Results 1721 - 1740 of 1935
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: BradK Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1721 | special revelation vs general revelation | Ps 19:1 | BradK | 89041 | ||
Radioman2 and Hank, Excellent insights on this topic of continued revelation. My biggest challenge to it is that SCRIPTURE does in fact speak against this (Heb.1:1-2), and the VERY subjective nature it entails. We are in fact putting "special revelation" on par with the Word of God when this practice is embraced. I certainly KNOW that the Bible, the Word of God is truth (John 17:17) but am not at all comfortable with so-and-sos' "revelation from God". It is simply too subjective. This also begs the question: If God has spoken to us through His Word, and His Word is truth, why do we seek or need any further revelation? Is the Bible alone not enough? As Jude writes "...I found it necessary to write to you exhorting you to contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all delivered to the saints." ( Jude 3) Speaking The Truth In Love, BradK |
||||||
1722 | Must we keep the law to be saved? | Rom 3:28 | BradK | 88992 | ||
Hi Mathew, You ask "But when does a person truly obtain salvation." First and foremost, Ps. 3:8 tells us "Salvation belongs to the Lord." I think there is a sense in which salvation is both present ( to those who belive) and future. Scripture tells us plainly in Eph. 2:8 ,2 Tim. 1:9 and Titus 3:5 that our salvation is an accomplished fact. "For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God;" "who has saved us and called us with a holy calling, not according to our works, but according to His own purpose and grace which was granted us in Christ Jesus from all eternity," "He saved us, not on the basis of deeds which we have done in righteousness, but according to His mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewing by the Holy Spirit," Our future (salvation) is "to be in the presence of the Lord"( 2 Cor. 5:8). The Glorification in Romans 8:30 is both present and future: "and these whom He predestined, He also called; and these whom He called, He also justified; and these whom He justified, He also glorified." Speaking The Truth In Love, BradK |
||||||
1723 | Born again son asking for Holy Ghost. | Luke 11:13 | BradK | 88876 | ||
Forum: What is the baptism of the Holy Spirit? The Baptism by the Spirit We will look at the Greek text of 1 Cor. 12:13,” By one Spirit are we all baptized into one body.” The body here is clearly the Mystical Body of Christ of which He is the Head and all believers from Pentecost to the Rapture, namely, from the time the Church was formed until the Church is taken up to Heaven at the descent of the Lord into the air, are members. The word “Spirit” is in the instrumental case in Greek. Personal agency is expressed occasionally by the instrumental case. At such times the verb is always in the passive or middle voice. The Greek construction here follows this rule of Greek grammar. The personal agent in this case who does the baptizing is the Holy Spirit. He places or introduces the believing sinner into the Body of which the Lord Jesus is the living head. The verb is in the past tense, referring to a past action, and is aorist, referring to a once-for-all act. This occurred potentially to all believers of this Age of Grace at Pentecost. It is the fulfillment of our Lord’s words, “Ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence” (Acts 1:5) Thus, the meaning of the Greek word, “to place” or “introduce into” gives us the purpose of the baptism by means of the Spirit, namely, the introduction of a believing sinner into the body of Christ. This brings us to a careful distinction which we must make. It is not the baptism with the Spirit or of the Spirit, in the sense that the Holy Spirit is the element which is applied to us. It is the baptism by the Spirit. This baptism does not bring the Spirit to us in the sense that God places the Spirit upon us or in us. Rather, this baptism brings the believer into vital union with Jesus Christ. It is the baptism with the Spirit in the sense that God the Father does the baptizing through His personal agent, the Holy Spirit. In Matthew 3:11 we have John the Baptist saying, “I indeed baptize you with water because of repentance… He shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire.” The word “with” is from a preposition which is used with the locative and instrumental cases in Greek. The particular classification of the locative here is “the locative of place.” The limits here are spatial. John literally said, “I place you in water.” His introduction of the believer into water is because of his repentance. Not only did John place them in water, but this placing in water was a ceremony or a rite. He not only baptized them into the water, but he baptized them by means of or with the water. The water was the element with or by which the believer was baptized. But when we come to the phrase, “baptized with the Spirit,” we find that the Greek grammatical construction will not allow us to interpret it as meaning that the Holy Spirit is the element with which we are baptized. Therefore the phrase, “baptized with the Spirit” does not mean that in this baptism, the Holy Spirit is applied to the believer as water is applied in the case of water baptism. In other words, there is no application of the Holy Spirit to the believer. Since there is no application of the Spirit in baptism, there is no power imparted in the act of baptizing with the Spirit. This baptism is only for the purpose of uniting the believing sinner with the Head of the Body, Christ Jesus, and thus making him a member of that body. The Spirit baptism to which John referred is the same one which Paul mentions in 1 Corinthians 12:13. It is a baptism with the Spirit in the sense that it is connected, not with water, but with the Spirit who Himself does the baptizing. The phrase “with the Spirit” therefore defines what baptism is referred to, and the words, “by means of the Spirit,” speak of the fact that the Holy Spirit is the divine Agent who Himself baptizes, the purpose of which baptism is to place the believing sinner into vital union with Jesus Christ and thus making him a member of the Body of which Christ is the living Head. The reader will observe that our study of the significance of Spirit baptism has been based upon a careful adherence to the rules of Greek grammar. This is a most scientific method of interpretation. It is a most sure method. A.T. Robertson quotes Dr. A. M. Fairbairn as saying, “He is no theologian who is not first a grammarian.” All correct theology must pay careful attention to the grammar of the Greek text, for a person is correctly understood only when his hearer or reader applies the rules of grammar which the speaker or writer uses. [Kenneth S. Wuest/Word Studies from the Greek New Testament/ W.B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.] Speaking The Truth In Love, BradK |
||||||
1724 | You need baptism of the Holy Ghost! | Acts 19:2 | BradK | 88763 | ||
Tim, I believe you have misunderstood my intent, brother. Please don't hear what I'm not saying. Have you not read my posts or responses? Neither have I put you down. (Eph.4:15) Perhaps the King James version should have been used in quoting Rom. 14:1. What I meant to emphasize was the "disputable matters". As you obviously took it wrong the fault is on my part. Please forgive me. In my humble estimation, the "fierce opposition" you speak of is none other than public discourse on the Forum! As there are a variety of views within Orthodox Christianity espoused here, you and me are likely to encounter some challenges to our statements. Don't take it as an affront to you personally, but rather realize that there is room for disagreement. If one attempts to be dogmatic in their support for a view Orthodox or not, they will likely be challenged. Hence, Rom. 14:1. Tim, my reason for responding to you in the manner in which I did, was that you presumed far too much and that your presumptions were and are incorrect. Please feel free to check out my user profile, as it may help you to better know me. Rest assured that "put downs" and "intimidation ploys" are hardly representative of my posts! You might try reading some to get a better feel before you offer up conjecture-that my friend is not becoming nor a Godly attribute. I take seriously, both how I response and with what I respond. Posting is a priviledge that comes with responsiblity. As such, 2 Tim 2:15 carries a great deal of weight in my walk. Speaking The Truth In Love, BradK |
||||||
1725 | You need baptism of the Holy Ghost! | Acts 19:2 | BradK | 88743 | ||
Tim, You need not loose any sleep or pour your heart out over any perceived "loss" on my part. I assure you of that:-) I'm complete in Him according to Col. 2:10. I most certainly understand the liberty I have in Christ!( Gal.5:1,13) That liberty also allows me the spirit of Rom. 14:1. "Now accept the one who is weak in faith, but not for the purpose of passing judgment on his opinions." My brother, if you are truly seeking truth revealed from the Spirit of God, may you find it. The Study Bible Forum is a tremendous source of biblical knowledge and experience. Speaking The Truth In Love, BradK |
||||||
1726 | You need baptism of the Holy Ghost! | Acts 19:2 | BradK | 88738 | ||
Graceful, I believe Hank spoke well to this situation, but since you asked me, I'll gladly provide an answer. We most certainly agree that scripture does not and cannot contradict. As I've stated before I do not view Acts as a DOCTRINAL book ( it is very much as inspired as the rest of the Word of God, though). As such I don't derive our doctrine of salvation ( soteriology) from it! Was it true then? Absolutely. However, I see Paul as laying out and elucidating these doctrines under which we now operate in the tremendous book of Romans! I do believe there is such thing as progressive revelation in scripture ( not extra-biblical) whereby we can understand and explain Acts 8:13-15 in its' context. I hope that adequately explains my views. Speaking The Truth In Love, BradK |
||||||
1727 | You need baptism of the Holy Ghost! | Acts 19:2 | BradK | 88721 | ||
Hi Tim, Thank you for your response. We will have to simply agree to disagree on this, my friend. There is , as I see it, no further "Holy Ghost baptism" other than that referred to in 1 Cor. 12:13. I believe the text to be quite clear. You ask "Do you speak in tongs, prophesy, or have the gifts of healing, discernment or miracles?" Trusting that you're asking a question with which you are agreeable as to my response- NO! I'd ask rhetorically, do you have the gift of love? Because, as 1 Cor.12:31- 13:13 elucidates, LOVE is the pinnacle! Without love, none of the gifts matter! "But earnestly desire the greater gifts. And I show you a still more excellent way." (12:31) " But now faith, hope, love, abide these three; but the greatest of these is love." (13:13) 1 Cor.12:29 -30 are quite clear, especially with the grammar that not all have these gifts of tongues,healings, or prophesy! As 1 Cor. 13:8 states : "Love never fails; but if there are gifts of prophecy, they will be done away; if there are tongues, they will cease; if there is knowledge, it will be done away." Grammatically, tongues will cease in and of themselves. I too operate within the "fruits of the Spirit" ( Gal. 5:22-23). Lastly, I do believe it error to be seeking something over and above that which scripture clearly contadicts. Speaking The Truth In Love, BradK |
||||||
1728 | You need baptism of the Holy Ghost! | Acts 19:2 | BradK | 88713 | ||
Hi Tim, I'm still confused by your response. How exactly is it that "these two events happened at different times" as you suggest? What is not clear by 1 Cor.12:13? "For by one Spirit we were ALL baptized into one body, whether Jews or Greeks, whether slaves or free, and we were all made to drink of ONE Spirit." From my understanding of scripture, there is only ONE baptism of (by) the Spirit, not two! Possibly you can clarify and provide more of a scriptural foundation:-) Speaking The Truth In Love, BradK |
||||||
1729 | You need baptism of the Holy Ghost! | Acts 19:2 | BradK | 88642 | ||
tj57h@cs,com, You state "This is Prof that you can be a believer and not have received the Baptism of the Holy Ghost." How so? And if this is the case, what of 1 Cor. 12:13? Speaking The Truth In Love, BradK |
||||||
1730 | A NON BELIEVER IS SET N WORDLY WAYS | John 8:23 | BradK | 88210 | ||
Elizabeth, Welcome to the Forum! Just a note: The use of capitalization on the internet is taken as shouting:-) Also, as a helpful hint,slang and abbreviations are not the most becoming way to post. "Let your speech always be with grace, as though seasoned with salt, so that you will know how you should respond to each person." (Col. 4:6) Speaking The Truth In Love, BradK |
||||||
1731 | THE CROSS | John 3:16 | BradK | 87800 | ||
Dear Jibby Jee, Welcome to the Forum! A fellow Northwesterner and Washingtonian to boot? Check my user profile and give me an e-mail, my friend. Best regards, BradK |
||||||
1732 | should you have extra marital affairs? | Rom 13:9 | BradK | 87614 | ||
Dear needhelp, Specifically, the Bible commands us against committing adultery in Ex. 20:14; Mt. 5:27; Rom. 2:22; and Jam. 2:11. Further, we see Pauls' admonition against such conduct in 1 Cor. 6:9-11: "Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God. Such were some of you; but you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God." The writer to the Hebrews tells us pointedly "Marriage is to be held in honor among all, and the marriage bed is to be undefiled; for fornicators and adulterers God will judge." Speaking The Truth In Love, BradK |
||||||
1733 | Does anyone have a good way to explain t | Bible general Archive 1 | BradK | 87565 | ||
Dear Hank and Forum: To those of us who rightly question the validity of the NWT and the veracity of it's so-called translators( who remain unamed). Who exactly are they? Well, here is some rather interesting information. "Translators of the New World Translation The following list of translators of the New World Translation is a compilation from a variety of sources: Frederick W. Franz: Main translator. Took liberal arts sequence at University of Cincinnati; 21 semester hours of classical Greek, some Latin. Partially completed a two-hour survey course in Biblical Greek in junior year; course titled "The New Testament--A course in grammar and translation." Left in spring of 1914 before completing junior year. Self-taught in Spanish, biblical Hebrew and Aramaic. Entered Brooklyn headquarters facility of Watchtower Society in 1920. Probable ghost writer for J. F. Rutherford (2nd president of WTS) from late 1920s through 1942. Vice president of WTS from 1942 to 1977, president from 1977 until death in 1992 at age 99. Franz writes in his autobiography: "What a blessing it was to study Bible Greek under Professor Arthur Kensella! Under Dr. Joseph Harry, an author of some Greek works, I also studied the classical Greek. I knew that if I wanted to become a Presbyterian clergyman, I had to have a command of Bible Greek. So I furiously applied myself and got passing grades" (The Watchtower, May 1, 1987, p. 24). Franz gives the impression that the bulk of his Greek studies were "Bible Greek" under "Professor Kensella" and that classical Greek was secondary under "Dr. Joseph Harry." The opposite is true. As mentioned above, Franz only took one 2-hour credit class of "Bible Greek" but 21 hours of classical Greek. According to the course catalog of 1911, Arthur Kensella was not a professor of Greek, as Franz wrote, but an "instructor in Greek." Kensella did not have a Ph.D. and he therefore taught entry-level courses. Nathan H. Knorr: No training in biblical languages. Entered Brooklyn headquarters in 1923; 3rd president of WTS from 1942 to 1977. Died 1977 at age 72. Milton G. Henschel: No training in biblical languages. Private secretary and traveling companion to N. H. Knorr from late 1940s until early 1970s. 4th president of WTS from 1992 to 2000. Still living, age mid-80s. Albert D. Schroeder: No training in biblical languages. Took 3 years of mechanical engineering, unspecified language courses in college, dropped out in 1932 and soon entered Brooklyn headquarters. Registrar of "Gilead School" from 1942 to 1959. Still living, age 90. Karl Klein: No training in biblical languages. Entered Brooklyn headquarters in 1925; member of Writing Dept. since 1950. Died 2001 at age 96. George D. Gangas: No training in biblical languages. Greek-speaking Turkish national, entered Brooklyn headquarters in 1928 as a Greek translator from English to modern Greek publications. Died 1994 at age 98. Franz was the only man capable of doing translation work. Gangas was a native Greek speaker, knew little of Koine Greek, and apparently helped out with a variety of non-translation tasks including reviewing the English grammar for continuity of expression. From all information published about him personally, one readily concludes that Knorr was the business administrator for the Translation Committee. Henschel might have been on it to take care of legal/secretarial matters. Schroeder and Klein did the copious footnotes (which included textual sources) and cross references and marginal notes, which in the original six volumes of the NWT were more extensive than in the 1984 edition. The NWT Committee has always been extremely secretive, and so information about who was on it has only trickled out of the Brooklyn headquarters as various staff members have left and revealed what they knew. Scant information has been published, other information has leaked by word of mouth." Source: www.freeminds.org/history/NWTauthors.htm Speaking The Truth In Love, BradK |
||||||
1734 | Who is the devil? | Isaiah | BradK | 87541 | ||
12345, Here is some info from Eastons' Bible Dictionary that you may find helpful. Devil — (Gr. diabolos), a slanderer, the arch-enemy of man’s spiritual interest (Job 1:6; Rev. 2:10; Zech. 3:1). He is called also “the accuser of the brethen” (Rev. 12:10). In Lev. 17:7 the word “devil” is the translation of the Hebrew sair, meaning a “goat” or “satyr” (Isa. 13:21; 34:14), alluding to the wood-daemons, the objects of idolatrous worship among the heathen. In Deut. 32:17 and Ps. 106:37 it is the translation of Hebrew shed, meaning lord, and idol, regarded by the Jews as a “demon,” as the word is rendered in the Revised Version. In the narratives of the Gospels regarding the “casting out of devils” a different Greek word (daimon) is used. In the time of our Lord there were frequent cases of demoniacal possession (Matt. 12:25–30; Mark 5:1–20; Luke 4:35; 10:18, etc.). Satan — adversary; accuser. When used as a proper name, the Hebrew word so rendered has the article “the adversary” (Job 1:6–12; 2:1–7). In the New Testament it is used as interchangeable with Diabolos, or the devil, and is so used more than thirty times. He is also called “the dragon,” “the old serpent” (Rev. 12:9; 20:2); “the prince of this world” (John 12:31; 14:30); “the prince of the power of the air” (Eph. 2:2); “the god of this world” (2 Cor. 4:4); “the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience” (Eph. 2:2). The distinct personality of Satan and his activity among men are thus obviously recognized. He tempted our Lord in the wilderness (Matt. 4:1–11). He is “Beelzebub, the prince of the devils” (12:24). He is “the constant enemy of God, of Christ, of the divine kingdom, of the followers of Christ, and of all truth; full of falsehood and all malice, and exciting and seducing to evil in every possible way.” His power is very great in the world. He is a “roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour” (1 Pet. 5:8). Men are said to be “taken captive by him” (2 Tim. 2:26). Christians are warned against his “devices” (2 Cor. 2:11), and called on to “resist” him (James 4:7). Christ redeems his people from “him that had the power of death, that is, the devil” (Heb. 2:14). Satan has the “power of death,” not as lord, but simply as executioner. [Easton, M. G., M. A. D. D., Easton’s Bible Dictionary, (Oak Harbor, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc.) 1996.] Speaking The Truth In Love, BradK |
||||||
1735 | Divorce Cult Member ? | 1 Cor 7:1 | BradK | 87418 | ||
Searcher, Let me preface my response by saying this:My wife and I got married because we believe in marriage. We didn't get married "to try it" and divorce is NOT an option for us! I've never counseled anyone regardless of their situation or circumstances to get a divorce( and I've counseled a few). I believe that strongly in marriage. My feelings are that if you got married, you need to stick to it, tough it out and make it work:-) As scripture instructs, we should seek the godly counsel of other believers.(Prov. 19:20) However, that being said, and knowing that scripture is clear, we also need to allow for some grace. We are not perfect and do not always make the right choices or decisions. Divorce is not the unpardonable sin. I hope that clarifies my view. Speaking The Truth In Love, BradK |
||||||
1736 | OT Laws - still apply today? | Lev 20:9 | BradK | 85909 | ||
Mathew, Thanks for your response. Possibly you could clarify for me specifically what you are confused about? That would help me to be very specific in my response. You state "Im wondering if a person is saved can he backslide." Based upon the NT, I would say no. The term backslider is not used with reference to NT believers! We can certainly be carnal and not 'walk in the Spirit' as Gal. 5:16 commands us, or we can walk contrary to it. (Note Eph.4:17-22). In short, we can reckon ourselves to be dead to God, and alive to sin- contrary to Rom.6:11. Consider Heb. 4:15-16,we can come boldly to the throne of grace in time of need! In my estimation, our time of need is almost constant:-) Remember, that God doesn't leave our faith or walk to speculation or chance! It is grounded in the immutable character of God, and His precious Word. A loving God doesn't leave His children with uncertainty, but promises based upon His faithfulness (1 Thess. 5:24). Speaking the Truth In Love, BradK |
||||||
1737 | OT Laws - still apply today? | Lev 20:9 | BradK | 85876 | ||
Mathew, It is my feeling that you are mixing Law and Grace and thereby confusing our "imputed righteousness" with our practical outworking as James is refering to:-)[Gal.2:21] You ask "Will grace "alone" keep you in right standing with God?" Yes! Eph.2:8-9, Titus 3:5 ,2 Cor. 5:21. Our righteousness is either based upon Gods' sovereign grace or our works. If it's our works then I have something in which to boast. "“Let him who boasts, boast in the Lord.” 1 Cor. 1:31 Speaking The Truth In Love, BradK |
||||||
1738 | OT Laws - still apply today? | Lev 20:9 | BradK | 85706 | ||
Dear Mathew, Without trying to echo Hank, you say "Grace saves us, but it doesnt change us." The Law still stands, but what has changed is our relationship to it. We are no longer under its' condemnation or tutledge. Brother,try reading Titus 2:11-12! If grace isn't our motivator to live godly, I don't know what is. "For the grace of God has appeared, bringing salvation to all men,instructing us to deny ungodliness and worldly desires and to live sensibly, righteously and godly in the present age," You tell me what it's saying:-) My friend, quite simply, if you're trying to keep the Law to seek, earn, or keep your righteous standing, good luck! You might consider re-reading Romans 7:-) "Therefore, my brethren, you also were made to die to the Law through the body of Christ, so that you might be joined to another, to Him who was raised from the dead, in order that we might bear fruit for God.For while we were in the flesh, the sinful passions, which were aroused by the Law, were at work in the members of our body to bear fruit for death.But now we have been released from the Law, having died to that by which we were bound, so that we serve in newness of the Spirit and not in oldness of the letter."(Rom.7:4-6) If only Christ could keep the Law, what makes you think that you'll have any success in your strivings? Isn't this an excercise in futilty? (Gal.4:21) It is our yielding to Him that produces the fruit in our life. (Rom. 6:11, Gal. 5:16-25) The Christian life is Christ living His life through us, not us trying to live up to the impossible standard of the Law. Also,I don't know that scripture says that "God was saved by the law." Speaking The Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
1739 | Is it wrong to want riches? | 3 John 1:2 | BradK | 85605 | ||
Dear Cowboy61, I'm not exactly sure what your position is...are you making a statement or seeking perspective? At any rate, my response would be: We need to seek a Biblical balance! There is nothing wrong with being either wealthy or poor. The bottom line is, what is our motive in seeking material wealth? Are we delighting ourselves in the Lord as the Psalmist admonishes us in Psalm 37:4-5? As Paul warns in 1 Tim.6:9-11 "But those who want to get rich fall into temptation and a snare and many foolish and harmful desires which plunge men into ruin and destruction. For the love of money is a root of all sorts of evil, and some by longing for it have wandered away from the faith and pierced themselves with many griefs.But flee from these things, you man of God, and pursue righteousness, godliness, faith, love, perseverance and gentleness." Money in and of itself is not evil, but the love of it is the root of all sorts of. I firmly believe God will bless our efforts if they are in line with his will and we are diligent in our efforts. (Prov. 21:5). Most Health and Wealth believers are simply "looking for a short-cut" to riches, without any sincere planned effort as Proverbs 15:22 advises. I'll venture to state this, based upon my experience and association. Any long-term successful business or financial endeavor has beeen wrought with prayer, planning, wise counsel, AND hard work! There is simply no short cut or get-rich-quick-scheme with lasting results. Scripture makes no promise that we'll be "wealthy" just because we're believers! Notice what Paul says to those who are already "rich" in vs. 17-18: "Instruct those who are rich in this present world not to be conceited or to fix their hope on the uncertainty of riches, but on God, who richly supplies us with all things to enjoy.Instruct them to do good, to be rich in good works, to be generous and ready to share," As I've studied this topic, two things stand out. 1. Scripture most definitely provides us with examples of wealthy individuals such as Abraham, Job, and Solomon who were godly. However, not ALL individuals in scripture were wealthy by any stretch of the imagination. 2. Not all of us will attain to material wealth in this life time, but we should non-the-less be content with what we have. ( Phil. 4:11-12) I'm not against prosperity for believers, but I do disdain the "Prosperity Gospel" as it is both a recent doctrine and severely lacking balance. A study of Proverbs certainly provides us with principles and guidelines in our endeavors, whether rich or poor. Speaking The Truth In Love, BradK PS It was 3 John 2 that says,"we are to prosper even as our soul prospers", not Paul:-) |
||||||
1740 | why god didn't allow man to pick mate? | Gen 2:7 | BradK | 85340 | ||
Dear Racan, Welcome to the Forum! It's good to hear from our Brothers across the Atlantic:-) I think it fair to say, that in answer to your question, we could only speculate. As Proverbs 25:2 tells us "It is the glory of God to conceal a matter,But the glory of kings is to search out a matter." Speaking The Truth In Love, BradK |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 ] Next > Last [97] >> |