Results 41 - 54 of 54
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: Treadway Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
41 | Where do very young kids go if pass on? | 2 Sam 12:23 | Treadway | 51416 | ||
Hello Mommaphs: "Where does the young child go..." was part of a discussion I had earlier, and, though I understand the credible assumption (and want to make it, for sure), I'm still wondering about an entire history's children, the children of the unbelievers like China, India, North and South American Indians, etc., who died. Would the assumption be that they, too, were taken to heaven? I realize there is no definitive answer to all this, but was wondering if you extend the credible assumption to these children, too? Treadway |
||||||
42 | Preterist interpretation of this verse. | Luke 21:32 | Treadway | 51391 | ||
Sure like this answer... :) Treadway | ||||||
43 | Preterist interpretation of this verse. | Luke 21:32 | Treadway | 51388 | ||
Hello Tim: You ask: "Why would they include references which were supposed to indicate that Christ would return within 40 years, when 40 years had already past?" Let's assume that your belief, that the "majority" of the NT was written prior to 70 AD is true. That would be a blow struck for the view that "soon", "near", mean exactly what the literal accepted meanings are for those words. As far as the belief that "most" of the NT was written after 70 AD, I'd need to see the sources for that. I don't think Paul's letters, Peter's letters would fall into that category. Also, why would Mark fit, when the the destroying of the temple happened in 70 AD? However, John would seem to be written well after 70 AD, don't you think? And as I suggested, there aren't too many mentions of "soon" or "near" in John. And Revelation was probably written well after 70 AD. What was on the mind of the Revelation's author may be anyone's guess. I don't know. As far as "context", perhaps the most important would be that of Paul and Peter. Paul, especially, since he was the direct messenger, and should have known better than anyone. Their comments certainly suggest to me, at least, that they were expecting the return in their lifetimes. My bottom line would be merely not to dismiss, in total, all of the pronouncements, including those of Jesus. And I could only "reject" if the evidence was "beyond a reasonable doubt". I don't think, as of yet, it all measures up to that standand, and "out of hand" rejection is not where I would go. Not yet, anyway....thanks for the preterist info...Treadway |
||||||
44 | Preterist interpretation of this verse. | Luke 21:32 | Treadway | 51374 | ||
Hello Autumn and Tim: A very important topic, indeed, and critical to many who are "waiting". I must say I haven't studied the "preterist" veiws as of yet (have to look all that up), but from my reading and study, I may lean in that direction. Here's some of the reasons: Matt 4: 17 "From then on, Jesus began to preach, 'Turn from sin, and turn to God, for the Kingdom of Heaven is near.' Emphasis on the word "near". The Good News is imminent. Matt 10: 7 "Go and announce to them the Kingdom of Heaven is near." Emphasis 'near'. Matt 10: 19 "When you are arrested, don't worry about what to say at your trial..." And, verse 23, "When you are persecuted in one city, flee to the next! I will return before you've reached them all!" Again, what is the context? Seems to me Jesus is referring to the current generation, to the lifetime of the disciples. Matt 16: 28 "And some of you standing right here now will certainly live to see me coming in my Kingdom." That seems about as clear as it can get that Jesus is saying to look for him in the disciples' lifetime. Matt 24: 9 To the disciples, concerning the Jesus's return: "Then you will be tortured and killed and hated all over the world because you are mine... 13 "But those enduring to the end shall be saved... 15 "So, when you see the horrible thing standing in a holy place, then those in Judea must flee into the Judean hills..." Once again, the emphasis is "soon" and immediate. Note: much of, if not all, is repeated in Mark and Luke; and curiously, in John, these kinds of warnings about "near", "soon", are sparse or non-existent. 1 Thess 4: 15 Paul-- "I can tell you directly from the Lord, that we who are still living when the Lord returns will not rise to meet him ahead of those who are in their graves..." Seems that Paul expects to see the return of Jesus. Hebr 10: 37 Paul: "His return will not be delayed much longer." Again, Paul seems to think the return of Jesus is right around the corner. 1 Peter 11: Peter: "And they (the prophets) wondered when and to whom all this would happen. 12 "They were finally told that these things would not occur during their (the prophets) lifetimes, but long years later, during yours..." Seems as though Peter believes the return will be in the lifetime of him and the other disciples. 1 Peter 5: 7 Peter: "The end of the world is coming soon." There's that word again--"soon". 2 Peter 3: 9 Peter: "He isn't really being slow about his promised return, even though it sometimes seems that way. But He is waiting, for the good reason that he is not willing that any perish, and he is giving more time for sinners to repent." Note the importance of this logic: Jesus has not come back as of yet because He wants all who are alive in that generation to have time to repent. Waiting for another 2000 years to pass before returning would, of course, defeat that purpose, since many millions more of sinners would have been born, etc. 1 John 1: 18 "Dear Children, this world's last hour has come. You have heard about the Antichrist who is coming, and already many such persons have appeared. This makes us all the more certain that the end of the world is near." Again, the echo of "near". And the coup de grace, perhaps, is in Revelation: Rev: 22: 6,7 Angel: "These words are trustworthy and true: "I (Jesus) am coming soon!" God, who tells his prophets what the future holds, has sent his angel to tell you this will happen soon." Two "soon's". Rev: 22: 10 "Do not seal up what you have written, for the time of fulfillment is near." Rev: 22: 12: "See, I (Jesus) am coming soon..." Rev: 22: 20 "Yes, I am coming soon!" ------------------------------------------- As of right now, based on the above, it is very hard to get past all the "soon", "near", and the beliefs of Peter and Paul, that Jesus would be returning in their lifetimes. At least for me. Now to look up "preterist".... |
||||||
45 | Saved with Baptism? | Bible general Archive 1 | Treadway | 51327 | ||
Dear Raven: You say, "Ignorance is no excuse." But it may be a reason, a good reason why many have not heard about Christianity (or been preached to). In reality, most of the people in today's world have never heard of Jesus or Christianity. You may find that difficult to believe but a little investigation will bear this out. And that's just "today". Imagine all of the people in the past who had never heard the WORD. I don't think the answer is as simple as you imply. In the course of history, literally billions of people were not exposed to the teachings of Jesus Christ before the end of their lives. And just asking, "Why am I here, where did I come from, what happens when I die," would not be an adequate replacement. You suggest that all children and retarded people have an automatic place in heaven. That may be true, I don't know. But what's the difference between a child or retarded person, and someone who has never had the opportunity to make a salvation decision? ....Treadway |
||||||
46 | Saved with Baptism? | Bible general Archive 1 | Treadway | 51310 | ||
Dear Raven: You ask if I can "surely" understand that if a child (or retarded) died unexpectedly, that he or she would go to heaven. I can only say that it is what I would hope. But different scenarios do come to mind. What about those who died prior to Christ's time? I assume they would have gone to heaven? What comes to mind are those who were killed by the Israelites, the destruction of the populations of the cities and killing of the enemies, including the children; or maybe even the ones who perished in the Flood, or in Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding countryside. Would they, too, have gone to heaven? And then there were the children of the "detested" Samaritans, and other various Gentile groups. As for the retarded, I see your point. I just don't know what the Bible actually says on this topic. Plus, add to the mix, the people who died who never had any kind of opportunity to know about God, much less Jesus. Ancient India and China come to mind. Would those people, never mind the children or retarded, have gone to heaven? In other words, is ignorance an excuse? The more I think about this, the more confusing it seems. But I'll keep reading to see if I can find the proper Bible information. Treadway |
||||||
47 | Saved with Baptism? | Bible general Archive 1 | Treadway | 51294 | ||
Hello again, Raven: Might be a "split of a hair", but seems to me that Jesus is speaking of a child (children) who believe, have faith, etc., the child who comes to Him in innocence. And is suggesting that is how the believing adult must approach, too. However, there is a lingering question for me, as to the child (or children) who has yet to have the faith of those Jesus speaks of. Or, those that have not had the opportunity, etc. For example, if an earthquake destroyed a city in Japan, and thousands of children were killed, would they be in a "safe state", too?.........Treadway |
||||||
48 | Saved with Baptism? | Bible general Archive 1 | Treadway | 51281 | ||
Hello, Raven: Just browsing through the posts and was interested in your statement: "That child is in a safe state, and if anything happens to that child, God will see to it that it will have a home in Heaven." Does this have a Bible reference? If you know it, I'd appreciate the Book and verse. It might take me forever to find it... thanks, Treadway |
||||||
49 | Was it complete? | Bible general Archive 1 | Treadway | 51275 | ||
Thank Tim, for your reply. You said: "There is not a requirement that every book in the NT must list it!" Okay, but my point was/is that if there was a definitive requirement, then it would seem, appropriately and commonsensically, that Mark would have listed it. To role play, if I had been the author of this Book, I certainly would have wanted to list it. And the same for Matthew. It is difficult for my thinking to believe that they knew and did not convey it. In trying to approach this absense in a reasonable and prudent manner, I am left with doubts as to whether or not they were privy to the information. I may, indeed, be incorrect, but feel it is a legitimate observation that something so central, so critical, would not be overlooked. Luke? Not sure what he does, but I'm sure, when the mood strikes, I'll try to find out. I hope he mentions something about it. Two not mentioning it is problem enough--hope it isn't three. :) Treadway |
||||||
50 | Belive in "The Good News" or Jesus? | Mark 16:16 | Treadway | 51268 | ||
Thanks, Leolipwee for your response. I read from Mark 9 to Mark 17, and unless I do some "inserting", it seems that the context is simply that a person must believe in the message of The Good News and be baptized. I must take Jesus at his word about this, that the message is that "God's Kingdom is near!" The saved person must believe this, then must be baptized. Unless I do the "inserting", that's all that is commanded. Also, I think if Mark knew about the major stip of believing in Jesus alone, he would have stated it previously, somewhere in his Book. And surely, he would have had Jesus say as much earlier. Anyway, not a huge deal, but I do like to be careful about "insertions" to text that seems to mean what it says. And, just an opinion. :)Treadway |
||||||
51 | Was it complete? | Bible general Archive 1 | Treadway | 51263 | ||
Could be wrong about this, but the statement that Saul of Tarsus saw the "Risen Christ" on the road, or the "Risen Christ" appeared to Saul,may not be exactly true. According to my understanding, Paul "heard" the voice of Jesus but did not actually "see" Jesus. Unless "blinding light" is acceptable for "appearing"....? | ||||||
52 | Was it complete? | Bible general Archive 1 | Treadway | 51257 | ||
...twas said: "Eph. 2:8-9 rules out all works, not just certain kinds!" Clear, indeed. But even with this "clarity" a question begs: Since knowing how "to be saved" would seem critically important, why is there no mention of "just believing" in Mark or Matthew? (not sure about Luke). Is the only logical answer for the ommittance, is that Mark and Matthew, and maybe Luke, didn't know? | ||||||
53 | Belive in "The Good News" or Jesus? | Not Specified | Treadway | 51250 | ||
When Mark 16:16 says: "Those who believe and are baptized will be saved...", to "what" exactly is Jesus referring to? In context, it appears to be "The Good News". However, many people I've heard state that it means to believe in Jesus as the Son. And another question: Mark 16:17 "And those who believe shall use my authority to cast out demons, and they shall speak in tongues. 18...They will be able even to handle snakes with safety , and if they drink anything poisonous, it won't hurt them; and they will be able to place their hands on the sick and heal them." Concerning to whom Jesus is speaking? Is he speaking to the disciples only, just those in his presense? Or, does he mean, as the text suggests, that ALL believers be able to do all of the things? How to understand all of this? It appears that if a person believes, then he should be able to drink poison and not be affected? Treadway |
||||||
54 | Belive in "The Good News" or Jesus? | Mark 16:16 | Treadway | 51261 | ||
When Mark 16:16 says: "Those who believe and are baptized will be saved...", to "what" exactly is Jesus referring to? In context, it appears to be "The Good News". However, many people I've heard state that it means to believe in Jesus as the Son. And another question: Mark 16:17 "And those who believe shall use my authority to cast out demons, and they shall speak in tongues. 18...They will be able even to handle snakes with safety , and if they drink anything poisonous, it won't hurt them; and they will be able to place their hands on the sick and heal them." Concerning to whom Jesus is speaking? Is he speaking to the disciples only, just those in his presense? Or, does he mean, as the text suggests, that ALL believers be able to do all of the things? How to understand all of this? It appears that if a person believes, then he should be able to drink poison and not be affected? Treadway |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 ] |