Results 21 - 40 of 165
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: Radioman Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
21 | Judas went to hell? | NT general Archive 1 | Radioman | 28594 | ||
Matthew Henry NASB Acts 1:25 "to occupy this ministry and apostleship from which Judas turned aside to go to his own place." AMPLIFIED Acts 1:25 To take the place in this ministry and receive the position of an apostle, from which Judas fell away and went astray to go [where he belonged] to his own [proper] place. "25. that he might go to his own place--A euphemistic or softened expression of the awful future of the traitor" (http://bible.crosswalk.com/Commentaries/JamiesonFaussetBrown). "from which Judas by transgression fell, threw himself, by deserting and betraying his Master, from the place of an apostle, of which he was unworthy, that he might go to his own place, the place of a traitor, the fittest place for him, not only to the gibbet, but to hell—this was his own place. "Note, Those that betray Christ, as they fall from the dignity of relation to him, so they fall into all misery. It is said of Balaam (Num. 24:25) that he went to his own place, that is, says one of the rabbin, he went to hell. "Dr. Whitby quotes Ignatius saying, There is appointed to every man idios topos — a proper place, which imports the same with that of God’s rendering to every man according to his works. And our Saviour had said that Judas’s own place should be such that it had been better for him that he had never been born (Mt. 26:24)—his misery such as to be worse than not being. "Judas had been a hypocrite, and hell is the proper place of such; other sinners, as inmates, have their portion with them, Mt. 24:51. (http://bible.crosswalk.com/Commentaries/MatthewHenryComplete/) |
||||||
22 | Judas went to hell? | NT general Archive 1 | Radioman | 28593 | ||
John Gill's Exposition of the Bible NASB Acts 1:25 "to occupy this ministry and apostleship from which Judas turned aside to go to his own place." AMPLIFIED Acts 1:25 To take the place in this ministry and receive the position of an apostle, from which Judas fell away and went astray to go [where he belonged] to his own [proper] place. "Judas chose his own fate of hell by rejecting Christ. It is not unfair to say that Judas and all others who go to hell belong there (compare John 6:70)" (MacArthur Study Bible, Word Publishing, 1997). John Gill's Exposition of the Bible Acts 1:25 that he might go to his own place; which may be understood of Judas, and of his going to hell, as the just punishment of his sin; which is commonly so called by the Jews, who often explain this phrase, "his place", by hell; as when it is said of Laban, (Genesis 31:55) that he "returned to his place", it intimates, say they, that he returned to his place, which was prepared for him in hell; and so likewise when it is said of Balaam, (Numbers 24:25) that he "returned to his place", they observe, that "he did not return from his evil way, but returned to his place; and so intimates by saying, to his place, that which was prepared for him in hell, as the Rabbins of blessed memory say; "they came everyone from his own place", (Job 2:11) a man from his house, a man from his country it is not written, but a man from his place, which was prepared for him in hell; and because they came to show mercy to Job, they were delivered from hell, and became worthy of the world to come; and so here, and "he returned to his place", (Mnyhgb wl Nkwmh) , "which was prepared for him in hell"." And another of their writers, on the same passage, has this remark, and he returned to his place, and he does not say, "he went on his way, for he was driven out of his way, and went down to hell." |
||||||
23 | Judas went to hell? | NT general Archive 1 | Radioman | 28592 | ||
NASB Acts 1:25 "to occupy this ministry and apostleship from which Judas turned aside to go to his own place." AMPLIFIED Acts 1:25 To take the place in this ministry and receive the position of an apostle, from which Judas fell away and went astray to go [where he belonged] to his own [proper] place. TEV Acts 1:25 "to serve as an apostle in the place of Judas, who left to go to the place where he belongs." GOD'S WORD Translation Acts 1:25 "Show us who is to take the place of Judas as an apostle, since Judas abandoned his position to go to the place where he belongs." |
||||||
24 | Judas went to hell? | NT general Archive 1 | Radioman | 28546 | ||
Nolan: I am astounded by some of the things I read on this forum. All my life I believed Jesus went to heaven and Judas went to hell. But according to some on this forum, I was wrong. According to some, Jesus went to hell and Judas went to heaven. I do not wish to hurt anyone, but, honestly, it seems to me that if the Scriptures (the verses quoted by you and kalos) do not clearly and plainly indicate that Judas went to hell, then we can never be sure of anything the Bible says. Radioman |
||||||
25 | Did Jesus go to hell after dying? | Ephesians | Radioman | 26695 | ||
Son, you obviously don't have enough knowledge of the Bible to determine that this or that preacher/teacher is wrong in his interpretations of it. What you have is a lot of nerve to assert that because someone disagrees with your uninformed interpretation he is wrong. Too many of your postings border on the insulting and the abusive. A word of warning: Posting to this forum is not a right; it is a privilege. To abuse it is to lose it. You need to watch your step. You can ignore this or come back with a smart-aleck reply. But, if so, you ignore it at your own risk. |
||||||
26 | Correcting the translation | Col 2:16 | Radioman | 26019 | ||
If you guys had the ability to read (especially minds); if you were smart enough not to make assumptions (where insufficient data exists); if you possessed a suprior mentality such that you always made good grades; if you could impress people with the length of your bibliographies; in short, if you had attended grad school, you would be brainy enough to figure out his position, which is: He has no position. His only position is that he, poor writing and communication skills aside, is right and all uneducated swine are wrong. If you don't believe it, just ask him. | ||||||
27 | Women speak in church? | 1 Cor 14:34 | Radioman | 25777 | ||
'ank: 'e was so wery 'umble that I thought 'e were Uriah Heep reincarnated. David C. |
||||||
28 | Who was that masked man? | Col 2:16 | Radioman | 25757 | ||
Heard on Christian radio. "Look for people who always seem stuck on one over-emphasized point of theology. This is the person who bangs the proverbial drum for his own little area. Some crazy quirk. And it usually is not some great divine insight. They'd like you to think they're so close to God that they have a great divine insight that no one else has. The fact of the matter is they're seeking a platform for the feeding of their ego. Watch for people with a lack of balance." If one has submitted a total of 80 postings and 79 of them are about the same verse, does that not seem a bit quirkish? Could someone who submits 79 out of 80 postings about ONE verse of the Bible be considered yet another Internet Lone Ranger Bible teacher and self-appointed expert with a lack of balance? |
||||||
29 | "M-O-O-N. That spells moon." - S. King | Deut 29:29 | Radioman | 25381 | ||
Charis: You write: "Dear Serenetime, "I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you mean by the 'bride eloping with the adulterous.' What is that?" Isn't it obvious? Perhaps I can illustrate the point: Hey, diddle, diddle. The cat and the fiddle. The cow jumped over the moon. The little dog laughed to see such fun. And the bride ran away without the groom. This may be the most sensible answer you get to your question. |
||||||
30 | what is the true worship day sun. or sat | Col 2:16 | Radioman | 25378 | ||
Now I know the area in which you are superior -- witty comebacks and putdowns of others. It takes a lot of learning to get a man as deep as you think you are. By the way, the plural of thesis is "theses," not "thesis's." |
||||||
31 | What IS your belief? | Col 2:16 | Radioman | 25375 | ||
You write: "And God knows exactly what you know and why you know it. He also knows why you don't know some things and what you could have known if you had taken the effort to know. Kapeesh?" Spare me the sermon. I was asking for clarification, not your judgment of me. What I kapeesh is that your last paragraph was a putdown of me. God knows what I could have known if I had taken the effort to know. Cute. Very cute. You spent two years studying two verses, but your study was of limited scope? No, I don't want a myth. How did you interpet from what I said that I wanted a myth? All I understand from your third paragraph is that you're a pastor -- one who studies at the rate of one verse per year - a pastor who doesn't interpret the Bible. Whatever. Enjoy the myth of your own superior knowledge or piety or both. |
||||||
32 | What IS your belief? | Col 2:16 | Radioman | 25369 | ||
I'm afraid I do not understand. How is it that the findings of others are the mere ramblings and speculations of man, but your findings are not the mere ramblings and speculation of man? Are you not a man? Do you have a direct line to God that no one else has? As to the question, "I still don't know whether you are saying that we should repent and dump Sunday assembly, or it's technically wrong but morally OK, or what?" -- you still have not given a direct answer, have you? Are you trying to hide something or what? I assume you will add my question to the list of those you refuse to answer. |
||||||
33 | Lowest Common Denominator | Bible general Archive 1 | Radioman | 25367 | ||
Casiv: Peace to you, too, brother. With all respect to you, I went back through the thread before I posted to Serenetime and even then I still had no idea to what she was referring or what she meant. I don't mind following your suggestion to read Matthew 13. However, I thought we wrote and read Notes to the Forum to aid in our understanding of the Bible. Instead, it seems I must now read the Bible in order to understand a posting. I don't mean to be argumentative, defensive or offensive, but -- I just read Matt. 13:14-15. Now I don't understand what you are saying either. Do you mean that if I don't understand Melchizedekau, Elijah, Solomon, Serenetime, etc., it's because my heart has become calloused? No sarcasm intended, but I thought the reason I couldn't understand them was that they were not making their meaning clear. I thought it might even be because they were being obtuse or that they themselves didn't know what they meant. Again, this is not intended as sarcasm. I am saying exactly what I mean. Does this mean that now we all have license to sit down at the keyboard with our eyes closed, bang out any combination of characters and then when people of average intelligence can't make head nor tail of our words, we can claim that they just don't love us? That they don't understand because they have an inappropriate attitude? I'm not trying to put words in your mouth. Once again, I am asking for clarification of that which is not at all clear to me. If the inability to comprehend the writing of others is a character flaw, then I suppose I need to repent. |
||||||
34 | Lowest Common Denominator | Bible general Archive 1 | Radioman | 25312 | ||
Who could argue with that? Since your post is totally unintelligible, incomprehensible and without either sense or meaning, it is impossible to agree or disagree with it. Next time you write a post, include some clues as to your meaning. If you're going to write total and complete babbling gibberish, there is no point in posting it. Come back when you have something to say. If you are a patient in an institution, that's different. In that case, never mind. |
||||||
35 | solomon and Love Stories around Ararat | Song of Solomon | Radioman | 25257 | ||
Who could argue with that? Since your post is totally unintelligible, incomprehensible and without either sense or meaning, it is impossible to agree or disagree with it. Next time you write a post, include some clues as to your meaning. If you're going to write total and complete babbling gibberish, there is no point in posting it. Come back when you have something to say. If you are a patient in an institution, that's different. In that case, never mind. |
||||||
36 | what is the true worship day sun. or sat | Col 2:16 | Radioman | 25148 | ||
Likewise, some seem to feel that translators can do no right, while they themselves, the critics, can do no wrong. |
||||||
37 | Renewal AGAIN to repentance? | NT general Archive 1 | Radioman | 25044 | ||
The Question: "If they die, having never repented, will they be saved?" An Answer: "Please search for your question before asking it." -- The Lockman Foundation, instructions preceding the "Ask your question" window. The point is: Your questions/comments are NOT NEW. We've been over these same points many, many, many times on the Forum. We need not rehash that which has already been debated to death here. |
||||||
38 | Renewal AGAIN to repentance? | NT general Archive 1 | Radioman | 25040 | ||
"Please search for your question before asking it." -- The Lockman Foundation, instructions preceding the "Ask your question" window. |
||||||
39 | "Once Saved Always Saved" | NT general Archive 1 | Radioman | 25039 | ||
"Please search for your question before asking it." -- The Lockman Foundation, instructions preceding the "Ask your question" window. |
||||||
40 | What is God's teachings on military war? | Deut 7:2 | Radioman | 24540 | ||
Martha: In all sincerity, thank you for your kindness. Radioman |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ] Next > Last [9] >> |