Results 41 - 58 of 58
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: inHzsvc Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
41 | succorer neutral gender | 1 Cor 14:34 | inHzsvc | 58724 | ||
I have practiced this at times, though not at all every time. Generally I shake hands with folks. Surely, you see that you are grasping for straws in this argument. You are speaking about a type of greeting which is not necessarily in the assembly and specific instructions on worship practices. There is not doubt that women are told to keep silent in the mixed assemblies twice in Scripture. The thinking that we can just throw things out that we don't agree with is a dangerous doctrine. |
||||||
42 | succorer neutral gender | 1 Cor 14:34 | inHzsvc | 58762 | ||
You need a lot of help with tact. Anyway, it was not a custom that Paul was referring to in either his epistle to the Corinthian church or his letter to Timothy. That women were to remain silent was a matter of church conduct. There is not even a hint that this was to go on outside the church--only inside. That means it was church policy and we don't have a right or reason to change it. |
||||||
43 | succorer neutral gender | 1 Cor 14:34 | inHzsvc | 58802 | ||
Nothing against you, but, it's sad that we live in a day and age when such a question would be asked. I, as well as many believers (and as far as I can tell, most all believers up until less than a century ago)get that this is church policy from I Cor. 14:34--"Let your women keep silence IN THE CHURCHES (this makes it church policy--now listen to the next part and see if it sounds like just a customary thing) for it is NOT PERMITTED unto them to speak; buy they are COMMANDED to be under obedience as ALSO saith the law." Paul is not speaking here to Pharisees, he is speaking to one of the Lord's churches. If we believe that we can disregard this as "custom", we have opened up a can of worms that ends in Catholicism. Catholics openly believe that they have the authority to override the Bible and many protestants have learned that from her. I Tim. 2:11-13 says, "Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, ten Eve." You see, it wasn't a custom thing. It's a creation thing. Paul here was writing to Timothy--a pastor--instructing him on this same issue. There is no room in Scripture left open for change on this issue. The only way we can change it, is it wrongly label it as merely custom. If we do this with this issue, where will we stop? God bless. |
||||||
44 | succorer neutral gender | 1 Cor 14:34 | inHzsvc | 58854 | ||
You think my logic is flawed because you do not want to believe it. The fact is, Paul wrote a letter to a church correcting them on many things. One of the things was that they were allowing women to speak in the assembly and he told them to quit it. This is just too plain to be misunderstood unless somebody has a theory to defend. As for Jer. 31:33,34, no I do not believe this has been fulfilled. I believe this is speaking of the future--restored Israel. As for now, they are "divorced" from Jehovah as an adulterous wife. The church is the virgin bride of Christ. We must keep them separate. The Lord has not cast away His people forever. He will bring them back and that is what this is speaking of. |
||||||
45 | succorer neutral gender | 1 Cor 14:34 | inHzsvc | 58891 | ||
First of all, I am in the same boat as your pastor. I too am a pastor of a small church and work a full-time job. Thanks be to God who has made it a very flexible job that understands the needs of a pastor. You said you didn't agree with my interpretation of I Cor. 14:34. Honestly, I don't see how else to interpret "Let your women keep silence in the churches (notice, this is plural); for it is not permitted (not that it is not a custom, but, that it is not permitted--that sounds like a rule of faith) unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience which also (this is not part of the OT law for the law ALSO says this) saith the law." This is not a hard passage to "interpret." Again, you have to look outside of the Bible to come to the conclusion that this is a custom. If you are looking for commentary to help you with it, I would suggest you didn't look at some of these newer liberal commentaries. Look at some of the older ones which knew more about the Bible than the preachers today who are just interested in nickels and noses. As to Hosea, I am impressed that you mentioned that book. I preached on it not too long ago and I noticed people having to look to the index to see where it is. I guess we are tempted to stay in the New Testament more than the Old. Anyway, I believe Hosea divorced his wife. I believe this is seen in Hos. 2:2. However, I believe he took her back and restored her. I believe this is a picture of Israel. I believe presently that she is divorced from God (Jer. 3:7-8). However, just as Hosea prophesied, I believe the Lord is going to restore the nation of Israel and fulfill the remainder of the OT prophecies. God bless. |
||||||
46 | Does Scripture mean what it says? | Gal 3:28 | inHzsvc | 3453 | ||
many people have, with good intentions, violated the Scripture.... |
||||||
47 | Is man a 'triune' creature? | Heb 4:12 | inHzsvc | 2296 | ||
charis, this is the position I used to hold. the thing that gave me problems is, after man is saved, this theory would make him have body, soul, spirit, and Holy Spirit--4 parts. i do agree that man died in the fall and must needs be regenerated. you departed from the "i believe" and "i think" language that I used. you went to the "i am sure" and "I don't think" language. isn't it funny how we can't seem to get away from that. God bless. |
||||||
48 | Is man a 'triune' creature? | Heb 4:12 | inHzsvc | 2381 | ||
One statement you said bothers me somehow. You said "God is not flesh." Jesus is God and He definitely was God in the flesh. However, He was, and is, not fleshly. I suspect that is what you meant? God bless. |
||||||
49 | Who is the Bride of Christ? | Revelation | inHzsvc | 1630 | ||
In the Book of Revelation, we are told that the Bride "hath made herself ready." We are also told that a church can lose it's "candlestick", which is representative of the church itself. This teaches two things--there are faithful Christians and there are faithful churches. The Bride will be composed of faithful members of faithful churches. The rest of the saints will simply be members who are "called to the marriage supper of the Lamb." God bless you and yours. |
||||||
50 | Best commentary on Revelation? | Revelation | inHzsvc | 1632 | ||
They even have a priest on there....talk about leading to a one-world form of worship. | ||||||
51 | Best commentary on Revelation? | Revelation | inHzsvc | 1772 | ||
Absolutely. They need to do a little research and see how the Catholics have treated other groups throughout history. That belief of theirs still exists, though hidden at this present time. | ||||||
52 | WHY DOSE IT HAVE TO BE MOSSES AND ELIJAH | Revelation | inHzsvc | 1775 | ||
Amen.....that's my attitude about it even though I think they MIGHT be Enoch and Elijah. | ||||||
53 | The beast with seven heads | Revelation | inHzsvc | 1777 | ||
My take on it is that this beast represents the Revived Roman empire. The one with a deadly wound that lives is the Antichrist. This is a very deep question that would take much more time than is allowed here.... | ||||||
54 | WHY DOSE IT HAVE TO BE MOSSES AND ELIJAH | Revelation | inHzsvc | 1801 | ||
You asked what Enoch ever did with respect to the Second Coming. Well, let's see.....Jude 14 begins "And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these things, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints, (15) to execute judgment upon all, and to convince all that are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed, and of all their hard speeches which ungodly sinners have spoken against him." Now, this sounds like something similar to what I think, at least, that the two witnesses will be preaching. Again, I am not dogmatic concerning Enoch or anybody else. However, I have many good commentators that feel Enoch is the second witness and they have reasonable ground to stand on. God can empower anybody He wants to with the powers the two witnesses will have. Moses and Elijah wouldn't have had them had the Lord not given them to them. God bless all and thanks for the good conversation. | ||||||
55 | WHY DOSE IT HAVE TO BE MOSSES AND ELIJAH | Revelation | inHzsvc | 1813 | ||
That passage has made me wonder how much Enoch was hated in the pre-flood era. God bless. | ||||||
56 | GEt back up | Revelation | inHzsvc | 2014 | ||
Thanks, Brother. If I'd read this first, I wouldn't have had to reply. I have never taken the term backsliding to mean losing one's salvation. John Bunyan, in Pilgrim's Progress, represents a Christian going up a hill. However, some ways up, he trips and slides back down a ways. He then gets up and goes back over the same ground he had once tread. Notice, the Christian is always on the hill. I know this is not infallible Scripture, but, I believe it is Scriptural. God bless, and, thanks for defending the truth. |
||||||
57 | GEt back up | Revelation | inHzsvc | 7501 | ||
So, you don't expect to see David, Peter, or Noah in Heaven? We have Scripture. Scripture says, "He that believeth HATH ETERNAL life." Are you a possessor or eternal life? That's what being saved is. If you are, it is eternal. If Christ surely paid for your sins, you have been made "at one" (atonement) with God. God bless. |
||||||
58 | GEt back up | Revelation | inHzsvc | 7552 | ||
Atonement means reconciliation. That means that Christ's blood acutally reconciled us to God--His blood made us "at one" with God. Christ said specifically that He gave His sheep eternal life and they shall never perish. Did the five foolish virgins make it in, you ask? Not to the wedding, but, there is no mention of them not making it to Heaven and there is no mention of them being eternally separated from. Christ, because of they're actions, didn't choose them to be in His bride. But, they were, nevertheless, virgins. This signifies that they'd been washed. Notice, when the Bridegroom called, all of the virgins arose. At the sounding of the trumpet, no lost will arise. I realize this is not the general teaching of this parable, but, there are too many unanswered questions if you think these virgins were lost. They simply were not members of the Bride of Christ which we all should be striving for. God bless. |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 ] |