Results 21 - 30 of 30
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: grafted in Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
21 | Paul’s missionary work created a controv | 2 Tim 2:15 | grafted in | 216542 | ||
Good afternoon John In Acts 10:28 Peter himself tells what God intended him to learn from the vision ("God has shown me that I should not call any man common or unclean") and verse 29 he tells of his response to the revelation ("Therefore I came without objection as soon as I was sent for"). No word about food. As far as the situation regarding Peter and the gentiles in Galatia - Peter was a man, quite capable of making mistakes. He messed up and Paul called him on the carpet for it, lesson learned. How about Mal. 3:6? |
||||||
22 | roman8:28to jesus,moses,joseph,jermiah | Bible general Archive 4 | grafted in | 216518 | ||
Vintage, Shalom. Usually the person asking a homework question doesn't use enough common sense to disguise it as something he/she wants to know. The question from 4runner was so confusing it seemed like it was a bonifide query. :o) |
||||||
23 | Paul’s missionary work created a controv | 2 Tim 2:15 | grafted in | 216460 | ||
Evening WW Let's see, No! No! All the way around, No! The Jews believed the only way to become a Christian was by going thru ritual conversion?? You want to explain that one? At the time of Cornelius, there were no Christians, the believers in Messiah were just another sect of Judaism called The Way. Mat 5:17-19 The Torah was not eliminated (the vision had nothing to do with food, it everything to do with people) or else we have a God who changes His mind willy nilly and we'd have to cross out Heb. 13:8 or call it a typo. |
||||||
24 | follow up to 1 corinth 15 question | 1 Cor 15:52 | grafted in | 216428 | ||
Daniq, You ask how will we know when it starts if the people are not taken out (which I don't believe is going to happen first) - we will know when the covenant is made to rebuild the Temple in Jerusalem and the building begins. I'm a pre-wrath believer. I believe that we will be here to witness that event and the wrath of hasatan on God's people. We will not be here to witness God's wrath on the lawless wicked ones, we will be enjoying the marriage supper of the Lamb! (Mark 13:3-27 is very fine proof-text that we will be here, especially see verses 14-19 and verse 24 is a strong indication that He was not speaking [only] of the persecution that the early church went through.) |
||||||
25 | The Kingdom of God | Matt 11:12 | grafted in | 216237 | ||
Good day Doc, Thank you for your kind explanation and suggestion. Have a great day! |
||||||
26 | I see alot of people are using the title | Acts | grafted in | 216210 | ||
Greetings stjohn, I didn't say Paul was out of the loop, I said that Acts 1:21-22 taken word for word would put him out of the loop, so therefore, that statement was not a precedent, it most logically fulfilled the immediate need. And there is still no expiration date on Eph. 4:10-16. Else we have to dismiss all other equippers for the ministry as they are grouped right along in there with apostles and prophets. If we have God-called evangelists, pastors and teachers (and I'm sure all agree that we do) then we most assuredly have God-called apostles and prophets. |
||||||
27 | I see alot of people are using the title | Acts | grafted in | 216202 | ||
Shalom Azure I'm reading that you think that the office of apostle has ended - if I've misunderstood you, please pardon me. That passage is simply Luke stating what took place at that moment for that particular need; he was not stating law. Acts 1:21-22 would completely leave Paul out of the loop. Apostle simply means sh'liach or sent one. At a moment's need, Azure, you could be apostle, a sent one. Eph. 4:10-14 has no expiration date on it that I can see. :o) |
||||||
28 | world vs age | Gen 1:5 | grafted in | 216030 | ||
Greetings FTK, Please reread your Bible. You have had some very, very, very bad, bad teaching. What's sad is when the trials and testings come, and they will, I fear you will crumble underneath them because they don't feel good at all. Feelings very rarely should be the basis for doing anything; they are weak, usually false, and very deceitful. :o( |
||||||
29 | was sadducees against Jesus? | Acts 5:17 | grafted in | 215945 | ||
Searcher, Just because they questioned Him doesn't mean that they were against Him. If you do a study on rabbis and their disciples you'll see that that is how they learned, by asking questions and the rabbi would answer by asking another question. If your pastor invited another pastor to speak at your church, when you got a chance to speak with this person, you would question him. How does his congregation do communion, how are their altar calls handled, etc. Just because you're asking questions would not mean that you are against his ministry. I'm sure there were many Sadducees against His ministry, but not all. At least not until He began talking about resurrection, then they definitely had to pull the stops since they didn't believe in angels or resurrection, that was why they were sad you see? lol |
||||||
30 | statusitis | Bible general Archive 4 | grafted in | 215329 | ||
Hello Grace, Glad to be of help. |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 ] |