Results 21 - 40 of 43
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: Servant7 Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
21 | Are the "sons of God" pre-Fall children? | Gen 6:2 | Servant7 | 30761 | ||
Heavenly Bodies, would be the most accurate rendering. I simply infer to Angles because any other time that word is used The "Translaters" put Angles. One thing is pretty certain, this has nothing to do with Seth. If the Lord shows us both it was something else, we should both smile, properly humbled:) In Christ, Servant7 |
||||||
22 | Are the "sons of God" pre-Fall children? | Gen 6:2 | Servant7 | 30759 | ||
I can see how an individual might take me that way, if they feel threatened or have an agenda. I feel neither about you, so I cannot figure out why your postings come off so harsh. Now you are right in the fact that you do not know my background, nor I yours. I will say i have spent some time studying this specific topic...it's quite interesting though, you must certainly agree:) Now in regards to your "dig". Any begining student can pick up a Hebrew concordance and see somethig is not right here. And this is not just my interpretation(I hate to do this), I know theologians and PhD's who infer to this belief( also born again believers like myself and you). And yes Hebrew is one of the studies i am persuing. I would encourage you to research the early church, you will find that the "lines of Seth" theory did not take root until then(4th century B.C). You and I (from reading your post's I get this) are after the same thing...Truth. This is the only reason I have fenced with you this far. I encourage much study on this topic, for both of us. This journey does not end until we are perfected in Christ. What does all of this mean...nothing, for all of this account's for naught next to The simplicity of the Gospel. My degrees do not, and will not matter. Let's be real... The Lord's foolishness is far above our greatest wisdom. In Christ, Servant7 |
||||||
23 | Are the "sons of God" pre-Fall children? | Gen 6:2 | Servant7 | 30604 | ||
I've been accused of being Verbose Before:) God Bless and keep you until We share again, In Christ, Servant7 |
||||||
24 | Are the "sons of God" pre-Fall children? | Gen 6:2 | Servant7 | 30603 | ||
I've been accused of being Verbose Before:) God Bless and keep you until We share again, In Christ, Servant7 |
||||||
25 | Are the "sons of God" pre-Fall children? | Gen 6:2 | Servant7 | 30602 | ||
Show me one verse that says the lines of seth were the ones who begat the Nephilim in Gen6. That is a type of logic that can be turned around. One thing is for sure, aside from noah and his family, the lines of seth were not on the Ark. In Christ, Servant7 I would love to have a shareing of ideas that does not denote sarcasm, perhaps we can all pray, and come back to this in humility. It is not for the Body of Christ to seek division, but unity. In Christ, Servant7 |
||||||
26 | Are the "sons of God" pre-Fall children? | Gen 6:2 | Servant7 | 30601 | ||
Show me one verse that says the lines of seth were the ones who begat the Nephilim in Gen6. That is a type of logic that can be turned around. One thing is for sure, aside from noah and his family, the lines of seth were not on the Ark. In Christ, Servant7 I would love to have a shareing of ideas that does not denote sarcasm, perhaps we can all pray, and come back to this in humility. It is not for the Body of Christ to seek division, but unity. In Christ, Servant7 |
||||||
27 | Are the "sons of God" pre-Fall children? | Gen 6:2 | Servant7 | 30600 | ||
Show me one verse that says the lines of seth were the ones who begat the Nephilim in Gen6. That is a type of logic that can be turned around. One thing is for sure, aside from noah and his family, the lines of seth were not on the Ark. In Christ, Servant7 I would love to have a shareing of ideas that does not denote sarcasm, perhaps we can all pray, and come back to this in humility. It is not for the Body of Christ to seek division, but unity. In Christ, Servant7 |
||||||
28 | Are the "sons of God" pre-Fall children? | Gen 6:2 | Servant7 | 30597 | ||
Jesus Man, I did not call angels "sons of God", The translation does. Let us not forget the Tanak (old testament)was not written in english, it was Hebrew. The word there and in Job is Bene Ha Elohim. In Christ, Servant7 |
||||||
29 | Are the "sons of God" pre-Fall children? | Gen 6:2 | Servant7 | 30595 | ||
This is why i generally write, and try to refrain from typeing:) I am a "hack" of a typer, if you listen closer, you will hear it...clank, clank, clank. On a serious note, When i type for college, i employ my spell check, sadly, I cannot find one here on line. In Christ( and humbled:) Servant7 |
||||||
30 | Are the "sons of God" pre-Fall children? | Gen 6:2 | Servant7 | 30592 | ||
The Lord Bless You, In future posts I will use simpler language, I do not mean this as a dig, but my point was quite clear. A scripture like I Timothy 5:21 cannot be used to denote angles are under grace, the term there is actually chosen. Bible 101- Always read scriptures, even chapters at times, before and after a scripture to gain true context. My response was to your point of view, not your scripture refrence, since your attempt to work those scriptures into your view is obviously contrived. I humbled myself to you then and I shall now. We are brothers in the shed blood of our redeemer, And rude posts such as the one you sent me here can only divide. reread what i wrote, a few times, there is validity to this. Let Me start over again for us. Hello my brother, it is blessed to share this board with you, and your company. In Christ, Servant7 |
||||||
31 | Are the "sons of God" pre-Fall children? | Gen 6:2 | Servant7 | 30581 | ||
Greetings in the Lord, If the lines of seth, at the time of Gen 6, were so holy, why 120 years after this fact was the world destroyed in a flood??? only 8 people out of the "noble" lines of seth remained faithful after 120 years??I would suggest all people who truly are seeking after truth test their "traditions" vs. the word. This sad stretch of I Tim 5:21 is exactly why a topic much be researched, and diligently prayed over before it is introduced as doctrine. This section of scripture is the form of an oath about not prefering one brother before another(elders/witnesses, not that angles cannot fall from grace. Jesus did not come in the form of an angle and die, He came as a man. Therefore, angles do not have grace. Consequently, elect here better translates as chosen. Chosen or elected for what? A statement or oath being made before them as a witness? perhaps angles that did keep their first estate. The Bible shows that angles have physical bodies, look at the angles at Sodom and Gahmora, they were physical. An angle one night had dinner with 185,000 samaratins before decimateing them. Oh heck, we have entertained angles unawares. Demons seek embodyment, angles have bodies. Fallen angles, were still angles...therefore, they are as physical. Here is something else to chew on, through scripture prove Angles and Demons are the same. one has a body...one seeks embodyment. There's that tradition again. Further more, why would the lines of seth, lay with the daughter's of men be big news? That's been going on since the garden. By the way... the daughter's of men, I hate to break this to you, is translated a little to loosely. The Hebrew word used here is "Benoth Adam". Better translated, "Daughter's of Adam".Seth is from Adam also. Why would this need be stated here? In closeing, I never stated Moses wrote Job...I do believe he wrote Genesis however. I actually believe there is a possibility that Job is a pre-flood book. This is due to alot of conditions, and animals that are spoken of in this book. One thing we do know though, is Job was actually pened before Gen. Even though Gen is an earlier progression, but The Lord is quite mysterious like that. Brother, I took on the same Joking tone with you, but please realize, as a brother, I hold you in the highest respect. Jesus is the Blood that flows between you and me, and we are the same body. Something i wasn't going to share at this point, but I feel called to.Gen 4:26 is mis- translated, the scripture does not read "Then began Men to call upon the name of the Lord", it actually infers profaneing the name of the Lord. If you think I am Mistaken, please seek this on your own. There was a time I held the same view as you. In Christ Always, Servant7 |
||||||
32 | Are the "sons of God" pre-Fall children? | Gen 6:2 | Servant7 | 30489 | ||
Greetings in the Lord, Matthew says angles are not given in marriage, it does not say they cannot. The debate rageing over "sons of God" in Genisis need not rage, Moses, when writeing Genisis did not say "sons of God", he said "Bene Ha Elohim"(Hebrew), this word refrences heavenly bodies, not humans. The only other time this word(s) in Hebrew is used in the Tanak(old testament) is in refrence to angles. Angles are "created" beings, but let's not forget, a whole group of them fell with Lucifer, by this logic, that wasn't possible until it happend. Sons of God is again stated this way in Job. I encourage you to seek this out, pray about it, then you and i will share our findings together. Always in Christ, Servant7 |
||||||
33 | Are the "sons of God" pre-Fall children? | Gen 6:2 | Servant7 | 30444 | ||
Greetings in the Lord, The angles that fell with satan, are the "sons of God" being refrenced here. The marvelous thing about our English translations are that they are translated. The Hebrew word being used here is "Bene Ha Elohim". This word, every time used in the Tanak refrences angles. ( Job 1:6, 2:1, 38:7, to name a few). I hope this helps, In Christ, Servant7 |
||||||
34 | Why did David choose five stones? | John 3:16 | Servant7 | 29803 | ||
Greetings in the Lord. When we read about David, we find that His faith and trust in the Lord are paramount parts of his character. To assume that David is so faithful in all ways of His life, a man after God's heart, then assume that in his stand for God, he had to pick up extra stones from lack of faith, is stretching it alot further than the former. Also, Davids refrence to "uncircumcision" is clearly a covenant issue; unless, of course, one would feel casual insults are part of the cannon. I infer to the covenant viewpoint. Perhaps a way to look at the Bible even talking about Goliaths four brothers is proof. What other use could the knowledge of them serve. Most believers know that every word in the bible has relavence. The knowledge of Goliaths four brothers serves no other perpose. I truly pray that if there is, the Lord will open it to me. I hope this helps brother Discipled, In Christ, Servant7 |
||||||
35 | One religion as good as another? | John 14:6 | Servant7 | 29718 | ||
Greetings In The Lord. God made a covenant with Abraham as an everlasting covevant. God cannot lie. By refrencing Abrahams seed, nothing political or otherwise is being alluded to. This, quit frankly, refrences the seed, or simplified, the offspring of Abraham. Through Christ, Believers are shareing in this covenant. Now, as far as the two studies i was writeing of; I feel I was sending this topic in two directions; therefore, two destinct studies. My apologies for the confusion:) Finally, understand,I agree that a person has to love The Lord God. A person who Hates God (That's a study all by itself), is not a child of God. We cannot forget; however, That the seed of Abraham( or Israel) ARE God's people. You and I both know that Salvation through Jesus is the only way. So in that understanding we can enjoy discussing the "meat" of the word. I am Grateful for your time. A servant in Christ, Servant7 |
||||||
36 | One religion as good as another? | John 14:6 | Servant7 | 29717 | ||
Greetings in the Lord. The promise that God made concerning Abraham's seed was fulfilled in Israel. Read the covenant promise and institution in Genisis, the seed of Abraham Is Israel. To Israel (or Abraham's seed) the covenant is made in Deuteronomy 28. We, as Born again (or regenerated) believers are partakers of this also( Galations 3) I hope this helps, In Christ, Servant7 |
||||||
37 | One religion as good as another? | John 14:6 | Servant7 | 29641 | ||
Greetings in the Lord. No one can nullify a covenant God institutes. By placeing a strong study in the book of revalation, you will see the Jews still have a huge role to play in the coming 1000 year reign. They have other roles to play as well, but instead of posting a huge explanation, i will encourage you to pray and dilligently seek this in the bible. If you hit a wall, post your question, and myself, as well as your other brethren on this post will prayerfully seek the answers for you. let us also not forget that Christians are also tied to the Abrahamic covenant in Galatians 3. The covenant's criteria is layed out in Deuteronomy 28. Jesus' sacrifice on the cross redeemed us from the curse of the law, but the blessings stand. Good luck on both studies, In Christ, Servant7 |
||||||
38 | Can angels have human babies? | Gen 6:4 | Servant7 | 29474 | ||
Greetings in the Lord. I've met your Nephi cousin, and i agree with him hole-heartedly:) You should be ashamed. I mean this lightly of course. More to come... In Christ, Servant7 |
||||||
39 | Can angels have human babies? | Gen 6:4 | Servant7 | 29472 | ||
Greetings in the Lord. Kalos, it is nice to hear from you. The NASB is also how the KJV reads. I used quotations to emphasise my point. In Christ, Servant7 |
||||||
40 | When will I speak/pray in tongues? | Acts 2:6 | Servant7 | 29305 | ||
There's that humility i've become so accustomed to, but what do you expect from a person who has already been discipled. The rest of us are still being worked on.LOL. It's great to be in the trenches again with you my brother.Let's place another nail in the Enemy's coffin! Still broken on The Cornerstone, Servant7 |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 ] Next > Last [3] >> |