Results 21 - 40 of 54
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: In the Andes Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
21 | Does God have a spiritual body? | Eph 5:25 | In the Andes | 54128 | ||
mmmmm. got a good comeback but better not. Does God have hands? a face? etc. etc. etc. |
||||||
22 | Are you refering to the thief ? | Matt 10:1 | In the Andes | 54127 | ||
So you are asserting that the thief went straight to heaven. that doesn't seem to answer the pending question, to be born again, brought into the New Covenant...Must one believe that Jesus was raised from the dead? |
||||||
23 | Dake's Annotated Bible | Bible general Archive 1 | In the Andes | 54124 | ||
Would this statement by Ken Copeland be heretical or unorthedox or orthedox? "The NT irrefutably teaches that Christ did not exercise at least three prime attributes of deity while on the earth prior to His resurrection. These were omniscience, omnipotence, and omnipresence. Had he done so while a man He COULD NOT have been perfect humanity. The miracles of our Lord offer further proof of His limitations as a man... It can be said on good biblical ground that all of Christ's miracles, powers, and supernatural information were the result of the Father's action through Him, thus safeguarding our Lord's identity as a TRUE MAN." Emphasis mine. |
||||||
24 | Can we put doctrine into practice? | Eph 5:25 | In the Andes | 54111 | ||
helloooo, that was the whole point of my question. how do YOU transform general principles (shall we call it orthodoxy) and turn it into practice (orthopraxy) hmmm? Yes, i do understand "not enough" now, good answer. |
||||||
25 | Are you refering to the thief ? | Matt 10:1 | In the Andes | 54107 | ||
I'm sorry, if the thief was with Jesus THAT DAY in paradise, he couldn't have been in heaven before the throne, which is where all NT believers (under the N. Covenant) go. Right? Also, was the plan of redemption only the death of christ or did it also entail, the burial, resurrection ascention and seating? If so, that would mean he didn't die under the NT. Was the plan of redemption finished on the cross. If that's the case why wait 40 days to send the Holy Spirit? When did Jesus enter into the heavenly Holy of holies with His own blood to obtain an eternal redemption? During the 3 days and nights? OR was that an immediate action? He died and instantly he was pouring out his blood before God. Or was the pouring out of his blood done at the cross and not in heaven? if that's the case why then did hebrews say he entered heaven itself with His own blood? The earthly tabernacal was symbolic,a shadow of the heavenly. At what point did Jesus go to paradise if he entered heaven immediately. Did the thief follow him to heaven or paradise? Lots to think about isn't it? When and where was redemptive act completed? If Christ was not raised we are still in sins... Not only that, Romans says, who was delivered up (crucified and died) because of our offences AND WAS RAISED BECAUSE OF OUR JUSTIFICATION. interesting interesting. How about this...if in the work of Christ was included everything from the cross to the seating, is the usage of the word CROSS in the NT refering to all of that (deathburialres.ascentionseating) unless stated otherwise by the scripture? By the way, even though I'm a bit sarcastic at times, i'm really sincere. Sorry if I come across harsh. i'm still working out my salvation. Sorry it's all a mess, I gotta write fast so I don't loose my train of thought. |
||||||
26 | Can we put doctrine into practice? | Eph 5:25 | In the Andes | 54104 | ||
I am just thoroughly shocked. I don't even know what to say. I mentioned Job in 1 posting and got 21 that's twenty one responses. And it's not over yet. I asked a question about how to treat our wives better and got 3 responses plus a two word answer that makes no sense. I'm not down on everybody, but i'm a little disappointed. I mean, It took a woman to write and say begin with kind words backed up by kind actions. Are there only 3 of us that are married in this sight? Or is it more fun to argue doctrine? Awaiting your responses. By the way Mom...Thanks for being honest. So, aside from your previous response. Would you like to say something to all us husbands out here in internet land. Maybe they don't know how to ask to be a better husband. So i'll do it. |
||||||
27 | Once saved, aways saved doctrine refuted | Matt 10:1 | In the Andes | 54103 | ||
who wants out? | ||||||
28 | rock foundation | Matt 7:24 | In the Andes | 54102 | ||
interesting, very interesting. i'm sorry for being so slow at the bible. it's just i always thought that the New Birth which was the placing of believers into the body of Christ which was a mystery in the OT was only available in the age of grace. which in ages past was hidden but now God willed to reveal that mystery to his saints. perhaps OT and NT saints are diff. maybe i should tear out the divider pages Old Test. and New Test. seeing as how there's no diff. job had a promise of salvation under "whatever" covenant he had with God. kept in abrahams bosom (paradise) until Jesus came. but to say that he experience the New Birth, placing him into the body of C. regenerating him. hmmmm. as if i hadn't opened up enough cans of worms... Job is conspicuously missing from Heb 11. i mean, sure there are lot's of OT saints not mentioned, but to have such a large book named after you... |
||||||
29 | Could the "2 witnesses" be ... | Heb 11:13 | In the Andes | 54098 | ||
Sure I can agree with that. Will you agree with me that Enoch and Elija are born again living in the age of grace and alive at the time of the rapture? Those that are alive and remain...Right? | ||||||
30 | rock foundation | Matt 7:24 | In the Andes | 53997 | ||
I'm sorry, maybe I'm completely illiterate and ignorant of scripture. I thought to be born again, one must believe that God raised Jesus from the dead and confess Him as Lord. How stupid of me not to know Job was "Born Again". |
||||||
31 | Can we put doctrine into practice? | Eph 5:25 | In the Andes | 53996 | ||
You didn't answer my question. You only responded with a "corrective" little bible lesson. What do you personally do to treat your wife as queen of the home? How about, cook for her often. Or, clean up after yourself. Or, leave her little notes around the house. These are just a few. Please don't tell me what I can do, tell me what you do. Would your wife brag on you to the other wives? If they were all out to lunch. Would your wife accidentally make all the other wives jealous by telling all the wonderful things you do? Hello, does no one do little things? I'm looking for some new ideas. I've got a great marriage. But in this world, Satan is trying harder and harder to break up marriages. Please no one respond to that last statement. We all know you agree. What do YOU do? |
||||||
32 | rock foundation | Matt 7:24 | In the Andes | 53968 | ||
What would we do without John 3? What did nicodemas do without Romans 10::9-10? He didn't get born again that's what. Do you realize the sermon on the mount expounds the 10 commandments which is impossible to keep without being born again? Jesus was teaching Jews under the OT. Sure there are principles there for us. I don't argue that at all. But the living of those principles are found in Rom-Jude. I'll never break one commandment if I follow the Holy Spirit. Many Christians who disagree on this are reading Matt-joh with hindsight. They already know the New Covenant and find it (sporatically) thorought the gospels. They think the Gospels are enough. However, Without knowing rom-jud they would be just like the disciples with Jesus, clueless. How many Christians study the OT and Matt-Acts without filtering it through Church doctrine. They are just like people going to Job and basing their life experiences on him. You know, we affirm that God is NO respector of persons right. How about a respector of Covenants? God is just in treating us diff based upon our covenants. See Matt 20:1-16. When I read Job, I read it from the standpoint of being More than a conquerer, Always triumphant, and seated FAR ABOVE ALL PRINCIPALITIES POWERS DOMINIONS ETC. WITH CHRIST IN THE HEAVENLY PLACES. Not as some weak defeated christian who knows nothing of the New Covenant, thereby associating myself with Job. I'm not like Job. Job was not born again. (Watch me open this can of worms) Listen, If God opened the door on Job for Satan to attack him, maybe that was Jobs covenant. It's not found in mine. I'm redeemed. As long as I'm sober and watchful, Satan cannot devour me. 1 Pet 5. Let's see where this discussion goes now. I'm so glad I found this place. It's totally cool. Andes |
||||||
33 | rock foundation | Matt 7:24 | In the Andes | 53967 | ||
You are too eloquent. Where did you get it? Studies or grace? Hey, I liked your site. Are you a pastor? Tell me more, tell me more. Andes I'll get back to babies spirits soon. I'm inclining on agreeing with you based upon the fact that there is little or no NT evidence either way. However, I think common sense sides with me. |
||||||
34 | rock foundation | Matt 7:24 | In the Andes | 53881 | ||
I don't have the time I'd like to give my full attention to this wonderful discussion. And have only briefly read all the responses. I will give further attention to them later. I also find it interesting that this conversation is still going. Could you please respond to this. As I believe Mac G. pointed out Paul's revelation was given to him directly by the Lord. I believe that the majority of it is about the Church, which is HIS BODY. Therefore Who we are IN CHRIST, Our eternal inheritence that we possess, And the Power displayed towards us (or what we can do)Eph 1:18-19, are only taught in the letters. Read Philemon 1:6 in the Amp. Therefore, without the knowledge of the WORK OF CHRIST on the Cross, you wouldn't know what Jesus had done for you. You'd only know he died and was resurrected. You would NOT know anything about the NEW COVENANT. You'd only know there was one. Furthermore, you'd be living the teachings of Jesus as HE LIVED THEM AND TAUGHT THEM. UNDER THE LAW. Therefore, according to the revelation that JESUS HIMSELF GAVE PAUL, you'd still be in your sins trying to be declared righteous. See Gal 2. In reality, you cannot be a successful Christian with the Gospels only. I NEVER said they were not important. To the contrary. I said they were. But to live successfully you must study WHAT THE DEATH BURIAL AND RESURRECTION MEANS TO YOU. And that is found in ROMANS THROUGH JUDE. I've even got a real life example for you. Here in Chile, they had a major revival at the turn of the century. The evangelical church FORBID the new believers to read ANYTHING but the Gospels. Guess what! They are ALL legalist churches. They are the deadest, most religous people you'd ever meet. They have NO idea who they are in Christ. And now I'm talking about the pastors. Can you imagine the sheep? No offense intended, but I don't know many catholics that are Born Again and walking in their rights as a believer. And they know all about the 4 gospels. Wish I had more time... |
||||||
35 | rock foundation | Matt 7:24 | In the Andes | 53781 | ||
You know, I've tried 4 times now to bring myself to respond. I just can't seem to do it. Do you really believe that or just trying to make an interesting argument? sorry. |
||||||
36 | image of God | Gen 1:26 | In the Andes | 53763 | ||
Hey hey, slow down zippy. I've got work to do. I'll get to responding to this soon. It's really interesting and I really haven't had time to read each chapter yet. You know it's enough to put in a book. No listen, this is by far one of the most interesting discussions I've ever had. But I need to change the subject a sec. Do you have "how to read the bible for all it's worth" by fee and stuart? I've got a question I'd like to ask if you do. |
||||||
37 | Can they all be right? | Matt 24:11 | In the Andes | 53751 | ||
If you'll read each of those ref. to false, in context it will tell you exactly what the heresy is that's false, and thereby deriving for yourself who is right and who is wrong. | ||||||
38 | Who is qualified? | 1 Tim 6:17 | In the Andes | 53750 | ||
No one ever said the Gospel is about money. No one ever said that to be a blessing it always requires money. Pro 22:2 Does not say that God makes one man rich and another poor. IT SAYS GOD MADE THE MAN. You should read the rest of the proverbs. Pr 18:13. I don't believe you've ever heard the whole story. It's obvious from your attack against my character. Of course evil men are blessed. The children of the world are often wiser that the children of the kingdom. According to Prov. wisdom in the area of finances brings wealth. No one said our purpose was the pursuit of wealth. You are NOT QUALIFIED to judge me and tell me I am not content. That position is the Lords. And THAT is precisely my point. Who is qualifed? Let me share a little something with you. I don't receive offerings from those to whom I'm preaching the Gospel. I'll tell you what though. It takes a great deal of money to do what I do. When was the last time YOU got on an airplane to go preach in another nation? It wasn't free was it. NO! I'll tell you what. You and a whole bunch of other christians would rather that I backpack from the states to Chile. Spending 80 or 90 percent of my time trying to find cheap lodgings and begging for rides from the nationals. Eating food that's not fit for the dogs! NO. I'm not going to do that unless I have NO OTHER OPTION. The fact is I do have other options. Why should be exhausted every time I get into the pulpit. I preach an average of 4 hours a day. 4 days a week, not counting Saturdays and Sundays. The Lord has instructed me to start 3 new schools here in this nation. Do you know one of them is 8 hours south of my home. I'm not going backpack down there. I'll take the bus as that's what I can afford. And when God prospers me, I'll begin taking a plane. That's every weekend now, 6 hours every Saturday and not including Sunday. Monday will be MY only day off. We are now in the process of planting churches. We've started 2 and have 4 more to do by the end of the year. Why don't you ask me how much that costs? Transportation, workers, advertisement, renting buildings, renting sound equipment. NO THE APOSTLE PAUL DIDN'T HAVE TO RENT BUILDINGS. He lived in a completely different culture than I do. He went into the synagogues, etc. Why don't you ask me how much is in my savings account? 0! You know why, cause ever penny I get keeps me here doing the will of God. I'm doing what I can with what I have. My vision is big. And God is sending us faithful people to get behind it. The more I have the more I can do. And I'll eventually have more. And those that aren't offended by it, will be laborers together with us, and will have "fruit abounding to their account." Won't they be surprised when they find out how many souls were wrought under their name. (I feel like the apostle Paul defending my apostleship to the Corinthians 2 Cor 10-11) And there's absolutely nothing more fulfilling or rewarding OR EXCITING than what I'm doing. This weekend I saw several several people got born and again and healed. There's absolutely NO substitute for it. I've NOT reduced the Gospel down to money. I know exactly what it is. God's got a bigger problem than a few preachers with their prioritys out of line. And as I was about to tell you what it was He told me to drop the subject. So with that. I'm not mad or offended. I know so many young people who would love to give their lives to the mission but are constantly told that God is NOT interested in money and they know of no way to fulfill their dream. We are laborers together. 3 John. One go's one send's. One man said it like this. Either Go or Send a substitute. I just want to stir up the church to this! My motto is, I'm either gonna cause a revival or a riot but when I leave you'll never be the same again. Andes |
||||||
39 | image of God | Gen 1:26 | In the Andes | 53725 | ||
Are you saying that babies come out of the womb with sin in their lives? Maybe the scripture is silent on the subject because it's common sense. Paul said, death spread to all men because ALL SINNED. You'll have to prove to me 1st that a 1 year old child can commit sin. Looking over those scriptures you quoted, I cannot find where men are born sinners, I see where death spread to all men BECAUSE ALL SINNED. Paul is very clear that "where there is no law, sin is not held against man." vs 13 As far as God making exceptions, He is no respecter of persons. Let me give you another veiw point to add to your 3 main views. Paul was refering to a time in his life when he was not spiritually separated from God. And when he understood the commandment, the nature of his flesh which was passed down from Adam arose and took advantage of the commandment and killed him. Thereby teaching him that he needed a savior. Paul says in Rom 2:14-15 that those without the law are a law unto themselves. And their consciences bear witness, accusing or excusing them. Babies must of necessity have clean consciences. Or they would go straight to hell. All men will sin (because of the nature passed down from Adam) and thereby need a savior. I'm not disagreeing with you on that. I think it is a bit much to appl Rom 5 and eph 2 to babies. This is a subject that i've heard quite a bit. In the seventies it was called the age of accountability. I haven't heard much about it since then. |
||||||
40 | self control / spirit control | 1 Cor 9:25 | In the Andes | 53720 | ||
Hey, If Paul is wrong he shouldn't be in the Bible. And if what He says contradicts Jesus then the entire Bible is wrong. So, Jesus saying it...that settles it doesn't fit too well with Bible interp. |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 ] Next > Last [3] >> |