Results 21 - 40 of 62
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: believer 2004 Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
21 | God can use woman in the ministry? | Gal 3:28 | believer 2004 | 133775 | ||
A lot of men do pass over this scripture. I think it has to do with age. The older generation was taught that a woman had no place in the church. No matter how many times people are told to study the scriptures to prove everything true, they tend to go with what they are taught.1 thess. 5:21.,Rom.12:2 The statement Paul made about women keeping silent in the church is also often misinterpreted to mean there is no place for a woman.1 Cor.14:34-35. I think this was a warning to those who were using church as a place to gossip, or possibly were disrupting the service by asking questions in an inappropriate manner. There were prophetesses and priestesses mentioned in the Bible, and there were many women followers of Jesus, as well as many women active in the church of the first century. God Bless, Misty |
||||||
22 | pastors or ministers? | Not Specified | believer 2004 | 133772 | ||
Are there any pastors or senior members of the church here? Misty |
||||||
23 | pastors or ministers? | Eph 4:11 | believer 2004 | 133773 | ||
Are there any pastors or senior members of the church here? Misty |
||||||
24 | is the seed non-human? | Dan 2:43 | believer 2004 | 133667 | ||
Jo, There are very few people that agree on every aspect of the Bible. People are different and no two people will think exactly the same.I think the reference he was referring to here was when the literal sense makes sense... Only they were not using literal sense with me ,but symbolism, which basically means you can make the Bible say anything that you want it to. God Bless, Misty |
||||||
25 | how can gov. minglewith the seed of men? | Dan 2:43 | believer 2004 | 133665 | ||
Brad, I'm sorry you haven't heard anything new in eighteen years. I have been reading the Bible most of my life and I learn something new everytime I pick it up. I hope you are aware that I am not the one who made this mole hill a mountain. I asked one person one question. It's obviously a controversial subject and i'm almost sorry I brought it up, but I guess Jesus probably felt the same way. He brought a new way of thinking and doing things and He was persecuted first. GOD BLESS you and yours, Misty |
||||||
26 | is the seed non-human? | Dan 2:43 | believer 2004 | 133663 | ||
You are making the assumption that clones are a good thing. You are also leaving the most important way to tell whether a thing is a human or not, and that is it's ability to Love and Worship the lord. This has nothing to do with science, but creation. You can not assume that clones come from God. To do so is to assume that every manmade thing is made because He wants it made, such as the tower of Babel and false gods, nuclear bombs, etc. He allows humans to do what they do so He can fulfill His plans. There is no way anyone can possibly think a clone is made of God. He does not breathe the breath of life in them, they are grown in a laboratory, not in the womb. If this was a good thing, He could have made Jesus in the same way. Which is ridiculous! He used the way He made and excepted to bring a child into this world, and it wasn't cloning. I think that IF clones are allowed, they will be aware, be able to think and ACT like a human, but have no soul with which to interact with GOD in any way. They will have no conscious to slow them down or make them feel guilt or sorrow. As I said, these are my opinions, as well as what you have given me is your opinion, not biblical truth. As for the verse in Matt., I only said it could be referring to something not human, not specifically cloning.What do you think it means? Having a clone, who I believe will not have a conscious, would be the perfect vehicle for demons to freely enter. GOD BLESS! Misty |
||||||
27 | is the seed non-human? | Dan 2:43 | believer 2004 | 133662 | ||
That's a good question, that's why I asked it! I am familiar with the verse in Isaiah. I know there will be animals. Will they be animals that died and went to Heaven, or will thay just be there because God puts them there? that is the question I was interested in. I haven't found any scripture to answer that, maybe you have. Misty |
||||||
28 | is the seed non-human? | Dan 2:43 | believer 2004 | 133660 | ||
Reighnskye, I know that clones and hybrids are two different things. What I said was that it is a possibility that it could be either. Meaning basically anything that isn't human. I used the scripture in Matt. to make the point that there ARE things that He didn't put here. I just think to assume this scripture is talking about government alone is reading something into it that isn't there. Do you read the Bible by symbolizing, or literally? Misty |
||||||
29 | is the seed non-human? | Dan 2:43 | believer 2004 | 133587 | ||
Brad, I gave many scriptures to back up what I said, no one reads anything just a like. As far as going to far, I was only replying to the questions and notes that were sent to me, not trying to build a case as if I was in court. Can we lighten it up now? And also, what scholary evidence do you need? I can give names if you want, but that still can't really prove anything, can it? Can people who don't agree just agree that we love the LORD JESUS CHRIST and be friendly and objective to each others ideas? Love in truth! Misty |
||||||
30 | how can gov. minglewith the seed of men? | Dan 2:43 | believer 2004 | 133586 | ||
Tim, You may be right, you may also be wrong.Personally, I hope you are right! I am not spouting a false doctrine at all, only asking questions and stating my opinions. I made it quite clear these were my opinions, not facts. GOD bless and may we all know the truth! Misty |
||||||
31 | is the seed non-human? | Dan 2:43 | believer 2004 | 133584 | ||
Rowdy, Although I agree with most of what you said, i have to disagree with you on a few points: 1) GOD knows who those with Jewish roots are. If you were thinking that I was even talking about the rapture at that point, it was a mistake, I wasn't. Also, there are many scriptures that talk about a literal thousand year reign as well as Jesus coming in what a lot of people refer to as the rapture. I would be more than happy to quote those verses for you but i'm sure you've heard it many times before. I've never really heard that Matt. 24 was a controversial chapter, unless it was between those who fail to see the church and the Israelis as two different groups. It also tells you that no one can know the day or hour, but those who aren't in darkness will know the approximate time. God bless, Misty |
||||||
32 | is the seed non-human? | Dan 2:43 | believer 2004 | 133581 | ||
Tim, There is a reference to this in Daniel. I will look it up and get back to you. Misty |
||||||
33 | is the seed non-human? | Dan 2:43 | believer 2004 | 133580 | ||
That's exactly how I am going at it. to say they mingled with the seed of men meaning each other is pure nonsense to me, I think they would have just said, they married each other and it didn't work. Just because I have a different opinion than you doesn't make either of us bad, it just makes us two different people, and I hope that you haven't taken any personal offense to my opinions. GOD bless you! Misty |
||||||
34 | is the seed non-human? | Dan 2:43 | believer 2004 | 133579 | ||
Brad, I have consulted godly scholars on the matter as a matter of fact. I am also a student of the Bible. I may be new to the forum but that doesn't make me illiterate at any rate. I also made it quite clear that these were my personal opinions, not biblical facts. And with all due respect, I think you are wrong about one verse being a doctrine. Genesis 1:1 just for an example. I am sorry to see someone attack another without ample reason to do so. Furthermore, even though I have talked to many godly scholars, I always let the Bible stand on it's own for truth because men are not infallible. God bless! Misty |
||||||
35 | is the seed non-human? | Dan 2:43 | believer 2004 | 133568 | ||
Steve, You can be no more sure of your statement than I can. If you interpret things figuratively, you will lose much of the Bible's importance. GOD bless, Misty |
||||||
36 | is the seed non-human? | Dan 2:43 | believer 2004 | 133566 | ||
How can that mean the same thing? They as men are each other. Their seed is their seed, a part of them, but not the whole. Misty |
||||||
37 | how can gov. minglewith the seed of men? | Dan 2:43 | believer 2004 | 133565 | ||
Steve, I see you have a sense of humor! Misty |
||||||
38 | how can gov. minglewith the seed of men? | Dan 2:43 | believer 2004 | 133563 | ||
Tim, Things in the endtimes will probably be worse than anything the x-files can think up. Misty |
||||||
39 | is the seed non-human? | Dan 2:43 | believer 2004 | 133562 | ||
Mark, All I can say to your first statement is AMEN! To your second, you never know, stranger things have happened and will only get stranger and more evil. God bless you and yours. Also, please never be afraid to express your thoughts. It may be that you could be one that God will use to un-lock the prophecies which were bond up in Daniel. Misty |
||||||
40 | is the seed non-human? | Dan 2:43 | believer 2004 | 133561 | ||
Rowdy, It is true that GOD is very patient, and He has delayed His coming before, but He also gave us very specific signs of his coming(matt.24) that we can't ignore. There is also the parable of the fig tree, Matt.24:32 which has already taken place. It is already written, and GOD does not lie. He can delay for a short time, but it has to happen in the generation of the fig tree.( 1948 when Israel became a nation, or 1967 when Jerusalem was won.)So time IS short. We must also remember that Jesus said there would be people who will say that time is as it has always been. Beware of the times as of Noah... Misty |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 4 ] Next > Last [4] >> |