Results 201 - 220 of 11018
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: DocTrinsograce Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
201 | Resisting the Place of Scripture | Rom 9:31 | DocTrinsograce | 243532 | ||
"You can think too highly of your interpretations of Scripture, but you cannot think too highly of Scripture's interpretation of itself. You can exaggerate your authority in handling the Scriptures, but you cannot exaggerate the Scriptures' authority to handle you. You can use the Word of God to come to wrong conclusions, but you cannot find any wrong conclusions in the Word of God. "Of the four attributes of Scripture, [sufficiency] may be the one that evangelicals forget first. If authority is the liberal problem [Scripture plus], clarity the postmodern problem, and necessity the problem for atheists and agnostics [and the 22,000 independent denominations], then sufficiency is the attribute most quickly doubted by rank-and-file churchgoing Christians. "The finality of Christ's redemption for us is intimately tied to the finality of his revelation to us. If we say revelation is not complete, we must admit that somehow the work of redemption also remains unfinished. Scripture is enough because the work of Christ is enough. They stand or fall together." --Kevin DeYoung, from his book "Taking God at His Word: Why the Bible Is Knowable, Necessary, and Enough, and What That Means for You and Me" |
||||||
202 | Gen 1:28, Sex in the garden of Eden? | Gen 1:28 | DocTrinsograce | 243531 | ||
Dear Paulus, Good point. I remember reading somewhere or another where some early teachers thought that the point you are making is evidence that the Fall came very, very soon after the completion of creation. In consideration of Genesis 3:8, it might well have taken place within 24 to 48 hours. I cannot vouch for that... I can't even remember the names of those scholars. In Him, Doc |
||||||
203 | ...All other ground is sinking sand... | Jer 6:10 | DocTrinsograce | 243521 | ||
"If some were to teach doctrines contradicting an article of faith clearly grounded in Scripture and believed throughout the world by all Christendom, such as the articles we teach children in the Creed -- for example, if anyone were to teach that Christ is not God, but a mere man and like other prophets, as the Turks and the Anabaptists hold -- such teachers should not be tolerated. For they are not mere heretics but open blasphemers... With their blasphemy such teachers defame the name of God... In like manner, those [should not be tolerated] who teach that Christ did not die for our sins, but that everyone shall make his own satisfaction for them. For that, too, is blasphemy against the Gospel and against the article we pray in the [Apostles'] Creed: 'I believe in the forgiveness of sins' and 'in Jesus Christ, dead and risen.' Those should be treated in the same way who teach that the resurrection of the dead and the life everlasting are nothing, that there is no hell, and like things, as did the Sadducees and the Epicureans, of whom many are now arising among the great wiseacres. We are told that when the holy fathers at the Council of Nicea heard the doctrine of the Arians read, all hissed unanimously, and would not listen or permit any argument or defense but condemned them out of hand, without disputation, as blasphemers. So, in this case, there ought not to be much disputing; but such open blasphemers should be condemned without a hearing and without defense, as Paul commands (Titus 3:10): 'A heretic is to be avoided and let go, after he has been admonished once or twice'; and he forbids Timothy to wrangle and dispute, since this has no effect, except to pervert those who hear (1 Timothy 6:20). For these common articles of all Christendom have had hearing enough. They have been proved and decreed by the Scriptures and by the confession of the whole church, confirmed by many miracles, and sealed by the blood of many holy martyrs. They are testified to and defended in the books of all the doctors. They need no more discussion and clever interpretation." --Martin Luther (1483-1546) from a lecture to a class (what we would consider upper division) he taught doctoral students at the University of Wittenberg |
||||||
204 | Our Lord's Prayers are Always Answered! | John 17:23 | DocTrinsograce | 243515 | ||
"It must be added that unity of faith and doctrine in the Church [visible church] is not a perfect and absolute one in this life; for at times controversies occur between members of the true Church through which this holy unity is torn. We therefore have to distinguish between that absolute, perfect unity, free from every form of disharmony, which is found nowhere except in the Church Triumphant [invisible church], and that fundamental unity, which consists in agreement concerning the principal articles of doctrine, while with respect to a few less important points of faith (fidei capitibus) or to ceremonies which are a matter of indifference or to the interpretation of some Scripture passages controversies will arise. And this is the unity obtaining in the Church Militant (ecclesia militans) [Christians on earth who struggle as soldiers of Christ]; for in this Church there is never found such a definite harmony that no disagreements arise in it. 'For we know in part, and we prophesy in part,' 1 Cor. 13:9. ... The truly pious are not yet perfectly renewed but retain remnants of the flesh. Hence they do not arrive at an accurate and perfect knowledge of the mysteries of faith but err and waver with respect to some of them. The flesh in the regenerate still strives against the spirit, for which reason it can easily happen, especially if the temptation of the devil also enters, that, giving way to wrong, carnal ideas, they create dissensions in the Church; however, if they do not become guilty of stubbornness and if the foundation is not shaken, they are not at once cut off from the body of the Church on this account. This is proved by the examples given in Acts 11:2; Galatians 2:11; Acts 15:39. In the Corinthian church divisions had arisen, profanations of the Eucharist had crept in, there were acrimonious debates about adiaphora [actions neither mandates nor forbidden], some persons doubted the article of the resurrection, etc.; in spite of all this, however, Paul does not refuse to call the assembly a church, but in addressing it, he terms it still a church of God, 1 Corinthians 1:2. In the church of the Galatians the article of justification had been corrupted through the adulterations of false apostles; but since the members were still open to instruction and some of them still retained the true faith, Paul still calls the Galatian congregations, churches, Galatians 1:2. ... Hence it is certain that a total and real absolute unity cannot be hoped for in this life. And therefore not every disagreement at once dissolves union and unity in the Church." --John Gerhard (1939) Note: If the prayers of a righteous man has great power (James 5:16); imagine the universe changing power of the only One who is utterly and entirely righteous! |
||||||
205 | Hearing and Heeding the Holy Spirit | Rev 2:29 | DocTrinsograce | 243514 | ||
"The Symbols of the orthodox Church of Christ are the matured fruits of the deepest devotion, experience and learning of its greatest and wisest members in its most trying ages; and as we may practically learn much from the biographies of the good, so we may learn much more from the Spirit-moved biography of the Church and the principles and testimonies which mark her life of faith. They are the sign-posts set up by the faithful along the King's highway of salvation to designate the places of danger to those who come after them, to warn and admonish us where we would otherwise be liable to err and miss the goal of our high calling in Christ Jesus. They are not laws to rule our faith, for the Word of God alone is such a Rule; but they are helps and tokens to enable us the more surely to find the true import [meaning] of the Rule, that we may be all the more thoroughly and sincerely conformed to that Rule. They are the human tracks which the best of the saints have left, by which we may the better detect the way which God has laid out and opened for the fallen and sinful children of men to travel, that they may fill their Christian vocation [divine calling] and come to everlasting life." --Joseph A. Seiss (1882) |
||||||
206 | The Freedom of the Christian | 1 Cor 9:1 | DocTrinsograce | 243512 | ||
"A Christian is a perfectly free lord of all, subject to no one. A Christian is a perfectly dutiful servant of all, subject to all. "...as Christians we do not live in ourselves but in Christ and the neighbor. Otherwise, we are not Christian. As Christians we live in Christ through faith and in the neighbor through love. Through faith we are caught up beyond ourselves into God, Likewise, through love we descend beneath ourselves through love to serve our neighbor." --Martin Luther (1520) from his book "The Freedom of the Christian" |
||||||
207 | Evidences that Give Assurance | Gal 4:7 | DocTrinsograce | 243507 | ||
"For Paul, the ability to cry 'Father!' was the work and therefore the evidence of the Spirit of the Son [Galatians 4]. The evidence of the Spirit is first of all Christian faith in God the Father or -- Christian prayer. The Spirit in these parallel texts is deliberately called 'the Spirit of (the) Son(ship),' not only because the Spirit belongs to the Son and is given in him, but because it is the Spirit's work to assure believers that they are, through the Son, truly sons of God. The gift of the Spirit is first of all the subjective assurance of the gift of adoption or justification. The 'objective' justification and the 'subjective' gift of the Spirit cannot be separated for one is acceptance with God and the other is knowledge of this acceptance. And what God has joined together no man should put asunder. The 'objective' justification never remains merely objective but is always accompanied mediately in the Word by its 'subjective' revelation, and this is the first work of the Spirit—this is the Spirit. His evidence is Christian assurance." --Frederick Dale Bruner (1970) |
||||||
208 | Rejoicing in Affliction | 2 Cor 7:4 | DocTrinsograce | 243506 | ||
"The godly do suffer and complain about it at times. But the Bible teaches plainly that their suffering, even after their conversion and reconciliation to God, is not punishment any longer, but chastening. It is not the punishment of a God who is angry with them, but the chastening of a God who is reconciled to them. Whom God loves, the Scriptures says, He chastens. He makes all things, including pain, 'work together for good for them that love God, and are called according to His purpose.' That should be the consolation and strength of the saints... That affliction is actually a blessing in disguise. At other times, the pain hurts so much that they cannot, through the tears, see the disguise. Momentarily they lament the heavy hand of God upon them, but when they are thinking in their most saintly character, they praise God. His rod and staff comfort them." --John Gerstner |
||||||
209 | Proof against election. | Matt 18:14 | DocTrinsograce | 243505 | ||
Shalom aleichem, baruch haba! I am a Jew, saved by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone. I am saved by works... indeed, I am saved by mighty and wonderful works... the works of God Himself. Consequently, I am quite grateful, praising God daily that He did not leave me to my own choices. If He had, I would never have been saved! The Greek word pororidzo (predestine) appears in six verses in the New Testament (Romans 8:29, 30; 1 Corinthians 2:7; Ephesians 1:5, and 11). If you are interested in God's sovereign providence, then you would want to understand these verses in their context. Each of these verses speak to your soteriological question. I am sorry that you have been "dismissed" as you tried "discussing this subject with them." Presumably by "them" you mean orthodox Biblical Christians. I cannot speak to their motivation. I would guess that it has to do with their being simply fed up with people who are more interested in defending their contribution to salvation than they are in the Word. The Scriptures do not elevate man's will above God's. However, not a single religion outside of these doctrines or even outside of Christianity, will admit to God's authority in all things. This is because, as Scripture assures us, that depending on the human heart will lead us only to being deceived (Jeremiah 17:9; Proverbs 28:25). In fact, the Word tells us that those who do so fundamentally lack sanity (Ecclesiastes 9:3b). Regardless, your problem is not a matter of failing to rightly understand the doctrine of God's predestination. It is more fundamental than that. When you argue about soteriological predestination, it is like arguing about Trigonometry when you still do not agree with the principle of addition and subtraction. Instead of trying to get people to argue the subject with you on the Internet, I would suggest that you find a pastor in your area with whom you could begin a discussion. He will help you with the basics concerning Scripture. Look for a church who hold to a confession (e.g., Lutheran Missouri Synod, Reformed Church of America, Dutch Reformed, Orthodox Presbyterian, or Reformed Baptist). The confession is what they understand to be the essential doctrines. Those without a confession will -- and do -- believe anything and everything. They will even place some things as having a higher authority than the Scripture. The pastor that you speak to will be able to articulate all historical perspectives. He will be able to help you in a far more practical way than we might do -- which is, actually, beyond our purview. Meanwhile, our forum, per our gracious host, the Lockman Foundation, is about Scripture. The Lockman Foundation sponsored the NASB and Amplified translations specifically because they believed that the Bible alone contains all that we must know to believe, to understand, and to obey our Lord. See the Terms of Use. The Terms of Use give us broad permission to express what we understand from Scripture; provided they are consistent with the eccumenical creeds: Apostles Creed, Nicene Creed, Chalcedonian Creed, and Canons of the Council of Orange. While we all hold the Scriptures as the highest authority, we are functioning in accord with Lockman's objectives. Although some who participate in our forum hold their denominational praxis as having a higher priority than anything else (you will see them by their operation contrary to the Terms of Use) -- nonetheless, the rest of us will be praying for you specifically as you seriously seek answers to your questions in study in the church in your community. God will always respond when He is sought above all else. In Him, Doc |
||||||
210 | Tilling the Soil | Matt 11:5 | DocTrinsograce | 243504 | ||
"Now it is perfectly true that men must be brought to Christ one by one. There are no labor-saving devices in evangelism. It is all hand-work. And yet it would be a great mistake to suppose that all men are equally well prepared to receive the gospel. It is true that the decisive thing is the regenerative power of God. That can overcome all lack of preparation, and the absence of that makes even the best preparation useless. But as a matter of fact God usually exerts that power in connection with certain prior conditions of the human mind, and it should be ours to create, so far as we can, with the help of God, those favorable conditions for the reception of the gospel. False ideas are the greatest obstacles to the reception of the gospel. We may preach with all the fervor of a reformer and yet succeed only in winning a straggler here and there, if we permit the whole collective thought of the nation or of the world to be controlled by ideas which, by the resisters force of logic, prevent christianity from being regarded as anything more than a harmless delusion. Under such circumstances, what God desires us to do is to destroy the obstacle at its root. Many would have the seminaries combat error by attacking it as it is taught by its popular exponents. Instead of that they confuse their students with a lot of German names unknown outside the walls of the universities. That method of procedure is based simply upon a profound belief in the pervasiveness of ideas. What is today a matter of academic speculation begins tomorrow to move armies and pull down empires. In that second stage, it has gone too far to be combated; the time to stop it was when it was still a matter of impassioned debate. So as Christians we should try to mold the thought of the world in such a way as to make the acceptance of Christianity something more than a logical absurdity." --J. Gresham Machen (1881-1937) |
||||||
211 | The SBF what does it need to do? | Bible general | DocTrinsograce | 243501 | ||
Dear Justme, One of the enormous problems over the years has been the unwillingness of members to be tolerant, accepting, humble, patient, kind, and gentle. Look at how often such people have been criticized? Our Terms of Use call us to be tolerant to those around us. Thus, I have quoted empiricists, liberals, Pentecostals, protestants, Roman Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, even atheists. I think that Lockman did its best with the Terms of Use, but I am persuaded that there are some whose faith is more about being against others than it is about being for anything. I have received more than half of dozen emails from people who have been so upset with such participants that they have left the forum entirely. I cannot blame them at all. Indeed, I intend to leave very soon myself. Let the left wing of doctrine make of the forum what they wish. Peter speaks of the unlearned and unstable in 2 Peter 3:16. Perhaps we can allow their approach to restore what they make shipwreck. I have always thought it was foolish beyond measure to ask people to post something contrary to what they believe. How does someone -- anyone -- come here and maintain a clear conscience? May God forbid. If you want to see what Godly early members of the forum thought, simply look for Hank (Southern Baptist) and Kalos (Pentecostal) had to say on the matter. Their positions are like many of the old teachers of the past, now beyond their ability to be argued. Nonetheless, it is truth that sets us free, not opinion. I have been active in this forum for thirteen years. Since then, I have prayed that God would magnify what brings Him glory, and that He would cause to whither what fails to do so. Since that time I have seen man's will magnified, man's opinion magnified, man's experience magnified, all at the expense of God's Word. Just as the enemies of the Word have vanished into history, while the faithful, though dead, still preach... we ought not expect the fads of men to prosper contrary to a forum based on Sola Scriptura. What a blessing that God's will -- even when we hope for something contrary -- cannot be thwarted despite the efforts of those who glory in men. Nonetheless, what a wonderful opportunity to pray explicitly for those who seek to subordinate the Word. It is through this very forum that we have been made aware of them, though they live faraway. God in His providence has given us their names, that we may daily pray that their eyes be opened. Watch the character of people around you. It will be clear as to whether they are Christlike or fleshlike. Pray earnestly according to the needs of each. Time is short. In Him, Doc |
||||||
212 | Be on Your Guard! | 2 Pet 3:17 | DocTrinsograce | 243500 | ||
“There's a way to preach the Bible unbiblically... You can use the Bible as the springboard for all kinds of ideas, can't you? Look around in here and find something that fits your fancy and then launch a rocket off it. People say, 'That was amazing, wasn't it? Remarkable what he got out of that.' Well of course it is because he put it in before he got it out.†--Alistair Begg https://www.truthforlife.org/ |
||||||
213 | "Quest for Glory" | Luke 17:18 | DocTrinsograce | 243499 | ||
Free book "Quest for Glory" well worth the reading by those who seek the glory of God above that of men: http://ministeriofiel.com.br/vidasemjogo/en/ |
||||||
214 | Paul Reading the News over our Shoulder? | 2 Tim 3:4 | DocTrinsograce | 243497 | ||
"But realize this, that in the last days difficult times will come. For men will be lovers of self, lovers of money, boastful, arrogant, revilers, disobedient to parents, ungrateful, unholy, unloving, irreconcilable, malicious gossips, without self-control, brutal, haters of good, treacherous, reckless, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, holding to a form of godliness, although they have denied its power; Avoid such men as these. For among them are those who enter into households and captivate weak women weighed down with sins, led on by various impulses, always learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. Just as Jannes and Jambres opposed Moses, so these men also oppose the truth, men of depraved mind, rejected in regard to the faith. But they will not make further progress; for their folly will be obvious to all, just as Jannes's and Jambres's folly was also." (2 Timothy 3:1-9) | ||||||
215 | Blessed are They Who Know God | Is 43:12 | DocTrinsograce | 243496 | ||
"Blessed, indeed, are the people who know this God who is God blessed forever. It is true that God is God, and therefore he cannot be comprehended. The finite cannot comprehend the infinite; time cannot compass eternity. But there is a difference between knowledge and comprehension, and comprehension is not necessary for knowledge. Although in the very testimony that God is God the church confesses that God cannot be comprehended, she also proclaims that He is knowable, and that He is known. He is known because He has revealed Himself. He has revealed Himself not merely as god, but also as the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who loves His church with an eternal and unfathomable love; who reconciles His people to Himself, not imputing their trespasses to them; who delivers them from the power of sin and death; and who gives them life eternal in the knowledge of Himself. "We know God in Christ Jesus our Lord, and not merely with our head, intellectually, as theology knows Him; we also know Him with our heart, spiritually, so that we taste that He is good and the overflowing fountain of all good. We know Him and have fellowship with Him, and we hear Him tell us that we are His friends, His sons and daughters. We know Him, and in this knowledge we have eternal life. 'This is life eternal, that they might know Thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom Thou hast sent' (John 17:3). "Let the church of Jesus Christ in the world clearly understand her calling and emphatically proclaim -- always and everywhere -- that God is God!" --Reverend Herman Hoeksema |
||||||
216 | Our Central Problem | Josh 24:27 | DocTrinsograce | 243489 | ||
"The central problem of our age is not liberalism or modernism, nor the old Roman Catholicism or the new Roman Catholicism, nor the threat of communism, nor even the threat of rationalism and the monolithic consensus which surrounds us. All these are dangerous but not the primary threat. The real problem is this: the church of the Lord Jesus Christ, individually corporately, tending to do the Lord’s work in the power of the flesh rather than of the Spirit. The central problem is always in the midst of the people of God, not in the circumstances surrounding them.†--Francis Schaeffer from his book "No Little People" |
||||||
217 | Free will, or ? | Rom 9:16 | DocTrinsograce | 243488 | ||
Hi, Lionstrong... I hope you are doing well... and continue to be as strong as a lion! Many modern teachers try to reduce the problem of "free will" to having the choice to turn left or turn right, to have eggs for breakfast, or cereal, etc. That entirely avoids the actual historic question in the church as to what we mean by free will. By dumbing it down to something as simplistic as this, who would possibly adhere to such a view? In theology we understand free will as meaning, the "ability to make choices without any prior prejudice, inclination, or disposition." The crux of the matter is the nature of the one making the choice. Keeping it simple for everyone, we might ask, for example, does a cat have the freedom of will to be bird? Does a man have the freedom of will to be a tree? The Bible states quite clearly that anything and anyone can only be what their nature allows them to be. God makes it quite plain through his prophet Jeremiah: "Can the Ethiopian change his skin Or the leopard his spots? Then you also can do good Who are accustomed to doing evil." (Jeremiah 13:23) Over and over we see things like this: Solomon said, "Though you pound a fool in a mortar with a pestle along with crushed grain, Yet his foolishness will not depart from him." (Proverbs 27:22) Christ said, "For there is no good tree which produces bad fruit, nor, on the other hand, a bad tree which produces good fruit." (Luke 6:43) Again, the Word says quite clearly, "But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, even to those who believe in His name, who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God." Paul, in his systematic theology, the epistle to the Romans, quite clearly assert that redemption is a matter of God's choice, not man's choice. Men do not share in God's glory. What a man earns by his choices are wages, while what God grants is a gift (Romans 6:23). Nothing could be more plain. Why, even God Himself, cannot do that which is contrary to His will (Titus 1:2; Proverbs 8:23-21; etc. etc.) For all of this I am exceedingly grateful, even beyond my ability to express it. If it were left to me, I would still be lost son of Jacob, resisting God continually. But God intervened on my behalf, freeing me from my hatred of Him, and creating a new creature... that I might choose Him and His will above all else. In Him, Doc |
||||||
218 | Harmonizing the Word Hermeneutically | Deut 19:21 | DocTrinsograce | 243482 | ||
"Give yourself unto reading. The man who never reads will never be read; he who never quotes will never be quoted; he who will not use the thoughts of other men’s brains proves that he has no brains of his own! Brothers and Sisters, what is true of ministers is true of all our people. You need to read. Renounce as much as you will all light literature, but study as much as possible sound theological works, especially the Puritan writers, and expositions of the Bible. "We are quite persuaded that the very best way for you to be spending your leisure time, is to be either reading or praying. You may get much instruction from books which afterwards you may use as a true weapon in your Lord and Master’s service. Paul cries, 'Bring the books' [2 Timothy 4:13] --join in the cry!" --Charles H. Spurgeon (1834-1892) Peter quoted Moses, Peter Joel, Peter quoted David, Peter quoted Paul, Peter quoted Christ, Peter quoted God, Peter quoted the Holy Spirit; Paul quoted David, Paul quoted Isaiah, Paul quoted Solomon, Paul quoted David, Paul quoted Moses, Paul quoted Cicero, Paul quoted Jeremiah, Paul quoted Ezekiel, Paul quoted Hosea, Paul quoted Peter, Paul quoted Christ, Paul quoted God, Paul quoted the Holy Spirit; must the list go on? Angels quoted Isaiah who was quoting God. The Virgin Mary quoted as much as did Zechariah. Imagine how much we would have if we listed all the quotes of the apostle John? And all this only in the New Testament! But, what utterly clinches the deal, is the number of times that our Lord Jesus Christ used quotes; both biblical and secular. Isaiah He quoted the most; David a close second. Now the Holy Spirit quotes to us all that the Word has to say to us. Astonishing that such angry, bitter, condensention would be heaped upon quoters. |
||||||
219 | They Burn the Bible bit by bit | 2 Pet 2:1 | DocTrinsograce | 243475 | ||
You would much appreciate Francis Schaeffer. It was quite a blessing to attend the seminary that he founded. "How Should We then Live" is great. His "Biblical World View and a Christian Mind" are classics. Like Machen, he spelled out precisely what we see in the churches of our day, and what we see in the common worldview held by evangelicals. If you read those books, please let me know what you think! They are not easy reads, but very well written. | ||||||
220 | They Burn the Bible bit by bit | 2 Pet 2:1 | DocTrinsograce | 243465 | ||
Doubtless he believes the same as we do, only there is some little difference as to terms.' This is treason to Christ and treachery to truth and cruelty to souls. If we love our Lord, we shall keep His words and stand fast in the faith, coming out from among the false teachers. Nor is this inconsistent with charity; for the truest love to those who err is not to fraternize with them in their error, but to be faithful to Jesus Christ in all things." --Charles H. Spurgeon "Divisions and separations are most objectionable in religion. They weaken the cause of true Christianity ...But before we blame people for them, we must be careful that we lay the blame where it is deserved. False doctrine and heresy are even worse than schism. If people separate themselves from teaching that is positively false and unscriptural, they ought to be praised rather than reproved. In such cases separation is a virtue and not a sin." --J. C. Ryle "Men today do not, perhaps, burn the Bible, nor does the Roman Catholic Church any longer put it on the Index, as it once did. But men destroy it in the form of exegesis: they destroy it in the way they deal with it. They destroy it by not reading it as written in normal, literary form, by ignoring its historical-grammatical exegesis, by changing the Bible's own perspective of itself as propositional revelation in space and time, in history..." --Francis Schaeffer |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ] Next > Last [551] >> |