Results 21 - 40 of 100
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: DPMartin Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
21 | Map of Jesus footsteps. | NT general | DPMartin | 234015 | ||
Try here: http://www.biblewalks.com/info/jesusfootsteps.html#Map |
||||||
22 | Sins against "human rights"? | NT general | DPMartin | 234052 | ||
As you are probably noticing, your expectations in human nature might be unwarranted, because what you expect to be in human nature, is not there. If your hope, (expectation) is in Christ, the Lord is able, even if you are incorrect about what expectations should be in the Lord. But trusting human nature is death, trusting the Lord Jesus Christ is Life, Life everlasting. You don’t have to condemn the world, and we are told by the Lord not to. The world drinks from the cup it loves, human nature. |
||||||
23 | How do you demonstrate contentment? | NT general | DPMartin | 234054 | ||
What if you are content with money, the spoils of ill gain, putting people in bondage to you and receiving moneys, so on and so forth? Your view of contentment is just that, your view, why don’t you ask the Lord Jesus what His view of what contentment is? It is a fool that thinks the Lord ought to think as the fool does. Jesus was content, why wasn’t those around Him content that He was there with them? Could it be that they were content to be with out God’s Presence with them in the world? |
||||||
24 | Jesus' death embody His ministry message | NT general | DPMartin | 234369 | ||
It all depends on, in who’s view. From the Lord Jesus’ view who was trying to be subversive to who’s governing? Jesus has the right/birth-right and He is Lord and Master. Who was trying to subvert who? Jesus being the Word of God who came into the flesh. The Word of God was already understood as the undisputed Lord and King of Israel. The Jewish leadership tried to prove that the Lord Jesus was not who He said He is. As far as the Romans, common sense would tell you they really didn’t care what Israelites believe, all they really cared about was their dominance in the region and maintaining that rule without calling out the troops from Rome. If it meant crucifying some one like Jesus to keep the peace then why wouldn’t they do so? Son of God , and Messiah is not something Romans cared about, unless it was something they had to deal with. There is no reason to believe that Pilot seen Jesus as a threat. On the contrary Pilot seen Jesus as a man that has done no wrong. It was the Jewish leadership that was the problem. Jesus was escorted into Jerusalem as the rightful King on Palm Sunday, (An Israeli tradition when a King of Israel is to take his place)which He is, that was what was being subverted, at least that is what the Jewish leadership thought they were doing, but in reality the Lord Jesus was offering Himself, by allowing these things to come to pass. Jesus came into the world as any son of man does and He left the world as one of the lowliest in the world does, but it is His Resurrection that is significant. His Ministry is about the Kingdom of Heaven of which there is Salvation, deliverance from death (His resurrection proving so) and Eternal Life that He has given us. |
||||||
25 | when Christ became sin for us,and how? | NT general | DPMartin | 234480 | ||
According to some theologies or “isms” that’s pretty close if not accurate to the theology, but Jesus came into the world like all son’s of men do, except Adam (Lk:3:38 KJV). And the place of men’s flesh is the place of sin, and like a man of lowest esteem in the world He lived and left the world, on a Cross like a criminal. But the Word of God in the Presence of God (Holy Spirit) in the Son of man, like you say Holy and sinless. Not deserving death for He is sinless but yet experienced death, and return to the place He came from with the key to the gate of hell in His hand. Therefore it’s not so much the flesh but the place it is, because of who God has given charge of it to, meaning men. 1Cor:15:21: For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. One question though where in scripture does it say Jesus “became sin”? How is it that unrighteousness (sin) can make righteous? Jesus is the righteousness that restores the once sinner into the place of His Righteousness, but sin is not removed by sin or becoming sin. |
||||||
26 | when Christ became sin for us,and how? | NT general | DPMartin | 234491 | ||
Brad thanks for the reply, and the references. I looked through all the verses in the NT (KJV) with the word “sin” and didn’t find anything that said became or become but I searched for “become” or “became”, so I missed those versus you found, again thanks. Rom:8:3 it say (KJV) that He condemned sin in the flesh but it doesn’t say He became sin. And it seems that the amplified is expressing that the spirit of what Paul was saying in 2Cor:5:21, by inserting the word “virtually” meaning: In respect of essence or effect, apart from actual form or specific manner; as far as essential qualities or facts are concerned. Would affirm what I posted. In the case of Jesus, clean cleans the unclean, because otherwise, the unclean makes unclean. Therefore Jesus is always clean even in the presence of unclean (flesh). |
||||||
27 | His diff relation to Creation Gen ch 1-2 | Genesis | DPMartin | 233728 | ||
In the first verse God is, but His Presence is not in creation. In the sec. verse God by His Spirit (His Presence) moving upon the face of the waters, becomes present in His creation therefore creation is not only in His presence but God is present in His creation. Now that God’s Presence is in creation, He speaks and God makes His Presence known in creation, and because there was light, creation responded to it’s creator, letting light be, according to it’s creator’s word. Hence the Creator and Judge is known through His Word in and from His Presence. Through out the first chapter, it is clear; God said, what He said is done, and God sees that it is good. No one else sees that it is good, God does, for only God is good. Who or what else can know good unless it Be God or of God. If you notice in the first chapter only God is mentioned then after creation is complete then the “LORD” is mentioned. In the first chapter of Gen. in Hebrew it is Elohim, meaning Creator and Judge (God). The “LORD”, (YHWH: meaning Yahweh) and we now know that Yahweh is the Lord Jesus Christ, the Word of God (Son of God) come into the flesh. (Son of man) What is to be understood is all that there is, knows God through His Word, and it is in His Presence is His Word good, for of God in God’s Presence is God’s Word not only of, but from. And also by resting on the seventh day, it can be understood that God (Elohim) lets His relationship between Him, and His creation rest on and in His Word. |
||||||
28 | His diff relation to Creation Gen ch 1-2 | Genesis | DPMartin | 233791 | ||
It is not uncommon in the Christian community to know that Yahweh is Jesus Christ, and Jesus Christ is Yahweh and Yahweh is spelled YHWH in English as a direct translation and is pronounced in English Yahweh and in the (KJV) is written LORD. If you don’t know that Jesus is the Word of God and that the Word of God is LORD of all creation then you don’t know the LORD God of Israel. For God is known through His Word, our LORD Jesus Christ. Read the first few verses in the Gospel according to John. John explains the Word of God. | ||||||
29 | His diff relation to Creation Gen ch 1-2 | Genesis | DPMartin | 233807 | ||
If you want a deeper explanation of words like “YHWH” (Yahweh) and “Elohim” (Creator and Judge). There are Jewish web sites that provide explanation for the Hebrew language and words used in the original text in Genesis. | ||||||
30 | His diff relation to Creation Gen ch 1-2 | Genesis | DPMartin | 233810 | ||
You are right, you are not sure. I wasn’t asking to know about the various usage and arguments for and against the JEPD Documentary Hypothesis. The use of words and their meaning by the Hebrews in scripture, is sufficient for bible study isn’t it? In reference to Bible, its not relevant what those who didn’t document the scriptures, or write them down, meant by their use of words, does it? What is relevant, is what the word means to those who wrote down the scripture. Which in this case is the Hebrews and their use of words thereof. |
||||||
31 | His diff relation to Creation Gen ch 1-2 | Genesis | DPMartin | 233819 | ||
good job, well done | ||||||
32 | His diff relation to Creation Gen ch 1-2 | Genesis | DPMartin | 233864 | ||
What ever floats your boat there “you”. It’s not my job to prove anything to you. You do know how to use the internet don’t you, google it. | ||||||
33 | how many brothers did joesph have | Genesis | DPMartin | 234317 | ||
If you know that Joseph had a coat of many colors, how is it you don’t know how many brothers he had. He had 11 brothers by virtue of his father Jacob. One, Benjamin by virtue of his mother, but “Joseph said unto his brethren” (BRETHREN MEANING MORE THEN 1) . 4: And Joseph said unto his brethren, Come near to me, I pray you. And they came near. And he said, I am Joseph your brother, whom ye sold into Egypt. |
||||||
34 | God created man in "OUR" image? | Gen 1:1 | DPMartin | 233981 | ||
Well then, what exited before man? Just about everything there is except man. Is it possible that angels exited before man did? And were they in the company or in the Presence of God at the time God said let us made man in our image? |
||||||
35 | Was Adam created in Gen 1:26 or Gen 2:7? | Gen 1:26 | DPMartin | 233893 | ||
Don’t be confused: Believe it not there is a logic here, its just not the way people would write today. I believe a good example is Noah, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. The stories about theses people start and then end with there death but the start of the story of the next generation for example Abraham to Isaac gives the impression that the next story starts after the death in the previous story. Not so, Noah was alive when Abraham (ten generations later) was alive, and Shem son of Noah was alive when Jacob was alive. So in the first chapter of Genesis creation of all things are said. Then the next chapter the focuses is on man. Therefore the details of the creation of man and so one are said. |
||||||
36 | How many went with Rebekah to Canaan | Gen 24:61 | DPMartin | 234016 | ||
Back in the day a servant could have servants under him. It doesn’t say Abraham’s servant was by himself. So it might be possible that the nurse had nurses under her and wherever she went her nurses under her went with her. It was understood as such. If you hire a business owner to do something like fix your car or remodel your home, those who are under him or in his employ also come with his services. | ||||||
37 | what is under the red sea? | Exodus | DPMartin | 234313 | ||
There might be chariot parts and related object. | ||||||
38 | God is His own witness | Ex 3:14 | DPMartin | 234292 | ||
In Ex:3:14: the Lord God says “I am, that I am” . Now the first time the scriptures say “the Lord your God” is in Ex:6:7: And I will take you to me for a people, and I will be to you a God: and ye shall know that I am the LORD your God, which bringeth you out from under the burdens of the Egyptians. There is no proof but the witness isn’t there? Therefore God is His own witness. No one comes to God unless it be through the Lord Jesus, and He is the Word of God and that is Spirit, hence the Presence of God. And Jesus came into the world to witness the Father to us(Jn:5:19), and He did say that the Father is His witness (Jn:8:18, Jn:5:36-37). Consider; man was made to be in His likeness and His image, and no man knows what God looks like, therefore only God is the witness that anyone is His likeness or image. Satan has seen God and is able to fool the world that he is the likeness of God, hence make them believe he is God, unless the Presence of God is in the world. |
||||||
39 | "bless God". | Ex 20:6 | DPMartin | 234066 | ||
A perfect God can be blessed by those who love Him. | ||||||
40 | What is abominable things we cannot eat? | Leviticus | DPMartin | 233943 | ||
If you are an Israelite under the Law, then its abominable and you can’t eat it. Otherwise it is a lessen in what the Lord said at the end of it: Lev:11:45: For I am the LORD that bringeth you up out of the land of Egypt, to be your God: ye shall therefore be holy, for I am holy. 46: This is the law of the beasts, and of the fowl, and of every living creature that moveth in the waters, and of every creature that creepeth upon the earth: 47: To make a difference between the unclean and the clean, and between the beast that may be eaten and the beast that may not be eaten. Holiness clean, pure, and not defiled is imperative in God’s Presence. So much so that the presence of the clean, cleans the unclean, purifies the defiled, and makes Holy that which was not Holy. Hence, Jesus for example when He “clean”, cleaned the unclean, a leper. Or a woman defiled and condemned by men,(the woman accused of adultery) pure in the site of God. |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 4 5 ] Next > Last [5] >> |