception at all, it should be clear to you by now that "another gospel" and "another Christ" have no place here and are welcomed by no one. |
||||||
68 | Only seal and horse in same verse Rev6:5 | Bible general Archive 1 | Radioman | 21504 | ||
Serenetime: You write: "Not treating people in a way where they want to avoid interacting on this forum." If you want to avoid interacting on this forum, you are free to do so. Be my guest. You write: "Your tone and note are quite offensive to me." Your tone is exceedingly offensive to many. This is not a forum for rambling riddles. Nor is it intended as a haven for universal religions who reject Christ and His Word in favor of a man-made doctrine. |
||||||
69 | Animal Intelligence Isn't Rational | Gen 3:1 | Radioman | 20878 | ||
Someone somewhere once asserted that the intelligence of the average StudyBibleForum user is rational. May I ask: is there any evidence that this is so? | ||||||
70 | Who dose not belive in the TERM Trinity? | Bible general Archive 1 | Radioman | 20672 | ||
Colossians 2:9 Again you misquote the Scripture. It does NOT say Jesus *is* all fullness of the Godhead. What it does say is: For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily. Colossians 2:9 (KJV) I do not know for sure what topic you are discussing or what your point is. I am discussing the essential Christian doctrine of the Trinity. You either believe it or you don't. You have already said you don't believe in the word Trinity. Therefore, one would conclude you also don't believe in the concept of Trinity. One cannot reject the doctrine of the Trinity and still claim to be a Christian. We could argue all day about words and about what you believe. The bottom line is you either believe in the Trinity or you don't. If you're trying to convince us that the doctrine of the Trinity is false, that is another matter. If that is the case, I would point out to you that this subject, pro and con, has already been the subject of a long, voluminous debate on this forum. I suggest you use the search function to lookup the many, many previous posts regarding Trinity. |
||||||
71 | Who were the witnesses? | Bible general Archive 1 | Radioman | 20634 | ||
With all respect, could you give an example or two of where the Left Behind series is a misleading interpretation of the scriptures? I have read every book in the series. I don't say I agree with every last interpretation of the authors. And I know there is some criticism of the theology of the books. But I would be interested to hear a couple of examples from you and how it is that they are misleading. Thank you. |
||||||
72 | Who dose not belive in the TERM Trinity? | Bible general Archive 1 | Radioman | 20633 | ||
And since this couple does not believe in the Trinity, then they cannot call themselves Christians either. | ||||||
73 | What did the lord tell moses? | Exodus | Radioman | 20631 | ||
Why does he not just read the Book? Maybe he's waiting until the movie comes out. |
||||||
74 | response | Rom 1:18 | Radioman | 20627 | ||
schwartzkm: In all sincerity, thank you for a very interesting post. However, I need clarification on something you wrote. Systamtic Theology. "Systamtic" is not a word that I am familiar with. Also, I could not find the word in the dictionary. Could you please define the word "Systamtic' in order to clarify your meaning. I won't know whether I agree or disagree with you until I know what the word means. Thank you. |
||||||
75 | Reformed and Arminian Gospel Preaching | Rom 1:18 | Radioman | 20623 | ||
The one born of Armenian descent would be the Armenian. The one who believes in the opposite of Calvinism would be the arminian. |
||||||
76 | Why was the samarian woman right? | John 4:16 | Radioman | 20343 | ||
Even stronger counter view casiv: Your attack on Tim is unfounded for a few more reasons. 1) Tim is right -- as usual. 2) You are wrong -- as usual. 3) Each and every one of your postings shows your ignorance, arrogance and abrasiveness. My advice to you once and for all is: Wise up or shut up! |
||||||
77 | Does Jeremiah 14 and 15 relate to U.S. | Jeremiah | Radioman | 19284 | ||
Ihavefavor: At times, we all use words without realizing or knowing the actual meaning or origin of them. I do not condemn you. I merely point out how the dictionary defines the word "gee." "*gee* (interjection) Used as a mild expletive or exclamation of surprise. [Alteration of JESUS.]" (American Heritage Dictionary) |
||||||
78 | Created and Placed | Gen 2:8 | Radioman | 18907 | ||
Meditation and Fantasy "meditation" is defined as "a discourse intended to express its author's reflections or to guide others in contemplation" "fantasy" is defined as "the power or process of creating especially unrealistic or improbable mental images in response to psychological need (an object of fantasy); also : a mental image or a series of mental images (as a daydream) so created" (www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary) |
||||||
79 | Should Christians practice nonresistance | Lev 26:6 | Radioman | 16137 | ||
No, no, no, no, no. It does NOT say "do not kill." A more accurate translation is "Do not murder." Read the NT book of Revelation. Any killing going on there? | ||||||
80 | What is eternal life? What is saved? | John 6:37 | Radioman | 15389 | ||
Re: the post " Hank, Your analogy of the lost son is ..." Hank, is this Note even worth answering? The arguments presented are so tiresome. The first sentence in the other Note is "Your analogy of the lost son is innaccurate." That sentence itself is laughably inaccurate. You very accurately called Luke 15:11 and following the "parable of the lost son." The theme of the chapter is not "sinners that need to repent." It is more than obvious from reading the chapter that it contains three parables concerning joy over repentance. Does John 15 have to do with the judgment of sinners? For everyone's information, lost souls are not gathered up in bundles to be burned. God deals individually with souls. Then we jump to the subject of man's much-touted ability to choose. Hello? While not denying human responsibility, can we at least acknowledge that divine sovereignty has something to do with our salvation? Then the writer of the other Note says: "I have seen those committed to Christ turn back to the world..." No, you haven't. You've never seen any such thing. This whole idea of proving the Bible by case histories or the experiences of people was adequately addressed in another submission posted yesterday. I quote yesterday's post for those who missed it. "I'll make my answer short. You write: "There are those that say, well, he was never REALLY saved, but how do we know?" How do we know? "1 John 2:19 (NIV) They went out from us, but they did not really belong to us. For if they had belonged to us, they would have remained with us; but their going showed that none of them belonged to us. "Faith that endures is the only legitimate saving faith. Consider Matthew 13:20. Some people make an emotional, superficial commitment to salvation in Christ, but it is not real. They remain interested only until there is a sacrificial price to pay, and then abandon Christ. "Always remember: we do not prove the Bible nor do we build doctrine on the experience(s) of people, whether the experiences are ours or belong to others. We do not establish Bible doctrine on case examples. On the contrary, we prove or disprove experience by the Bible." Finally, the other post uses the same old tired and false argument twisted from 2 Peter 2 to "prove" that it's possible for a blood bought, blood washed, born-again, Holy-Spirit sealed and indwelt child of God to "fall from grace and lose his salvation." Who is being spoken of in 2 Peter 2: false teachers or born-again Christians? The answer is simple to ascertain. Verses 20-22 use the word "they" a number of times. They is a pronoun. Every pronoun has an antecedent. If one keeps backing up until he find the pronoun's antecedent in 2:1, he will see that the chapter is talking about false teachers. False teachers, not believers. There is no magic or guesswork here. This conclusion is arrived at by the application of the rules of English grammar. Oh, did I forget to mention? This question and the arguments from John 15 and 2 Peter 2 have been asked, answered and refuted a number of times. Anyone who can read will note before he posts a question that the instructions plainly say: "Please search for your question before asking it?" Merely following the directions would have shown that this question has already been debated to death here on the forum. |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ] Next > Last [9] >> |