Results 41 - 60 of 8433
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: EdB Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
41 | Judgment Against False Doctrine | Zech 5:4 | EdB | 243951 | ||
What is false doctrine when talking about orthodox Christianity? Anything that denies the theology you hold? If you are a Calvinist then anything else is false. If you are an Armenianist then anything else is false doctrine. If you are a Dispensationalist then anything else is false. If you are a millennialist then anything else is false. If you are Ammillennial then anything else is false. If you are a true Christian your particular theology really does not matter as long as you are looking to Jesus for your salvation. |
||||||
42 | Judgment Against False Doctrine | Zech 5:4 | EdB | 243950 | ||
The question remains who decides what is false doctrine? Is the doctrine of the Baptist false? Is the doctrine of the United Methodist false? Is the doctrine of the Presbyterian false? Is the doctrine of the Wesleyan false? Is Calvinism correct? Is Arminianism correct? The list goes on which is false and which one the one correct one? Who says and who makes the call? Then we can take it further Is Dispensationalism false? Is the belief in the rapture wrong? Is millenninialism false. Is covenant theology wrong? Is perterist wrong? And again the lists goes on. Should we baptize in the name of Father Son and Holy Spirit or just in Jesus name. Should we dunk or sprinkle for baptism? Should we pray to God the father or to Jesus. Does the Holy Spirit have a complete ministry or just a part? And the list goes on Since there isn't anyway to determine which is correct we pick the one the fits our belief system and as long as it meets the requirements of orthodox Christianity it makes no difference. Debating which is correct or even most correct leads to anger and strife so why do it? |
||||||
43 | Liberalism, Despite Different Names | Jer 32:33 | EdB | 243947 | ||
There is nothing wrong with doctrine. Discussion of doctrine becomes problematic when done in such a that all aspects of the discussion can not be done fairly presented. A forum such as this is not the place. |
||||||
44 | The Word Gifted to the People of God | 2 Pet 1:17 | EdB | 243943 | ||
Beja If theology is considered to be valid within the scope of orthodox Christianity should it be called wrong? Or simply different. I am no talking of cultic theology but Protestant theology that does not stray the boundaries of orthodoxy. Differences can and will be seen but to label them as anything other than differences usually leads to misunderstandings, arguements, hurt feeling and outright nastiness. To refuse to down play those differences and in fact to focus upon them leads to strife, division and the appearance to the unknowing as confusion and division.. |
||||||
45 | The Word Gifted to the People of God | 2 Pet 1:17 | EdB | 243941 | ||
... | ||||||
46 | The Word Gifted to the People of God | 2 Pet 1:17 | EdB | 243938 | ||
That statement is untrue and unfair. Yes there has always been heresies but the major change came when social/political/religion entities came together and decided to construct new theologies. Are these theologies all wrong? No! I never said they were. What I said is they did however open doors that never before existed and never should have been opened. End result division within the body of Christ and the appearance of confusion within the body by the observing world. The real problem is this forum was not constructed to fairly allow denominational differences in discussions/debates. That is the exact reason why the Terms of Useage says there should not be any attempt to push a denominational agenda. However there are those among us that insist they must denigrate other denominations within the forum at the expense of this forum. I say make all discussions of the difference in denominations and theology doctrine cease. We should be standing united not discussing the things that divide us. My humble opinion! However that opinion has been mocked, ridiculed and it has been attempted to make it look foolish unlearned, unread, and without thought. Sad! |
||||||
47 | The Word Gifted to the People of God | 2 Pet 1:17 | EdB | 243937 | ||
Notice in Job 32:1 it was the friends that were wrong. The two verses in Proverbs are excellent but who do they apply to? I'm sure either side looks at the other as the fool. The problem is arguing over theology. Both sides believe they have the truth and the other is wrong. Better to live Christ like and let man made theology alone. Only a fool insists theology and denominational doctrine must be discussed in arena that was made to cater to all orthodox theologies and denominations. | ||||||
48 | Both Fell in a Hole | Luke 6:39 | EdB | 243934 | ||
AMEN! I wonder why so many seem to do that? | ||||||
49 | The Word Gifted to the People of God | 2 Pet 1:17 | EdB | 243931 | ||
Oh I read everything you have posted. I just don't buy what you are posting. I am not parroting anything, I am simply saying the differences in our theology have existed for 600 years, people far wiser and more knowledgeable than you or I have argued the differences without resolution for those 600 years. Further these differences will not be settled here so why must you pick the scab of those differences. There are far greater issues, bigger problems and lost souls dying and going to hell. I know about what you are facing and I have been praying about it. I would have liked to have conveyed my concern to you by email but you know that is not possible. Blessings to you. |
||||||
50 | The Word Gifted to the People of God | 2 Pet 1:17 | EdB | 243928 | ||
Actually the point is to teach, but within established theology, not trying to change theology or altering established truths. Scripture gives us that truth and it has been taught for thousands of years not just the last 600. God established His doctrines, His ways, His standards, His precepts, His commands that and that alone is what we are to teach. Not our own brand of theology that manufactures characteristics of God that aren’t seen in scripture. All teaching must be true to scripture not to the theology of a man. No matter how brilliant that man he was not called to establish doctrine contrary to who God is, contrary to God’s standards, precepts or demands. Man can never put words in God’s mouth nor should he try to use his intellect or logic to convolute a loving God. I don’t trail just any man I only trail Jesus who brings light to the darkness. |
||||||
51 | The Word Gifted to the People of God | 2 Pet 1:17 | EdB | 243926 | ||
QED | ||||||
52 | The Word Gifted to the People of God | 2 Pet 1:17 | EdB | 243925 | ||
Scripture is supreme, scripture stands on it’s own, most importantly scripture is living it conveys to it’s readers today just as it did in the thousands of years in the past. Scripture never changes. What changes is the conclusions (theology) man draws from scripture. The church had a theology that existed 1500 years, was it perfect? NO! Far from it but it was based on scripture. Then one day a group of Enlightened men decided that the existing theology gleaned from scripture was wrong and they set down to detail the differences, they used great flowing words, eloquent speech, a form of wordsmithing rarely seen before. Their presentation of their theology appealed to man, it tickled their ears and more importantly it seemed more logical and intellectual. There was great debate, men on both sides of the issue lost their lives. End result division. A divide that has been there for over 600 years with no progress from either side, with one exception a majority of the believers stayed with original theology, they made needed corrections, discarded some parts they believed were man made but basically they believed as they had before the division. However the other side refuses to accept this. They demand they are correct. That their conclusion (theology) of scripture is the only correct conclusion (theology) and for over 2000 years every one else is wrong. That brings us to today. Scripture has not changed, the words have not changed or modified yet today we have various schools of theology. Why, I am not sure but I do know that some make accusations against those that do not agree with them and scripture clearly tells us to, “Do unto others as we would have them do unto us.†Enough said. |
||||||
53 | The Word Gifted to the People of God | 2 Pet 1:17 | EdB | 243923 | ||
I think the original illustration said, “If you write to your Aunt Mildred, would you think that anyone other than Aunt Mildred should interpret what you have written with the intent of her interpretation?†Are now to understand that God gave us men down through history to help us understand what a letter written to Aunt Mildred should have read to Aunt Mildred? Wasn’t the hue and cry of the Enlightened Generation that every man was capable of understanding for himself what scripture was saying? Why do these men have a better understanding than any other man? Does this not neglect that for 1500 before this Aunt Mildred and others did read and understand but then the Enlightened Ones said oh no you have it all wrong it is like this? Again Aunt Mildred had received the letter, had read it for herself and had lived by her interpretation of that letter for 1500 years. Then one day “Enlighten individuals†came on the scene and said, “Oh Aunt Mildred you have it all wrong, here is what these letters are really saying.†When Aunt Mildred questioned the Enlightened ones they told her she was using mysticism and low view of the letter and that a high view without the mysticism the letter said thus and such. However Aunt Mildred and almost everyone agreed with Aunt Mildred had interpreted from the letters were in fact correct and that they should now worry about what others said. However those that disagreed with Aunt Mildred refused to let the issue die and even now 600 years later they still demand they are right and everyone else is wrong. |
||||||
54 | The Word Gifted to the People of God | 2 Pet 1:17 | EdB | 243921 | ||
“If you write to your Aunt Mildred, would you think that anyone other than Aunt Mildred should interpret what you have written with the intent of her interpretation?†Great Illustration! Let us take it a step further: Now suppose your Aunt read these letters for 1500 years interpreting them as she believed you meant them, then one day a group of “enlightened individuals†came to Aunt Mildred and said you have been reading these letters all wrong! Your logic and your intellect should tell you that what the writer meant was totally different than your interpretation. You must be weak minded to have missed this or you had a hidden agenda. However on further research we find the people that are saying this are the ones that have an agenda. Now suppose we look at the situation almost 600 years after the fact the people that tried to destroy Aunt Mildred’s reading of the letter are still around but very much in the minority to those that agree with most parts of Aunt Mildred’s reading of the letter. Yet those that oppose Aunt Mildred interpretation refuse to accept that some people really don’t care how they interpret the letters to Aunt Mildred because they see much more important issues to be dealt with. Yet the protesters of Aunt Mildred’s interpretation will not stop trying to shame people into their way of thinking. They will even challenge a person’s belief system, their walk through life and even their intelligence in an effort to render Aunt Mildred’s interpretation of the letter invalid. |
||||||
55 | The Prevalence of the Liberal Low View | Heb 2:1 | EdB | 243916 | ||
What is often missed in this discussion is the fact that it still comes back to man's interpretation of what scripture is saying to them. If you agree with a man's interpretation that man claims you have a high view of scripture, however if you disagree with his interpretation then he claims you have a low view. High low, all I want is to follow Jesus. And I want to be treated as my brother in Christ would want to be treated, because that is how Jesus us instructed us to treat our brother and even our enemies. |
||||||
56 | Wisdom of God | Prov 2:7 | EdB | 243914 | ||
The reaction of the liberals to the recent election should be a lesson to all. We see the liberals trying to invalidate the results by trying to shout down and censor the elected. Censorship is merely the distasteful tool used by those that do not want to have their position challenged. |
||||||
57 | Post-Truth | 1 Tim 5:25 | EdB | 243912 | ||
What mention of inferences did I make? You stand on a relatively new doctrine invented by the reformers in about 1600. The original doctrine of the church has existed for 2000 years. If you make this post disappear you prove to all you have no honor |
||||||
58 | How should we view Christianity. | Eph 4:24 | EdB | 243910 | ||
Beja Where did I say we ought not to have any dealing with unclean untrustworthy sinners? I think what I said was what scripture said, " Do not be bound together with unbelievers; for what partnership have righteousness and lawlessness, or what fellowship has light with darkness? ?" Now if you do not agree with that your complaint is not with me. More importantly none of this is in this thread! Even more importantly why would you want to enter into relationship with someone whose father is Satan? |
||||||
59 | How should we view Christianity. | Eph 4:24 | EdB | 243909 | ||
... | ||||||
60 | How should we view Christianity. | Eph 4:24 | EdB | 243908 | ||
... | ||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ] Next > Last [422] >> |