Results 161 - 180 of 333
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: Chusarcik Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
161 | Is Matthew 10:5 fulfillment of prohecy? | Not Specified | Chusarcik | 90508 | ||
In Matthew Chapter 10 verse 5 Jesus instructs his apostles to spread the gospel to the Jews but not the Gentiles at that time. I understand that Jesus told the apostles this because the gospel was to come FIRST to the Jews as God's chosen people, but I wondered if this verse is also a fulfillment of old testament prophecy? Chusarcik | ||||||
162 | Is Matthew 10:5 fulfillment of prohecy? | Matt 10:5 | Chusarcik | 90521 | ||
In Matthew Chapter 10 verse 5 Jesus instructs his apostles to spread the gospel to the Jews but not the Gentiles at that time. I understand that Jesus told the apostles this because the gospel was to come FIRST to the Jews as God's chosen people, but I wondered if this verse is also a fulfillment of old testament prophecy? Chusarcik | ||||||
163 | what is the gift of Moses? | Lev 14:4 | Chusarcik | 89763 | ||
Well, it certainly does. THanks! Chusarcik | ||||||
164 | what is the gift of Moses? | Not Specified | Chusarcik | 89755 | ||
In reading Matthew Chapter 8, I'm confused about something.In verse 4, Jesus heals a leper and tells him to show himself to the priest to prove he's clean, but then Jesus tells the leper to offer the gift Moses commanded.What is the gift and why is the man to offer it? Second question is |
||||||
165 | what is the gift of Moses? | Lev 14:4 | Chusarcik | 89756 | ||
In reading Matthew Chapter 8, I'm confused about something.In verse 4, Jesus heals a leper and tells him to show himself to the priest to prove he's clean, but then Jesus tells the leper to offer the gift Moses commanded.What is the gift and why is the man to offer it? Second question is |
||||||
166 | Question about meaning of turning cheek | Matt 5:39 | Chusarcik | 89686 | ||
Very Good,Thanks. Chusarcik | ||||||
167 | Is this the opinion of most Christians? | Matt 5:39 | Chusarcik | 89685 | ||
Thankyou, Chusarcik |
||||||
168 | Is this the opinion of most Christians? | Matt 5:39 | Chusarcik | 89648 | ||
Thankyou, that answer seems to make sense to me. I'm wondering if in general, Christians agree with your opinion. Is there anyone else out there that would care to comment? Chusarcik | ||||||
169 | Question about meaning of turning cheek | Not Specified | Chusarcik | 89618 | ||
I have a question regarding Matthew chapter 5 verse 38 to 42. My Bible study group was reviewing the part of verse 38 where Jesus says, "If someone strikes you on the cheek, turn to him the other also." One of our study members said a Jewish teacher told her that you would need to understand Jewish history to understand this sentance and that turning the other cheek was a form of insult at that time, in other words, if someone insulted you by slapping you, not appreciating what you're giving, you'd be basically righting them off by turning the other cheek. Does anyone know if this is true? It does seem the Christian is to draw the line when he's determined continuing to give would be unappreciated by the receiver such as in Matthew 7:6 where it says not to cast pearls before swine. Thanks, Chusarcik | ||||||
170 | Question about meaning of turning cheek | Matt 5:39 | Chusarcik | 89641 | ||
I have a question regarding Matthew chapter 5 verse 38 to 42. My Bible study group was reviewing the part of verse 38 where Jesus says, "If someone strikes you on the cheek, turn to him the other also." One of our study members said a Jewish teacher told her that you would need to understand Jewish history to understand this sentance and that turning the other cheek was a form of insult at that time, in other words, if someone insulted you by slapping you, not appreciating what you're giving, you'd be basically righting them off by turning the other cheek. Does anyone know if this is true? It does seem the Christian is to draw the line when he's determined continuing to give would be unappreciated by the receiver such as in Matthew 7:6 where it says not to cast pearls before swine. Thanks, Chusarcik | ||||||
171 | another question on this topic | Matthew | Chusarcik | 87448 | ||
Thanks, Chusarcik |
||||||
172 | another question on this topic | Matthew | Chusarcik | 87395 | ||
Thanks for the answer and additional information. So it seems the scripture purposly lists the sets of 14 to represent the 3 steps of deliverence and I understand numbers in scripture are often listed in multiples of seven, but the fact that some generations are ignored and left out in order to come up with the sets of 14 needed would make scripture appear purposly contrived to come up with the needed outcome. At least I feel that is what a non believer would think if I were to try to explain this. I know that sometimes when prophecy is fulfilled there are gap periods of time that are not counted in the total because nothing significant happens during the silence period, such as the gap of time between the 69th and 70th week in the prophecy of Daniel. Could it be that those ancestors left out in Jesus' ancestory were not important because either nothing important to fulfillment of prophecy ocurred during their lifetimes or they were not believers? Any comments? Chusarcik |
||||||
173 | Question about Jesus' gentile ancestors | Matthew | Chusarcik | 87392 | ||
Thanks, very helpful! Chusarcik |
||||||
174 | Why are some ancestors not listed? | Not Specified | Chusarcik | 87355 | ||
My LifeChange gospel of Matthew study guide indicates that in Matthew chapter one, where Jesus genealogy is given, that not all of the ancestors between Abraham and Jesus are listed, but some are deliberatly left out. Why is this? And the ones listed are listed in 3sets of 14. What is the significance of that? Chusarcik Chusarcik |
||||||
175 | Why are some ancestors not listed? | Matthew | Chusarcik | 87358 | ||
My LifeChange gospel of Matthew study guide indicates that in Matthew chapter one, where Jesus genealogy is given, that not all of the ancestors between Abraham and Jesus are listed, but some are deliberatly left out. Why is this? And the ones listed are listed in 3sets of 14. What is the significance of that? Chusarcik Chusarcik |
||||||
176 | Question about Jesus' gentile ancestors | Not Specified | Chusarcik | 87349 | ||
In Matthew Chp 1, what is the significance of the fact that of the 4 women listed in Jesus' ancestory, 3 are gentiles? Chusarcik | ||||||
177 | Question about Jesus' gentile ancestors | Matthew | Chusarcik | 87353 | ||
In Matthew Chp 1, what is the significance of the fact that of the 4 women listed in Jesus' ancestory, 3 are gentiles? Chusarcik | ||||||
178 | Who are"violent men of your own people? | Dan 11:14 | Chusarcik | 84164 | ||
Emmaus, Thanks, your information is always great. Chusarcik |
||||||
179 | Who are"violent men of your own people? | Dan 11:14 | Chusarcik | 84102 | ||
Thanks!! Chusarcik | ||||||
180 | Who are"violent men of your own people? | Dan 11:14 | Chusarcik | 84070 | ||
Emmaus, Thanks for your answer. If this group of people was the Ptolemies and Seleucids why are they referred to as "violent men among YOUR OWN people. Daniel is being addressed here and it sounds as though it's talking about a sub group of Daniel's people from Jerusalem? And I still don't understand what vision this group of viloent people is trying to fulfill? My study Bible doesn't have any information on the topic Can you clarify? Chusarcik |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ] Next > Last [17] >> |