Results 21 - 40 of 49
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: you Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
21 | His diff relation to Creation Gen ch 1-2 | Genesis | you | 233854 | ||
I am not sure how you have such confidence in the meaning of a word that you don't have the correct vocalization for to tell how it should be parsed. Biblical Hebrew verb tenses are also not specifically past, present or future. I see a Karite document www.karaite-korner.org/yhwh_2.pdf that discusses possibilities. You might find a Rabbinic one from a Reform scholar. If you are relating it to Ex 3:14 then Pratico says on page 305 of Basics of Biblical Hebrew 'This construction allows for "I am who/what I am" or "I will be who/what I will be."' | ||||||
22 | His diff relation to Creation Gen ch 1-2 | Genesis | you | 233827 | ||
So what do you do with the absence of the article on God? Did you read the footnotes the asterisk points to indicating the problem with his rendering? Toward is better than with for pros. I dont know what you want to render as Yahweh Elohim. |
||||||
23 | His diff relation to Creation Gen ch 1-2 | Genesis | you | 233821 | ||
Good job what. I consulted that in the beginning. I knew what YHWH meant way before any discussion now but you have given no indication of knowing when you called Yahweh a translation. | ||||||
24 | His diff relation to Creation Gen ch 1-2 | Genesis | you | 233820 | ||
I may think that what the author meant by a something they wrote down is adequate to understanding it but the way the New Testament uses quotations of the Hebrew scriptures I'm surprised you might think that. EdB didnt think that when I said the exhortation to attend the public reading of scripture implied an expectation of listening at a synagogue because they were the only ones who had scrolls. He said God knew we would have Bibles even if the writer didn't. | ||||||
25 | His diff relation to Creation Gen ch 1-2 | Genesis | you | 233818 | ||
I guess my consulting The Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament by Koehler and Baumgartner was inadequate. Yahweh is a transliteraton not a translation of YHWH. I would have thought you would have said it means "I Am" based on Moses encounter at the burning bush. God could also have been saying to Moses "I will be who I will be" because people thought they could control a god if they knew it's name. | ||||||
26 | His diff relation to Creation Gen ch 1-2 | Genesis | you | 233815 | ||
In what I could get to of Rotherham right now doesnt cover it. If your saying God in John 1:1 would not be a translation of YHWH this true but it would be the same being. However only quotes of scripture would you even know you found the Name and as your reference says no one would have said it so it wouldnt be in a dialog. | ||||||
27 | His diff relation to Creation Gen ch 1-2 | Genesis | you | 233813 | ||
I dont know what your saying I am not sure of. If you want to try to find implications of the Word in the Hebrew scriptures then you would have a better arguement with "Let us make man in our own image" or in creation by wisdom in Prov 3:19. | ||||||
28 | His diff relation to Creation Gen ch 1-2 | Genesis | you | 233796 | ||
Heres a word for word translation: In beginning was the word and the word was with the God and divine was the word. This was in beginning with the God. It says the word is divine and with God. God and YHWH are the same. The logos may be part of the Godhead but it is not all of it otherwise the distinction made in the verses makes no sense |
||||||
29 | His diff relation to Creation Gen ch 1-2 | Genesis | you | 233793 | ||
I am not arguing about the accepting the trinity which is not allowes by the TOU but you cant claim one who emptied himself is all of God as YHWH is. | ||||||
30 | His diff relation to Creation Gen ch 1-2 | Genesis | you | 233792 | ||
I am not sure what kind of distinction you are trying to make between YHWH and Elohim. You can see in Genesis 2:4 "in the day YHWH Elohim made the heavens and the earth". YHWH and Elohim here are the same being. If you want to know about the various usage then look for arguements for and against the JEPD Documentary Hypothesis. Elohim does not mean creator even if Elohim is the creator. Elohim can mean God, gods and possibly judges whose meaning is determined by context. In Ex 21:6 is a verse that elohim might be better translated as judges then God. | ||||||
31 | His diff relation to Creation Gen ch 1-2 | Genesis | you | 233790 | ||
Where exactly do you get that YHWH is the same as Jesus. Have you read Matt 22:44 and Psalm 110:1? YHWH says to my Anon ... | ||||||
32 | Jonah's religion | Jonah | you | 233682 | ||
This one seemed to obviously be homework. I wanted to see if someone had a nicer response then mine would have been to read the book of Jonah. I wonder if Lockman is losing an audience here by not providing better search tools. You should be able to come here and type in a phrase you heard from any translation and get a response back with the NASB and Amplified even with the different phraseology. You should be able to limit searches on keywords to the questions in the title and not have to know about date limits only seen in the advanced search. We should be able to substitute a title for the question on a note so people are not confused when the topic has mutated and they are not looking at the threads. The original question should be in the dialog without having to drill down on the first answer. | ||||||
33 | did Jesus bring a child back to life | Bible general Archive 4 | you | 233576 | ||
Thanks. It is pseudepigraphal and not Apocryphal but without the capitalization apocryphal seems to cover more than just the Apocrypha. On a better topic. What makes things heretical? |
||||||
34 | Why don't we follow Luke 4:16 | Luke 4:16 | you | 233474 | ||
elder4yhwh - click on the message title and scroll down to the bottom to see the message thread. EdB was responding to me requesting information from the commentary. | ||||||
35 | Why don't we follow Luke 4:16 | Luke 4:16 | you | 233469 | ||
I meant his extrabibilical sources to support the statement: "In Paul’s day, if someone made the vow while away from Jerusalem, at the termination of his vow he would shave his head, as Paul did, and afterwards present the shorn hair at the temple within 30 days." | ||||||
36 | Why don't we follow Luke 4:16 | Luke 4:16 | you | 233455 | ||
Are there any sources referenced in MacArthur's quote? | ||||||
37 | Where is the Scripture? | 1 Cor 15:3 | you | 233450 | ||
Did you reject the Isaiah 53:10-11 reference because the servant/rigtheous one is not identified as the Christ? | ||||||
38 | Where is the Scripture? | 1 Cor 15:3 | you | 233449 | ||
"on the third day" reference sure sounds like a variant to Hosea 6:2. No variants on 6:2 listed in BHS. Anyone have a copy of BHQ of the minor prophets to see if something was found more recently? | ||||||
39 | Why don't we follow Luke 4:16 | Luke 4:16 | you | 233448 | ||
Thanks for the reference. Paul appears to have intended to make the animal sacrifices from the moment he took the vow because he kept the hair cut in another country (Acts 18:18) that he would need in the temple and in Acts 24:17 he indicates presenting offerings (the animal sacrifices specified in Num 6:14 an other things in 6:15) was one of the reasons for making the trip. | ||||||
40 | Why don't we follow Luke 4:16 | Luke 4:16 | you | 233438 | ||
So in Acts 21:26 Paul and the 4 men presented 3 animals each to be sacrificed one being a ewe-lamb as a sin offering as specified in Num 6:14. | ||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 ] Next > Last [3] >> |