Results 21 - 40 of 1935
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: BradK Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
21 | why is cain not in adams generation | Genesis | BradK | 235248 | ||
My dear Escar: Well, that's the first clear and concise post you've made in 27 attempts on this topic! What took you so long? Just an FYI- I've made no accusations against you regarding any particular group! BradK |
||||||
22 | why is cain not in adams generation | Genesis | BradK | 235234 | ||
Hello escar, I personally believe none of us is ever too old to learn. In other words, the learning process never really ends! The old adage applies: When the student is ready, the teacher appears! BradK |
||||||
23 | why is cain not in adams generation | Genesis | BradK | 235209 | ||
OK! | ||||||
24 | why is cain not in adams generation | Genesis | BradK | 235204 | ||
Hello Mr. Smith: Yes, I agree truth is what we're after. However, we must first have clear communication so that both of us know what the other is talking about! You keep changing thoughts in mid-stream, so I cannot follow your logic! What does any of this have to do with whether Cain is the son of Adam and Eve? What do you say about Gen. 4:1? "Now the man had relations with his wife Eve, and she conceived and gave birth to Cain, and she said, "I have gotten a manchild with the help of the LORD." (NASB) BradK |
||||||
25 | why is cain not in adams generation | Genesis | BradK | 235194 | ||
My Dear Mr. Smith: Again, my disagreement is not with God's Word, but with what YOU try to say it says! Sir, your posts are muddled and incoherent! You are not coming across clear in your communication as you jump from one thought to the next! I'm sorry, but I cannot follow what you are trying to say. Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
26 | why is cain not in adams generation | Genesis | BradK | 235190 | ||
My very dear sir: Your explanation makes no sense! I'm not sure what it has to do with the original question? A studied reading of both Genesis 4 and 5 sets aside any notions about Cain not being Adam's son! Chapter 4:1-2 "Now the man had relations with his wife Eve, and she conceived and gave birth to Cain, and she said, "I have gotten a manchild with the help of the LORD." Again, she gave birth to his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of flocks, but Cain was a tiller of the ground." (NASB) This established the birth of both Cain and Abel. Then, Gen 4:25 "Adam had relations with his wife again; and she gave birth to a son, and named him Seth, for, she said, "God has appointed me another offspring in place of Abel, for Cain killed him." This establishes the birth of Seth to Adam and Eve. Chapter 5:1 speaks of the generations (or descendants) of Adam. It is not an all-inclusive list. But, the fact that neither Cain or Abel are speifically mentioned does not negate the truth set forth in chapter 4. Does it? In 5:3 we read, "When Adam had lived one hundred and thirty years, he became the father of a son in his own likeness, according to his image, and named him Seth." The listing merely starts with Seth. However, the "gap" is filled in by the next verse: "Then the days of Adam after he became the father of Seth were eight hundred years, and he had other sons and daughters." The "other sons and daughters" referred to here is certainly a clear reference back to chapter 4:1-2! Is it not? I'm not sure where you're confusion comes from. My disagreement is not with God's Word, but what YOU say it says! Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
27 | why is cain not in adams generation | Genesis | BradK | 235187 | ||
Hello escar, I'm confused by your response. Though divinely inspired, for whatever reason the genealogy in Genesis 5 does not mention Cain. We do not know why as we're not told. However, Cain's definitely the son of Adam and Eve! Genesis 4;1 cleary states, "Now the man had relations with his wife Eve, and she conceived and gave birth to Cain, and she said, "I have gotten a manchild with the help of the LORD." (NASB) You can believe what you want about Cain, but to deny he's Adam's son is to deny the clear testimony of scripture itself. Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
28 | Places in scripture where God the Father | Amos 1:1 | BradK | 235158 | ||
Hello glelder, You've asked and answered your own statement? As this question is being asked numerous times here on the Forum, might I inquire as to why you're seeking an answer to this? Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
29 | are these all other races of people, | Gen 7:21 | BradK | 235004 | ||
Hello escar, I'll start on that study right away:-) Merry CHRISTmas to you, sir! BradK |
||||||
30 | are these all other races of people, | Gen 7:21 | BradK | 234995 | ||
Hello escar, OK, but you are the one making the assertion! What is it that you totally disagree with me about? For starters, you're the one who brought this whole matter up. I'm simply asking some questions about what you stated and telling you where I don't agree. It is standard convention here on the Forum that the one making an assertion has the burden of proof upon them to establish it's validity. You've established nothing! That being said, I'm still not at all clear what your point is with all of this? Are you just looking for someone to agree with you? Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
31 | are these all other races of people, | Gen 7:21 | BradK | 234991 | ||
Hello escar, I'm not sure where you're going with all of this? You're taking a verse from 2 Peter 3:8 and literally applying it back into Genesis 1! This is simply not a correct biblical application my friend. Your hermeneutic is seriously flawed! I'm not sure how and why you make this enormous leap? Second, how is it, "...reasonable to believe that there were people on earth before adam and eve"? Reasonable in what way? Scripture supports no such claim, and I'd challenge you to prove otherwise. What you're saying may be your opinion, but amounts to little more than gross speculation! There's no biblical evidence to back it up! How exactly do you arrive at such a wild speculation? It's one thing to have a reasonable question from or about scripture that you don't understand or cannot seem to reconcile. It's a far different thing to jump to conclusions that have no biblical or historical support! Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
32 | was christ conceived dec.25 or born? | Luke 2:8 | BradK | 234944 | ||
Hello kitty w, Frankly, I do not agree with your commentary on the "roots or origin of Christmas" being traced to pagan Rome". Is that the Watchtower version of Church History to which you refer? Regardless, here's what I know: We celebrate the birth of Christ as the miracle of the Incarnation- of God becoming united with mankind, as prophesied in Is. 7:14. Fulfilled in John 1:14, The Lord Christ is truly God with us. That is CHRISTmas! Without His birth, we could not have had a Saviour- fully God and fully man to redeem us! Then, we celebrate His death at Easter. 1 Cor. 15:3-4 tells us, "For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received, that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures," (NASB) Yes, we celebrate the birth and death of our Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ! So, both are important to observe to those that are "in Christ" and truly believe upon Him. Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
33 | Question of one word in Romans 8:38-39 | Rom 8:39 | BradK | 234894 | ||
Hello kitty, May I ask where you get any such notion from the text of Rom. 8:38-39 that it's making any reference to Calamites, let alone "wicked spirit creatures"? Your response is nothing but conjecture! Please support your answer from scripture as requested by our host, the Lockman foundation. Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
34 | Input on ephesians 5: 8,9 | Eph 5:1 | BradK | 234890 | ||
Hello kitty, Isn't the Watchtower Organization a group of "false religious teachers", putting people under bondage to lies? Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
35 | Where did God and Jesus come from? | Bible general Archive 4 | BradK | 234889 | ||
Hello kitty, Actually, Jesus is eternal- pre-existing with the Father, "in the beginning". Otherwise, Col 1:16-17 makes no sense, "For by Him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities--all things have been created through Him and for Him. He is before all things, and in Him all things hold together." (NASB) In John 3:16, Begotten has to do with His incarnation, not physical birth! Col. 1:13-18, First-born (Gr. prototokos) is in reference to His position over creation, not that he was literally "first born". God has no physical birth! My guess, is that you are espousing Watchtower theology? Arianism was defeated and renounced as heresy at the Council of Nicea back in 325! You might want to read the Terms of Use to which you implicitly agree to when registering on this Forum. Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
36 | what is moving me | Bible general Archive 4 | BradK | 234880 | ||
OK, then why ask your question? |
||||||
37 | the theme of genesis 1 | Genesis | BradK | 234864 | ||
Hello gogo, You asked and answered your own question? I would disagree that the "theme" of Genesis 1 is God's soverenty (sic). Would it not be His creation of the world? Certainly by doing this, He demonstrates His Sovereignty! Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
38 | ISAIAH 12:4 | Bible general Archive 4 | BradK | 234709 | ||
Hi Keith, How exactly did you arrive at your conclusions? What can you present to this Forum that would substantiate your postulation? In other words, why would those of us don' t know you accept your statements? Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
39 | ISAIAH 12:4 | Bible general Archive 4 | BradK | 234704 | ||
Hi Keith, Well, I think you answered your own question! Is ignorance then bliss? Out of curiosity, what was your major? Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
40 | Private Interpretations | 2 Pet 1:20 | BradK | 234677 | ||
Hello Edb, I read your response. Thank you for the comments. You said, "But questions such as why did the majority of translators translated this verse this way and that verse that way even though it might be "fringe" to you should be addressed. " Can you or would you be willing to provide such helpful input on this matter for the edificstion of the Forum? Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ] Next > Last [97] >> |