Results 21 - 40 of 51
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: pcdarcan1 Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
21 | Is the church is infallible? | 1 Tim 3:15 | pcdarcan1 | 137298 | ||
Oh, even though the thread is restricted, you can still read it... Just search for "2 Cor 4:4". Thank-you kindly for your review and input. You will see where Steve was intentionally playing dumb (thus, less than dishonest) and he even admits it. The reason? Because he was passing judgement on my post and decided that he didn't like me - I'm not sure why though, I never did anything to him. | ||||||
22 | Tradition Or The Bible? | Matt 15:3 | pcdarcan1 | 137297 | ||
Ok, I think we have had enough Catholic bashing... next question please. | ||||||
23 | CLARIFICATION of Gen. 1:26 | Gen 1:26 | pcdarcan1 | 137296 | ||
Hank, thanks for restricting the thread that contained this awful comment from BradK "If these are indeed your "only true and honest observations", you need to be a bit more observant!" - BradK I know you have a lot on your plate... may I remind you (in case you may have overlooked it) that BradK needs to be removed from this forum in harmony with the rules of this Lockman Foundation forum. Thank you Hank for carrying out your duties in a fair manner. |
||||||
24 | Is the church is infallible? | 1 Tim 3:15 | pcdarcan1 | 137293 | ||
Hi, I respect your feedback. What you don't know is that recently Steve (forget his username), attacked several of my posts and started playing games with his replys to my sincere efforts on this forum. When I called Steve on this, Hank stuck up for Steve (who clearly violated the guidelines and said that I the offended was quilty of breaking the rules). I called it a conspiracy and a use of double-standards... You seem like a reasonable poster. Check out the restricted post 2 Cor 4:4 and you will see where Steve admitted to be dishonest simply because he didn't "like" my scriptural responses. You'll see where Steve forced me to call his bluff and you'll also see Hank's ignoring of my requests to review the whole situation carefully. About BradK, please reread what he said... it wasn't kind at all and if Hank only reprimands who he doesn't like - I would call that favoritism and abuse of his privileges. Your last statement I agree with. As far as Lockman, I want to talk with them an go over each post to prove my case - it is very strong and Hank knows it... that is why he is trying to ignore me and is frantically restricting these otherwise fine threads. If you look at my posts (outside of the ones dealing with this issue), you'll see that Hank suppressed some very fine admonition from the apostle Paul that can really help people in these distressful times that we live. Thanks for your feedback, btw. |
||||||
25 | Can satan see the face of God? | Rev 12:7 | pcdarcan1 | 137292 | ||
At the time of Job, Satan and his demons had access to God, but not after the events of Rev 12:7-9 "Then war broke out in heaven. Michael and his angels fought against the dragon, who fought back with his angels; but the dragon was defeated, and he and his angels were not allowed to stay in heaven any longer. "The huge dragon was thrown out - that ancient serpent, named the Devil, or Satan, that deceived the whole world. He was thrown down to earth, and all his angels with him." So, he no longer has access to heaven and thus the face of God. Rev 12:12 goes on to say: "And so be glad you heavens, and all you that live there! But how terrible for the earth and the sea! For the Devil has come to you, and he is filled with rage, because he knows that he has only a little time left." |
||||||
26 | what is love for God and your neighbour | Matt 6:20 | pcdarcan1 | 137278 | ||
Love for God means finding out his will and doing it. You must read his word of truth (John 17:17) For neighbor, love means so many things - even as it does with God. There's no one answer and the Bible is full of many ways that we show love for God and neighbor - Mt 7:1 contains details such as not judging your neighbor. (Reference James 1:27) |
||||||
27 | meaning of mark 5:19 | Mark 5:19 | pcdarcan1 | 137276 | ||
Jesus did not let the man healed from demon possession to follow him; but notice the witness that that man gave on Jesus' behalf in the very next verse! Mark 5:20 "So the man left and went all through the Ten Towns, telling what Jesus had done for him. And all who heard it were amazed." I believe Jesus knew what was going to happen and wanted this man to witness about him in his home town. |
||||||
28 | Is the church is infallible? | 1 Tim 3:15 | pcdarcan1 | 137267 | ||
Oh, one more thing. You also need to revoke BradK's membership because he has shown no signs of repenting from these rude remarks and besmirching this forum. | ||||||
29 | Who's at the circumcision debate in Acts | Acts 15:2 | pcdarcan1 | 137266 | ||
By the way Hank, what was wrong with this post?, because its another example of mine for the Lockman Foundation and I need to know what in particular was in violation or is this you again showing favoritism and partiality towards your personal believes? How many times do I need to prove to you that this is a site for interdominational beliefs? You are violating this Hank and you need to stop it. | ||||||
30 | Is the church is infallible? | 1 Tim 3:15 | pcdarcan1 | 137265 | ||
Hank, this is a violation of the Lockman Foundation rules, isn't it? Are you going to restrict this thread, too? If not, you are being hypocritical and following a double standard - can't you see this? Because all on this forum can see it crystal clear. This is an unbelievably sharp remark from BradK: "If these are indeed your "only true and honest observations", you need to be a bit more observant!" btw: Each instance of you avoiding and protecting your minions is more proof for my case with the Lockman Foundation and the general consesus of participants on this forum. You need to come clean about your association with the Lockman Foundation - please name names or I will be determined to find out and not give up. It's a matter of Godly principle. I know I don't worship a God who supports double standards - but your actions show you do. |
||||||
31 | Who's at the circumcision debate in Acts | Acts 15:2 | pcdarcan1 | 137252 | ||
The Bible provides only limited detail about the composition of an early governing body, most of the information being in Acts chapter 15. That account indicates that in 49 C.E. that a group of Christian men forming the governing body consisted of “the apostles and older men in Jerusalem.” Who were these?—Acts 15:2, 4, 6. James, the half brother of Jesus, presided at that meeting to discuss the question of whether Gentile converts to Christianity had to keep the Mosaic Law, including circumcision. The apostle Peter shared in that discussion. The account speaks of Judas (called Barsabbas) and Silas as “leading men among the brothers,” but it does not specifically say that they were part of that governing body in Acts 15. (Acts 15:7, 13, 22) The “sect of the Pharisees” are believers who were once associated with the Pharisees, the very ones who took a side against Jesus. The ones of that sect who became believers also brought their old ways (you may say) into the congregation and tried to insist that circumcision was necessary for believing Gentiles in order to get saved. Of course, the book of Acts tells the outcome. Hope that helps. |
||||||
32 | Bible verse - foolish man looks back? | Luke 9:62 | pcdarcan1 | 137243 | ||
I believe the cited verse above is the one you are alluding to. | ||||||
33 | 2 corn. 4:4 the god of this world hath b | 2 Cor 4:1 | pcdarcan1 | 137240 | ||
From the Lockman Foundation web-page: "The Lockman Foundation is a nonprofit, interdenominational ministry dedicated to the translation, publication, and distribution of the New American Standard Bible, La Biblia de las Américas, the Amplified Bible, and other Biblical resources." Key phrase: "interdenominational ministry" Hank, I really don't mean to cause you pain (what are you doing up so early in the morning... for heavens sake, get some sleep... and I mean that sincerely.) My personal belief is that you over-acted, causing you to not act in fairness. When rules are given in a forum, they just have to apply to everyone - I'm sure you agree with that statement. Respectfully, pcdarcan |
||||||
34 | Why no love herein? | 2 Cor 11:5 | pcdarcan1 | 137205 | ||
Hank, perseverance in your wayward course is not going to work - the Lockman Foundation can't possibly support what you are doing. Can you please provide me with a name who you are dealing with in the Lockman Foundation? (If you feel upright about the way you have been behaving, you will have no problem in revealing that to me.) Thanks for understanding that this cannot go on - I want to recommend that you step down from your position because you said, 'We don't play these type of games' on this forum. Do you remember this comment that you made in a post? Well, I now have conclusive proof that you and your lackeys have been 'playing games' - do you see the seriousness of this? |
||||||
35 | Why no love herein? | 2 Cor 11:5 | pcdarcan1 | 137203 | ||
Oh, one other point. The Lockman Foundation will not support the wayward ways of these few because it would reflect poorly on them. So, don't anyone blame the Lockman Foundation... there's just a few bad apples and like I said, I need to find out how high up these go. I hope its not another Enron - people are sick of that. |
||||||
36 | Why no love herein? | 2 Cor 11:5 | pcdarcan1 | 137200 | ||
Hi, I'm going to get to the bottom of this... you can see my posts that have been restricted and I've included my serious intentions in them in order to see to it that all these bullies who have conspired to push their own beliefs are brought to justice. That is not what this forum was intended for -that a few elite would conspire to get people kicked off anytime they disagreed with reasonable and scriptural posts. Don't anyone leave the forum - this could take some time but I need all the support I can rally because the corruption may be deeper than you or I imagine - remember Enron? God will prevail, he always does and he will never forsake truth seekers - never! |
||||||
37 | Be Angry and Sin Not , Verse Reference? | Eph 4:26 | pcdarcan1 | 137192 | ||
By this time you know I'm sincere about my complaints and actions that I am taking against you Hank... you can run, but you can't hide. I'm going to make sure Lockman knows how you and a few others are corrupting this forum and its intent. Come clean Hank, you know you and your lackeys are wrong in your dealings with people - and of all people, you should know that from your personal reading of the Bible. I'm still not sure why you set this in motion. |
||||||
38 | 2 corn. 4:4 the god of this world hath b | 2 Cor 4:1 | pcdarcan1 | 137191 | ||
But that is another subject... let's be clear Steve, you acknowledged in your posts here that Satan IS "the god of this world"... and that's the real issue that was raised when one of the posters said it was God (the Creator) who "blinds the minds of the unbelievers" and created quite a stir as you know, “but” it took some time before you came out with that admission yourself because you were hoping to discourage me and you wanted to support one of your “own” because that poster was be proved wrong. So, by your actions, you were more interested in making me look bad, as opposed to supporting the truth of the Bible – do you see this? As people read through the threads between you and I, they will see that you were less than honest with an ulterior motive all along because you are (I'm guessing) intimidated by my Biblical response. The truth must be made known. I'm gathering all the usernames that have abused their self-appointed positions on this otherwise great site, because you’re spoiling it for everyone! We will have no Enron's on this forum, it was not the intention of the Lockman Foundation to have an elite class of users abuse their power. Remember the saying, "Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely." Hank is the poster child for this and I have his number. I am politely proceeding to round up all of Hank's Lackeys (you would be one and I suspect BradK) and I'm investigating the others. I'm going to blow this wide open get this straightened out for the Lockman Foundation. |
||||||
39 | Eve always blamed for the fall of Man. | Gen 3:12 | pcdarcan1 | 137186 | ||
Good post... in a way, Adam was more responsible because he wasn't deceived (as Eve was). Like you said, the result is that we "all" inherited sin. Ro 5:12 | ||||||
40 | Which prohet ate a book? | Ezek 3:1 | pcdarcan1 | 137175 | ||
Hank, you should know that legally you cannot hold anyone accountable to the stated rules of this forum IF the moderators don't enforce them for "everyone". And, because there are no real moderators, but an elite class of uses that seem to control the posts in this forum, if those elite don't hold everyone, including themselves to the same high standards laid out in the forum, there is absolutely no legal recourse. So, you are really up a creek without a paddle. And, you brought it all on yourself. Your behavior is childish. |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 ] Next > Last [3] >> |