Results 41 - 45 of 45
|
||||||
Results from: Answers On or After: Thu 12/31/70 Author: Suede67 Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
41 | John used the Book of Enoch? | 2 Tim 3:16 | Suede67 | 92245 | ||
Yes, the hands down best commentary is available on line, and in book form as well if you would rather have it on paper. It's "Days of Vengeance" by David Chilton. The best I've seen, and believe me, I've see a lot. See link below. Though not impossible that John saw and read the Book of Enoch, the only one that actually quotes it is Jude. Take care http://freebooks.entrewave.com/freebooks/docs/2226_47e.htm |
||||||
42 | When does millinium start?Where are we? | Revelation | Suede67 | 84361 | ||
So many different views on this, it would be hard to sum them all up in one post. In short there's three "main" views, PreMillennium, Amillennium, and PostMillennium. (I'm an Amill myself.) I would HIGHLY recommend R.C. Sproul's book called, "The Last Days According to Jesus." He's got a great chapter looking at the different views and just as important a look at parts of Revelation and the Olivet Discourse. Another book you can look at is this, "Three Views on the Millennium and Beyond" edited by Darrell Bock. It's got overviews of the three views by some well known supporters of each. Bear in mind though, that like all things, there will be views within those views, none are in stone, but you should get the jist of them. Lastly, there are of course stand alone books on each view indivdually. Take care, |
||||||
43 | tribe of dan | Revelation | Suede67 | 116099 | ||
Nob, You're correct in your belief. Dan is not mentioned in Revelation 7, but then again neither is Ephraim. Both Dan and Ephraim are noted for idolatry (Jdg 18:18,19; 1 Ki 12:29-30; Hos 4:17) and this probably explains why they are not included in the list that is selected and sealed by God. However, this does not mean they are forgotten or out of God's grace. Ezekiel 48 deals with the restoration, which makes the events in it coming AFTER the events of Rev 7. So there is no mistake here. Due to their past wickedness, none were to be selected and sealed from Dan (or Ephraim) in Rev 7, but after the restoration of all things, God forgives and grace shines upon Dan AND Ephraim once again. If anything, this is a show of God's great grace and love, it is hardly a 'mistake'. Take care, SUEDE |
||||||
44 | The truth in Revelation? | Rev 1:1 | Suede67 | 94721 | ||
The very short answer is John is saying that Jerusalem will be destroyed in a few years. Many in the church believe Revelation to be written in 90 or 95 AD. New research shows this to be incorrect. A better date is before 70 AD, sometime in the 60's. Note in 1:1 that the things listed in Revelation must SOON take place. And they did indeed! Take care, SUEDE |
||||||
45 | Did this war already occur? | Rev 12:7 | Suede67 | 116129 | ||
BStudent, In short, yes it did. You are wise to see the time indicator in verse 3. That's not the only one either. ββ¦to show to His bond-servants the things which must shortly take place.β (Rev. 22:6) "Behold, I am coming quickly. " (Rev. 22:7) "Do not seal up the words of the prophecy of this book, for the time is near." (Rev. 22:10) "Behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward is with Me, to render to every man according to what he has done.β (Rev. 22:12) "Yes, I am coming quickly." (Rev. 22:20) A belief that might be up your alley is known as Preterism, which believes in past fulfillment of prophecies. Take care, SUEDE |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 ] |