Results 41 - 60 of 66
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: fmp6954 Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
41 | what is antinomianism ? | Not Specified | fmp6954 | 235825 | ||
what is antinomianism ? | ||||||
42 | what is antinomianism ? | Bible general Archive 4 | fmp6954 | 235831 | ||
what is antinomianism ? | ||||||
43 | what is dispensationalism? | Not Specified | fmp6954 | 235824 | ||
what is dispensationalism? | ||||||
44 | what is dispensationalism? | Bible general Archive 4 | fmp6954 | 235833 | ||
what is dispensationalism? | ||||||
45 | Worship after church? | Matthew | fmp6954 | 235818 | ||
9 of the 10 commandments were incorprated into the New Testament with a little change. excepth the forth comandment (keeping the Sabbath) I hope this clears up this issue. FMP |
||||||
46 | How do you feel about the Ten Commandmen | Ephesians | fmp6954 | 235815 | ||
9 of the 10 commandments were incorprated into the New Testament with a little change. excepth the forth comandment (keeping the Sabbath) I hope this clears up this issue. FMP |
||||||
47 | Live over 2000 years Old | Bible general Archive 4 | fmp6954 | 235813 | ||
BradK can you suport your stand with evidence Book, chapter ,and verse. that the Kingdom came at another time then at Pentecost? |
||||||
48 | Live over 2000 years Old | Bible general Archive 4 | fmp6954 | 235807 | ||
when I said "all the evidence" I was refering to all the evidence that I posted in my note. Not saying that their was not any other evidence out their. But let me say that if you can find any other evidence the is contary to the evidence that I displayed, then wouldn't that indicate a contradiction in the word ? I don't believe the bible contradicts it's self. Therefore all scripture will agree if understood corectly. Do you not agree? |
||||||
49 | How not to identify a Christian | Matt 13:29 | fmp6954 | 235801 | ||
Hey you! Trying to understand what you are trying to say. I sounds like you are saying that God should not pronounce final judgement on a person for worshiping God by the way they feel in their heart about the word of God instead of following the commandments of God. (feel good religon) |
||||||
50 | How not to identify a Christian | Not Specified | fmp6954 | 235794 | ||
Do you know How Not To Identify a Christian |
||||||
51 | How not to identify a Christian | Matt 13:29 | fmp6954 | 235795 | ||
Do you know How Not To Identify a Christian |
||||||
52 | Live over 2000 years Old | Bible general Archive 4 | fmp6954 | 235793 | ||
No you didn't rattle me at all I was just saddened to see someone abuse the the doctrine of God that way The Apostles were not the only people Jesus was talking to in Matt. 16:28 did you not read Mark 8:34 that I quoted? Out of that group of Peoplesome could have died before Penacost ,when the Kingdom came. by the way the Kingdom was Christ's Church |
||||||
53 | Live over 2000 years Old | Bible general Archive 4 | fmp6954 | 235783 | ||
CDBJ i have know idea where you came up with "all of you standing here" I use the NASB and it doesn't say that Matthew 16;28 actually says 28 asuredly, I say to you, there are some standing here who shall not taste death till they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom. I checked the The NAS New Testament Greek Lexicon and all does not I repeat does not apear under the difinitionss of some. Further more all the scolars that compiled the new american standard bible say it is some and I belive they are more intelegent than you are. Verily I say unto you. This is a strong asseveration, Christ puts his "Amen" to it; declaring it to be a certain truth, which may firmly be believed: there be some standing here; meaning either his disciples, or some of the audience; for it is clear from ( Mark 8:34 ) that the people were called unto him with his disciples, when he said these words: which shall not taste of death: that is, shall not die; a phrase frequently used by the Jewish doctors: they say till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom; which is not to be understood of his personal coming in his kingdom in the last day, when he will judge quick and dead; for it cannot be thought, that any then present should live to that time, but all tasted of death long before, as they have done; for the story of John's being alive, and to live till then, is fabulous, and grounded on a mistake which John himself has rectified at the close of his Gospel: nor of the glorious transfiguration of Christ, the account of which immediately follows; when he was seen by Peter, James, and John, persons now present; for that, at most, was but an emblem and a pledge of his future glory: rather, of the appearance of his kingdom, in greater glory and power, upon his resurrection from the dead, and his ascension to heaven; when the Spirit was poured down in an extraordinary manner, and the Gospel was preached all over the world; was confirmed by signs and wonders, and made effectual to the conversion and salvation of many souls; which many then present lived to see, and were concerned in: though it seems chiefly to have regard to his coming, to show his regal power and authority in the destruction of the Jews; when those his enemies that would not he should reign over them, were ordered to be brought and slain before him; and this the Apostle John, for one, lived to be a witness of. BEWARE! Stop trying to twist the word of God to conform to your doctrine and miss using the Greek. |
||||||
54 | Live over 2000 years Old | Bible general Archive 4 | fmp6954 | 235775 | ||
The Kingdom came on Pentacost. Pentecost Consider the following facts. (1) Both the Old and New Testaments teach that Christ was to receive his kingdom after he ascended to the Father (Acts 1:9-11). Daniel foretold that “one like unto a son of man” would come “even to the Ancient of Days” [God] and there he would be given “dominion, glory, and a kingdom” (Daniel 7:13-14). Similarly, Christ himself, in the parable of the pounds, spoke of a certain “nobleman” who journeyed “into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom, and to return” (Luke 19:11ff). The “nobleman” was Christ, the “far country” was heaven, and the nobleman’s “return” represented the second coming. The “kingdom” was received by the Lord in heaven—before the second coming, not on earth afterward. (2) The collection of kingdom prophecies in the Gospel accounts all point to a regime that was not realized during the days of Jesus’ earthly ministry. And, as emphasized earlier, the information in Acts and the Epistles (as well as Revelation – 1:6, 9) show the kingdom to have been a present reality from Pentecost onward (with the exception of a few passages that represent “heaven” as the final dimension of the “kingdom”; cf. 2 Timothy 4:18; 2 Peter 1:11). (3) Just prior to the prophecy of the coming kingdom, as reflected in the testimony of Matthew, Mark, and Luke, there was the exchange between Jesus and his disciples; then more specifically between Christ and Peter. The Lord made it clear that the “church” he was to build is the equivalent of the “kingdom.” In a symbolic sense, Peter used the “keys of the kingdom” (i.e., the authority resident in the gospel message) to admit sinners into the church by means of their obedience (Acts 2; 10). (4) The Savior announced that the kingdom would arrive with “power” (Mark 9:1). The most natural interpretation of that phrase centers on the events of Pentecost. Just before his ascension back into heaven, the apostles questioned the Lord as to when the “kingdom” would be restored (likely reflecting a misconception on their part as to the nature of the regime); Jesus provided a general answer. The “when” of the coming kingdom would be when the power of the Holy Spirit descended upon these men “not many days hence” (Acts 1:5, 8). It is beyond doubt that this was fulfilled ten days later on Pentecost (Acts 2:1ff). “The coming ‘with power’ (Mark 9:1) and ‘seeing the kingdom’ (Luke 9:27) must focus on Pentecost” McGarvey wrote: They saw the kingdom “come with power,” because such was the power of the Holy Spirit’s demonstrations through the apostles, that three thousand men were that day turned to the Lord. And they saw the Son of man coming in his kingdom, not literally, but by manifesting his invisible presence to the eye of faith. What they saw with their eyes and heard with their ears attested his presence in his kingdom (1875, 315). As noted by McGarvey, there is no problem in Matthew’s statement that the disciples would “see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.” In his Gospel record John had quoted the Lord as indicating that by the sending of the Holy Spirit he, indirectly, would be coming (John 14:18). Thus, by “seeing” and “hearing” the effects of the Spirit’s empowerment on Pentecost (cf. Acts 2:33), the apostles were assured of the Lord’s presence. The term “see” frequently is employed of spiritual perception, rather than physical vision (cf. Matthew 24:30; John 3:3; 16:16, 19; especially see Thayer 1958, 451). (5) As Jesus and his disciples were concluding the Passover supper, the Savior said: “I say unto you, I shall not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until the day when I drink it new with you in my Father’s kingdom” (Matthew 26:29). The “drinking,” of course, was not to be a literal drinking of the fruit of the vine, but a spiritual communion with Christians in the kingdom as they partake of the Lord’s supper. The language implies that Christ was not “in the kingdom” at that time. On the other hand, the disciples began partaking of “the breaking of bread” (i.e., the communion supper) on Pentecost (Acts 2:42), and continued thereafter (Acts 20:7; 1 Corinthians 10:16). Without a doubt, the kingdom had arrived! Conclusion All the evidence, therefore, indisputably points to the fact that the Lord’s prophecy regarding the coming kingdom, as set forth in Matthew 16:28, Mark 9:1, and Luke 9:27, came to fruition on the day of Pentecost, fifty days after the death of Christ. |
||||||
55 | would u still go to hell | 1 John 3:9 | fmp6954 | 235750 | ||
if a person is a christian in a saved condition when they die they will go to Heaven. If a person was once saved fell from grace. by forsacking the fellowship, and stopped growing in the Lord, and died in that condition then Hell is their distination. |
||||||
56 | ARE THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ABOLISHED ? | Bible general Archive 4 | fmp6954 | 235736 | ||
You say: it will never be abolished. IF IT IS NOT ABOLISHED THEN WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO THE MOSIAC LAW AND THE TEN COMMANDMANTS THAT IS PART OF THE THAT LAW WHEN GOD SAID IT WAS FULFILLED, COMPLETED, FINISHED, ENDED, DONE AWAY WITH ? THE LAW INCLUDING THE TEN COMMANDMENT AND REPLACED IT WITH THE NEW LAW (THE NEW TESTAMENT). YOU CAN’T LIVE BY TWO LAWS AT THE SAME TIME. |
||||||
57 | ARE THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ABOLISHED ? | Bible general Archive 4 | fmp6954 | 235733 | ||
you quoted this. when Christ was crucified the blood ordinances was nailed to the cross with him WHAT ARE YOU REFERRING TO AS BLOOD ORDINANCES? book , chapter and verse please. |
||||||
58 | ARE THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ABOLISHED ? | Bible general Archive 4 | fmp6954 | 235732 | ||
Here is what you quoted "There is only one way to salvation and that is through the blood of christ,his blood was shed once and forever ,no flesh can be saved by the law," Are you saying the old law could not save you ? If so I agree that is why Jesus done away with it and gave us a new Law the New testament. |
||||||
59 | ARE THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ABOLISHED ? | Bible general Archive 4 | fmp6954 | 235722 | ||
Your note: There is only one way to salvation and that is through the blood of christ,his blood was shed once and forever ,no flesh can be saved by the law, WHAT LAW ARE YOU REFERING TO? when Christ was crucified the blood ordinances was nailed to the cross with him WHAT ARE YOU REFERRING TO AS BLOOD ORDINANCES? ,circumcision is of the heart both for man and woman.and as for as the law it is what keeps man out of trouble AGAIN WHAT LAW ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? it will never be abolished, IF IT IS NOT ABOLISHED THEN WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO THE MOSIAC LAW AND THE TEN COMMANDMANTS THAT IS PART OF THE THAT LAW WHEN GOD SAID IT WAS FULFILLED, COMPLETED, FINISHED, ENDED, DONE AWAY WITH ? THE LAW INCLUDING THE TEN COMMANDMENT AND REPLACED IT WITH THE NEW LAW (THE NEW TESTAMENT). YOU CAN’T LIVE BY TWO LAWS AT THE SAME TIME. AND IN THE FIRST PLACE THE LAW INCLUDING THE TEN COMMANDMENTS WAS NEVER FOR CHRISTIANS OR GENTILES. IT WAS GIVEN TO MOSES FOR THE NATION OF ISRAEL. EXODUS: 34:27,28 |
||||||
60 | ARE THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ABOLISHED ? | Bible general Archive 4 | fmp6954 | 235721 | ||
When the Bible says that the wages of sin is death; what is it referring to since there are 7 different types of death mentioned in the Bible? Romans 6:23 (NKJV) (A) 23 For the wages of sin is death, This death is Definition The NAS New Testament Greek Lexicon 1. the death of the body a. that separation (whether natural or violent) of the soul and the body by which the life on earth is ended b. with the implied idea of future misery in hell separated from Christ. Can you name the seven deaths ? and add the book chapter and verse where they occur. I could not respond the the following words, The didn’t make a whole lot of sence to me. Could you explain what I have in CAPITALS Your response When Jesus said it is finished in John 19:30 he wasn’t dead yet SO IT COULDN'T HAVE BEEN HIS PHYSICAL THAT PAID THE PRICE OR SIN. John 19:30 (NKJV) 30 So when Jesus had received the sour wine, He said,"IT IS FINISHED" And bowing His head, He gave up His spirit. The word finished in the English is translated from the Koine Greek verb “TELEO” and IT IS IN THE IDICATIVE MOOD WHICH MEANS IT WAS ALREADY A REALITY at that point in time and the passive voice meaning He had received it SO IT WASN’T PHYSICAL DEATH THAT PAID THE PRICE! The blood as referred in the OT is what’s known as a representative analogy: it foreshadowed what the Messiah would accomplish when He came into the world. It could only cover sin at that point in time until the Lamb of God would take it away. Again what death was it that paid the price for sin? If you suggest that it was physical death then when WE DIE PHYSICALLY THAT WOULD PAY FOR OU OWN SINS AND THAT WON’T CUT IT! |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 4 ] Next > Last [4] >> |